User talk:Royroydeb

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your move - given the vast number of footballers with this name (see Jairo#Association football) there is no primary 'Jairo (footballer)'. If you disagree please feel free to start a WP:RM discussion. GiantSnowman 11:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Bobby Hakim has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations for DYK.-Nizil (talk) 05:09, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nizil Shah: Thanks!. RRD (talk) 06:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
• Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
• MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
• Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
• Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
• Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:FC Martinenc players, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. You may find it helpful to use the gadget HotCat, which tests whether a category exists before saving a change. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Anju Bala at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nizil (talk) 04:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mahendra Nath Pandey at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 18:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have left some more comments at your DYK nom. Please see. Regards. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 12:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Shah Jahan II at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DBigXrayᗙ 10:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 19:04, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Bandaru Dattatreya has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I was trying to determine the disposition of the criminal charges against Dattatreya when I discovered he has been dropped as a candidate for the BJP. I added that information to the article. If you can find any information concerning the criminal case it would be good to add it. Every reader will wonder what happened.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Royroydeb. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Anju Bala at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. Happy that I reviewed it. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 06:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sumedhanand Saraswati at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CeeGee 09:30, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• May I kindly ask you whether you are willing to proceed with your reviewing process? CeeGee 10:29, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Please note that I've already responded to your query. CeeGee 06:33, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sikandar Begum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in my article Princely states of Pakistan, where Ghulam Moinuddin Khanji is mentioned, I have just added a link to him from there. I was glad to see you had it right that in 1947 the states were offered the option of complete independence, which some of them chose. Sadly, many Indians now do not know that there was such an option. Moonraker (talk) 15:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Kishen Pershad has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

transclude the DYK nominations over the article t/p(s). Regards, ∯WBG^converse 05:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented at most of your recent DYK nominations. Please check them. ∯WBG^converse 06:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noting this thread. ∯WBG^converse 17:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: I will check and reply soon. RRD (talk) 08:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn to identify WP:HISTRS. Look for whether the author and the publishing house is reputed, at the very minimum. Also, look for reviews of the work in academic journals and their evaluations. ∯WBG^converse 14:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: Before that you must understand WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. The articles were not nominated for FA. Wikipedia:HISTRS is an essay only and not a policy / guideline and hence not something compulsory. Even in this essay, please read what "Nutshell" and "What this essay does not mean to imply" sections say. RRD (talk) 07:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we shall always strive for excellency. And, as much as you are not writing FAs; you were pushing inaccurate facts to the main-page. ∯WBG^converse 07:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: I will reply. RRD (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you are a current participant in round 2 of this year's WikiCup! There are only a few days until the second round ends – if you haven't made you first submission for this round yet, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 05:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Royroydeb. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Sikandar Begum at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 20:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... and five --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Template:Did you know nominations/Ram Singh II, some work is needed on this. I have to say, it could turn into a most interesting article, but you do need to do more before it will pass DYK. Please ping me when you would like me to look again. Moonraker (talk) 12:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

• Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
• Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
• Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
• Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Barkeep49 with six GAs, Ceranthor, Lee Vilenski, and Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Royroydeb. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Nasir-ud-Daulah at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 22:05, 1 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saadat Ali Khan I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durbar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Sikandar Begum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Royroydeb, you reviewed my nomination of Haneen Zreika for DYK. It passed all criteria but needed a QPQ. I have now completed a QPQ, so the review can now be approved. – Teratix ₵ 13:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saadat Ali Khan I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to try helping you pass the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Mahendra Nath Pandey. Please see my suggestions there. Thanks. Flibirigit (talk) 07:37, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Royroydeb. As you recently decided to make large-scale edits to Saadat Ali Khan I; Brill has an entry on Saadat Ali Khan I from the latest version of the Encyclopedia of Islam.[1] I don't have access myself to Brill, but I'm sure our helpful colleagues at WP:REX could help you out in case you decide to use the source. Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 22:08, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Mughal Empire, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Mughal Empire and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Mughal Empire during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please return to the nomination and work on the issues raised; if you will be unable to do so within a reasonable timeframe, the nomination may be marked for closure as stale. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Tomb of Isa Khan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Tomb of Isa Khan has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a thought, why don't you combine all hooks of Humayun's Tomb into one? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dharmadhyaksha: I beg your pardon. I cannot understand what you mean. RRD (talk) 06:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He meant, combine the facts from all the hooks presented into a single hook. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Afsarwala Tomb Complex at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saumitra Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishnupur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Arab Serai. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:53, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Rathindranath Tagore at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:58, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for contributing to Did you know. I note that your primary editing interest is on India-related topics, and your DYK nominations have generally been about India. It has been noted in a recent DYK discussion that some of your hooks lack context on the hook's article subject matter, which would make it difficult for non-Indian readers of Wikipedia to appreciate them. In the future, when writing hooks, please try to write hooks that could appeal to a broad audience: that is, try not to write as if you assume readers know what you are talking about. For example, when writing about Indian history, try to explain how the places, persons, or events mentioned in the hook are important. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Narutolovehinata5: (I was away for some time so I couldnt reply earlier). Okay, I would keep in mind what you said. Also the ambiguous statements Birjis Qadr article was not added by me. Also to remind you, you seemed to have abandoned many DYK reviews which you are started like Template:Did you know nominations/Nasir-ud-Daulah, Template:Did you know nominations/George Ali Murad Khan. RRD (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Royroydeb. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Saadat Ali Khan I at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with DYK and all the best, Miniapolis 20:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you are a current participant in round 3 of this year's WikiCup! There are just over 2 weeks until the third round ends – if you haven't made you first submission for this round yet, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 19:11, 12 June 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

Hello, Royroydeb. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Afsarwala tomb at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Orville1974 (talk) 22:27, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Arab Serai at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:02, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Saadat Ali Khan I at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
• Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
• SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
• Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Afsarwala Tomb at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Rathindranath Tagore has been completed by several editors.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

valereee (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Saumitra Khan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

valereee (talk) 00:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Nice job promoting Arab Serai to the Main Page! I'm a big fan of your work. MX (✉ • ✎) 14:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MX: Thanks a lot. RRD (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Rathindranath Tagore at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Nasir-ud-Daulah at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! starship.paint (talk) 06:42, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Responded, three issues left :) starship.paint (talk) 03:25, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Roy, I've approved Nasir-ud-Daulah for DYK. I'd like to discuss your editing on your talk page. As you know, my DYK review turned up a significant number of issues. You had to remove content 5 times (and you changed several other things), and that is concerning. I know you've read the sources, because I can tell you paraphrase what you've read. But content like "Chowmahalla Palace", "Manjli Begum ki Haveli" and "Jahangir Ali Khan" were added by you [2] with no apparent source, you later removed them when I pointed that out. So it's puzzling. Was it that you read it in some source while writing, but forgot to cite the information? I'm not here to attack you, just want to improve your editing, so I'm providing feedback. starship.paint (talk) 00:22, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Arvind Sawant at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Late but not least. Congratulations. For patience and hard work. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 06:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

valereee (talk) 00:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 02:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Saadat Ali Khan I at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]