User talk:PizzaKing13

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 16:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1979 Salvadoran coup d'état you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1979 Salvadoran coup d'état for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 1946 in El Salvador, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Revolutionary Government Junta of El Salvador

added a link pointing to People's Revolutionary Army

Vice President of El Salvador

added a link pointing to Santiago González

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of 1979 Salvadoran coup d'état at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Your nomination is now over 5 weeks old and still has outstanding issues. Please be in touch on the DYK nomination template before the end of this week. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 18:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join WikiProject Phoenicia You appear to be someone who may be interested in joining WikiProject Phoenicia. Please accept this friendly invitation from a member of the project. I can't wait for us to work together! ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's go!

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gómez de Alvarado you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gómez de Alvarado you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gómez de Alvarado for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pizzaking13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1909 in El Salvador".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pizzaking13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1908 in El Salvador".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gómez de Alvarado you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gómez de Alvarado for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Final Offensive of 1981 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 17:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pizzaking13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1946 in El Salvador".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Final Offensive of 1981 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Final Offensive of 1981 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 19:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cerrón Grande Reservoir you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JPxG -- JPxG (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cerrón Grande Reservoir you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cerrón Grande Reservoir for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JPxG -- JPxG (talk) 09:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of generic names of political parties, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages American Party and Blue Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Imperial Order of the Yoke and Arrows has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 01:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you check recent edits to the above article (in particular, the photo). I have to sign off for work. Thanks, Denisarona (talk) 11:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Denisarona: Thanks for letting me know. I reverted the problem. Pizzaking13 (talk) 05:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nayib Bukele, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Faro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for creating Abraham Castillo Mora. Good to see well-written and well-sourced new articles in this area. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 08:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2020 Salvadoran political crisis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JBchrch -- JBchrch (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Salvadoran political crisis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FredModulars -- FredModulars (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2021 Salvadoran political crisis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2021 Salvadoran political crisis for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FredModulars -- FredModulars (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2021 Salvadoran political crisis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Salvadoran political crisis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FredModulars -- FredModulars (talk) 19:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2020 Salvadoran political crisis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Salvadoran political crisis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JBchrch -- JBchrch (talk) 22:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pizzaking13. I was wondering why you reverted my edit. Bukele is a member of GANA. There is no legal binding between him and "Nuevas Ideas".^[1] TanookiKoopa (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, kudos on your article on the 2021 Salvadoran political crisis. Are you aware of the most recent developments? Bukele-controlled assembly just passed a law to retire all judges and prosecutors over 60 years of age or 30 years of service. The constitutional judges appointed on May 1st also made him eligible for re-election, which is prohibited in the Salvadoran Constitution.

Statement by the US Embassy in El Salvador about the re-election ruling

Reuters article on law to retire judges and prosecutors

Thanks,

TanookiKoopa (talk) 20:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please pardon me—I'm just fixing the talk page ref list. —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jaime Abdul Gutiérrez.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rafael Antonio Gutiérrez you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FredModulars -- FredModulars (talk) 04:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rafael Antonio Gutiérrez you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rafael Antonio Gutiérrez for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FredModulars -- FredModulars (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rafael Antonio Gutiérrez you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rafael Antonio Gutiérrez for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FredModulars -- FredModulars (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

Hi PizzaKing13, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Muboshgu (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! —Remember, I'murmate — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 00:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

The logo of the Guardia Nacional de El Salvador doesn't have an improper licence because it was edited by me taking the patches as reference. Stop annoying by deleting my contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atlacatl Cortés (talk • contribs) 22:48, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlacatl Cortés: It is improperly licensed. See this file for how to attribute source, date, and author. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 23:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @PizzaKing13. I am writing this message to inform you that I have reported the user Atlacatl Cortes in the IRC channel of wikipedia in English and wikipedia in Spanish for several edit wars with you, for uploading images with the wrong license in wikimedia commons and ignoring our warnings (I have seen that you warned him before, I also warned him in eswiki but it seems that he ignored our warnings and is doing whatever he wants). I would like to kindly ask you, if you can, to report him here as well. If you need my statement for the report, let me know. Best regards, mate. 🫡 𝘇𝘂 𝗜𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 Talk to me! 17:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaKing13. I have already made the corresponding report. We will see what they decide. 🫡 𝘇𝘂 𝗜𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 Talk to me! 18:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

The article about Totana has been rated as Start-Class, but I think that it deserves to be assessed ad C-Class.

Regards,

--Yolanda95 (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)Yolanda95[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

Template:2021–2022 Primera División de El Salvador has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central America under Mexican rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central American Civil Wars. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you look for my contributions on Wikipedia and reverse them, no matter what and where they are, I think you have something against me, regrettable and laughable.

Your observations seem wrong to me, you assure that the information of the introductory paragraphs are already in the body, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is not a portal that offers summaries about people, facts or things, if you want the information, you go to the section and you read it, you don't stay with the first few lines. SalvadorianPower (talk) 23:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SalvadoranPower: Just dropping this here.

"The lead section of a Wikipedia article—also known as the lead, beginning or introduction—is the section before the table of contents and the first heading. The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents. It is not a news-style lead or "lede" paragraph." –WP:LEAD

And, I never claimed to be the "owner of the truth"??? PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 23:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

help me improve articles to which I added information from the wikipedia in Spanish

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecuadorian%E2%80%93Colombian_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombian_Civil_War_(1860%E2%80%931862) Hailcolombia2009 (talk) 01:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For this edit, and the explanation in the edit summary in general. I've been on WP for a while, but seeing edit reversions and explanation such as that help me GREATLY understand policy better, and criteria for what to/not to revert. It may not seem like much, but it's a big help to an editor such as myself, so I wanted to extend this barnstar and say thank you! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 20:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—2021–2022 Iraqi political crisis—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 18:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1957 Latin Cup you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1957 Latin Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1957 Latin Cup for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1957 Latin Cup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1957 Latin Cup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:PizzaKing13|<span style="background-color:#0047AB;color:#F8BF45">'''PizzaKing13'''</span>]] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">[[User talk:PizzaKing13|<span style="background-color:#AD1519;color:#FABD00">''¡Hablame!''</span>]]</sup> ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 13:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Central America under Mexican rule you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Central America under Mexican rule you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Central America under Mexican rule for comments about the article, and Talk:Central America under Mexican rule/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 06:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Central America under Mexican rule at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Costa Rica national football team

added links pointing to Gavi and Carlos Soler

Costa Rica national football team results (2020–present)

added links pointing to Gavi and Carlos Soler

Spain national football team results (2020–present)

added links pointing to Gavi and Carlos Soler

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article La Matanza you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 11:23, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators