User talk:Neddyseagoon

This user may have left Wikipedia. Neddyseagoon has not edited Wikipedia since May 30, 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

All existing talk on this topic is stored here. Unlike the other sections in my archive, this is meant as an active talk-archive, so if you have any additional discussion on any of the topics stored there, or on a new topic related to such translations, do not hesitate to add it there. Neddyseagoon - talk 12:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from it:Tempio di Minerva (Aventino) into Temple of Minerva (Aventine). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you did not add the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license, when you created the article Anne Brown. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! A very old edit by you added that the Sutton Hoo helmet was displayed at the 1951 Festival of Britain. Do you remember what your source for this was? I haven't been able to find anything through Google or other databases/newspapers. --Usernameunique (talk) 10:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again---not to bother you, but I was hoping to check back in and see if you might have an idea on the source for that edit. Thanks! --Usernameunique (talk) 12:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Hedwig of Saxony page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.herenvanholland.nl/eigenaar.cfm?eigenaarnummer=1550 Xx236 (talk) 14:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wolfgang Lipp (theologian) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obviously very incomplete, with a missing Life sections.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi! I noticed you created {{AKL}} ten days ago or so. I don't think it has any documentation, so would it be possible for you to add some minimal documentation to the page so other editors can figure out what it does? I think it's related to {{BBKL}}, but I'm not sure. Thanks! Enterprisey (talk!) 03:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sculptors by century and nationality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 18:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Slovene salon-holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 14:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Paul Leopold Haffner, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Well done on creating all these articles. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for your recent articles, including Andrzej Niemirowicz, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is too long to be readable, it almost crashed my browser. If you don't know how to archive your page, ask for help at Wikipedia:Helpdesk. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi, I've reviewed some of your pages. For the biographies of naval officers, please expand them to indicate notability and please remember to use inline citations as opposed to a mere source list. I've also added {{archiveme}} to the top of this talk page as it's getting really long. Thanks! DrStrauss talk 13:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jean-Louis Rouméguère, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Does the artist meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG? There's not enough in this to see why he is notable. Can you help improve it?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Carmes Prison page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Robert McClenon. Neddyseagoon, thanks for creating Franz Karl Praßl!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There is a longer article in the German Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tank you for the start on Leise. I don't understand "they were often unanimous or consisting of a single stanza". "Unanimous" looks like a translation of "einstimmig" but for singing, einstimmig means that all sing the same melody, no different parts, - is there a word in English, other "in homophony" which sounds awkward. And why "or"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this - I doubt that talking about a Roman Catholic Church before the Reformation makes much sense. There was one catholic church in Western Europe at that time, - "theologian" captures that well enough. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neddy, I see you have just created a redirect to a non-existant page. Have you perhaps misspelled the destination? IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK it's there now :-) IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Neddyseagoon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ami Chessex for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Killer Moff (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Abbots by religion, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I read this, for some incongruous reason, I had a mental image of Johnny Depp as I Am Crow. As you have done all the work on this I am reluctant to jump in but would it be a bit intrusive, or otherwise spoil the flow, if I added "Dublin porter" after "Crazy Crow"? It would probably be referenced as a footnote: {{refn|"Crazy Crow" was the nickname of one George Hendrick, a porter for Dublin Musicians|Group=n}}, with a book reference attached. Thanks. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 10:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Grigory Alexandrovich Demidov, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your time and effort in writing this - it's appreciated. It's been reviewed now. Could you look at it and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria Luise Thurmair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Maria Luise Thurmair published the "love talks" she exchanged with her husband when he was a soldier in World War II, and wrote the lyrics for many hymns in the Gotteslob? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria Luise Thurmair. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maria Luise Thurmair), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Swpb informed me that he proposed deletion of Jamie Curtis. Considering that I just created Jamie Curtis on 7 December 2008‎ as a redirect page redirecting Jamie Lee Curtis, and you changed it to a main article on 9 January 2009, I think that it is appropriate to let you know this proposed deletion. Thank you for your contributions. --Neo-Jay (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Peart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Peart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Louis Alexandre de La Rochefoucauld d'Enville

added links pointing to Forges and Turgot

Boris Vladimirovitch Golitsyn

added a link pointing to François de La Rochefoucauld

Ernest II, Count of Mansfeld-Vorderort

added a link pointing to Stolberg

Georg Engelhard Schröder

added a link pointing to Estates

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

Thanks for creating St Mary the Virgin Church, Wendens Ambo, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've done general cleanup. I've added a source, linked to it from the pre-existing Wikimedia Commons category and the Grade I listed buildings in Essex page, added a link to the official website and tags on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 13:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ursula of Munsterberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Glatz and Munsterberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madame Cavé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rentier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:UNESCO officials, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Martin's Church, Plaistow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plaistow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on IAZYGES 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles de Coligny

added links pointing to Oratorian and Siege of Paris

Jacqueline de Montbel d'Entremont

added links pointing to Battle of Saint-Denis and Gaspard de Coligny

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Marc-Claude de Buttet, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I looks like you're still working on the translation of the empty sections.

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Guillaume de Gadagne

added a link pointing to Estates General

Jacqueline de Montbel d'Entremont

added a link pointing to Margaret of France

Marc-Claude de Buttet

added a link pointing to Margaret of France

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jacques Rousseau (diplomat), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Adnan Enaya Afzal  ^talk 11:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Église Notre-Dame-de-Confort

added links pointing to Dominican and Francesco Salviati

Church of the Holy Name and Our Lady of the Sacred Heart, Bow

added a link pointing to Our Lady of the Sacred Heart

Ciro riconosciuto

added a link pointing to Amasis

Pierre-Joseph de Beauchamp

added a link pointing to Yedi Kule

St Leonard's Priory, London

added a link pointing to John Leland

Vidar Norheim

added a link pointing to EP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Natalia Ryumina has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The garmine ^(talk) 14:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carlo Giuseppe Plura has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The garmine ^(talk) 13:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Their Finest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just a reminder, the Film project does not cover biography articles. Therefore, the {{WikiProject Film}} banner should not be added to articles about actors, directors and filmmakers. Those articles are covered by adding |filmbio-work-group=yes to {{WikiProject Biography}} instead. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jean Le Michaud d'Arçon

added links pointing to Saint-Germain and Auteuil

Monsieur Fabre

added links pointing to Pierre Bertin and CICC

English Without Tears

added a link pointing to Territorial Army

Les Lavandières du Portugal

added a link pointing to Alwyn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Charles Delagrave (publisher), Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, thanks for writing this article. I've reviewed it and the only concern is the lack of inline citations. As the article gets edited by others, this will be far harder to fix, so I'm hoping that while it's fresh in your mind / easily looked into, you can make them inline. Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Monsieur Fabre, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, you've certainly been busy creating articles, that's wonderful! There is an inline note for this but I can't see where your sources are. There was an external link (it didn't say this was your source, but perhaps it was?) to IMDB, which I removed as it is an unreliable source, as, like Wikipedia, it can be edited by anyone. Do you have any reliable sources for this film? If so, please add them. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jean Georgescu, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'll leave this as the last of yours I review today, as I don't want to overwhelm you with messages and the issues are essentially the same, they all seem to have issues around sourcing. This has no references - it has external links, but it's not clear if these were used as sources for the article and if so, which source for which piece of information. The AfD looks a clear error, so hopefully that will be closed soon, but at the moment there is too little to make his reasons for notability clear and it is unsourced.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neddyseagoon, I'm wondering from your Talk page if you read your messages or if you choose not to? You don't seem to have responded to any of the many messages above, going back several years. Please let me know if you do. I certainly recognise something of my own approach to editing when reviewing your articles - create many stubs, to get things started which can then grow. I do this because there are so many missing articles on clearly notable people. However, you've been around too long to be persistently creating unreferenced articles, or articles with major referencing issues. A lack of inline citations is incredibly difficult to resolve as an article grows and it's left permanently tagged, when it could have been easily and quickly formatted right at the start. You're the most experienced article creator on English Wikipedia not to have autopatrol rights, so it's creating a lot of work at New Page Patrol, plus numerous mistakenly opened deletion discussions/proposals. It's a shame, because you seem, on the whole, to be producing articles on notable people that are quite well-written. Please consider slowing down a bit and making sure the articles are sourced well enough. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Assembly at Wanstead House, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to verify the page's content and establish notability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Meatsgains (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating John West Wilson, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

\Hello, I guess you choose not to read/respond to messages at all, but I don't feel it's acceptable that after a decade's editing, and being a prolific creator of articles, that you refuse to add sources properly to any of your articles. If the external link is actually a source, please put it inline, it also needs more sourcing, but that can be developed over time. You also keep linking dates, but the guidelines were changed several years ago and these need to be deleted. I hope letting you know this will save you time in the future as you will avoid adding them and others won't need to use their time deleting them. Best wishes, and again thanks for taking the time to write articles, Boleyn (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating Grigory Dmitriyevich Yusupov, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this, but again there are significant sourcing issues. I'll work on it, and if you are able to work on it further, I'd be grateful.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Order of St Mary Magdalene, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'll make this the last one I review of yours today, so I'm not inundating you. Can you please change this (or let me know and I'll change it for you) - I'm unclear if the bibliography section is sources you've used, and they need to be made inline, or is more of a 'further reading' section.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Max Simonischek, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, if you would prefer I didn't send you the review as you may feel it's too much, please send me a message and I'll just tick them off. This man is probably notable, but this is an unreferenced biography of a living person, which is a major concern. I'll see what i can do to improve it, but the WP:BURDEN od sourcing falls on the creator.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 12:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Don Juan Comes Back From The War, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I am assuming this is notable because it has articles in 2 other Wikipedias, but notability isn't asserted or verified in this article - it just states it is a film and says a little about the plot, has links to script but no sources. Please add your sources to this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Madame Cavé, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please look at the 'bibliography' section and clarify whether these were used as sources and need to be made inline, or are already inline, or if this is a 'further reading' section.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Wanstead Roman Villa, Neddyseagoon!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I see you have continued to create articles that need inline citations. If you continue to do this, I will initiate an ANI, as you are an experienced editor who won't respond to messages and isn't following Wikipedia guidelines. Please stop, I don't want either of us to end up in a discussion like that, and if isn't necessary. Especially as your sources here are quite obscure, no one else will be able to move them inline.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you started a number of biographies on French officers of the Napoleonic wars such as Jean-Baptiste Broussier, and that you included a template to "Biographie des célébrités militaires des armées de terre et de mer de 1789 à 1850". I have rewritten the template so that if the name on wikisource is given it will link to the correct article eg:

• {{Cite Mullié|wstitle=BROUSSIER (JEAN-BAPTISTE, comte)}}
• Mullié, Charles (1852). "BROUSSIER (JEAN-BAPTISTE, comte)" . Biographie des célébrités militaires des armées de terre et de mer de 1789 à 1850  (in French). Paris: Poignavant et Compagnie.

This may be of help if you decide to write another similar article. -- PBS (talk) 20:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 19:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that you should not take chunks of articles somebody else has researched and created and use them to create articles such as the ones you created at Stretford Road Workhouse and Withington Workhouse? If you aren't aware you should be, see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. The lack of attribution gives the impression that you did the work.

You have stripped the Chorlton PLU article of important information and so I am going to restore it and redirect the articles to where they belong. When you can provide more information of your own you could recreate them in your own words. J3Mrs (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently failing to respond to messages posted for you on this page regarding important issues which editors are trying to discuss with you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neddyseagoon, I have blocked you based on a discussion at the administrators' noticeboard because you have been either ignoring or simply not receiving messages posted on this page, including a post regarding that noticeboard discussion which was posted a few lines above this section. A number of editors would like to discuss problems with your edits, but you have not acknowledged or responded, and this seems to have been going on for several years. Because you do not respond on this page or elsewhere when you are notified of a discussion, and you have not enabled email, there is no other way to reach you. You will not be able to edit elsewhere while you are blocked, but it is my hope that you will respond to the important messages here in the meantime. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have also manually archived old messages on this page into annual archive subpages (User talk:Neddyseagoon/2012 up to User talk:Neddyseagoon/2016), following a pattern you seemed to have been following up to 2012, because this page was much too long. This was one of the problems that other editors had tried to discuss with you. If you would like to archive some other way or set up automatic archiving with a bot, I would be more than happy to help. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. If you have read the last few talk page notices above, and the ANI discussion, you will have seen the concerns raised about your lack of responses to talk page messages. I am trying to work out what is going on here. I get the impression that you prefer to edit and work on articles, rather than engage in discussions, though you have responded to messages in the past. That is only my initial impression, though. This may come across as too personal a question, but are you able to say why you don't respond to messages left here? Would it help to discuss that here, rather than at ANI, or maybe even to discuss some aspects of this another way? If you are able to respond here, that would help make a start at sorting things out here. Carcharoth (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the ANI discussion regarding your editing habits has concluded. The result of the discussion was that you are allowed to continue creating articles, but they must be sourced and not copied from other locations. Should you fail to keep within these bounds, and fail to respond to notifications or queries from other users, you will be indefinitely blocked. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I