User talk:Koplimek

Hello Wikipedians, without much adieu I want to say welcome. I love information which is why I'm here, so feel free to drop a line on topics that may concern you. I would also like to say lets keep verbage civil and everything should be just fine. thanks for posting! Koplimek (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Koplimek, thanks for the message and always glad to be of assistance - just let me know if there is anything that I can do. Take care and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Aquitania

Hi, thanks for the message i am trying to find the evidence about the Aquitania design, i think it is mentioned in one of the former Cunard commodore autobiographies (possibly Harry Grattidge) - when i find it i will let you know!

Regards

msa1701 (talk) 14:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you know the name of the maritime site that listed the Kichemaru shipwreck [1]? If you know the site name or domain, it might be possible to recover the info as someone might have archived it or it might be on archive.org. Ha! (talk) 04:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've created an article on the SS Dakota that you mentioned in the AfD. Ha! (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

see reply to User_talk:Koplimek#Kickermaru. Ha! (talk) 14:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I liked the link to the image [2] of the Dakota that you added (then removed) from the Project Gutenberg site. If it's from Project Gutenberg, isn't it very likely to copyright free and so able to be added to the article directly (like in an info box). Do you know what book it came from on Project Gutenberg. There's also an image here [3], although that one says it was scanned in 1999 and you need to pay for copies of it so it can't be used. I think the source they come from will be public though, so it's just a case of finding a copy that someone scanned or photographed and didn't copyright.

++ I found a whole bunch more links by searching for Steamship Dakota instead of SS Dakota (why I didn't think of that before I don't know). There should be a fair bit to build the article up

• http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9E05EEDC1E3BE631A25754C0A9649C946597D6CF
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Taylor
• http://www.prairiepublic.org/programs/datebook/bydate/08/0208/020608.jsp
• http://www.secstate.wa.gov/history/newspapers_subjects.aspx?s=111 (needs DejaVu plugin)
• http://www.immigrantships.net/1800/dakota18761002.html (this is a ship from 1876 - odd)
• http://www.jcameron.com/personal/smithen/AnnLaws.htm (and again, from 1876)
• http://www.mnhs.org/collections/manuscripts/pres.htm
• http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mruddy/jomfuneral.htm
• http://content.lib.washington.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/ic&CISOPTR=349&CISOBOX=1&REC=1
• http://books.google.com/books?id=5taHoMjDc6IC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=steamship+dakota&source=web&ots=0ukqpv9dp-&sig=x7v4xjDIkVu-kKbxH7x80jRWzt8&hl=en
• http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/rescue/timeline/index.html (added sig - Ha! (talk)}

I was also thinking that a page should be opened up on Dakota's identical sister ship "Minnesota" who saw a longer service life up to 1923. Minnesota was also called "Troy" during her World War One service.Koplimek (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, good idea - go for it. If I find anything I'll it your way. If you need a hand creating the article I'll be glad to help. Ha! (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one signed I'll assume it's Ha. I removed the Gutenberg photo (I liked it too) cause there was copyright problems even though there shouldn't be since the photo is from 1907 and way before the 1923 cutoff year for copyrighted pictures. I found the sharper Dakota photo on Google Images by typing in "Dakota Steamship" just like you were doing. I agree 'SS Dakota" doesn't always work. Sometimes you get different results by typing "S.S. Dakota". i didn't think there'd be a problem with just 'linking' the photo as opposed to uploadingit onto Wikipedia without permission. Thankfully the photo exists in a number of versions in contrasty to sharp versions. Koplimek (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you say, it's OK to add a link to it, as long as it's not displayed as a photo in the article it can't break any copyright. I've seen a couple of different images (maybe some of them were just flipped around or mirror images actually) of the Dakota sinking on postcards, there seem to be a few of them around. Ha! (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek! I noticed your contributions to SS Dakota, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Ships, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of ships of all kinds. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Maralia (talk) 03:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added a {{cn}} request for " As it was a single pump was used to vacate water from different compartments with the use of a nozzled hose". Can you remember where this came from?--Old Moonraker (talk) 23:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to my most recent post in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? It's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, but that's not what the discussion in that section is about. It's about whether list-type articles should have sources cited in them just as any other article. Can you read my last post at the bottom of it and give your opinion there? I'd really appreciate it. Nightscream (talk) 00:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Zeffie Tilbury has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=b (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You're welcome for fixing the link and no, I'm not related to Ms. Suratt. Pinkadelica^♣ 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for identifying that the Fool's Paradise image was not Theodore Kosloff-- that still never really looked like Kosloff to me, but I couldn't say who it was. Glad to see that someone could step in and make a positive identification. Avram (talk) 07:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Devil's Pass Key (1920 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 12:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. 6 march 2009 you edited the lusitania article and added a detail about ships sunk by U20 before lusitania, here [4]. Ive just been reading Beesly, Room 40, p 102 where he observes that U 20 sank a three masted schooner clalled 'the earl ot lathom'. i was wondering therefore about the discrepancy and where your list of names comes from? Sandpiper (talk) 22:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Now all I have to worry about is whether its Lathom (as Beesly has it) or lataham as it also appears elsewhere. Sandpiper (talk) 21:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. We're quite appreciative that you have chosen to write an article for Wikipedia, but there are a few concerns in White Gold (1927 film) that you might consider addressing. For film articles, it's not enough to show that the film simply exists. It is always best to show through references that the subject has received critical review and/or coverage in multiple sources in order to meet notability criteria for films. First and foremost is proper sourcing for the article, as Wikipedia requires that information in articles be cited back to reliable sources (not blogs, not facebook, not twitter, not myspace, not IMDB). Please consider visiting my essay on films to see how to gauge if your article meets inclusion criteria. And always feel free to ask for input or advice from editors at WikiProject Films on the project's talk page. Best regards, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koplimek. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Koplimek. I saw the The Incorrigible Dukane article while I was patrolling new pages, If you can increase the article length to 1500 characters of prose (so not including the references or infobox) then it would make a good WP:DYK candidate as the oldest surviving John Barrymore film. It would need a better reference than ImDb mind... Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to help you improve any articles that need more referencing or anything like that. Just hit me up on my talk page whenever something comes up. Silverseren^C 16:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated The Incorrigible Dukane, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		Good Fellowship Award
		I am honored to present you with this Award of Good Fellowship for your cooperation with other editors in improving the article The Incorrigible Dukane. Encouraging other's continued participation through positive and supportive action is one of the surest ways to both keep editors and to make Wikipedia a better place... and you have done both. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced the Connecticut Yankee image with one properly named. Sorry for the original typo. It was late. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It took a little time, but the articles you listed HERE now all have images uploaded and added. I also gave the articles a few very minor tweaks. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Incorrigible Dukane, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1915 film The Incorrigible Dukane is the oldest surviving movie starring John Barrymore? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that the correct place to post to me is on my talk page... not my user page. I have thus moved your recent posting and responded there. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the list here and am making some progress. I am most proud of my efforts at turning this stub into a decent start class article. Lots of fun. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More[edit]

Lots of great sources found for The Devil's Pass Key. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Smouldering Fires (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Clarence Brown's 1925 silent film Smouldering Fires starring Pauline Frederick is considered a cautionary tale? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

• Cool, huh? :) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We're bumpiing edits at White Shadows in the South Seas. If you would not mind, may I go through and add sourcing? Then invite you back for further cleanup? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added the image[edit]

Added the image and then gave it a few tweaks. Nice job. I expect others may build on it.

After that I got an itch and began to scratch. Check out what is growing HERE. I figure its time to turn a LOT of redlinks to blue. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I blame this on you :)[edit]

That Clyde De Vinna now is a sourced article in mainspace, I blame on you. Thanks. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And if you want to learn some amazing stuff about De Vinna, take a look at this online preserved book form 1941... Chapter 5 and on.[5] An amazing fellow. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koplimek. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Koplimek. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You recently mentioned diff that Legagneux committed suicide, rather than having died in an accident. Do you have a reliable source for this? In Popular Mechanics Feb. 1915 on page 195 his name is listed as a aviation-related death on 6 July 1914. Are you saying that he committd suicide by deliberately crashing his aircraft? If you have a reliable source stating that this is the case, it would be very interesting, since I have been unable to confirm this via online sources. Thanks. --TraceyR (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, which states "... il se tue à Saumur en tombant dans la Loire en essayant un avion, victime de sa passion."

My knowledge of French regrettably leaves a lot to be desired, but my understanding of this sentence is that "he died at Saumur when he crashed into the Loire while testing an aeroplane, a victim of his passion" (i.e. for flying). I came across this reply to a question about whether "se tuer" implies suicide:

Re: "se tuer" vs "se suicider"

In English there is usually no difference between to commit suicide and to kill one's self

He killed himself by taking poison.

se tuer - accidentally kill one's self

"Il s'est tué en voiture" would mean "He was killed in a car accident".

Based on this, and the fact that no other source mentions suicide, I don't think that we can claim that Legagneux commited suicide. --TraceyR (talk) 00:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is "appareil" suposed to be "apparel"? -- AnonMoos (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'd had some in the works and your refs did help. I just thought he was a fascinating character. If I find anymore, I'll put it on the page. The picture of Bellew in a dress [6] is real as far as I know (even though Bain News Service can be somewhat unreliable). I think it was for his role in 1902's "School for Scandal" or 1910's "The Scandal" where he had to dress in drag briefly, but he sure looks good for a 60-year-old man! The later play was a critical flop, but must have been somewhat entertaining. I also nominated the article for DYK. Froggerlaura (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 June 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kyrle Bellew, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that British stage-actor Kyrle Bellew (pictured) was accused of being Mrs. Leslie Carter's lover at her 1889 divorce trial? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

thanks so much for letting me know.Koplimek (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are cordially invited to User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines as I feel its going live is imminent and I value additional eyes and input. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for what it's worth, I created the category because it was already sitting as a redlink on seven or eight film articles (which isn't supposed to happen, as categories aren't supposed to be added to articles until they actually exist, but I digress). For what it's worth, any filmmaker who's directed a reasonable number of films that have Wikipedia articles of their own is allowed to have a comparable category, so there's no reason why you couldn't create one for Chautard as well — but for Chester Franklin, I'd suggest concentrating on an actual article about him before worrying about whether there's a dedicated category for his films or not. Bearcat (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

check The Garden of Eden (1928 film) :) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When coming across an image that is overly large, I have found the free tool "Resize Magic App 2.1" to be invaluable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All but one. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bloggers in the outside world are not nearly as concerned with copyright and attribution as we are at Wikipedia. For The Isle of Lost Ships (1923 film) someone had made a collage of multiple images. And while the collage assemblage itself might be the intellectual property of the blogger, the included original poster from Associated First National is not. So I used an online tool to remove the unattributed-by-blogger image and present it as the single poster intended, shared by, and properly attributed to Associated First National. And while happy you solved the Flickr problem, look at the cautions on THIS page. Certainly the Flicker user could not assert a copyright on someone else's work, but that does not prevent them from tagging images uploaded there with a "all rights reserved" tag and locking it from download. It would seem that Flicker does not investigate misuse of such tags. I felt it better to avoid that can of worms.

And as you are so proactive in preserving early cinematic history, might you consider being a coordinator for WikiProject Films? We need more editors who have a grasp of the importance of preserving film heritage. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:38, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Single Wives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Touch Of Light (talk) 01:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Koplimek! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Just Another Blonde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Hugh Bennett

Traveling Salesman (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Robert Dudley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koplimek, and thanks for your message about that category! Thanks for noticing. I guess I was just surprised that silent films weren't already organized this way, and the work of doing it has been instructive, and sort of fun. A super-wonky kind of fun. That's not a bot, that's me. My thinking on the "American silent films" cat is to clean it completely out and keep it. As to that image.... well, sorry to say that's not my area of expertise either! All best -- --Lockley (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frozen Justice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Ullrich Haupt and Arthur Kay

An American Tragedy (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Charles Middleton

The Cheat (1923 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Jack Holt

The Cub (1915 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Extant

The Red Widow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Channing Pollock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I updated those disambig. links. ThanksKoplimek (talk) 15:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Roy Overbaugh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shore Leave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although it was a faithful reproduction, it was still a replica F2B that somewhat bizzarely appears in Death Hunt, not at all what pilot Wop May was really flying in the actual Mad Trapper air chase. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series) characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Nettleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you have shown an interest and ability in improving articles on early films, thus preserving cinema history to serve the project and its readers, might you perhaps assist in copyedit and sourcing the article The Lawful Cheater? Thanks much, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael, Happy New Year. Sure, I'd be glad to. Thanks for alerting me.Koplimek (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Men (1918 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Alfred Moses and Robert Cain

The Secret Game (1917 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Ogle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for publishing the new article Sally of the Scandals, and increasing Wikipedia's coverage of notable lost films. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Hell Diggers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lois Wilson

The Man Who Fights Alone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lois Wilson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw what you did there! Thanks for adding citations. We always need more of that! --RichardMills65 (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

To the Last Man (1923 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Dix

Wallace Eddinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Margaret Lawrence

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gambling Wives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marjorie Daw

The Climbers (1927 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Paul Stein

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Vernon Steele, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrician (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Sawdust Ring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Ince (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited National Red Cross Pageant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eugene O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Tree of Knowledge (1920 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Forman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for creating this! I've been working on Ivan Abramson film articles on and off for a while, glad to see another one created, and of a film which we know is actually preserved! Cheers.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gentle Julia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marsha Hunt

New Morals for Old (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elizabeth Patterson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, very interesting. You'd think they would have awarded it sooner. Maybe if there's a good reference, a brief sentence could be added somewhere in the article. DonFB (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not add material to articles without citations of reliable sources, especially regarding matters of suicide, as you did with this edit to List of suicides. No disrespect intended, but having accumulated over 21,000 edits since 2006, you should be acquainted with WP:V and WP:CS by now. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add links to this website to the "See also" section of article, since this section is only for links to other Wikipedia articles. The proper place for them to go is in the "External links" section, and I would appreciate your moving the ones you've already posted.

It's also possible that your link may not be acceptable under our external links policy, but I'm not going to pass judgment on that. You should just be aware that another editor may decide that your links are spam and remove them entirely because of that. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

What a very nice message on my talk page. Thank you so much. Tim riley (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Silentera.com: reliable source? Plus other issues. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek. First I want to compliment you on the huge amount of work that you have done adding and editing silent film articles here at WikiP. My request regards this article The White Flower. There is an external link for a foreign film poster that uses the title Havaii Girls but there is no mention of this alternate title in the article. I am wondering if you can add a bit of info about this with a proper source. If not no worries I will just leave things as they are but I thought that with your excellent research skills you might be able to enhance the article. Thanks for your time and thanks again for all your efforts here. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 21:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I guessed that the poster was for TWF but that there was some quirk to the translation. I think that you have figured things out. My only concern was that another editor might remove the link since there was no info about this alternate title in the body of the article. On the other hand that might never happen. Thanks again for taking the time to reply to my request. MarnetteD | Talk 01:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Her birth year came from the 1949 John Adams Comstock genealogy book. I've also seen 1868 listed as her year of birth as well as 1873. Unfortunately I no longer have access to certain records that could help point to the correct year. As to Adele Ritchie I was not aware of a previous article.John F. Barlow (talk) 21:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your early film actor bios and others. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Michael.davies1. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Evelyn Ellis, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Mike 20:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can help me. I’m not sure of the correct procedure concerning right of precedence with Lightnin' (play) that I recently created, and the existing article Lightnin' which is about the 1925 film based on the play. I’m also interested in removing the redirect to The Silent Voice that links to the playwright of The Silent Voice (play). Thank you John F. Barlow (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just seen your addition to this page, and I have some concerns. It's interesting material certainly, but I'm not sure that so much detail is necessary in an article which is a biography of Blériot: possibly it could be added in this detail to Daily Mail aviation prizes, and also to the article on the Wright Brothers. I also have concerns about its accuracy: for instance there's a 3 Nov 1908 letter from Wilbur to Orville in which he talks of the prize, saying that winning it would "practically end the necessity for further demonstations next year", so the £1000 cannot really be called 'paltry'. I also don't think it's very well integrated into the article: it leaves the para about the Channel having been crossed by balloon as a non-sequiter. Imo the topic would be best integrated into the para about his rivals for the crossing. TheLongTone (talk) 22:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, thought I'd left a not saying I'd done that edit...glad you approve & thanks for clearing up some of my (typically) sloppy editing. I still think a thousand quid a lot of money...it's not to be sneezes at today, and in those days would have cought you a couple of Gnome engines & was the annual salary of the Director of the Royal Aircraft Factory.TheLongTone (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Melbourne MacDowell and South River, New Jersey, there seems to be no source associating him with South River, either in his article or in the article for South River, and a source is required in both places. Do you have any source to support the claim that Little Washington became South River, and can that source be added, as well? When you add the source for McDowell in the South River article, can I ask you to put the entry in alphabetical order? Alansohn (talk) 00:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for reordering by alpha. Can you add a source for McDowell to the South River article? The Strang source would be appropriate, and it would be even more useful if you had a version of the source that was available online, perhaps through Google Books. I do see versions of the book online, but perhaps you know of an online accessible version of the specific 1899 version. Thanks again. Alansohn (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:LISTPEOPLE specifies that notables included in articles, like the one for South River, are to have reliable and verifiable sources establishing a connection between the person and the place. I'd always prefer a source that can be confirmed by clicking a link, rather than by searching in an archive for a book more than 100 years old and long out of print, but the one thing that's needed is a reliable and verifiable source. The source should be added as soon as possible, otherwise WP:LISTPEOPLE specifies that the entry should be removed. Alansohn (talk) 03:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to let you know I had undone one of your recent edits to Ada Rehan I think the edit was in good faith however, I thought that information about that particular external link was unnecessary. If you have any other questions please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Roborule (talk) 02:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We've gone through this before. If a film is lost, a reliable source should say so. If the only source you can find says the status is unknown, that's not lost and it should not be categorized as such. I asked this on the film Wikiproject and was told the exact same thing. If you want to seek a new consensus about it or bring the topic back up on the Wikiproject page, feel free to do so and I'll even add my two cents again but I don't think saying "it's well known that the film is lost" is how we should go about categorizing films. Film articles are held to the same standards as other articles and I'm sure I can't go to any page here, add some content I think I know to be true without a source and expect others to take my word. I know sources exist that support this kind of information because I've found them myself for numerous articles. Pinkadelica^♣ 19:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I understand your last message. It's not semantics to say a film is lost. Lost means just that - its whereabouts are unknown. I wouldn't say a lost person is dead just because I don't know where the person is. I can presume they're dead after a reasonable amount of absence but I cannot definitively say the person is gone forever unless there is proof. As I said above, I asked the community and was told we don't say a film is lost unless a reliable source says so. That's pretty clear to me but if you want to debate this, let's open it back up the community because it seems like you think this is my personal opinion and I'm pulling this "rule" out of the air for kicks. I'm not trying to give you a hard time about this but we obviously don't see eye to eye and some sort of common ground needs to be reached before this goes forward. Pinkadelica^♣ 19:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

or lobby card for Rustlers (film)? I am having a difficult time doing so. Thanks in advance. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A confusing issue, but we have sources citing Ford for Rustlers and Barker for The Rustlers. Apparently the two men worked closely together at Universal,[7] and it appears that Barker directed and Ford found talent and was producer. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I decided to do a redirect to The Dancers since there is no page-and it does link to some pages for the film, problem is apparently now it also links to adult films, oops, not sure what to say now! Wgolf (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't actually know, sorry. A lot of films of that vintage are missing so the chances are quite high that it is now lost. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charles Lindbergh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[RADM]]) [[Richard E. Byrd]]'s famed North Pole expedition, but apparently his bid came too late.)<ref name=Berg>{{cite book|last=Berg|first=A. Scott|title=Lindbergh|year=1999|publisher=Berkley/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly give your source for this? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. Yes, please do let me know if you find anything more. I suspect that, at a minimum, Love and Loraine performed together in other shows, and it would be good to know more about that. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Let me know if this leads you to a WP:RS that mentions Mary's being married to the other Loraine. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ora Carew may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''Beyond the Crossroads]]'' (1922)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Riders of the Night may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''''Riders of the Night''''' is a 1918 silent film drama directed by John H. Collins] and starred his wife [[Viola Dana]]. It was produced and distributed by the [[Metro Pictures]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Plot: A man devours a bar of soap and later vomits everywhere he goes." Might be the most unexpectedly hilarious phrase i have ever read in a wikipedia article. Roidroid (talk) 04:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Georgiana Drew may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Georgie and Ethel were staying in 1893.<ref>Barrymore, John; ''Confessions of an Actor'' c.1926(John Barrymore recalls the elderly woman telling him about Georgie when he was visiting [[Nassau,
• recalls the elderly woman telling him about Georgie when he was visiting [[Nassau, Bahamas|Nassau]](probably filming ''[[The Lotus Eater (1921 film)|The Lotus Eater]]''(1921)</ref> It was 14 year old

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Telephone Girl (1927 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/arneparamountpictures.html ''The Telephone Girl'' at Lost Film Files: Paramount - 1927]]</ref> 1927 silent film directed by [[Herbert Brenon]], It was produced by [[Famous Players-Lasky]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wanted: A Husband may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• html The Library of Congress American Silent Feature Film Survival Catalog: ''Wanted: A Husband]]]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baby Mine (1928 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] and is her third feature film, she having made two previous films in 1916 and 1918. <ref>[http://www.silentera.com/PSFL/data/B/BabyMine1928.html ''Baby Mine'' at silentera.com</ref> <ref>''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madge Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''The Fair Pretender'' (1918) )(*extant; Instituto Valenciano de Cinematografia(Valencia))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madge Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''The Danger Game'' (1918)(*extant; Instituto Valenciano de Cinematografia (Valencia)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Louisa Lane Drew may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• unrecognized-drew/ The Unrecognized Drew by Talia Myers] Retrieved September 9, 2014</ref> <ref>[http://imagesearch.library.illinois.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/actors&CISOPTR=1513

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elinor Glyn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''The Career of Katherine Bush'' (1916) (*film: ''[[The Career of Katherine Bush]]'') 1919)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) We hope (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek! I have to commend you on all of the article creation you have been doing. A very impressive line of work! I just have a question for you. Where are you getting the {{Infobox film}} parameters from? It looks like you may be using an old template, since we now use "name" in place of "title" and "image size" in place of "imagesize". Not a huge concern but it is causing some funky things to happen, like The White Sister (1915 film) has the disambiguator in the infobox when it shouldn't. I would also point you to the use of the "screenplay", "story" and "based on" parameters. We have moved towards using these more specific parameters when in the past we would use parenthetical modifiers in the "writer" parameter. Let me know if you have questions. BOVINEBOY2008 15:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this is sort of late. Had to be out of town for a bit without laptop and internet access. Still have some RL things going on but will try to get up to speed again soon. When it comes to determining if the poster is post-1923 public domain, it depends on either the film company didn't mark their posters as copyrighted, or in the case of the poster having a copyright, that the film was not renewed by the movie company.

We have quite a few posters here which are licensed as non-free; when I'm able to find a large enough copy that hasn't been cropped so I can see if there are really any copyright marks or not, I'll change the license and upload a larger copy of the poster. If you're interested, there are some films whose posters do have copyright marks but when you get hold of a large enough copy of the lobby cards for the film, the movie company didn't copyright the lobby cards. ;) When Subway Sadie was at FA review, it had a very small copy of the film's poster. I couldn't find anything large enough to prove that the poster didn't have a copyright mark, but a very nice, large lobby card for the lost film did surface and it's what you see in the infobox there. :) I keep looking and either change licenses when I can or if I find something we don't have and it's not marked, I upload the poster or lobby card. We hope (talk) 22:36, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Willard Robertson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Dark Hazard]]'' (1934

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lawson Butt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[Beyond the Crossroads]]'' (1922

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Isabelle Keith may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[You'd Be Surprised (film)|You'd Be Surprised]]'' 1926)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mary Boland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Women trailer.jpg|thumb|left|in the trailer for ''[[The Women (1939 film)|The Women]]'' (1939)]]..]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:24, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revised. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spring Is Here (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• for free download at [https://archive.org/ Internet Archive], along with ''[[Tanned Legs]]''(1929

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this consensus discussion? I know you did this last month, but it wasn't a formal consensus discussion, but now it is. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please join me so I don't have to drink alone. :-) Have found a copy of the Dearie poster--they're really tough to find a copy of. The problem is that it's in sort of rough shape in spots, especially the background where there's been a lot of old folds and creases. If I can't work things out with it, I'll upload it and ask for one of our graphics people to lend a hand. Hope you'll also have a wonderful holiday season! We hope (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barrymore is at Peer review now. You can comment there about any changes that ought to be made to the new version of the article. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dearie poster.jpg This is the only copy I've been able to find on the internet. It's now at the Graphics Lab, so cross your fingers someone will be able to work with it soon.;) We hope (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:RY for guidelines as to which births and deaths should be included in year articles from 2001 on. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]