User talk:Quoth-22

Hey thanks for your copyedit! It's definately appreciated!  ALKIVAR™ 00:23, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Quoth. On the one hand, thanks for copyediting the article. On the other, it's not a nice feeling if people give me the impression they have to "clean up" after me. In particular, I do wonder if it's such a good idea (a) to use that phrase and (b) to have readers jump from her death date (which now appears to be exact) to a single footnote and then back to somewhere in the middle of the text. And I do remember the days when I wrote "Bibliography" and it was changed to "Further reading". Anyway, keep up the good work, and all the best, <KF> 16:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I've offended, but "clean up" is the catch-all phrase I use for general tidying of an article... Now that you've pointed it out though, I see it's obviously not the best way to phrase it :P I'll endeavor to use "copy-edit" instead. I feel the use of a footnote was more appropriate than attempting to nest further information inside that small section, and also allows for an explanation rather than a fairly unhelpful one word descriptor. I also think that the existence of the annotation on the dates serves as an obvious enough indicator that there's more to them than what was just read. Regarding the bibliography, I was merely editing in what I found recommended in the Wikipedia guide to layout. Thanks for making the time to leave me a message :) – Quoth 17:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wondered if you have a specific reason for replacing "&ndash;" with the simple ASCII hyphen, in date ranges (I noticed the single change in John Wilkes). Using a hyphen or a double hyphen is a common simplification on typewriters, but all browsers can render the n-dash and m-dash, and we should strive for correct typography. In this case, n-dash is specifically the right choice for indicating a range. You can find this all written up in the style guides, and precedent passim, unless there has been a recent consensus I've missed. So I'm taking the liberty of reverting that one change, at least. Nonethless, I encourage your passion for detailed cleanup; I indulge it myself. Please don't stop. David Brooks 04:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've never replaced "&ndash;" or "&mdash;" with hyphens, but with their correct UTF symbols (found below the editing window in blue) as opposed to their HTML code. So while they may look like your standard hyphen in your editing window's font, they are in fact n-dashes, and are rendered such in the article. Compare the three and see: <hyphen> <ndash> <mdash> = - – —. This is part of the current Wikipedia policy on dashes (see the paragraph in bold). I've reverted back what I'd done, but thank you for calling me on it. I hope I've cleared up any confusion. Happy editing! – Quoth 08:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I see your point. I have a strong disagreement with that particular part of the policy, because subsequent editors cannot see the difference between dash and hyphen; they look the same in the edit box (at least, they do in Courier) and I think that has bad consequences for various reasons, only one of which is the way we are wasting each other's time! Honestly, I don't see that typing the HTML entity is more difficult than alt-zero-what were those digits again or finding the right length in the insert menu. However, the guide uses "may", so either approach is considered correct. Enough breath wasted on this one, especially as I see an anon has made some substantive and ugly edits to the article in question. David Brooks 17:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In your "edit" of the Black Dahlia entry, you changed the street name Normandie (correct) to Normandy (wrong). This street name is very well-known to most people as in the "flash-point of the L.A. riots at Florence and Normandie." You also changed the name Lillian Lenorak to Lillian DeNorak. "Edits" such as yours are one reason I no longer contribute to Wiki, although I do point out the more egregious errors. Please repair your damage. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.54.183 (talk)

I noticed a number of grammatical and structural inconsistencies between the quoted text and its apparent source, seeing as how it was a quote I decided to do a clean copy of it, trusting the current source had been more correctly transcribed or proofed. I'll add the corrections into the text following each word, but still believe this is the correct way to quote a report (or the closest thing we have to the source). Thank you for contributing enough to alert me to it, although I can't say the sarcastic tone helped to illustrate in anyway. – Quoth 15:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sure, nevermind the citation. Because when I read that, I had NO idea what to cite or what anyone else could cite. He has beat D12 in a rap battle, you can read that on the same page.

About studio albums. I know, no need to explain. I changed it because it looks nicer.

About the name: I took that from Eminem's page.

Tuplad 10:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is a how-to unencyclopedic? People come to wikipedia for all sorts of information. Why can't how-to's be part of that? If a specific comment about the Underdogs' patch is made, that it is bad, isn't it our responsibility to tell them of a fix for the problem? At the very least, there should be a note that says "One fix to the problem can be found <here>" This information needs to be disseminated. Do you just edit for editing's sake?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 22samurai (talk • contribs) 02:48, 27 October 2006

Thank you for responding in a professional way even when I didn't exactly extend you the same courtesy. As you've noticed from my blog, I learned a lot from this experience and understand you to be holding up the standards of Wikipedia. I was excited that I had solved a problem that was so bothersome and prevalent that a comment about it had actually made its way into the Wikipedia. I typed first and asked questions later, something, which I hope to do less of in the future. 22samurai 18:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing the {{Film}} template from film pages. Thank you, Cbrown1023 21:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, sorry about those few edits— I was under the assumption that the templates were used something akin to categories and if there was a more specific one in existance (horror films) then removing the more generic template was OK. – Quoth 22:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you thought that, it is fine, though. I guess I could've been nicer... but I thought that you probably removed a lot of them and I had wanted to get cracking on fixing it; so I was a little hasty. Thanks, though.

In relation to your thought; normally, yes. However, in this case they are two seperate WikiProjects. Films deals with films (surprise) and Horror deals with all horror (books, other literature, media, etc.). Cbrown1023 00:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In "editing" the Black Dahlia entry, you wrongly stated that the case is closed. It's not. Murder cases in the U.S. are never closed. You might check before making such statements, thereby avoiding elementary mistakes.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.52.19 (talk)

Ah, back again for another "scolding" I see. Thank you ever so much for once again gracing my talk page with your cheerful, yet informative, comments. Once again I will thank you for bringing this bit of information to my attention regarding U.S. murder cases, as of that fact I was quite unaware. While it did cross my mind during the creation of that sentence, by the time I'd finished copy-editing the section I had forgotten it completely. Luckily for all concerned, Wikipedia happens to be a "collaborative" process, and someone was able to catch my slight error. As the Black Dahlia article is still in great need of rewriting and referencing, we may need to talk again. In such a case, I'll ask you to try and follow the very simple instructions in the friendly looking box located at the top of this page. – Quoth 13:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the article CORPG for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that CORPG satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CORPG. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of CORPG during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion.

P.S. I wanted to give you a heads up because you seemed to have done some work on this article, and I wanted to give you a chance to have a look and see if the references can be added that the article needs. If sufficient verification is added, I'll reconsider my recommendation. Thanks! Dugwiki 23:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you were the creator of the article on Sherlock Holmes: The Awakened. I'm really interested in learning more about the game, but one thing I can't find anywhere is a listing of system requirements for the game, such as one might find on the box. However, since SH:TA is being sold online, and the game's website doesn't list system requirements, I don't know whether my system can run it, and I could guess that others would be confused as well. Do you know what the requirements are, and whether we could add them to the article? Thanks, Kasreyn 18:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found them on the Buy screen; they're not very visible at all. Sorry to bother you. Kasreyn 18:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HipHopDX.com, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that HipHopDX.com satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HipHopDX.com and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of HipHopDX.com during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spellcast 00:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just added a few quotes to the A Dictionary of Modern English Usage article, and then I noticed you (I think it was you) removed a quote several months ago.

Im a big fan of that book, have been for about 30 years. The book is well-known for its witticims, which are often hilarious and widely quoted. I think many encyclopedias include well-known quotes from books, in order to give a feel for the work.

What do you think? Noleander (talk) 18:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. I removed the previous quotation because it neither related to the rest of the article or illustrated his particular style well. It additionally stated that his stance on split infinitives were notable, yet failed to explain why. At the time of the substantive copy-edit I hadn't yet obtained a copy of the book, and so couldn't contribute much to the article. Thank you for expanding the article, it desperately needed some examples. – Quoth (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Discworld II: Missing Presumed...!?: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 12:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quoth. I've nominated Agostino Vespucci, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it as you see fit. If you can add more info to the article, perhaps something not about Mona Lisa, such as his work as assistant to Niccolò Machiavelli or his other surviving letters and manuscripts, it would be great. Thanks. Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On July 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agostino Vespucci, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Pasta, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Given the variety of preparations of pasta, the nutritional value obviously varies and you added (well-intentioned) information that is almost certainly false in many if not most cases. Toddst1 (talk) 05:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quoth, the WikiProject Video Games Newsletter is conducting a retrospective survey of some of its oldest members and their thoughts on the development of the project through the years. You were noted as one of the early contributors to this project and we'd love to hear your thoughts on the matter. There is a short (16-question) interview posted here and if you got a free moment this weekend to answer some or all of the questions then your answers would be most appreciated. The newsletter goes out April 2, so time is short. Sorry about the short notice! I hope we get a chance to hear from you soon! Thanks in advance, -Thibbs (talk) 03:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

02:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Quoth! I'm looking for editors to help with making improvements to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive article and European Market Infrastructure Regulation articles, and I thought these might be topics you're interested in. I see you were one of the editors to most recently edit the stub for this regulation and I hoped you might want to take a look at my proposed updates. They're available here for MiFID and here for EMIR. As a disclosure: I do have a conflict of interest as I'm working on this topic as a paid consultant to the Managed Funds Association and I won't make edits to the live articles. Let me know if you'd be able to look at either of the articles. Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 13:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Quoth-22. Your account has been granted the "file mover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want file mover rights anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it.

Your account has also been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Swarm ♠ 04:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very very much for your quick aid, Quoth! Best regards, Hippo99 (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	I want to express my thankfulness on your quick and helpful act in creating the {{lang-ban}} upon my query on the {{lang}} discussion page. Know that your aid was much appreciated, Sir! Hippo99 (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow — thank you for the barn star, it's appreciated in kind. I'm just happy to help people such as yourself continue to contribute high-quality edits :) — Quoth (talk) 12:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! :) Why did you remove the information about the codename entirely? Looks like a notable bit to me... --WikiKiwi 11:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WikiKiwi, I had intended to find a more appropriate place for it in the development section but couldn't find a suitable location for the parenthetical I removed from the lede. I then thought it would be more informative if it was fleshed out into a sentence, but I'd have needed a better citation so I left it for later. Thanks for reminding me. I've added it to development section, and got a little carried away with copy editing in there as well. — Quoth (talk) 02:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! Happy to having reminded you than :) --WikiKiwi 05:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the merger of High school into Secondary school, which you supported (per "the above reasons" while in fact no particularly relevant reasons were given above), seems to be particularly ill-judged. Note that I have just proposed undoing that merger, with a quite comprehensive rationale on Talk:Secondary school#Revert merger of Secondary school and High school. Feel free to join into the discussion. Regards, PanchoS (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert the addition of to that work by Cicero?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bellerophon5685, that article already had an {{authority control}} on it. I reverted to remove the duplicate. – Quoth (talk) 20:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quoth-22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quoth-22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate you taking the time to send thanks! Cicero thanks you as well. Bobdog54 (talk) 22:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:24, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quoth-22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quoth-22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Todd Porter (game developer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCREATIVE. Only source is to an interview.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for some guidance. Many of the references where are old. I have a fair amount I could provide with respect to newer links, resources, etc. Is this something you can help with? 173.44.89.234 (talk) 20:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Space Quest III cover art.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kys5g ^talk! 02:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]