User talk:JerrySa1

Sources to use in future:

Cocoliztli http://blogs.plos.org/publichealth/2013/07/30/guest-post-what-killed-the-aztecs/ http://www.ajtmh.org/content/62/6/733.full.pdf+html

Neith http://authors.library.caltech.edu/53320/1/PT.3.2583.pdf That book, if I could afford it.

Hi! Why did you copy the infobox into the article while there's a template to be included? --Emesik (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean?

It seems that you have pasted entire Template:Syrian Civil War infobox into the article. Didn't you? --Emesik (talk) 00:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I did this because previously, the page was done incorrectly. All the things shown in the info box could be seen and messed up the beginning of the page. You can see from the edit before mine. Why is it wrong?

Someone else broke the infobox. It should be fixed in the template, not in the article. --Emesik (talk) 14:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what should I do ?

Never mind, I managed to fix it already :) --Emesik (talk) 23:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I updated "RET" to "RETIRED", since RET did not have note explaining its meaning. Thanks for asking. Harvardton (talk) 10:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's an abbreviation.

I made my account here when I was a very young teenager (like, 13) and most of the stuff I had up on there was pretty cringeworthy to 2015 me. Ahawowow (talk) 06:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
79		Montserrat national football team (talk)						Add sources
268		Online disinhibition effect (talk)						Add sources
20		1998 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF) (talk)						Add sources
9		DRB Tadjenanet (talk)						Add sources
43		Zanzibar national football team (talk)						Add sources
42		Eritrea national football team (talk)						Add sources
37		Efraín Juárez (talk)						Cleanup
5		2015 in Indian sport (talk)						Cleanup
1,413		Grenada (talk)						Cleanup
19		Sint Maarten national football team (talk)						Expand
233		Lebanon national football team (talk)						Expand
8		Stade Léopold Sédar Senghor (talk)						Expand
41		Soccer in South Africa (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
352		2015 Africa Cup of Nations (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
91		Golden generation (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
44		Ariana (name) (talk)						Merge
21		Timeline of Scientology (talk)						Merge
44		India at the FIFA World Cup (talk)						Merge
395		Rob Paulsen (talk)						Wikify
443		Northeast blackout of 2003 (talk)						Wikify
1,112		Victoria's Secret (talk)						Wikify
5		Costa Rica national football team results (talk)						Orphan
5		Gandelger Ganbold (talk)						Orphan
0		Costa Rica national football team 2011 (talk)						Orphan
154		Lenny McNab (talk)						Stub
21		West African Football Union (talk)						Stub
43		Dean Gorré (talk)						Stub
109		Lucy Hannah (talk)						Stub
33		Harry Gast (talk)						Stub
17		CECAFA (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cocoliztli epidemic of 1576, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indigenous. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Battle of Golden Hill instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JerrySa1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia🎄/tlk 20:29, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JerrySa1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia🎄/tlk 20:29, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I change (or will) the article Epidemia de cocoliztli de 1576 because its content was almost the same (more undeveloped and with not totally reliable sources) as Cocoliztli. Now the article will focus on the outbreak and not on the disease. Sorry for my english. Edslov (talk) 23:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your english is fine. Thank you. JerrySa1 (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I left a few comments on the peer review. I'm no expert and some of the guys at WP:FOOTY may disagree with some of what I have said. I hope it was helpful. To respond, please speak to me on my talk page as I don't check Wikipedia very often. Spiderone 12:14, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Pelé page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neith (hypothetical moon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Short. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jerry. I wanted to bring Shakespeare's funerary monument up to FA status and nominate it for TFA for 23 April for the same reason, but I have had a lot of personal events prevent me from working on the article. I left this message on the nom page but I don't know how to put it in the right place. Tom Reedy (talk) 00:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trevin Caesar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 07:05, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was vandalism, as your edit indicated he had scored 2 goals without making an additional appearance! GiantSnowman 07:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was only because I forgot to update the appsJerrySa1 (talk) 19:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
6,929		Leicester City F.C. (talk)						Add sources
413		Perihelion and aphelion (talk)						Add sources
391		Area codes 718, 347, and 929 (talk)						Add sources
20		East High School (Rochester, New York) (talk)						Add sources
4,042		United States presidential election, 2000 (talk)						Add sources
140		Semi-major and semi-minor axes (talk)						Add sources
6		Helen Foster (politician) (talk)						Cleanup
28		Cultural depictions of Julius Caesar (talk)						Cleanup
437		Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards (talk)						Cleanup
88		Quake (natural phenomenon) (talk)						Expand
8,628		Premier League (talk)						Expand
15		Playing the Moldovans at Tennis (talk)						Expand
1,497		Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016 (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
66		Liberty pole (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
117		Mike Bassett: Manager (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
389		International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (talk)						Merge
76		Orbital plane (astronomy) (talk)						Merge
183		Voluntary euthanasia (talk)						Merge
248		Quartering Acts (talk)						Wikify
416		Tortola (talk)						Wikify
10		The History of Timon of Athens the Man-hater (talk)						Wikify
6		Kevin Piper (talk)						Orphan
15		The Nine Planets (talk)						Orphan
3		Vinogradov Fracture Zone (talk)						Orphan
21		Morris High School (Bronx) (talk)						Stub
77		Inferior and superior planets (talk)						Stub
12		Aikhulu Chasma (talk)						Stub
20		Steyning Grammar School (talk)						Stub
3		Pewou Bestman (talk)						Stub
32		Sondre Holst Enger (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for beginning your GA review of David Davis (footballer). I think I've answered your points so far. I'm just here to let you know that I'll be off-wiki for 10 days from next Monday (11th), so if you add to the review after that date, I won't be able to respond until I get back. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your script edits, for example at New England (diff). Points I noticed are:

• The first of the following was changed to the second which broke the template:

  {{convert|71991.8|sqmi|sqkm|abbr=on}}

  {{convert|71991.8|sq mi|km²|abbr=on}}

  WP:MOSNUM says that km² should not be used, instead use km<sup>2</sup>. However, both are wrong when the text is a parameter to a template, as is inserting a space in "sqmi".

• Another change is seen at New England#Employment. The table heading used to have "December 2014[102]" but now has "[102] Net change" (the ref was moved from once column to another).
• The script must be fixed to avoid hard-to-see stuff like changing the first of the following to the second:

  url=https://books.google.com/books?id=meS-dCN7wU4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=new+england's+crises+and+cultural+memory&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjOoJW8v_XLAhVBOT4KHZorA-sQ6AEIHzAA#v=onepage&q=new%20england's%20crises%20and%20cultural%20memory&f=false

  url=https://books.google.com/books?id=meS-dCN7wU4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=new+england's+crises+and+cultural+memory&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjOoJW8v_XLAhVBOT4 kHzorA-sQ6AEIHzAA#v=onepage&q=new%20england's%20crises%20and%20cultural%20memory&f=false

  It changed "4KHZ" to "4 kHz". An article using the doubly wrong "4KHZ" should probably be carefully examined rather than changed automatically.

Johnuniq (talk) 01:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copied to here from my talk. Johnuniq (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I looked over the edits in the script, many were fine. Sorry for any inconvenience. Don't see the problem in this.. [last point above] JerrySa1 (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is hard to see, but in the last point of my post above there are two long lines starting "url=". The first line contains "4KHZ" but the second does not. Searching this talk page for "4KHZ" would be an easy way to see the text. The second line contains "4 kHz". That sort of automated change, if it is desirable, should not occur in a URL. I'm not complaining and I'm sorry that my message reads rather stiffly. I noticed there was a problem and thought you should be aware that some of the automated changes are breaking things. Similar issues may have occurred in other articles. Johnuniq (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you're a Bernie supporter, which indicates to me that you would support fair voting reform. The Wikipage: Instant-runoff voting.

For the group fighting for it, check out: http://www.FairVote.org.

To see why it's necessary, check out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqblOq8BmgM.

It's supported by the Green Party: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb7MQ7da6sg.

Suggestions:

• Share on Facebook
• Twitter
• Everywhere
• Post a sign in your front yard that says, "The USA needs Instant-Runoff Voting!"

^Knowledge_Battle ^(Talk) | ^Godless_Infidel ︻╦╤── 19:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pelé you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackJack -- BlackJack (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pelé you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pelé for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackJack -- BlackJack (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JerrySa1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup Greetings, GA Cup competitors! November 28, 2016 was supposed to mark the end of the first round. However, we needed 16 competitors to move on, and currently only 10 have completed articles. Thus, the judges have come together to let the participants decide what we shall do. Please complete this quick survey to let us know whether you would like a holiday break. There will be two options for what we will do next in terms of Round 2 depending on the results of this poll. If the survey indicates that the competitors want a break, we will have a 2nd round after the break ends with just the 10 competitors who have reviewed articles, starting in January (with a specific date TBA). If the survey does not indicate that participants want a break, we will extend Round 1 until the end of December. We apologize for sending out this newsletter late. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase! To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for promoting my Kim Possible article to GA! :-) Changedforbetter (talk) 05:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup Greetings, GA Cup competitors! December 29th marked the end of the first round, after it was extended from its previously scheduled conclusion at the end of November. Because of the smaller pool of contestants this year, it was decided to keep sign-ups open throughout the month of December. This extension proved to be very helpful as we saw that more users signed up and completed many reviews. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 402 points, followed by Cartoon network freak with a close 338 points. Shearonink who signed up after our extension was in third with 170 points. We had a rule clarification in Round 1 which was that many articles were being passed with blatant copyright violations and plagarism occurring in the articles. Thus, the judges have concluded that if an article is passed even if it has a copyright violation/plagarism, we will not provide points for that article as it wouldn't be considered a "complete review" under the scoring rules. In the end, 94 articles were reviewed by 14 users who will all advance to Round 2. The judges had planned on having 16 contestants advance but since only 14 did, we are changing the pools in this round. We will be having 2 pools of 3 and 2 pools of 4 in Round 2, with the top 2 in each pool advancing to Round 3 as well as the top participant ("9th place") of all remaining competitors. Round 2 will begin on January 1 at 00:00:00 UTC and will end on January 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase! To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review of Sally Jewell! I appreciate your feedback. It looks like we have some overlapping interests here on Wikipedia so hopefully our paths will cross again. Knope7 (talk) 03:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just wanted to note that you put an AFD tag on Blink man but didn't create the discussion page. clpo13_(talk) 23:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, um the page was redlinked in the preview, and when I clicked it, it said it was deleted. Weird. JerrySa1 (talk) 23:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:JerrySa1 - I will see if I can create the discussion page. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have it, but I am not sure. (I am assuming that you found it on New Page Patrol, and that it doesn't neatly fit any of the CSD categories, and you tried to AFD it, and something went wrong. Is that correct?) Robert McClenon (talk) 00:06, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly that, but I could swear it was deleted by TWO admins for being "a blatant hoax." But I saw people still editing it, which is where I saw that something went wrong. JerrySa1 (talk) 00:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how it's a "blatant hoax" when it's been in published books. I'm from the area, and it might not be "real," but it's a "real story.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekmyers (talk • contribs) 03:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3 Hello, GA Cup competitors! Sunday saw the end of Round 2. Shearonink took out Round 2 with an amazing score of 499. In second place, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an astounding 236 points, and in third place, Cartoon network freak received 136 points. Originally, we had plans for one wild card for 9th place, however it appears that both Chris troutman and J Milburn were tied for 9th place. Therefore, we have decided to have both advance to Round 3. In Round 2, 91 reviews were completed! At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 7 months; at the end of Round 2, the longest wait had decreased to a little over 6 months. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 3 so we can keep decreasing the backlog. To qualify for the third round, contestants had to earn the two highest scores in each of the four pools in Round 2; plus, one wildcard. For Round 3, users were placed in 3 random pools of 3. To qualify for the Final of the 3rd Annual GA Cup, the top user in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 4th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 3 has already started and will end on February 26 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here. Also, we'd like to announce the departure of judge Zwerg Nase. We thank him for all his hardwork and hope to see him back in the future. Good luck and have fun! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, and MrWooHoo. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Final Hello, GA Cup competitors! Sunday, February 26 saw the end of Round 3. Shearonink finished in first with 616 points, which is more than the point totals for all the other competitors combined! In second place, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 152 points, followed by Sturmvogel_66 in third with 111 points. Chris troutman and Kees08 each received a wild-card and were able to advance to the Final Round. There was a major error on the part of the judges, and initially, 8 users were advanced instead of 5. This has been corrected, and we sincerely apologize for this confusion. In Round 3, 71 reviews were completed! At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 7 months; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait is still holding steady at a little over 6 months, the same as for the previous round. By the end of all three Rounds, the total number of nominations increased slightly - this suggests that users are more willing to nominate, knowing that their articles will be reviewed. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Final so we can keep tackling the backlog. In the Final Round, the user with the highest score will be the winner. The Final has already started and will end on March 31st at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Finals and the pools can be found here. Good luck and have fun! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, and MrWooHoo. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chemical warfare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Donald Trump has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Guy (Help!) 21:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Wrap Up Hello, GA Cup competitors! Saturday, April 1 concluded the 2016-2017 GA Cup. 64 reviews were completed by our finalists. Although the backlog increased by 42 over the reviewing period instead of declining, the increase suggests that the contest is encouraging editors to nominate articles for review. Congratulations to Shearonink, who is the winner of the Cup, finishing with 672 points! Once again, just as in last round, this is more than the point totals for all the other competitors combined! It was a close race for second place between Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, who achieved 164 points, and Sturmvogel_66, who earned 150. Though Sturmvogel_66 reviewed one more article than Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga managed to earn 14 points more due to reviewing older articles. Our two wildcard competitors, Kees08 and Chris troutman, came in fourth and fifth, respectively. There were some bumps in the competition this time: The sign-up deadline and the first round were both extended due to fewer competitors signing up then was planned for. And there were delays in tallying points and getting out the newsletter. The judges apologize for this latter difficulty. Lastly, mid-way through the competition we bid farewell to Zwerg Nase, who stepped down from their position as judge due to other commitments. Information about the Final can be found here. Thank you to all of our competitors, and congrats to our winners! Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, and MrWooHoo. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

Hi, I started a review here: Talk:Pelé/GA2. Based on the article's length, the issues needed to be fixed, and the importance of this article, I will give you exactly one month starting today. You may request more time if you need it. Let me know if you have any questions! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 20:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pelé you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pelé for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComputerJA -- ComputerJA (talk) 20:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey, final issues were just posted on the GA review page. We're close to getting this article promoted. Talk to you there! MX (✉ • ✎) 06:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your excellent work and patience throughout the 2-month long Good Article Review of Pelé, I want to award you this barnstar. Thank you for staying on top of things and updating the article. I'm confident Pelé's article will be an example for other football articles that want to be promoted to GA. Happy editing, MX (✉ • ✎) 23:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Pelé at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Pelé at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm afraid that your nomination is not eligible for DYK since the article has already appeared on the main page under the "On This Day" section; see, for example, [1]. Yoninah (talk) 19:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JerrySa1. You chipped in a bit on this page a while back. I have proposed some tweaks/updates here and I was hoping you might have a minute to take a look. Thanks in advance if you do. CorporateM (Talk) 13:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@CorporateM: I will be on vacation very soon. I will be back the 23rd. Jerry (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JerrySa1. No problem. The requested edits are still on Talk if you're up for taking a look, now that you are back from vacation. I'll poke around elsewhere if you're not up for it. Cheers. CorporateM (Talk) 16:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, JerrySa1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Muharem Kurbegovic at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vladimir Zhirinovsky's donkey video you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vladimir Zhirinovsky's donkey video you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vladimir Zhirinovsky's donkey video for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been nearly four days since the last edit to the article. Since it's on hold, I'd be inclined to close the nomination after seven days of inactivity. Ribbet32 (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Muharem Kurbegovic at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vladimir Zhirinovsky's donkey video you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Vladimir Zhirinovsky's donkey video for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 04:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per this edit you did [2], you may want to see this: [3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång Holy shit I made the post. That is amazing. I didn't even know about the Orrin Hatch tweet. Jerry (talk) 17:16, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedians rule over life and death, apparantly. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Country Winners
• Diversity winner
• High quality contributors
• Gender-gap fillers
• Page improvers
• Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JerrySa1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I use this and this--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 17:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Luke Stark 96: The latter has been discontinued because of youtube policy, I hope the same doesn't happen to the first. Jerry (talk) 17:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Olivetti Lettera 35, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. One or more of your pages have DEFAULTSORT conflicts: (search)

• User:JerrySa1/sandbox

Please either

• <nowiki> DEFAULTSORTs (if your page is a draft consisting of multiple subjects); or
• remove redundant DEFAULTSORTs (if your page is a draft with multiple DEFAULTSORTs); or
• remove all DEFAULTSORTs (otherwise)

in the affected pages. Thank you. – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 03:11, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article SpongeBob SquarePants has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

There are several issues with the citations that will need to be fixed before FA reviewers will pass the article. Each citation should include either a website name or a publisher. A number of the article's citations are missing one or other of these fields. There are also many instances when up to five citations are provided for one statement. These extra citations should be trimmed. One section is also tagged for updating and this needs to be done (if there's anything to add) and the tag removed.

Best of luck moving forward.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:06, 8 September 2019 (UTC) @Twofingered Typist: Thank you. Prose is not one of my strongest areas, so that will likely be easier to do. Again, thanks for the effort copy-editing such a large article. Appreciate the effort. Jerry (talk) 01:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Kasenetz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Olivetti Lettera 35, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I left you some comments on your peer review request on SpongeBob SquarePants. Feel free to add discussion. Thanks, Thatoneweirdwikier Say hi 20:49, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For performing the merge of Cocoliztli Epidemic of 1545–1548 and Cocoliztli epidemics. Surachit (talk) 04:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would be very grateful if you could make a map like this and of course I would upload it and put you as co-author. Well, I'm from Croatia, so I would be Ok with Croatian signs on a map, but it can be done in other languages, also. I would help you with the translation. --Kaštel Stari (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on April 1, and will continue until the end of May.

Harrias ^talk 06:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Olivetti Lettera 35, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of t