User talk:Darwin Naz

Hello, Darwin Naz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Thinker78 (talk) 03:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome Thinker78. My apologies for this late reply. I am only able to able to explore the community, talk pages and noticeboards recently. The wikimarkups was initially daunting and I also thought your message was automated :). Anyway, the resources you posted were very helpful since I could just open my Talk page and find the links. The sheer amount of info for editors could be quite overwhelming.Darwin Naz (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Darwin Naz, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invite Pharaoh of the Wizards. I will surely head there if I have questions.Darwin Naz (talk) 01:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my name is Yousif Kassab. I'm hoping to collaborate with you on the Heracles article. How do you suggest working together, or do you have any recommendations for where to start?TrueNeutral14 (talk) 23:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TrueNeutral14. It's nice to hear from you. I think that you could choose to expand one or some of the entries under the Further Adventures, Other Adventures subsections.Darwin Naz (talk) 05:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Customer communications management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tablet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent edits there. It seems you have access to some decent academic material on relevant subjects. I encourage you to keep contributing, to that article or others of your choice. If you do keep improving Goddess movement, you may wish to remove some of the warning templates at the top of the page, once you think they are no longer needed. There are complaints on the article talk page going back a decade, but not much real work for years, so your contributions make a difference - thank you. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Carbon Caryatid (talk). I appreciate the good word. I will take a look a closer look at Goddess movement whenever I have time and contribute as much as I can.

Great! And as you're finding your way around Wikipedia, don't be afraid to ask for help - from me, or the Teahouse, or on talk pages and project pages. I'll give you a gentle reminder to sign your posts with four tildes ~. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that. I am actually learning more about using this Talk feature and the norms entailed in my conversations with other users like you. Noted on the tildes. Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a pleasure to mentor new editors who, such as yourself, indicate a desire to learn community norms, and contribute positively to the encyclopedia. Re norms: we indent each contribution to a discussion thread like this one, for ease of reading. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 11:56, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hessian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darwin Naz! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:17, Monday, September 10, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I will definitely send you a message if I have a question or need assistance. Also, thank you for taking time listing those resources. They will be very helpful. Darwin Naz (talk) 13:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Darwin Naz.  

Regarding your edit to the Aesthetic Realism lead, Aesthetic Realism does not hold “that happiness can be attained through a unity or harmony of the opposites such as the acceptance that the world is both beautiful and horrific.”  Perhaps you wanted to simplify the lead by summarizing the study in one sentence, but this source misrepresents it.

The Concise Guide to Today's Religions and Spirituality is the publication of a right-wing religious group called Watchman Fellowship (based in Texas) whose mission is to convert adherents of what they call cults  (defined as “mediators between you and God”) "to true Christianity."  Any religion or movement that doesn't embrace the Walker Fundamentalist interpretation of scripture is listed as a cult including Roman Catholicism, Judaism, Buddhism, Islam, Taoism, the Baha'i Faith, Native American religions, and on and on and on.  It is hardly a scholarly work, and it is not part of mainstream Christianity but advances a prejudicial point of view that is far to the right and highly distorted.   Walker, in a sloppy way, equates Aesthetic Realism with Taoism simply because it talks about opposites.

Aesthetic Realism is a very careful, wide, educational philosophy founded in 1941 and it is grounded in scholarship of the world’s literature, history, and art.

If the goal was to make the lead description shorter, maybe you could replace the Walker description with Eli Siegel’s description of the philosophy as "the art of liking the world and oneself at the same time, by seeing the world and oneself as aesthetic opposites.” (Using the NYT source you quoted).  

At any rate, we need to take out the Walker sentences asap as not being a reliable source. I would suggest reverting the lead back to the way it was and perhaps adding the NYT quote as a summarizing sentence.  This would provide a fuller and more accurate description of the philosophy. Nathan43 (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan43. You seem to be very knowledgeable on the subject. Feel free to make changes to any of the edits made so that the article can be improved further. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Darwin Naz. I'm reverting now. Nathan43 (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Darwin Naz I have added projects Internet, Psychology, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. To reply please click here. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gryllida. Thanks for the invitation. I will head to the pages you mentioned and will likely participate because those are areas I am very interested in. Darwin Naz (talk) 01:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I am glad you like them, Darwin Naz. Please let me know if you need any help. --Gryllida (talk) 01:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will. Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 01:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to drop by and thank you for adding a new lead on the article I was working on. That was very kind of you! (re: Wikipedia:Teahouse#had article moved to draftspace)

Seahawk01 (talk) 03:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seahawk01. Just also recognizing the contribution you are trying to put in especially given that we are encouraged to assume that editors do their work in good faith WP:GF. Best regards! - Darwin Naz (talk) 04:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Virginia (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Virginia (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —0xf₈e₈ (talk) 02:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at said discussion page. Darwin Naz (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks so much for you help on the Kalani Pe'a page! Allanbcool (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Emotive Internet, does not have proper sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Specifically, this article is using a neologism, which is not explicitly referred to in the citations. See WP:NEOLOGISM for information on what such a page requires.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Citrivescence (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i seldom edit articles anymore since i think every one has been reverted destroying hundreds of hours of work... POOF up in smoke with a couple mouse clicks by arrogant ASSHOLES ...

I even stopped participating in editing workshops, so the community has definitely lost a good editor because they ignore the harm of arrogant elitist editors --Qazwiz (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC) to be clear, i'm not saying my contributions were perfect, far from it, i expected editing of the material... but i defy you to find somewhere that a contribution by me had an attempt of improvement before some heavy handed revert eleminated my thoughtful typing. which by the way takes me twice as long as most since i don't usually use a regular keyboard --Qazwiz (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qazwiz. That is true. Some forget that this is a crowdsourced platform and an article is supposed to be a collaborative effort. There are also so many rules that an editor could invoke and some of them are vague and even conflicting, so discussions tend to be overly protracted. Unfortunately, I do not see any way to get around it because reverts and deletions are also part of crowdsourced nature of Wikipedia. You can contest artbitrary reverts and deletions and seek consensus. But then, as I cited, it would involve another lengthy process, something one whose work is being questioned would have no drive to pursue. So what I can probably suggest is to be patient :) and, again, you should know that there are editors who understand your frustrations. I, for one, could promise a level-headed/objective help whenever I can. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://milproj.dc.umich.edu/pdfs/2014/Glion%20Summary.pdf, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Presently, I cannot compare my revision to your edit so I could not check the part you said was copied from that PDF source. I think I did use content from that document but sourced it accordingly. I believe that is how you came across that link in the first place. I understand the need to write in my own words but quotes are also allowed as reflected in this entry I added "universities exist to liberate the unlimited creativity of the human species and to celebrate the unbounded resilience of the human spirit," which is now listed under your edit. Also, I did not know that the previously cited PDF source does not have a compatible copyright license or how such license is determined. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of information from a self published source has been removed. Xulon Press is a self-publishing company and according to Wikipedia:SPS,"Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications." Per Xulon Press, David Bird is a medical doctor with no specialization in the field of history.[1] --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Ahmed Al-Khabaz.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

The section organization needs some rethinking IMO. "Criticism" is a very vague section heading for a biography article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rosguill:. Thank you very much for reviewing my article. I have edited the ["Criticism"] section. I also realized that it gave the impression that the subject is receiving criticism. Thanks again. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:53, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article! ― Mainly 20:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Doomsdayer520:. Thanks for reviewing the article as well! Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darwin Naz. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Leland Chapman. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). AllStarBio.com seems much worse. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ronz Noted on that. These minor celebrities, since you are probably talking about my edit for the Leland Chapman page, seems to be covered only by these outlets. That page lack inline citations and I tried to add some sources to some of the information given. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up that I moved your addition to the lede on Bricolage down to the visual arts section. It did not summarize the article content as the lede is meant to do, but fits very well into the visual arts section.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you clarify? Thanks. Wwwhatsup (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wwwhatsup Done. Thanks for following up! Darwin Naz (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments welcome! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Andrew_Lancaster/Germanic_peoples_drafting Keep in mind that the article is currently frozen and the split proposal was called off by the proposer.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 14:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respectable D. Naz. Let me tell you that I am working in Draft:Gérard Gertoux, but English language is not my native language. I was reading that you are a member of WikiProject Translation studies, so I wonder if you could help me in make corrections. Thank in advance if you have some of avaliable time. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 19:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco. I would be delighted to help. I can check and do the corrections whenever I have time. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just reviewed Henricus Sedulius - a very nicely written article. Thank you! Mccapra (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mccapra. Thank you for reviewing the article and also for leaving nice words here. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thanks for helping out on the wikiproject biography assessment backlog Nerd1a4i (talk) 07:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Nerd1a4i! Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 08:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you create a separate article for Lucy Goodale Thurston from Asa and Lucy Goodale Thurston? I think Lucy deserves a stand-alone article. KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure KAVEBEAR. However, you need to make the necessary editing at Asa and Lucy Goodale Thurston. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, —valereee. Thanks for the update! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:45, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Darwin Naz (talk) 22:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:39, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ghmyrtle. Any discussion in particular? Or is it just an invitation to participate in the noticeboard? I can head over there and weigh in a bit later. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DRN#Edward Colston. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Ed-Tech Press has been determined to be an unreliable publisher; see the WP:RSN discussion at Special:Permalink/969121327#Odd publisher: Ed-Tech Press. I am notifying you because you added some references to books from this publisher in the past, and I have removed them. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 20:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Biogeographist. Noted. Thanks for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 21:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Seth and Mary Eastman a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Seth Eastman. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Diannaa. If you have taken a look at the Talk page of the Seth Eastman article, you would have found that I am not trying to give the Seth and Mary Eastman a different title. I am also not trying to move it to another page by copying and pasting. I am trying to create a separate article for Mary Henderson Eastman in response to a request at the Women in Red Project. I, myself, believe that Mary Eastman deserves her own article. I am, however, unsure about the split in history you mentioned or if it is relevant to what I am trying to do. This is a bit complex because there are three pages involved as I create Mary Eastman's page: Seth and Mary Eastman, Seth Eastman (redirect), and Mary Henderson Eastman (current draft). Since you have reverted the edit, I am now at a loss on how to proceed. Darwin Naz (talk) 11:12, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that when moving a page, you have to use the move function, so that the page history remains with the relevant text. This is because a list of contributors is required under the terms of our license, and the page history is where the contributor list is located. I will move the page properly for you now.— Diannaa (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move complete. There's redirects for Mary Eastman at Mary Henderson Eastman and Mary H. Eastman. These will need to be changed once your new article is live. Mary Eastman currently redirects to Eastman (surname). You will need an administrator to properly move your draft once it is ready for mainspace.— Diannaa (talk) 11:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your help! Darwin Naz (talk) 11:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,741		Guinea-Bissau (talk)	Add sources
139		Ocean Girl (talk)	Add sources
7		Wasashatta (talk)	Add sources
67		Gérard Genette (talk)	Add sources
81		S/Z (talk)	Add sources
2,016		Dominance and submission (talk)	Add sources
554		Vitruvius (talk)	Cleanup
36		Sociology of terrorism (talk)	Cleanup
14		Jing zuo (talk)	Cleanup
423		Christology (talk)	Expand
285		Anastasio Somoza Debayle (talk)	Expand
6		Richard Hönigswald (talk)	Expand
10,358		Prince Andrew, Duke of York (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,341		Archaeology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
112		Max Scheler (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
94		Naïve realism (talk)	Merge
537		Rishabhanatha (talk)	Merge
3,961		Vishnu (talk)	Merge
1,719		Architecture (talk)	Wikify
110		Paul Churchland (talk)	Wikify
12		Dermot Moran (talk)	Wikify
4		Diagrammatology (talk)	Orphan
8		Eastern Ethics in Business (talk)	Orphan
3		Chlamydia research (talk)	Orphan
12		Objectivity and Liberal Scholarship (talk)	Stub
13		James Giles (philosopher) (talk)	Stub
4		Tadeusz Czeżowski (talk)	Stub
52		Existential phenomenology (talk)	Stub
6		Foundation for Polish Science (talk)	Stub
5		Acerronia Polla (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, —valereee. Thank you for the update! Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Eugénie Ginsberg, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. Thank you very much for the good words! Four of my articles were featured in the Did You Know section already. The most recent two of these were self-nominated. Given the total, I am already expected to review other DYK entries, so that was what I was doing when the Eugénie Ginsberg article was completed. The script you mentioned was new to me and I have installed it. You will definitely receive a message from me if I would need a hand. :) Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Darwin Naz

Thank you for creating Ontopoetics.

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 17:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you {{Re|Gazal world}} and also for reviewing the page. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darwin. the template {{Re}} should be used without 'nowiki' tag (For example: {{Re|Gazal world}} without nowiki). So that the person you pinged will get notification. You can also use the template {{ping}} for the same purpose. -:) --Gazal world (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Gazal world: In my previous reply, I copied the code of your username from your post. As you might have noticed, I am not very good at editing source codes. :) Again, thanks for your help! Darwin Naz (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Ontopoetics at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Flibirigit. Thank you for reviewing the nomination. I have addressed your concern at the nomination page. Darwin Naz (talk) 03:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cwmhiraeth for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Darwin Naz,

In the miniaturization article, one edit mentions "the comparative ease in miniaturizing electrons". My understanding (from skimming over classical electron radius) is that it's completely impossible to miniaturize electrons. My understanding is that even measuring the size of electrons is very difficult. So I am *very* interested in any process for miniaturizing electrons, whether it is easy or not.

What process can miniaturize electrons? --DavidCary (talk) 15:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, DavidCary. It should be "electrical devices" not "electrons". This part has been edited accordingly. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 12:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Darwin, when you have time, would you mind looking over my translation from the French version of the topic, please. I have been going at it and will have made English errors I fail to see. I am fairly confident about the accuracy of the translation, as this is my field and I am bi-lingual. Here and there I have gone off-piste, updating and adding as the French version has dated. Many thanks!--Po Mieczu (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu! I have taken a look at the changes that you have made on the Analytical psychology page. They are quite numerous. The succession of edits - including those made by other editors - would make going over your translation work challenging. However, I can identify bulk additions you have made and I think that is where I could check. At this point, the most important thing for me is whether the added contents included their sources. If an unsourced information is widely documented, I might be able to help with referencing. If you can send me the link of the French page, it would also be appreciated. Best regards, (talk) 23:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, Darwin Naz, for your response. The French version is this: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychologie_analytique I have replaced French references with English language ones where available, including page numbers, as I have many of the sources. It takes hours, as you know. However the entry is too important to be left as was. Any help is gratefully received. Kind regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 00:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you added some welcome sources to this one. For consistency can you ammend the Spencer encylopedia reference to match the others, e.g. The Murray Crusades examples. Particularly, adding the author of the entry, and the entries name. I don't have access to this work otherwise I would have done it. Hopefully you'll feel like doing some more on this article. It needs a fresh pair of eyes. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 11:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Norfolkbigfish for the good word. I also have amended the reference format. It took me a bit of time to do this. See, when I do my editing I usually use the Visual Editor interface and reference using its Cite option. I had to learn the coding part of the sfn template and how it relates to the Biography. Kindly go over the changes and let me know if there is something I missed. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Np, DN. I tweaked the Hurlock & Mayer ones, have a look. Mayer I just added the JSTOR location. With the Hurlock one, Murray is the source, Hurlock is the editor. So added Murray & the chapter name. What do you think? Norfolkbigfish (talk) 14:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add, is it possible for you to follow what I did on Hurlock/Murray for the Tucker one. I don't have access but would guess the entries have authors and the chapter is the entry name. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 14:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Tucker source is more like an encyclopedia and not an anthology of works. There is an Outremer section but it does not constitute a chapter nor bylined by an author. Darwin Naz (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was guessing, looks like I guessed incorrectly. Thanks Norfolkbigfish (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for your help. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 (talk) 13:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cdjp1. Best regards and happy new year! Darwin Naz (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Peacemaker67. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Nice article. But please see Wikipedia:Writing about women. The policy is not to use first names. It is, rightly I think, seen as being sexist because men are invariably referred to by their surnames. Roundtheworld (talk) 09:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Roundtheworld. Thank you for the good words. Regarding Olga Petit's first name use: I do also use surnames for articles I wrote with female subjects (e.g. . However, in this case, I decided to use Olga to distinguish her from her husband. When talking about them, it would have been confusing to refer to both as Petit in the same paragraph. Nonetheless, I will try to look into the article and see if I can find a way around it. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Zinaida Vengerova at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ffranc (talk) 18:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ffranc. Thank you for recently updating the article and for doing the review. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Darwin Naz (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,216 views (601.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 04:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK hook about Zinaida Vengerova and her role in an anti-Semitic ritual in which a circle of intellectuals drank blood received 7,216 page views (601 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the one of most viewed hooks during the month of February and is thus listed on the February stats list. Cbl62 (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cbl62. Thank you for the update! Darwin Naz (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Darwin Naz. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marcelo Cortés, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 10:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged it CSD G7. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 14:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you review your edit to Sakuradamon Incident (1860), as I can't figure out what you meant to say in the sentence beginning "An account ..." Shenme (talk) 01:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shenme, this edit has been made for some time already and I had to retrieve my source for this reply. Now, the "account" you mentioned should be clear if you are treating it not as a standalone sentence but approached in relation to the entire paragraph and the section itself, which is all about the consequences of the incident. Note that it specifically supports the preceding sentence, which described the ensuing violence of the Sonnō Jōi. The sentence merely states how Sakuradamon led to the resurgence of the warrior spirit (Jansen, p.295). This pertains to the Bushido or to the cult of the warrior, which had deteriorated prior to the incident. You can say that Sonnō Jōi was the immediate consequence while the resurgence of the Japanese warrior spirit (characterized by violence), as a long-term consequence. Darwin Naz (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm looking to understand how to improve the articles I create; you recently assessed Anthony Maitland, 10th Earl of Lauderdale as start-class, and I was hoping you'd be able to provide some pointers as to why it was assessed as such? Many thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The previous rating was assessed using Rater, which confirmed the previous assesment. Anthony Maitland, 10th Earl of Lauderdale is a B-class article. If you want to improve the pages you create and target a specific assessment class, you can make changes according to its outlined criteria. For instance, if you want it listed as a good article, then you must satisfy these requirements. Darwin Naz (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. Darwin Naz (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Darwin Naz, and welcome to Women in Red. I see that you have in fact been supporting the project for some time with quite a number of biographies of women in various fields, some of them promoted via DYK. Given your extensive spheres of interest and the consistently high quality of your articles, you are certainly going to be a useful member of the project. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ipigott for the good word. The project has a lot of interesting subjects that can be covered. I am glad to contribute. I will look into the resource you cited and will certainly send you a message if I need assistance. Best regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 22:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - August 2021[edit]

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207 Online events: New: Indigenous women | Women's leadership & empowerment Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Olympic & Paralympic Games | Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Darwin Naz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rybinsk Tank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already tagged it CSD G7. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208 Online events: New: Women writers & their works Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's leadership & empowerment | Olympic & Paralympic Games Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Learn more about our proposed one-day online recruitment initiative in October. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211 Online events: New: Women in STEM New Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman Special event: 12 October: Ada Lovelace Day 24-Hour Global Edit-a-thon See also: Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

	Women in Red Women in Latin America contest
	Darwin Naz Thank you for your additions September 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Darwin Naz (talk) 00:16, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213 Online events: New: Film + Stage | Endocrine health Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]