Talk:Secular liberalism

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Social and political / Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy Philosophy of religion Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article has a number of issues including the lack of good sources: it would be better if we could have coverage from some kind of text on political philosophy or political theory or ideology. It seems very narrowly restricted to British and American sources. The terms of political discussion are much different in a country like France. I can't quite put my finger on what is wrong with this article, but there is much that needs fixing. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added some discussion about the state of secular liberalism in France. I hope you like it. GVnayR (talk) 23:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in the AfD discussion, this topic currently lacks salient points of secular liberalism (henceforth ScL). We're relegating the topic itself to the introduction; the bulk of the article discusses periphery topics surrounding ScL. Lets tackle this thematically and give it a proper treatment.Bunston (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understood much of what was being conveyed in the Beliefs section and how it is directly tied to liberal secularism. Requires clarification. 24.200.87.51 (talk) 20:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]