Mad Studies

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Mad Studies is a field of scholarship, theory, and activism about the lived experiences, history, cultures, and politics about people who may identify as mad, mentally ill, psychiatric survivors, consumers, service users, patients, neurodivergent, and disabled.[1] Mad Studies originated from consumer/survivor movements organized in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and in other parts of the world. The methods for inquiry draw from a number of academic disciplines such as women's studies, critical race studies, indigenous epistemologies, queer studies, psychological anthropology, and ethnography.[2] This field shares theoretical similarities to critical disability studies, psychopolitics,[3] and critical social theory. The academic movement formed, in part, as a response to recovery movements, which many mad studies scholars see as being "co-opted" by mental health systems.[2] In 2021 the first academic journal of Mad Studies, The International Journal of Mad Studies, was launched.

Origins and scope[edit]

Richard A. Ingram, a senior research fellow in the School of Disability Studies at Ryerson University (2007), has been credited with coining the phrase "Mad Studies" at the First Regional Graduate/Undergraduate Student Disability Studies Conference at Syracuse University on May 3, 2008.[2][4][5] In an academic article entitled "Doing Mad Studies: Making (Non)sense Together," Ingram points to a number of theorists who created the intellectual groundwork for the field, including Nietzsche, Bataille, Blanchot, Deleuze, and Guattari.[4]

In a 2014 Guardian article, Peter Beresford names Canadian scholars at the forefront of this academic field: "Mad studies has been pioneered by Ryerson and York Universities in Toronto, with key figures such as mental health survivors, activists and educators David Reville and Geoffrey Reaume and academics Kathryn Church and Brenda LeFrancois."[6] Journalist Alex Gillis summarizes the spread of mad studies programs in a November 2015 article: "Soon after Ryerson and York launched mad studies courses in the early 2000s, similar courses began in Simon Fraser University’s department of sociology and anthropology, and more recently at Memorial University’s school of social work, Queen’s University’s school of kinesiology and health studies, and the history departments at Trent University and the University of Winnipeg. A few universities in England, Scotland and the Netherlands launched courses in the past two years, using Canadian courses as models."[7]

Some dimensions of this emerging field may include research on the "social construction of 'mental illness, normalizing imperatives of the state and medicine, rapidly expanding nosologies (categories of pathology) for mental illness, collusion(s) of pharmaceutical corporations and professional associations within psychiatry, connections between ecocide and mental stress, psychiatrization of nonhuman animals, representation(s) of madness in media, history of consumer/survivor movement(s), and the rise and fall of mental treatments within scientific, medical, and lay communities."[8]

Mad people have traditionally been excluded from shaping what constitutes expert knowledge about themselves.[9] Mad-positive pedagogies often center on ways Mad persons' experiences represent sites of/for learning holding deep knowledge and value. ″Mad studies represents an evolving interdisciplinary field in which Mad studies scholars often seek to disrupt, counter, and nuance dominant discourses on mental health.″ As such, Mad Studies informed pedagogical approaches emphasize Mad persons' perspectives as a way to counter sanist oppression and reshape curriculum to better appreciate and understand Mad subjects.[10] Thereby refuting a pedagogy of saneness[11] and opening new possibilities. Teaching from a Mad Studies informed lens requires unlearning normativity, rethinking sanist paradigms, and represents a disruptive critical praxis.[12]

Connection with disability studies[edit]

Mad Studies is greatly connected with Disability Studies, though it veers from certain discourses.

Like disability studies, Mad Studies developed from existing activist movements and relies on social models of disability, which argue that "disablement is the outcome of a range of structural, social, cultural and political forces which are disabling, rather than the inevitable consequence of individual impairment."[13]: 109  Further, both frameworks hold central the concerns of those impacted by the discourses (i.e., Mad people and people with disabilities), as see those impacted as producing vital knowledge.[13] In part, this means that knowledge produced and circulated about the disciplines must be accessible.

However, while the disability movement included Mad individuals, physical disabilities were centered, particularly in developing Disability Studies.[13] This becomes more apparent in the centering of impairment versus disability. According to Disabled Peoples' International, impairment refers to "the functional limitation within the individual caused by physical, mental or sensory impairment," where disability refers to "the loss or limitation of opportunities to take part in the normal life of the community on an equal level with others due to physical and social barriers."[14]: 5  People with mental health conditions may feel the language of impairment does not apply to their experience.

Further, though lay individuals with mental health conditions may dislike the language of madness, they also do not feel the social model of disability adequately represents their needs and struggles.[15]

Conferences and symposiums[edit]

  • June 12–15, 2008, Simon Fraser University, Madness, Citizenship, and Social Justice Conference[16]
  • May 2012, Ryerson University, International Conference on Mad Studies[17]
  • September 9–11, 2014, Lancaster University, Disability Studies Conference (stream that focused on Mad Studies)
  • May 2015, Bergen, Norway, Nordic Network for Disability Research, Mad Studies Symposium[18]
  • June 17, 2015, Liverpool, UK, PsychoPolitics in the Twenty First Century: Peter Sedgwick and Radical Movements in Mental Health
  • June 2015, Lancaster University, Mad Studies and Neurodiversity- Exploring Connections
  • September 30 - October 1, 2015, Durham University, UK, Making Sense of Mad Studies
  • September 6–8, 2016, Lancaster University, Disability Studies Conference (stream that focused on Mad Studies)
  • September 11–13, 2018, Lancaster University, Disability Studies Conference (stream that focused on Mad Studies)[19]

Key texts[edit]

Wikiversity has learning resources about Mad Studies
  • This is Survivor Research, edited by Angela Sweeney, Peter Beresford, Allison Faulkner, Mary Nettle, and Diana Rose (2009)[20]
  • Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life, by Margaret Price (2011)[21]
  • Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by Brenda A. LeFrançois, Robert Menzies, and Geoffrey Reaume (2013)[2]
  • Psychiatry Disrupted: Theorizing Resistance and Crafting the (R)evolution, edited by Bonnie Burstow, Brenda A. LeFrançois, and Shaindl Diamond (2014)[22]
  • Decolonizing Global Mental Health: The Psychiatrization of the Majority World by China Mills (2014)[23]
  • Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada, edited by Liat Ben-moshe, Allison C. Carey, and Chris Chapman (2014)[24]
  • Madness, Distress, and the Politics of Disablement, edited by Helen Spandler, Jill Anderson, and Bob Sapey (2015)[25]
  • Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting by Bonnie Burstow (2015)[26]
  • Searching for a Rose Garden: Challenging Psychiatry, Fostering Mad Studies, edited by Jasna Russo and Angela Sweeney (2016)[27]
  • Deportation and the Confluence of Violence within Forensic Mental Health and Immigration Systems by Ameil J. Joseph (2015)[28]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Castrodale, Mark Anthony (2015). "Mad matters: a critical reader in Canadian mad studies". Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 17 (3): 284–6. doi:10.1080/15017419.2014.895415.
  2. ^ a b c d LeFrançois, Brenda A.; Menzies, Robert; Reaume, Geoffrey, eds. (2013). Mad matters: a critical reader in Canadian mad studies. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press Inc. ISBN 978-1-55130-534-9.
  3. ^ Cresswell & Spandler (2013). "The Engaged Academic: Academic Intellectuals and the Psychiatric Survivor Movement" (PDF). Social Movement Studies. 12 (2): 138–154. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.696821. S2CID 55495048. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-07-20. Retrieved 2019-10-16.
  4. ^ a b Ingram, Richard A. (2016-12-29). "Doing Mad Studies: Making (Non)sense Together". Intersectionalities. 5 (3 (Special Issue) Mad Studies: Intersections with Disability Studies, Social Work, and ‘Mental Health’): 11–17. Archived from the original on 2018-02-26. Retrieved 2018-03-15.
  5. ^ McGowan, Victoria (November 13, 2015). "Mentally Sound Radio Show #9". Mentally Sound Radio Show. Archived from the original on August 6, 2019. Retrieved March 15, 2018.
  6. ^ Beresford, Peter (October 7, 2014). "Mad studies brings a voice of sanity to psychiatry". The Guardian. Archived from the original on April 4, 2018. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
  7. ^ Gillis, Alex (November 3, 2015). "The Rise of Mad Studies". University Affairs. Archived from the original on March 13, 2018. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
  8. ^ "Mad Studies". Asheville Radical Mental Health Collective. 2014-07-19. Archived from the original on 2018-03-13. Retrieved 2018-03-12.
  9. ^ Castrodale, M. A. (2018). Teaching (with) dis/ability and madness. In M. Jeffress (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching with disability (pp. 188–204). Routledge.
  10. ^ Castrodale, Mark Anthony (2017). "Critical Disability Studies and Mad Studies: Enabling new Pedagogies in Practice". Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education. 29 (1): 49–66. ISSN 1925-993X. Archived from the original on 2022-12-13. Retrieved 2022-12-13.
  11. ^ Procknow, Greg (2019-05-28). "The pedagogy of saneness: a schizoaffective storying of resisting sane pedagogy". International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 32 (5): 510–528. doi:10.1080/09518398.2019.1597208. ISSN 0951-8398. S2CID 150685760.
  12. ^ Snyder, Sarah N.; Pitt, Kendra-Ann; Shanouda, Fady; Voronka, Jijian; Reid, Jenna; Landry, Danielle (2019-08-08). "Unlearning through Mad Studies: Disruptive pedagogical praxis". Curriculum Inquiry. 49 (4): 485–502. doi:10.1080/03626784.2019.1664254. ISSN 0362-6784. S2CID 210372162. Archived from the original on 2021-04-14. Retrieved 2023-05-20.
  13. ^ a b c Morgan, Hannah (2021). "Mad Studies and disability studies" (PDF). In Beresford, Peter; Russo, Jasna (eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Mad Studies. Routledge. pp. 108–118. doi:10.4324/9780429465444-16. ISBN 978-0-429-46544-4. S2CID 243074532.
  14. ^ Oliver, Mike (2005). "Defining Impairment and Disability: issues at stake". In Emens, Elizabeth F. (ed.). Disability and Equality Law. Routledge. pp. 3–18. doi:10.4324/9781315094861. ISBN 9781315094861.
  15. ^ Beresford, Peter; Russo, Jasna (2016-02-17). "Supporting the sustainability of Mad Studies and preventing its co-option". Disability & Society: 1–5. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1145380. ISSN 0968-7599.
  16. ^ "Madness, Citizenship and Social Justice Conference". Simon Fraser University. 2008. Archived from the original on 2019-01-08. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  17. ^ Coyle, Jim (May 19, 2012). "The Star". Archived from the original on October 1, 2017. Retrieved March 12, 2018.
  18. ^ "Past Conferences". Mad Studies 2014. 2014-08-15. Archived from the original on 2018-03-13. Retrieved 2018-03-12.
  19. ^ "Disability Conference 2018". Lancaster University. Archived from the original on 2018-03-24. Retrieved 2018-03-12.
  20. ^ Sweeney, Beresford, Faulkner, Nettle, Rose (2009). This is Survivor Research. UK: PCCS Books. ISBN 978-1906254148.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ Price, Margaret (2011). Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0472051380.
  22. ^ Diamond, Shaindl; Burstow, Bonnie; Lefrançois, Brenda A., eds. (2015-06-09). "Psychiatry disrupted: theorizing resistance and crafting the (r)evolution". Disability & Society. 30 (7): 1133–1136. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1037561. ISSN 0968-7599.
  23. ^ Mills, China (2014). Decolonizing Global Mental Health: The Psychiatrization of the Majority World. East Essex: Routledge. ISBN 9781848721609.
  24. ^ Ben-Moshe, Liat; Chapman, Chris; Carey, Allison C. (2014). Disability incarcerated: imprisonment and disability in the United States and Canada. New York (N.Y.): Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-39323-4.
  25. ^ Spandler, Helen; Anderson, Jill; Sapey, Bob, eds. (2015). Madness, distress and the politics of disablement. Bristol Chicago: Policy Press. ISBN 978-1-4473-1458-5.
  26. ^ Burstow, Bonnie (2015). Psychiatry and the Business of Maddness. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. ISBN 978-1137503848.
  27. ^ Russo, Jasna; Sweeney, Angela, eds. (2016). Searching for a rose garden: challenging psychiatry, fostering mad studies. Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire: PCCS Books. ISBN 978-1-910919-23-1.
  28. ^ Joseph, Ameil (2015). Deportation and the Confluence of Violence within Forensic Mental Health and Immigration Systems. London: Palgrave MacMillan. ISBN 978-1-349-55826-1.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mad_Studies&oldid=1219839594"