User talk:Wordreader

Welcome to Wikipedia, Wordreader! I am Theleftorium and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Theleftorium 16:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your comment at Talk:Eric Doeringer. Thank you for solving the mystery. Cunard (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit here looks like it was semi-automated, as it included a number of minor tweaks of that nature, but it also removed a significant amount of material that at the very least would require discussion. Also, some of the tweaks were of the sort that seem logical to a bot but should be checked by a human; for instance, you changed an instance of {{cite book}} to {{cite web}} instead of replacing the url=books.google.* with ISBN. Also, "immunise" is a valid alternate spelling according to m-w.com. In at least one instance, it is being used by the British PM, but I am actually not sure which variation of English spellings is in use at that article. Feel free to fix that back and anything else you really intended that did not make it back in my cleanup. Happy editing, - 2/0 (cont.) 18:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've clarified the explanation for this in reply to the user's question at the new editors' help desk, and on 2/0's talk page. It arose from editing an old version of the page. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, David Biddulph. Wordreader, my apologies for the above and for not replying to your message on my talkpage - I could not figure how your edit jived with your description of it. All is good now, so keep up the good work. - 2/0 (cont.) 14:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in contributing more to medical related articles you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (signup here).

If you like working with other people, then you might like to help out with our official collaboration article. (All you have to do is show up and try to improve it, but it's fun to have people say hello, too.) There's also a small group at WP:WikiProject Nursing that you might like to check out. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wordreader. I've just noticed your final comment at the new contributors' help page where we were discussing a rogue editing mistake that had ambushed you.

I just wanted to say that I hope you're not really discouraged by this experience, though I can understand why it would make you feel at sea. Wikipedia doesn't have the most intuitive user interface, and anyone can make mistakes: users much more experienced than you have made much more spectacular errors! Please don't be too embarrassed, treat it as a learning experience, and stay with Wikipedia - we need thoughtful contributors who take the project seriously (just not too seriously all of the time) :) Gonzonoir (talk) 16:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to know if you know about edits made under your name to the talk page saying "Please don't use that FAG memorial as the source for his birthdate as I know for sure that some people wanted the birthdate from WP used as proof for FAG!" It seemed quite out of place, given that you have helped edit this page before, and it also looked grammatically incorrect. So I just wanted to ask if this was a hack, a mistake or something different. --RayneVanDunem (talk) 21:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I wrote that. The point is that there was a circular citation thing happening: FAG users wanted me to cite WP about the birth date and WP wanted to cite FAG about the birth date. That doesn't amount to a citation at all. We need a reliable third party citation that can be linked to or leave a birth date out, saying only that "his DOB is about".... Wordreader (talk) 20:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is "FAG?" --RayneVanDunem (talk) 21:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since I don't know whether or not you receive a notice that I replied here to your comment, I also put it on your member talk page ---

I'm sorry; I should have been clear. FAG = Find A Grave. It's a dopey name for a burial registration website. The David Kato memorial is here: http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=64969752 Those photos there are new, uploaded since my last message to you. People keep uploading photos that violate copyright law. IF one of them is there legitimately, perhaps we can get permission to use it here on WP. Will have to see.

For several good reasons, Wikipedia doesn't consider FAG as a reliable source (and certainly no circular references are allowed):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links/Perennial_websites#Find-a-Grave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions/Archive/2009/April#Find_A_Grave_Image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links/Noticeboard/Archive_2#Find_a_Grave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links/Noticeboard/Archive_6#Find_a_Grave_and_Imbd

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_93#Find_a_Grave_as_a_reliable_source_or_reference

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)/Archive_28#Propriety_of_links_to_Findagrave.com

There are many more discussions of the inadequacy of the site in the WP archived material, if you'd care to search "WP:find a grave". Yours, Wordreader (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User talk:RedSoxFan274/Userboxes/Wakefield.

Thanks, RedSoxFan274 _{(talk~contribs)} 01:39, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your post over at the article feedback page, and also noticed your recent edits to the art article.

Yes, there are a lot of resources. I wrote most of that history back when we didn't require citations so much, just so the article would have something. My intent was always/has always been to get back to it at some point in some big way, perhaps sitting in the Newburgh library's well-equipped history room, and cite that section better or rewrite it entirely with the help of the materials there. If you have the time to do so, go ahead. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo. Just a note, that I replied to your old question at Template talk:Punctuation marks. HTH. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:58, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am one of those totally clueless men who still can't comprehend why anybody gives a rat's hiney about the dress worn by any member of the parasitic aristos; but I am also self-conscious enough to concede that this may say far more about me than about the topic per se. I do hope that such kerfluffles do not discourage you from contributing your own POV to this mammothly complex project: we need varying perspectives here more than ever! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me}} Hello,

This stub was created in May 2012: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candlenut_Kitchen . Development hasn't occurred. The link to the restaurant's site doesn't go to their homepage, but to their 'About" page. According to the homepage, the restaurant closed in January 2012 http://www.candlenutkitchen.com/ . Now nobody hates to see a restaurant close more than I, even way over there in Singapore, but unless there's some documented lasting impact on the culinary world of this restaurant, this stub seems like it has nowhere to go.

I posted a comment on the article's "Talk page" pointing out the restaurant's closing. Is that enough or should a "Speedy deletion" request, category A7 {{db - inc}} also be made, as it seems to me? (If the article wasn't created until after the restaurant had already closed, I might have added criteria G 11 as well.)

Questions for you:

- Is the "Speedy deletion" marker edited right into the article page? If so, where? If not, where else?
- I'm confused about how the marker should look - how should it look?
- How speedy is speedy?
- There are FOUR separate page addresses that all seem to present the same information: Wikipedia: Criteria http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions ; WP:CSD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD ; WP:SD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SD ; WP:SPEEDY http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SPEEDY . What am I missing?

If I misunderstand the purpose for this "Speedy deletion" option, please forgive an uneducated wanderer in the WP forest. Thank you so much for your time, Wordreader (talk) 22:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not sure just click the template link on those page - e.g. {{db-inc}} - takes you to Template:Db-inc - those individual pages often have a documentation page showing the syntax. Also consider enabling Twinkle in the Gadgets section of My Preferences - it will give you extra menus - one of which is an easy way to add speedies.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Sorry for all the frustration. I replied here, by the way. Let me know if you have any questions. I added the book to the bottom in the new Further reading section. As for the italics, Testing: A small test by Me. Biosthmors (talk) 06:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you just need to type it out again. I think there might be something carrying over from a copy paste because when I tried it it was weird too. =) I have my own projects I'm working on here, but I would be happy to help you learn how to edit. You can do it! =) Best. Biosthmors (talk) 06:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And you may have wondered how I added the book easily. I know from Help:Citation_tools#Tools, that if I put in a google books url at the google books tool website I'll get out a formatted citation template, which I added. Biosthmors (talk) 06:28, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And you may like the look of this edit: [1]. Now when someone types in WP:MENTOR or Wikipedia:Mentorship, that's what they will see. Biosthmors (talk) 06:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your comment at Wikipedia talk:Teahouse. I was very impressed, we don't see intelligence without snarkiness around here much. In any case, I just wanted to say nice to meet you. Ryan Vesey 04:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply left on the user talk page of Ryan Vesey. Wordreader (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your post on the Norwalk Museum page. If you want information about norwalk, I would contact the historical commission http://www.norwalkct.org/index.aspx?NID=285 Earlopogous 03:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Reply given on the Earlopogous talk page. Wordreader (talk) 20:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the template is {unsourced|section} - only you use the double braces on each side rather than single. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

or {refimprove|section} if there are some cites but not enough or not very good sources .01:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

this page Wikipedia:Template_messages is the directory to a lot of the templates. they are grouped mostly by the type of page they are used for. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I need a little bit of help, don't mean to be annoying.

I really need to move Interprovincial 3-Day to Interprovincial Championship (cricket) and 2013 Interprovincial 3-Day to 2013 Interprovincial Championship. I would do it myself, but my account is new, so I still don't have the privileges required to do it. I'd be really grateful if you could just nip across to do it please.

Many thanks, NitramCricket96 (talk) 16:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply added to your Talk page. Wordreader (talk) 00:26, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll respond here as the response is not related to improving the article. Rhythmic gymnastics is a discipline of the olympic sport gymnastics. Two events (individual all-around and team all-around) are contested.
Wrestling, including both Greco-Roman and freestyle, will either be reinstated later this year or replaced by squash or baseball/softball. 85.167.110.98 (talk) 07:25, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chand Baori may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The Ancient Stepwells of India; Morna Livingston, Milos Beach; Princeton Architectural Press, 2002); ISBN-10: 1568983247 - Google Books |publisher=Books.google.co.nz |date= |accessdate=2012-01-07}}</

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply message left on A930913 (talk · contribs)'s talk page. Thank you, 24.47.173.120 (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:49, Sunday, May 18, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vagotonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syncope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested correction made. Thank you for your help, Wordreader (talk) 15:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wordreader, please note that your comment was dealt withless than an hour after you posted, with this edit to the article and this comment on the talk page.

Unfortunately LightShow, (or WikiWatcher as they previously were) has monumental sour grapes about the re-write the article went through, and has spent too long sniping and trolling on the talk page because his ownership of the page was taken away from him. A string of RfCs over trite points resulted in the community voice being against him on nearly every ocassion, and trips to ANI have resulted in the question of a topic ban for him - a step that was never formally proposed, but will always remain a possibility if he continues in the same vein. His approach has been to turn the talk page into a toxic minefield through his constant attacks, and even a proposal to revert it from FA status back to the last version he was guarding. Such nonsense is only ever going to rile people, and suggestions to him that he take this from his watchlist have not reached home. - SchroCat (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw that you were questioning the existence of the term Living National Treasure. If you read Japanese, would this convince you? (it specifically mentions 人間国宝. bamse (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Garchy (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per this edit: Thanks for putting in the links to those sources! I am not sure I will be able to get to working on that article in-depth for a bit. But it's nice to know someone's watching ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to the grant request for training Wikipedia admins to be more aware of sexism! This grant has been approved in pilot form, and the Ada Initiative is running an Ally Skills Workshop at Wikimania 2015. This workshop will focus on teaching specific skills and techniques directly relevant to Wikipedia admins and editors, and in particular will teach people about the psychology of trolls. The workshop will be on Thursday July 16 from 2pm to 5pm in Don Diego 3.

If you are attending Wikimania, you are invited to apply to the Ally Skills Workshop! Space is limited and we may not be able to accept all applications, so apply now. More information, including a link to the application form, is here:

Ally Skills Workshop description and application form

People of all genders are welcome to attend. Unfortunately, travel scholarships for Wikimania are already closed and we don't know of any other sources of travel funding. If you know anyone else attending Wikimania who might be interested in attending this workshop, please encourage them to apply!

Thank you for your time,

Valerie Aurora (Instructor and Interim Executive Director of the Ada Initiative)

Valerietai (talk) 22:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an experiment to see if I can master interplatform linking:

This is: File:Brahmaea wallichii insulata (Brahmeid Moth) wb edit.jpg

Well, that could have gone better! Back to the Teahouse to ask about controling the size of the image. Sigh! Wordreader (talk) 05:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]