Tan0777

This is Tan0777's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhusree Hatial (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sophisticatedevening were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhusree Hatial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft article on Madhusree Hatial. I appreciate your feedback and understand the concerns regarding notability and tone.

Since your last review, I have made substantial revisions to the draft:

I have added multiple independent, reliable, and secondary sources (including national newspapers like The Pioneer, Jagran, Prabhat Khabar, The Hans India, and BizzBuzz) that provide significant coverage of Ms. Hatial’s work and recognitions.
I have carefully rewritten the content to ensure a neutral, encyclopedic tone, removing promotional language and aligning the style with Wikipedia’s Manual of Style.
I’ve also formatted citations using proper inline references and removed any non-notable claims lacking reliable sources.

I would be grateful if you could take another look at the updated draft and let me know if it now meets Wikipedia's notability and content standards. Any further suggestions would be sincerely appreciated.

Kind regards,

Tan0777 Tan0777 (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tan0777! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft article on Madhusree Hatial. I appreciate your feedback and understand the concerns regarding notability and tone.

Since your last review, I have made substantial revisions to the draft:

I have added multiple independent, reliable, and secondary sources (including national newspapers like The Pioneer, Jagran, Prabhat Khabar, The Hans India, and BizzBuzz) that provide significant coverage of Ms. Hatial’s work and recognitions.
I have carefully rewritten the content to ensure a neutral, encyclopedic tone, removing promotional language and aligning the style with Wikipedia’s Manual of Style.
I’ve also formatted citations using proper inline references and removed any non-notable claims lacking reliable sources.

I would be grateful if you could take another look at the updated draft and let me know if it now meets Wikipedia's notability and content standards. Any further suggestions would be sincerely appreciated.

Kind regards,

Tan0777

Tan0777 (talk) 14:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhusree Hatial (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhusree Hatial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhusree Hatial (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiMentor01 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

plz remove uncourced info. keep only those which are highly relevant to subject. Be neutral. cut short by removing less important chunks from each segment and re submit. make sure whatever u write is well supported by genuine sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Madhusree Hatial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiMentor01 (talk) 06:15, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Tan0777

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhusree Hatial (April 13)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhusree Hatial (May 16)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhusree Hatial (June 8)

€4.95