User talk:InspectorForge

Hello, SebastianCelea7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to or change it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Guidance for article subjects

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:SebastianCelea7 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to I. Venugopal Reddy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Suryadevara Naga Vamsi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Sources are not about the subject.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The award was for "director Gowtam Tinnanuri’s Jersey was declared the Best Telugu Feature Film and also won the National Award for Best Editing for Naveen Nooli." Does not mention the subject." The page also lacks significant coverage on the subject in secondary independent reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suryadevara Naga Vamsi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello InspectorForge,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged I. Venugopal Reddy for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want I. Venugopal Reddy to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you to decide what is apt for main space? The producer S. Naga Vamsi is national award winning notable producer. also stop your tactics, you remove all the extensive details i provide in my article, u spoil the article and manipulate it with half edits to make it look like non-notable, and take credit for my edits? i created the article, not you. i know what is notable and what is not. stop your tactics or i will report you to administrator and arbitration committe. in the name of notability you take credit for my work? for my work you take undue credit? for my work? if you have issue with notability discuss in talk page and will add references. stop moving it to draft space without consensus. i am experienced editor, stop ur tactis on me. most importantly stop your non sense and stop wasting my time. i dont know from where editors like you pop up to waste time and energy. stop interfering on this article. stop stop stop. are you threatening me? like you did in the above case. this is serious matter.I know habitual draft space movers such as you who want to take undue credit for others work. Non sense.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 06:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Suryadevara Naga Vamsi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Declined AfC submission moved to mainspace, without illustrating notablity. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vestrian24Bio 08:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. If this block is based off of private evidence, it can additionally be appealed to the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 08:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

A month ago, your username and userpage said^{admin link} you were this guy (who needs to get better at faking magazine covers). Since then, you've renamed and switched to creating articles about non-notable people from India, e.g. Draft:I. Venugopal Reddy. At a certain point, WP:DUCK applies with respect to paid editing. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 08:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

before any warning check my edit history. i didn't done any type of editing from last 7-10 days.

so why you are giving me warning without any recent editing activity? InspectorForge (talk) 08:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What i Did Now?

since i did not done any thing so why these warnings? InspectorForge (talk) 08:38, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]