User talk:FunkMonk

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 13 May 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 16:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! FunkMonk (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Thank you today for the article "about a ceratopsian dinosaur which is unusual for its large snout and similarity to a Texas Longhorn. This is perhaps also why it has gained a bit of fame recently by being featured in the Jurassic World franchise. Everything published about it should be summarised here, and luckily there are a lot of nice, free images available. Note that a Master's thesis (Ridgwell) that was also used in the FA Kosmoceratops is included here for comprehensiveness, as it does not present controversial information."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! FunkMonk (talk) 09:13, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Proceratosaurus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Proceratosaurus and Talk:Proceratosaurus/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:44, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Proceratosaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Proceratosaurus for comments about the article, and Talk:Proceratosaurus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Junzi imperialis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gibbons.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the TFA, Nasutoceratops was a fascinating read! GoldRomean (talk) 02:15, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, glad you liked it! FunkMonk (talk) 02:27, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should we move or at least put a question mark in the Stenonychosaurus if the Neotype is granted and or another paper comes out going along with and even citing the latest paper on the subject? Bubblesorg (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As Darren Naish points out, this is just one paper, and we already know there are dissenters, so it will not be the last word on the issue. If scientific consensus is ever reached, then we can do something. ~~

Wait there is a Darren Naish paper? --Bubblesorg (talk) 15:29, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Way too soon for that, it was just a Facebook comment. But there are other recent papers with another group that disagree with using the name Troodon for anything but the holotype tooth. They're likely to respond. FunkMonk (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]