User talk:Auric

This is Auric's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Archives

2004-2010, 2011-2013, 2013-Apr 2015, Apr 2015-Dec 2016, Jan 2017-

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Thank you for the edit help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:AF03:E389:758D:7D12:1D44:4309 (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:18th-century BC births indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Auric. I saw your edit concerning a draft of mine, titled; Igbo (weed). You made mention of etymology and references, so I thought to ask for areas I can improve on. Thanks in anticipation 🙏 Gemini22jnr (talk) 17:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Katy Boyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks SIGCOV in independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 15:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]