Template talk:Epsom Derby

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: This is completely uncontroversial. Sure, some templates have different naming schemes than articles, but this should be consistent with the topic here. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 00:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EpsomDerby → Template:Epsom Derby – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. 203.118.164.94 (talk) 08:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - No rationale given. --Bcp67 (talk) 20:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• It is obvious. 203.118.164.94 (talk) 22:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose templates have different naming conventions than articles. No clue why this is needed. Montanabw^(talk) 23:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as uncontroversial. Per WP:TMP, "template names are easiest to remember if they follow standard English spelling, spacing, and capitalization". Not sure why this requires discussion, the oppose !votes above hold no weight. PC78 (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.