User talk:Materialscientist
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
- If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here.
- I turned off most notifications in my preferences, and therefore can't see pings, sorry.
- New messages go at the bottom.
Thoughts on an ANI section
[edit]You might be able to help us out here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
If U don't mind…
[edit]June 21 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) June 22 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) June 28 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) October 6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Those pages have been semi-protected more than a year ago, two of which were by you, with an indefinite expiration time. Can their settings be downgraded to indefinite WP:PCPP from now onwards and let's see how things go?197.19.166.10 (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2025 (UTC) NB: Whatever you do, please don't modify the move-protection settings.
A barnstar for you!
[edit] | The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for all your help combatting that spammer just now. Gommeh 🎮 15:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC) |
Symbolic Depiction of Abbas ibn Ali in Removed Artwork
[edit]I’d like to respectfully clarify the rationale behind the faceless depiction of Abbas ibn Ali in the removed artwork. The image was intentionally designed without eyes or detailed facial features to align with Shia Islamic visual ethics, which generally discourage fully illustrating the faces of sacred figures—especially members of the Ahl al-Bayt. The artist, Muntadher Saleh (a Shia polymath and visual artist), follows this tradition, using symbolism over realism. The absence of facial details is not a flaw but a deliberate choice to reflect spiritual transcendence, inviting viewers to connect with the divine virtues Abbas represents—loyalty, courage, and sacrifice—rather than his physical traits. This style is commonly used in respectful religious art within Shia communities. It avoids anthropomorphizing revered figures while still honoring their memory. In this context, the facelessness is what adds reverence, not ambiguity. Therefore, I kindly suggest that the image be reconsidered for inclusion. It is culturally and religiously appropriate, and it adds a valuable visual and interpretive dimension to the article, especially from the Shia perspective. Thank you for your consideration. 004bvan (talk) 06:03, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Page Review
[edit]Draft:Farhan Ul Arshad Zona2 (talk) 08:30, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Problem IP
[edit]Coming from this, they restored their unsourced version and added similar in other articles. I've reverted one of their edits, POV-change of source quote [1]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2025 (UTC)