User talk:Annh07

Archives (Index)

2024/February 2024/March 2024/May

The Italians ,the defeat,resisters.The liberation of the concentration camps Mosa2121 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mosa2121. What do you want to discuss? If you want to add content to the article again, please provide a reliable source. In addition, you should not copy text from elsewhere (most sources are copyrighted materials). Please review the policies and guidelines on your talk page. If you need help, please post a question at Tea house. Annh07 (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your report. You mentioned block evasion. What other addresses or accounts are involved? Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jake Wartenberg. You can see Gulab Chand Kataria's page history, many IPs have been blocked for similar behavior. I also requested temporary page protection. Annh07 (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi-protected the page. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. They made too many worthless edits, causing the history of the article to become unnecessarily bloated. Annh07 (talk) 18:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit regarding the movie? "Link spam" does not explain it. The link was not an advertisement. Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Maurice Magnus. That link was posted by an editor with a conflict of interest: ExhibitionOnScreen – they based their username on Exhibition On Screen (see the about page on their website). They spammed their site in many articles. You should also visit their talk page to see the discussions. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 12:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I reposted it independently of that person. I have no conflict of interest. Maurice Magnus (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you can restore the content because you have no conflict of interest. However, if you can find a better and more independent source, you should replace it. Annh07 (talk) 12:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it and added a link to an independent source, namely a review in The Guardian. But I see no reason to delete the official source. Of course, it promotes the film, but it also contains information about it. Maurice Magnus (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I had recently added a website as a reference to the Black ops 6 Wikipedia page under marketing and you seemed to revert the page giving the reason "not needed". I apologize if I find it unclear as to the reason why you reverted as I am new to Wikipedia editing. But I think the website could be needed if people would like to preview the marketing material used. I do understand that the website could possibly be a temporary website. TheOminousBlade (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TheOminousBlade. Your edit is not adding a reference, you are actually just providing an external link to a website as a reference. The purpose of references is to help readers verify the content in the article – what is stated in the article must be cited from reliable published sources (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). When adding references, you must provide a specific link to the page containing the source material, not just a link to its home page, which is not helpful to the reader because they need to verify information, not learning about that website. I encourage you to read Help:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia:Citing sources. Happy editing! Annh07 (talk) 21:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake in my previous edit I've changed it 102.89.22.46 (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have not cited reliable sources, see WP:PROVEIT. If you don't know how to do that, see WP:INCITE. Annh07 (talk) 18:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have create an article on Paruvu.

This is a Telugu language show. Features rather well known actors and is being promoted by some of the biggest names in the industry. It is generating lot of newsprint.

Request you to have a look if possible and suggest changes I could make to make the page better.

Thank you Filmy World (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Filmyworldwiki. I have reviewed your article. You got a good start, but expanding the article and adding a few sources when possible is suggested. After the movie is released, you will probably have more info to add to the article. Happy editing! Annh07 (talk) 18:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

.. Someonemadd (talk) 10:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Someonemadd, you should make useful edits instead of vandalizing articles. Annh07 (talk) 10:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man when it comes to slimani the word i added means great in my language, concerning Mahrez and didine it's memes, mind your business bruh, they ain't even from your country 41.97.108.28 (talk) 10:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's plenty to do, and instead of engaging in disruptive actions, it would be much more helpful to improve our project instead of vandalizing it. Annh07 (talk) 10:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just curiosity, where are you from? Someonemadd (talk) 11:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Annh07, I hope you are doing well. Review the article Blaise Ffrench. Thanks in advance. Laurengoldstreet (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Laurengoldstreet. I have reviewed your article. It looks like a very good start. Thanks for your contributions. Annh07 (talk) 11:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failed verification: In the career section, there is a paragraph that says "and has since worked with notable players such as James Harden, Kristaps Porzingis, Donovan Mitchell, Kyle O'Quinn, and WNBA player Skylar Diggins-Smith". I didn't see this mentioned in the source so I removed it. Annh07 (talk) 13:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Explain this revert please.

You may check that if you go to Special:Edit/1 and try to use this code there:

{{subst:Link current revision|1}} {{subst:REVISIONID:1}} 

– it indeed won't work correctly. Jack who built the house (talk) 09:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JWBTH. It certainly doesn't work on the page "1" itself, however it will create a link to Special:PermanentLink. The previous note was more complete but probably should have changed "the previous revision" to "Special:PermanentLink". Annh07 (talk) 10:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

however it will create a link to Special:PermanentLink
...which is absolutely useless and amounts to the template not working. We should make that clear to the user. Jack who built the house (talk) 11:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. You can add that to the note, but don't remove the previous note because it's still useful. Annh07 (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]