User talk:Ajf773

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ajf773. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Yashovardhan (talk) 11:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajf773! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Flame 1324 (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 15, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of bus routes in London, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 10:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 70, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheviot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The correct order for sections at the end of an article is:

• See also
• References
• External links

Thanks. Schwede66 02:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, will continue as per that Ajf773 (talk) 02:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 44, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inglewood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles can be given a quality rating, and the lowest rank is stub. Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/Assessment is of relevance to WikiProject New Zealand. When the class of an article is 'stub' as recorded on its talk page, a tag can be added to the article page that puts it into one or more types of stub category. I've just reassessed Colombo Street from start class (i.e. the second lowest rating) to C class (the third lowest rating). If you ever get into rating articles, it's important to remove stub tags from the article when it gets rated as something better than stub class. Please ping me if you have questions. Schwede66 03:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I have noticed with your recent edits to Top Ryde City and Birkenhead Point Outlet Centre you have removed a whole heading and paragraph containing useful information, please do not remove any of the information or else you could be blocked. Please ping me if you have questions. BugMenn(talk) 03:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided links to official TFL spider maps and the Abellio London website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawsj123 (talk • contribs) 20:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on. Are you sure that what you're doing is correct? Akld guy (talk) 07:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Let's discuss this first. I have only made edits to Ellerslie Railway Station and Puhinui Railway Station. My reasoning is due to the fact the services terminate at Papakura Railway Station ever since the full roll out of EMUs last year, with a diesel shuttle connecting Papakura to Pukekohe Railway Station. This is noted in in the most recent resources from AT. I'll hold off any edits or reverts for now until we can agree on something.(Ajf773 (talk) 07:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Specifically which of the EL rules do you think my revision contravened?Johnragla (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• External links are best used as a third party source specifically relating to the article in question. As a matter of good faith I chose to undo the edit. The first reference regarding AADT was fine, but could be better used as referring to content. I have just added content to the article using the reference but instead referencing the AADT sheet 2011-2015 on the NZTA website rather than the historical list to make it less ambigious. The second link is just a url to a traffic delays page so WP:NOTGUIDE and the third was a reference to Facebook which is not a reliable source (but if the same content can be sourced elsewhere that may be acceptable). Ajf773 (talk) 05:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Still no answer on which EL rule I've broken. Neither can I find anything in What_Wikipedia_is_not#External_links, except it says EL shouldn't be of excessive length. Are 3 links excessive? The Facebook page gives the source - http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/content-aggregator/getIEs?system=ilsdb&id=1081104. Are you saying that and the map are unreliable? If so, why?Johnragla (talk) 08:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refer to WP:EL for external links. The quantity of external links should be limited a few that have significant connection to the article - I added the New Zealand Transport Agency as an example as this is the governing body that administers the highway. EL guidelines don't apply to links within citations. The content may be factual but the source itself is not reliable and social media sites and blogs are, more often than not, considered original research WP:NOR.
• I still don't understand why you say that the "content may be factual", when it's a map on the National Library website. Are you suggesting the National Library makes up maps which aren't factual? If so, what's your evidence?Johnragla (talk) 08:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The original link you had supplied referred to facebook/social media. The second link refers to the National Library website. The difference here is where the content was sourced - the latter is reliable, the former is not. Ajf773 (talk) 08:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• But the latter refers to the former, so at what point and how does it lose reliability? It's just that the Facebook link is easier for most people to follow, since the National Library website is structured in a way that requires 4 steps to reach the result shown on the Facebook link. I could include the Library reference and a long explanation of how to get to the relevant part. Is that what you're suggesting?Johnragla (talk) 08:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It doesn't appear that way to me. Looks fine to use the source you just posted. When you cite links correctly it will display a title rather than the url WP:CITEHOW Ajf773 (talk) 08:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• hope i've followed your instructions. still seems to me to be better as it was, but at least the link's there.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 62, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Main North Line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your revisions regarding Public transport in Hamilton and Waikato specifically the 'Bicycle ban' section which claims Hamilton has been the largest city not to carry bicycles on any of its public transport. No reference specifically verifying this statement has yet been cited. Multiple references relating to transport in other cities (Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch) are references to their own respective transport systems (but not those in Hamilton and Waikato). A reference to city populations from the New Zealand census does not state anything about bicycles on public transport. It is not immediately distinguishable to the reader and remains trivial and ambiguous.

If you can find a single source which clearly states that Hamilton has been the largest city not to carry bicycles on any of its public transport, then I'll be happy to allow it to remain. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article's talk page seems a more appropriate place to resolve Edit Wars, not continued use of the undo button.Johnragla (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have warned the above IP to stop making disruptive edits to New Zealand articles, in particular the changing of dates from dmy to mdy (the American format). I notice that you have also expressed dissatisfaction with the IP. See his Talk page for a recent warning by another editor. Akld guy (talk) 20:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How can you make a reference and put a link on it? I left on the summary because I was hoping someone could do it for me. Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 13:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015[reply]

Also here is the source http://allaboutcancun.com/about-cancun/travel-tips/faq/ Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015[reply]

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web has instructions on how to use the cite web template. If it were me, I'd lay it out like this:"All About Cancun - Frequently Asked Questions". Retrieved 12 July 2016. (see the edited code). This website appears to be exclusively for the Mexican state of Quintana Roo which may differ from the rest of Mexico (although the entire country has 18 as its MDA). Ajf773 (talk) 19:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am surprised that you made such a suggestion. Anyway, just letting you know that I have relayed why I believe they deserve to be separate articles on the talk page. Cheers. JaumeBG (talk) 11:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you previously contributed to a deletion discussion for London bus route 99, another similar deletion discussion is ongoing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53 which you may wish to give your input on.

Note: I've placed (or am in the process of placing) this notification on the talk page of anyone who took part in the original deletion discussion, as the most recent similar discussion, regardless of deletion preference, which is allowable under WP:CANVASS. The only exception being if that person has already contributed, or has indicated on their profile that they are inactive.

Thanks for your time. Jeni ^(talk) 10:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, thought I could explain better here. The last edits were very detailed on the features and venues, but were highly promotional. Since they're gone, I thought having that link there would interest people who were into that sort of stuff... like architecture and technology... like me... I do enjoy that page... I often don't even think to look at a page on Wikipedia unless it's hyperlinked... even if you think it's useless... :) E ribbon toner (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The article is self explanatory and the 'see also' heading to the generic article is unnecessary. A better way to format it would be as follows:

Event Cinemas have over fifty movie theatre venues around Australia, many located in large shopping centres. The cinema complexes comprise multiple screens.

Read WP:ALSO for the manual of style relating to the content.

I totally get it now, you're completely right! Thanks for this. :) E ribbon toner (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://deepwhale.com Appealing for volunteers, I'm trying to create the world's shopping and dining directory.

Go in, add a few directories. It will take just a few minutes.

Some of the Singapore shopping directories I've added: VivoCity: http://www.deepwhale.com/index.php/VivoCity,_Singapore Jurong Point: http://www.deepwhale.com/index.php/Jurong_Point_Shopping_Centre,_Singapore Ang Mo Kio Hub: http://www.deepwhale.com/index.php/Ang_Mo_Kio_Hub,_Singapore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinseah (talk • contribs) 12:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Apologies for originally posting this in the wrong place. Thank you for your correction. I trust this is correct?

With respect to your recent reversion of my edit, I have added a section to Visa requirements for New Zealand citizens talk page.

Kwutchak (talk) 10:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to get IP 27.252.145.37 blocked for a month at WP:ANI today. See here. Disruptive editing at Onehunga Branch, Pak'nSave, and others. I see you once warned him, so thought you might appreciate the good news. Akld guy (talk) 02:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Glad to have that nuisance IP blocked. Guessing it will only be a matter of time before they are back. Cheers for the heads up. Ajf773 (talk) 03:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing that duplicate reference at Phil Goff. It wasn't an oversight on my part BTW, it was due to an edit conflict and by coincidence we used the same reference. Akld guy (talk) 01:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't miss anything. I was editing at the same time as you but you posted first, so when I posted a few minutes later, there was an edit conflict. I reposted and found that by coincidence I had used the same Herald reference that you had. By then I was too distracted by other matters to edit out your cite. Akld guy (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Wadestown, New Zealand

added links pointing to Wellington College and Wellington High School

Bill Ralston

added a link pointing to Mike Lee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ajf773! I notice your campaign against mention of retailers in Underwood, Queensland. However, if you look around, you will see it is common practice to mention retailers (and particularly notable restailers) in suburb articles (there's often not a lot else to say in them!). You keep saying that Wikipedia is not a retail directory; however, I am not aware of this as one of Wikipedia's policies. While WP:NOTDIR prohibits providing great detail, it does not prohibit mention. Listing their addresses, phone numbers and opening hours etc would be going too far, but I don't think saying something like:

Nowheresville has a Coles, a Kentucky Fried Chicken and a hot bread kitchen.

is a problem. If anything, it gives a pretty clear indication of the kind of place it is by the retailers active there.

The other thing to note is that this kind of content is often provided by new contributors in which case WP:NOBITE applies. We should always think twice before removing good faith content provided by new contributors.

I really don't see the harm in short lists of this kind of content, particularly in articles where there isn't a whole lot else to say about the place. Kerry (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kerry. I don't have any issue with mentioning retailers if there is a special claim to fame (and can be verified with third party sources) or a very limited inclusion criteria (such as anchors in a shopping centre) but mentioning a retailer in geographic area , just because it exists, isn't enough reason for inclusion in my opinion. Because of the changing nature of commercial activity in areas, content goes out of date fast, and such become a harvest for new and inexperienced users to keep adding content leading eventually to spam. Yes WP:NOTDIR covers this (and the policy is not exclusive to phone numbers and addresses) also potentially they can infringe WP:NOTADVERT, WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTRAVEL. More notably the other more important matter is that there are often completely unsourced, as was also the case in this particular article.

I don't believe lists like this are commonplace in articles and I am observing more of an effort to clean these up rather than retain them. Ajf773 (talk) 04:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers re the edits on Micropub - the whole article needs a bit of a tidyup and I think some of it has been copied in from elsewhere. Crookesmoor (talk) 12:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The change you just undid in Places of worship in Bangalore was done by IP address = 157.49.164.149, not me. User:Pratyk321 (talk)

@Pratyk321. Correct. Sorry if you inferred differently but the edit by the IP was reverted back to the previous version which was your latest.Ajf773 (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Māori Television page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Class455 (talk) 23:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Please comment at this articles for deletion discussion. Thanks, 103.6.159.72 (talk) 10:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of businesses in Omaha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of businesses in Omaha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thryduulf (talk) 10:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not really seeing why you removed material that had been present for several years. What makes the removed material "enrolment guidey"?

You have left it very difficult to understand what being split into houses means. Information on subjects offered is, for instance, present in AGS's article. Information on school blocks, whilst interesting, is perhaps extraneous whereas the rest is sort of critical to understanding the nature of the school.

Clearly, however, you are more familiar with Wikipedia editing than myself, which is why your changes, as yet, have not been undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vonvorx (talk • contribs) 08:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let me put it to you simply by saying Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a guide. We don't indiscriminant pages of content to school articles that has no encyclopedic value and serves more of a guide for enrolling students into the school. See WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:SCHOOLCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 07:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may find it helpful in future to avoid mistaking repeating assertions for answering questions. This is particularly discourteous when the questions include actual reasons.

In terms of schoolcruft, a crufty name btw, there is little sign of that either. There was the stuff about blocks but if you'll notice, I agreed this was extraneous. And the wifi. That can stay gone, I guess? But why does noting that the school offers standard subjects amount to cruftiness? If an article doesn't discuss, briefly, whether a school uses NCEA/IB/CIE I think we've absolutely failed to provide a description of the school. Similarly, it may make sense to you or I what a house is but this is not always going to be true (consider the NCEA talk page question about credits). Due to your unexplained decisions about what is enrolment guide-like (after years of edits, including by experienced Wikipedians) both of these important facets are now not present. So, I repeat why should this be the case? (Which means, specifically, what is it about these facets that makes them crufty?)

In truth, thanks to you, we should be renaming this article "Staff of Rosehill College" because there is more about the principals now than such basic things as whether or not the school has a uniform or not! In short, [citation needed] better described the majority of the problems (i.e. excluding blocks, wifi) rather than blanket removal. Unless, of course, there is some compellingly enrolment guidey character I did not see first time around and have not been assisted in seeing despite enquiring. (Unless, of course, we should go through presumably ever school article in NZ and remove information about their zones, which is obviously actually guidelike.)

Vonvorx (talk) 12:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

when i saw it was being moved to 'list of restaurant of australia', instead of reverting - I changed to 'list of resturants of australia', to fit my knowledge of english usage, so it is an unresolved mess - as the lead sentence refers to the original title which is more appropriate

JarrahTree 13:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I had noticed the article had been renamed for some unknown reason so thanks for fixing it. Ajf773 (talk) 17:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you reverted my edit on the 51st New Zealand Parliament page with the comment that the change should wait until after the Mount Albert by-election. I stand by my original statement, however - Labour currently has only 31 seats as Mount Albert is vacant and held by no party. If a vote were to be called, Labour would only have 31 votes - not the 32 proportionality would entitle it to. If Labour wins the election, this (obviously) would revert to 32 seats. If this makes sense to you, I think my edit should be re-instated. What do you think? Cheers —tdltrombonator 11:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• We didn't do the same when Phil Goff resigned and forced the Mount Roskill by-election, 2016 so I don't think it's necessary in this instance. Ajf773 (talk) 11:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doing something one way one time doesn't mean it's best practice. As per the Parliament website, Labour only has 31 seats. For accuracy, I think we should update the article to reflect this, and amend it after the by-election is over for whichever party/candidate wins. —tdltrombonator 12:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. Perhaps add a note pending the result of the by-election. Ajf773 (talk) 12:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reconsidering. I think that adding a note as you suggest pre-guesses the result of the by-election, so I won't be that explicit. —tdltrombonator 12:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as fas as I can see the external links in the above article are neither excessive nor inappropriate, and they are in footnotes. What would you change? Cheers, Drahtlos (talk) 13:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi @Drahtlos. I suggest we deal to the external links by removing them all. Some may be suitable to be converted to a citation, others we should leave unlinked and develop a list inclusion criteria for the article to decide whether or not to include them long-term. Ajf773 (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Regarding the difference between Clendon and Clendon Park, on the Auckland Council site, Google maps, and a map of Manukau & Howick Wards Post Codes, the area is referred to as Clendon Park. I am not finding official use of Clendon as the suburb. So, I reverted the version of Clendon to the redirect to Clendon Park. If I am missing something and you have sources that state that the official name is Clendon, though, please let me know.

By the way, I have added citations to the Clendon Park article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @CaroleHenson Appreciate this. The redirects for the Clendon article were from an IP user who has a high history of disruptive editing (across multiple IPs). Very seldom do they get it right. I am satisfied with your response and affirmation that the redirect is suitable. Ajf773 (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Youstruck out a comnent because the editor was trying to post two. Do you not think [[1]] is the same person as [[2]]? I have no evidence. Just that they both are for keeping it and the former has only on edit, suggesting an IP hopping. Although, I don't want to accuse wihout certainty. 2600:1:F18E:779D:2961:E106:9A9D:7391 (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has all the hallmarks of IP hopping which I have noted down to assist in the outcome of the AfD. Ajf773 (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And concerning the article, the orginal creator [[3]] has been blocked indefinatly.

And the article really is questionable. Don't get me wrong. Blue's Clues was also a part of my childhood and I can understand why old fans should want such honors. However, Wikipedia is not for honoring third parties. I do feel Daniel was in the right and that few people second him so that he is forced to put up with the editors whose only obivious purpose for retaining the article is too honor the show, as is quite obivious from one ip's mention of the list of Dora videos (apparently a sign of understandable jealousy). So, in my opinion, Daniel's suggestions are in the right and should be followed redirecting or deleting the page. What do you think? 2600:1:F18E:779D:2961:E106:9A9D:7391 (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I support DanielRigal's reasons to nominate the article for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of neoprohibitionism is that the government will implement seemingly non-prohibition alcohol regulations which have the side effect of reducing the demand for alcohol. In Mike Baird's case, the lockout laws placed severe regulations on the operations of bars in the city. The bars could not survive with such regulations, which was the real intent of the regulations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.200.3.66 (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits were reverted because they were not written from a neutral point of view. Please familiarise yourself with WP:NPOV instead of perpetrating pointless edit warring. Ajf773 (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have deprodded Gaisano Capital Kalibo, as it was prodded back in 2009 and is therefore permanently ineligible for another prod nomination. If you still wish to pursue deletion, please open an AfD discussion. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:56, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I would like you to retrieve the page HOPES Diagnostic Laboratory so that i can improve the article to make it suitable according to wikipedia's rule book. Thank You. Muhammad Wamiq 20:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wamiq Husnain (talk • contribs)

• Hi @Muhammad Wamiq . You should visit Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion and make a request for undeletion or to userfy the content, I am unable to do so, cheers. Ajf773 (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cycling_in_Sydney. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Note, I have not removed your edits for now, but plan to do so soon. I created this page and have been maintaining it for 9 years. Being an active cyclist in Sydney, I feel I have a good understanding of what makes for appropriate citations in this topic and should be allowed to publish them . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teraplane (talk • contribs) 02:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• This ridiculous warning was posted by an editor with less than 500 edits to their name, angry at me for reverting edits under the WP:NOT policy just because as they were the creator of Cycling in Sydney they believed they were entitled to add whatever they liked! Ajf773 (talk) 11:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• It's worth reading through Talk:Cycling_in_Sydney to get a more complete version of what happened here. I accepted that many of the links were of a promotional nature. I noted this and was happy to for their removal. But there were other important links, form community based web sites (not for profits) where much of the info on this page was discussed further. While Ajf773 defined all these as WP:NOT, I pointed out they could also be classed as WP:ELMAYBE or several other acceptable categories. My main concern was that useful content were being removed without any discussion in the Talk page. From the above discussions, this has happened on several other pages. I suggest it's best to notify authors and maintainers who can then provide a wider context to the reason for specific links and other info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teraplane (talk • contribs) 01:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't need to discuss in talk if I see external links that clearly don't belong in an article. Willing to consider them as cited references though. Ajf773 (talk) 06:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No caps for "railway station"? Most other articles have caps. Akld guy (talk) 07:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Really? Does Hamilton railway station, New South Wales, Hamilton railway station, Victoria or Hamilton railway station (Ontario). Ajf773 (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The vast majority of stations in Auckland and a few I've checked in the North Island have caps. You stated as reference that you were following NZ convention, not NSW, Vic, or Ontario. Akld guy (talk) 07:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • There's no mention of capitalisation in that article. Does it matter? Change it, I don't really care. Ajf773 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks again for your contributions here. I've gone ahead with the merge/redirect. If you feel that the redirect page isn't warranted (and I'm inclined to agree that the subject's notability is questionable as a standalone 'thing'), then I'll open the RFD myself. Otherwise it's a 'cheap' solution. Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 23:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• All good. Cheers. Ajf773 (talk) 02:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please tell me. what is the problem in my wikipedia artical. P&M Hi-Tech City Centre Mall Bivash Maji (talk) 09:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The reasoning is explained in the edit summaries I made. Ajf773 (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Back in February 2017, you had flagged this article as having content that is written like an advertisement: Norwest Venture Partners

I have recently made edits to the page that hopefully correct the issue. Could you take a look and see if the issues are corrected, or if not, suggest (or make) any still-needed edits? And then, thank you for considering removing the flag if appropriate.

Thank you! Martyr2566 (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Recently you removed a listing for software company Meta SaaS located in Austin, TX for non-notability. I discovered this company via an in depth article on Venture Beat https://venturebeat.com/2017/05/24/mark-cuban-leads-1-5-million-round-in-saas-management-tool-meta-saas/ and further found in depth articles on the Business Journal's web site. These articles do not appear to be self promotional or press releases. The standard for company or organizational notability seems to be met by the definitions laid out on Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies). I certainly do not want to get into a wikiargument but it appears that the company meets the criteria for notability and should be returned to the listing. Before I do that though I welcome your feedback as there are numerous other companies in the Austin area I intend to add. Chatterboxer (talk) 01:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The list criteria is for companies which have Wikipedia articles (blue-links). If it has an article it may be added. Ajf773 (talk) 08:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I would like to ask for your help to retrieve an article you had tagged for deletion, Vista Land & Lifescapes. It is a publicly listed company and would rather have the article revised by the community to be compliant of the standards instead of being hastily deleted, as it was already there for a year and I have thought that it was okay. Thank you. Vortex Editor (talk) 08:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not able to do that myself, but you can make a request for undeletion via here: Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Ajf773 (talk) 08:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You recently expressed views on the AFD for Parabanks Shopping Centre that was closed with no consensus. I have renominated that article for deletion as someone who was not involved with the original AFD, and would like to invite you to express/re-express any views you may have. You can find the new AFD here   «l|Promethean|l»  (talk) 11:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to know why you are undoing my bus fleet table that I have added to the Newcastle Transport page. I see you have never had any previous history on this page before and I would like to know what your reasoning is for undoing it. Is there an issue with it? If the issue is with pictures I'm working on it but I have worked on the Newcastle Transport page previously before without any troubles and if you think I'm a untrusted person then you have me wrong. I'm happy to provide information that I'm contributing the page and not adding fake or useless information. Finally I don't see any problem with adding a fleet table as I've seen plenty of other Bus company pages that have their fleet listed in a table. Please respond with a good reason as to why you are removing something I've spent the day working hard on as I don't find it fair my changes my changes are being reverted. Thanks Volgren User (talk) 10:25, 30th December 2017 (AEDT)

• @Volgren: I removed your edits because they appear to be original research. You provided a link to what appears to be a bus enthusiasts fansite, self published sources are not reliable sources. Furthermore, just because other articles include them doesn't automatically apply to others. Many of these other tables end up being removed as well. See WP:FANCRUFT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ajf773 (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays
	Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 01:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of schools in Kollam district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paravur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Zilla Schools of Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zilla School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hwllo Ajf773! I'm Trevor, a product manager at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm investigating a bug report for a new feature we worked on, and I think you could help. Today you made this revert which triggered an edit summary notification. We want reverts to not trigger these notifications and are trying to track down what triggered this.

What tool did you use to perform this rollback? Twinkle, the tool on the history page? something else? Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated! Thank you. — Trevor Bolliger, WMF Product Manager (t) 22:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Afj773. I suspect Special:Diff/832474453 also pinged the user in the edit summary. Would you mind telling us what software you're using? We can see that it is updated to not ping anymore. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TBolliger (WMF): @MusikAnimal:. Not using any software. Any rollbacks I do are restoring old revisions. Ajf773 (talk) 17:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So are you manually typing in the edit summaries, "Reverted N edits to previous/last good version by..."? I see Special:Diff/832474453 is not tagged as Undo or Rollback, and you do not have the rollback right. If you are typing the summaries in manually, this is completely fine, but just note that [[User:Foo]] will ping User:Foo. You can avoid this by simply prefixing a colon, like [[:User:Foo]]. Cheers — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try that from now on. Ajf773 (talk) 19:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you giving me a massage in my talk page. According to you I want to own the article List of programmes broadcast by Discovery Kids (India) as mine. But please listen, I do not want to do such. In the previous history of the page, you deleted the section of movies giving a summary that the page does not need the movies that has ever appeared. But they have appeared there with many repeats. And what would an encyclopedia help if most of information is not provided. Such as, if anyone want to find a movie on that channel he wil not find about it. So I reverted your edit. You can lend me if I have any misunderstanding or mistake. But please talk over the issue. User:AnkurHow ^(talk) 1:43 PM, 10 April 2018(UTC)

• The list of movies was removed because movies are not regular nor original programming on television networks. As you are the creator you should be aware anyone can edit the article and you should give constructive reasons for your edits, as I have done but you haven't. Ajf773 (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Ajf773, I understood your words. Thank You

User:AnkurHow ^(talk) 1:29 AM, 11 April 2018(UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from The Moment (New Zealand TV series), which you proposed for deletion. While you nominatated the series for deletion under the 'Notability' criteria, the programme indeed meets these, as the programme was broadcast on a national broadcast network, owned by the national broadcaster TVNZ. The channel itself is one of the highest rating channels in the country, and the series was seen by a high percentage of the population. Local programming for New Zealand is important and is worthy of documentation.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Tvtalknew (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The List of YouTubers is being nominated for deletion again. I don't know why. It's been nominated so many damn times. Take a look here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 00:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for concurring with me at Wikipedia: Articles for Deletion that having an article "List of bonsai on stamps" represents original research. Vorbee (talk) 19:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you suggest bundling all of these in an AfD?

• • Mossi states
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Gwiriko
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Liptako
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Tenkodogo
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Wogodogo
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Yatenga
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Bilanga
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Bilayanga
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Bongandini
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Con
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Kuala
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Macakoali
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Nungu
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Piela

Enigma^msg 19:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree, bundle the lot and nominate for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • That was brutal. I finally finished nominating everything. It took 15-20 minutes. Enigma^msg 20:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Last time I'll do an AfD bundle. Takes forever and it all for naught as they're going to be kept. Enigma^msg 04:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You had voted in the deletion request for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of plants of The Edge Chronicles. You might be interested in other deletion requests on the same subject:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Edge Chronicles characters
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Galerider
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Ship,
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Pilot

--Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have participated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foods by calorie. Therefore, you might be interested in the following AFD involving lists of food Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of breakfast drinks (2nd nomination) --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schwede66 is now persistently deleting the disambiguation hatnote at the article above. Since you took part in the recent discussion, recommending disambiguation, you may wish to comment on the mattter on its [4] talkpage. Sweetpool50 (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the revert, I forgot to clear up all the unsourced lists of buscruft; some of them are okay, but people just keep putting random ones in without noticing and it ends up with a giant jumble. Anyway, hopefully now it's trimmed to a reasonable size. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I created the above article today and already an editor has changed it to Panuku Development Auckland. What are your thoughts on restoring it to Panuku, as per WP:COMMONNAME? Akld guy (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I would assume that Panuku Regional Development is the formal name (according to Auckland Council sources) although I don't see Panuku being used in anywhere else so it could be acceptable for the article, at the very least a redirect. Ajf773 (talk) 08:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided to leave it as it is. The article is linked to by about 9 other articles, all of which already used the full name Panuku Development Auckland, and some changed from red links to blue automatically. It was a trivial matter to link the others rather than piping Panuku with the "|" character, so perhaps it simply is best as it is. I haven't looked but there should already be a redirect from Panuku because of the Move. Thanks for taking the time to reply. Akld guy (talk) 20:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, just confirmed that the redirect works. Akld guy (talk) 20:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for an engaging and respectful discussion. It is very much appreciated. YBG (talk) 07:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did some looking around and found Category:Lists of churches in England, which has a number of articles with the same basis as the Lisburn list but with fleshed out tables and such about the churches. I'm of the opinion that these are still just directories with neither most of the contents nor the indiscriminate lists themselves being notable. Most of them were also created by the same user, so I don't believe there is a consensus for these sorts of lists to be there. Reywas92^Talk 21:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you said those ware not serial numbers means, then what.? just go and see malayalam movies list 2018 or some other years. in one year we cant count, how much of movies released in tamil movies wikipedia list. thats why i added a serial numbers. kindly add serial numbers for the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VigneshVijayaRaj (talk • contribs) 18:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• All other List of Tamil films of do not have these. They do no serve any purpose and are horrible to maintain. Please do not add them. Ajf773 (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE KINDLY SEE THIS WIKIPEDIA PAGE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Malayalam_films_of_2019 LIKE THIS I WANT SERIAL NUMBERS FOR THE LIST OF RELEASED MOVIES NUMBERS.

• Well, I don't. Discuss it on the relevant talk page if it is an issue. Ajf773 (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You voted to delete this list during the AfD. I am now editing it and would like your opinion on how to make it better. Thanks Aurornisxui (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all the red linked entries and separate whatever is left into geographical regions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So is that the reason why all the past flavours got removed last year due to the new wiki guidlines ir something?

Like the new limited flavours. Or the new permament tropical sugar free flavour thats here to stay. And the perament iced coffee,mocha,chocolate thats part of the v family main flavours like blue and normal?

Sheld999 (talk) 04:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply] 

please explain the reason you are continuosly and arbitrarly removing frrebird charter service from Malpensa Airport page

• It's a charter service, not generally accepted in the scope of WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT
• It's a future route using a holiday booking website as a reference - spam. Ajf773 (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajf773 :

• charters are widely included in airport pages, heavily listed in Malpensa page (and punctually updated), why this have to be different?
• Sources clearly states when and how this service will take place. I also gave multiple sources. The fact that they are "holiday booking websites" do not undervalue their effect and, for sure, are NOT spam.

Your arguments are INCONSISTENT. Evaluate to restore the edit (you can, of course, add additional and/or more meaningfull sources)

• To be consistent the rest of the charter flights should be removed. They are not routine services and should not be included. The Wikiproject group made this consensus.
• Holiday booking sites are spamlinks. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Ajf773 (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajf773 : The rest of the charter flights listed in Milan Malpensa airport are ALL PROPERLY, TIMELY and VERIFIEDLY referenced. It is NOT forbidden to list charters services as per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT unless they are private, ad-hoc (one per time) or irregular (and none of the prevoius is the case of freebird to Bodrum).

• I'm looking at some of those sources and they are questionable. Some of the links don't even work. Also do bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a directory and there is no obligation to even have these destination lists. It's a general consensus that routes which operate so sporadically should not be included. Same goes with future routes (ones that are not operational at the present time). Ajf773 (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are some possible typos in this [5] which I am not sure how to address. Probably best if you do so. "by proving detailed" and "perfectly find".SovalValtos (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, now fixed up. Note to self not to rush AfD's, they take time to do right! Ajf773 (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.116.57 (talk) 08:06, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Excuse me but who are you? Ajf773 (talk) 08:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I've been here for 11 years without an account so it will remain that way. By the way accusations of sockpuppetry are considered disruptive. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.116.57 (talk) 08:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• For someone who has only began editing using this IP since today, and only on airport articles, I will assume you to be a sockpuppet until proven otherwise. By the way, don't serve me with notices (such as ownership of articles) without any proof of any misbehaviour. Ajf773 (talk) 08:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, it's a dynamic IP[6], so any use prior to today would be more unexpected than otherwise, all things being equal (talk page watcher) ——SerialNumber54129 08:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I fixed the source and i put instead a link to Ryanair's official website. The winter schedule is already published and people can order a flight from Nuremberg to Tel Aviv.Friends147 (talk) 21:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• A link to the official website isn't suitable enough. There needs a reference to the exact date to when the flight begins. Ajf773 (talk) 21:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But it mentioned in the website!!!!! If people can order a flight it's reliable enough!Friends147 (talk) 21:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Refer to WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. This is the consensus on how we publish future destinations. Ajf773 (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• "For future destinations, add: "(begins date service begins)" after the destination. Starting dates must be provided with full date including the year[5] and references should be provided" - I did the exact thing! A reference to the official website which you can book a flight is reliable enough. It shown that the first flight will start on October 28.Friends147 (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The official website does not provide the exact start date. If this has to be found using the airlines search engine then this is a violation of WP:SYNTH. If you can find a press release stating this, use that instead. Ajf773 (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Humair (talk) 08:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Hey Ajf773 can you please tell me how to remove page deletion from my page Amir Khan (Pakistani Anchor/Analyst Person), Please help me and delete your petition of deletion for page i am new at wikipedia learning things so please help me. i added some of the reliable sources you can check in my citation i added more please check. Thanks[reply]

The AfD notice will remain for a duration of a week and administrators will decide whether or not to delete/keep it. If I were you, I'd write on the AfD page explaining that the subject is notable and provide those sources if they can be found. Ajf773 (talk) 08:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm know You Something Joke!--CartoonLover66 (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You delete "ends" after the routes and you said that there is better source needed. You can check the dates in the timetable. There is never an info about ending routes, so to keep wikipedia on-time leave that. You know these routes are ending as shown in the timetale.

• How about you find a better source with definite end dates. No one should expect to have to trawl through timetables to verify content. Ajf773 (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you have classified RASHAYS addition to the List of Restaurants as spam and looking in my inbox, its flagged as inappropriate where you have hooters listed, even with a link to the website that has half naked women. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenslinks888 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I requested to you not deleted shivram singh inter college this article based on a college. who famous in uttarpradesh or his information on newspaper name - amar ujjala , dainik jagaran. Sir you search for on google. Sir I say sorry, because I removed you tag you set in my article sir school is not a film or movies or cartoon who evidence for notablity but I am notable person my friends is Kumar ,Sanu ARIJIT SINGH ,but you is not notable who are you to says my school is not notable your are students not student of my school, in the many students come many states of Indian come and study in my school, you are not any information for study,what is study? you do not know I am a Indian playback singer, but you not buissness you make any article and I am deleted your article and you not know any information from your article. your are deleted my article but you have not feel guilty because you did not create any article .this article is not based on any person . ,.thanks you. (talk). 5:57 am, 14 April 2019.(UTC). Mayank123456 srivastava (User talk:Mayank123456 srivastava 06: 14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

• I don't really know who you are, or care for that matter. What I did what proposed your article for deletion, not actually delete it. Ajf773 (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, will you delete my article, Residential shivram singh inter college article please do not delete it. This article is based on a school which is very famous in Uttar Pradesh, if you believe, then search on Google if you yourself .so, thank you for publishing.Sir, you will delete my article after April 20 -thanks you User:Mayank123456 srivastava 1:47 ,14 April.

Hi, i just mentioned you and said I was pinging you for reply, within Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of night buses in London (3rd nomination). But i failed to include the ping. Please do see there. I do hope you don't mind my disagreeing with you in the AFD. I do believe we would have some common ground if we talked it out more, including that I also don't terribly like a list-article to be merely a slightly outdated copy of current info available somewhere else. About the AFD, though, I think the topic of "night buses in London" is big, culturally/historically/etc., and the AFD target is a combo. It needs editing but should be kept, IMHO. --Doncram (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]