Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of viewWikipedia open wikipedia design.
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neutral point of view page. |
|The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Wikipedia. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic.|
Are you in the right place?For questions or discussions about the application of this policy to any specific article(s), please post your message at either the NPOV Noticeboard (any neutrality-related issue) or the Fringe Theories Noticeboard (undue weight given to a minority view).
|WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia|
Note: Edit history of 001-017 is in 017.
Threads older than 30 days may be archived by .
Overall reception in album ratings boxes and NPOV/Due
Input is appreciated here - Please see this discussion on how NPOV affects the selection of 10 album ratings in an album ratings box for critical reception sections, considering the overall reception of an album (negative, mixed or positive). Lapadite (talk) 06:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
New RfC that concerns NPOV policy
A new RfC has started that concerns if an old sentence at WP:NPOV_dispute accurately reflects NPOV policy, please see Wikipedia talk:NPOV dispute#RfC: POV Pushing On Talk Pages -Obsidi (talk) 14:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Is there any diplomatic policy regarding the order for enumerating 2 opponents
- Israel vs Palestine conflict - River Plate vs Boca rivalry - George Bush vs Al Gore debate
which can be found on titles, lists, rankings and infoboxes I would propose suggesting alphabetical order or oldness (when appliable) as an arbitrary principle in the NPOV policy
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 23:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)