User talk:Zach425

Note: Any user talk page I contribute to is kept on my watchlist for at least one week. Feel free to respond here or there.

Hi Zach. You're correct, strictly speaking it should be deleted, but I don't think it's worth making a fuss about if it's a re-direct. Cheers. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I saw that you turned this article, formerly a redirect, into a kind of disambiguation page/soft redirect. I think the problems raised by this article require further discussion, and have taken it to AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin M. Emanuel (3rd nomination). Your comments are welcome there. Thanks in advance. Robofish (talk) 23:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help. Please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mole#Non-moles and tell Richard what you told me. Chrisrus (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or barring that, at least look at it and see if you'd like to help in some way. Chrisrus (talk) 03:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you created this page at the wrong place, so I've moved it to Wikipedia:Abuse reports/66.4.233.x, which is correct. Luckily I recognised what the page was because I've just been involved in a discussion concerning abuse reports :). Cheers - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 22:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, not a problem :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 22:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zach425! You just fixed the {{Rfd2}} generation of stats links for multi word redirect titles by replacing {{urlencode}} with {{anchorencode}}, so with Baggy jeans, for example, we went from (stats) to (stats). Unfortunately, with S&P, for example, we went from (stats) to (stats), and nesting the encodings won't work either.

Spaces are more common than ampersands in redirect titles, so I think your change was an improvement, but I don't know how to fully fix it. (That doesn't mean there isn't an easy fix as I am not at all familiar with mediawiki.) -- ToE^T 10:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I probably should have done some more testing before making the change. Still, I agree that it's at least an improvement - instead of none of the stats links working, at least some will now work (though it seems all special characters fall into the same category as the ampersand). I'm not very familiar with mediawiki either, so I've posted a request there for the restoration of the old urlencode in some form—it was a relatively recent change that made spaces become plus signs. I'll let you know the result, but if you'd like to experiment with the template in the meantime, I've created a copy on my user page, linked at my sandbox. --Zach425 ^talk/contribs 19:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks to be working, but you wrote that you "made that replacement in {{stats.grok.se}} and added this template to {{rfd2}} instead, which gives much cleaner output", but that doesn't seem to have happened. I looks as if the {{stats.grok.se}} has gotten subst-ed into the {{rfd2}} code, making the output far from clean. Have you checked out the resulting code from a {{subst:rfd2}}? Here's one to edit and look at. -- ToE^T 06:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

====<span id=""Ron" Paul">"Ron" Paul</span>==== *{{noredirect|1 = "Ron" Paul }} → [[:Ron Paul]] ([[Special:Whatlinkshere/"Ron" Paul|links to redirect]]) ({{#ifeq:|true|<span class="plainlinks">|}}[http://stats.grok.se/{{CONTENTLANG}}/{{#if:|{{{year}}}{{0expr|}}|{{#if:|{{#ifexpr:{{{month}}}>{{CURRENTMONTH}}|{{#expr:{{CURRENTYEAR}}-1}}|{{CURRENTYEAR}}}}{{0expr|{{{month}}}}}|{{#ifexpr:({{CURRENTMONTH}}-1)>0|{{CURRENTYEAR}}{{0expr|{{CURRENTMONTH}}-1}}|{{#expr:{{CURRENTYEAR}}-1}}12}}}}}}/{{FULLPAGENAMEE:"Ron" Paul}} stats]{{#if:stats|| to {{#if:"Ron" Paul|''[[:{{CONTENTLANG}}:"Ron" Paul|"Ron" Paul]]''|this page}} {{#if:|during {{#if:|{{MONTHNAME|{{{month}}}}}}} {{{year}}}|{{#if:|during {{MONTHNAME|{{{month}}}}}|last month}}}}{{#if:|{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{lang}}}}}|{{lc:{{CONTENTLANG}}}}|| on the [[:{{{lang}}}:Main Page|{{ISO 639 name {{lc:{{{lang}}}}}}}-language Wikipedia]]}}}}.}}{{#ifeq:|true|</span>|}}) Join the "ReLOVEution". [[User:Thinking of England|ToE]]<sup>[[User talk:Thinking of England|T]]</sup> 06:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC) 

Besides the 10 lines of code, I chose this example to show how stats.grok.se chokes a bit from the quotes. Your link works as well as if we'd typed the title in and ran the query ourselves, but stats.grok.se leaves the title box empty and links to the front page instead of the article. You do still get the stats, at least. -- ToE^T 06:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you need to double subst it somehow, so that all that date code gets evaluated. If that can't be done, I don't see that having the date change would be all that bad. -- ToE^T 07:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Woof[edit]

Congratulations, I think you've done it. You might as well soup up {{Rfd2m}} as well. I noticed an earlier versions showing the previous month. Did you drop that due to the complexity?

I'm glad you seemed interested in the Jeans/Baggy jeans traffic anomaly. True nerds are blissfully oblivious to their social ineptitude, but had it not been for you pointing out the other blips in the data, I'd have felt that I was carrying on too long in an inappropriate forum. -- ToE^T 14:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I've changed it to the month prior. I've also updated {{rfd2m}} and created a brief documentation file for it - hopefully there won't be any bugs.

As for the traffic anomaly, those are always very interesting. They can be severe time drains for Wikipedian nerds, though... --Zach425 ^talk/contribs 21:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that ... the urlencode issue had me stumped and I had just left it ... great work! --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 07:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zach, I just wanted to let you know that I approved the report that you just filed at Abuse Response and it should be investigated shortly. While there appears to only be 4 block notices on the talk page it was actually blocked 6 times (with the most recent being in March for 6 months.

I was also interested in wondering if you had any issues filing the report or thoughts about the filing process/template. We have changed most of the templates used in the reporting process when we started a complete redo of the old Abuse Reports system and so would appreciate any feedback you had. Jamesofur (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick followup on improving abuse response, I have a few questions on your experience.

1. Where did you find the IP to report to abuse response?

2. How did you know to report it to abuse response? (This is so we can see if most users know to report it to AR)

Thanks for you help in improving AR! (And Jamesofur, you always get to responding to the new reports faster than I do xP) Netalarmtalk 03:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good questions. In response to 1, I'm typically not one to search for vandalism on the recent changes page (unless I'm bored & looking for a distraction). The most recent act of vandalism by IP 71.5.70.130 was to one of the pages on my watchlist, and in the process of issuing a warning I noticed the recurrent abuse history.

As for how I knew to report to abuse response, this is actually my second report (the first one being for the 66.4.233.x range). My first report was filed after noticing a high volume of vandalism from the IP 66.4.233.3 (again, through my watchlist). I went to WP:Vandalism and followed the instructions to trace the IP address. Upon learning it was a school account in a range with other repetitive vandals, I followed the instruction on the vandalism page, which states: "For repetitive anonymous vandalism, particularly where registered to a school or other kind of responsive ISP, consider listing it on Wikipedia:Abuse response."

Let me know if there's anything else you'd like to know. As a strong supporter of the abuse response process, I'd be happy to help make it more accessible and broadly used. —Zach425 ^talk/contribs 07:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are CSD under "Common Sense" - although these were neither very harmful nor very recent - as much as anything it is cheaper to delete them than to discuss them further. But yes these would have been G6's (though I might have used the wrong delete summary on them). Since they were (alomst?) all created by the same person in a batch a few months back, I doubt it is worth mentioning them in documentation - but I suppose I wouldn't object overly. Rich Farmbrough, 18:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Zach, what is your opinion on Talk:Guitar Hero#Guitar Hero: Beatles redirect -- any reason to keep? Is a retarget to The Beatles: Rock Band#Promotion too tenuous? Stats on "Guitar Hero Beatles" show 300/mo with another 200/mo or so from the rest (when factoring out the case insensitivity). Of course this gives no indication of how many users were searching for the term versus those who happened to see it in the drop down box when initially looking for something else. I'm not sure if the retarget would be better than a delete. (Stats for the first half of this month must reflect the recent parody video Masem wrote of.) -- ToE^T 09:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure what functionality your changes were meant to add? (Early in the morning, haven't finished my coffee. All I could decipher was that you could omit "num="... And it didn't have the bottom text, but this is already possible using "nt=yes"). In any case, please do this at a new page rather than repurposing my redirect, I'm kinda fond of it. How about {{random ubx}} ? –xeno^talk 12:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The shortest answer is that we generally handle ban evasion by WP:RBI. If you genuinely believe that the given image is the best possible illustration available to Wikipedia to illustrate the topic of gerontology, you can choose to place it (though I would tend to recommend against doing so — perhaps you could find an image of a noteworthy old person?).

The somewhat longer answer is that Shustov was banned for (among other problems) a habit of self-promotion. That self-promotion included his professional work (where he is apparently a minor figure in the world of earthquake engineering, and on the basis of which he created an extensive walled garden of articles citing and promoting his own publications and patent-pending minor inventions) and his personal exercise program, "Upstream fitness" (deleted as spam by another admin). I was keeping a record of the cleanup (it's taken a while) at User:TenOfAllTrades/Shustov, but I haven't been updating that page lately.

Because of his conduct, he's banned on (at least) the English and the German Wikipedias. Over the last few months, he's migrated mostly to Commons, where he's created a category full of images of himself doing his exercises. He's spent a significant amount of time adding images to articles and creating links back to his "upstream fitness" category on Commons from over a dozen different language Wikipedias, usually from the articles on gerontology and fitness. The image captions often include reference to his exercise program.

Consequently, I'm extremely hesitant to encourage or allow him to add any material to Wikipedia. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good pic! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 16:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zach425, I noticed that you do quite a bit of vandal-fighting, and that your reverts are good. Would you like rollback rights so you can have an additional tool to assist you when dealing with vandals? Acalamari 20:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted. Remember though that rollback should be used to revert blatant vandalism/spam, and that using it in revert-wars or to revert edits you disagree with can lead to its removal...and note that some admins don't even give a warning before removing the right. If you would like to test the tool before using it to revert vandalism, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. That all being said, happy reverting! Acalamari 00:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, so do I! You're welcome for the tool! Acalamari 01:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...for your help with Mole. Chrisrus (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zach425. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Abuse_response#Template_for_user_talk_page.3F.
Message added 05:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

  bsmithme  05:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have undone this edit of yours. It is actually γέρων; genitive γέροντος. Cheers. --Omnipaedista (talk) 07:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• [1] I full support the comments and endorse the move. It makes sense. PaulHammond2 (talk) 00:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rfd2/helper has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from 212.219.143.131. We wanted to let you know that the case has been opened and is currently under investigation. -Fumitol (talk) 11:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that this edit was over a year ago, but you added some treatment information to the Pica page and there was a small error I was hoping you could help fix. The following text was part of your addition: "Visual screening, with eyes briefly for a short time after pica is attempted" This sentence is clearly missing a word or two ("eyes covered"? maybe "eyes closed"?). Do you happen to remember what this should say? -- Fyrefly (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ethel Percy Andrus Gerontology Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.usc.edu/dept-00/dept/gero/researchServices.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Randykitty (talk) 06:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rfd2m/helper has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zach425. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zach425. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zach425. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ubxrand/table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great chatting with you today! Send me a user talk message if you ever get active again :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely will do! And yep, great to chat. See you soon, I'm sure! —Zach425 ^talk/contribs 15:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]