User talk:Walter Humala

Welcome to my talk page.

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page. Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end. Please use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics. Please indent your posts with ":" if replying to an existing topic (or "::" if replying to a reply). I will generally respond via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article) rather than replying here. Anyway, I could also reply here if your comment might produce several replies, so you may want to Watch this page until you are responded to. ⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives

/Archive 1 (From April '06 to Dec '06) /Archive 2

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I can tell you had some time on your hands to make all those funny comments on your userpage. Thank you for making Wikipedia a fun time. I hereby award you The Barnstar of Good Humor!!!--¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 04:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Why1991! see your talkpage--Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia 22:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please DON'T add false information. `'mikka 06:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. its just I got confused gdfl with "old work=no license". --Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia 23:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PeruProject: Please keep it serious. `'mikka 06:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mikkalai, since you are still watching me, well, hmmm, I can tell nothing, just that I wont make any funnTy comments, even if the template will never be listened. Cheers! and thanks for the unblock. --Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia 23:32, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please do not vandalize remove jokes on my user page. If you wish to talk about something please do so civilly on my talk page. Thanks. TheRingess 03:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra Fractal article

Hey man sorry for deleting the joke you've made on there. Now please check the ultra Fractal article and tell me what you think of it. --Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia 03:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about not getting back to you sooner. I should apologize for reverting the content the way I did, I didn't realize that you were midway through your rewrite. Anyhow it looks a lot better. I use UltraFractal also. As a matter of fact, I wrote "BringItIn" a small tool for importing images into UF.

BTW, I see that you are very interested in Peru. I went to Peru first in 2001 and visited Machu Picchu. Went again in 2003 to Q'eros and 2004 to Huancacalle and Puncuyoc (met my fiance in Lima in 2004). I've gone back 3 - 4 times since then getting to spend some time in Chiclayo and Mancora. My website has some of my photos My website.

Take care.

TheRingess 16:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please TheRingess ceck your talk page for answer

Glad you liked my website, fractals and photos. Take care. TheRingess 16:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How would that be the last warning?, Ive never vandalized a userpage, in fact this is the first one, so please dont be so rude. Thanks. -- Walter Humala Godsave him! ^{(wanna Talk?)} 16:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Sorry for taking so long to reply. I got a bit busy in life. By the way, I hope you know that if you adopt me, you'll have to teach me everything you know. --Itachi Uchiha13 21:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What am I trollin'? Premier Tom Mayfair^Talk_F@H 02:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for the welcome message on my talk page. Thanks for the advice! Aufheben 15:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. I'm still just doing stuff here and there. Not really sure I want to stick with this, but we'll see. I'll ask for help if I need it. Thanks! Aufheben 14:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome and offer, but i've already been "adopted". I wouldn't mind help on wikimarkups and perhaps a link to a rundown on code if you got time.

Cleverdan204 05:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Walter. As to your question do Descendall, what he told me before he left was that Wikipedia had become a waste of time for him, and he felt it was time to move on. It's a pity, as our articles on Peru, and everything else he did, were vastly improved by his attention. But I respect that he has other things to do, so c’est la vie.--Cúchullain ^t/c 08:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Descendall was a great user, sucks to see him go.--Jersey Devil 08:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had to remove it from the Peru main page article because it contained info relevant to the United States (internal links to Colonial America, the American Revolutionary War, etc...). These problems will have to be fixed before that template can be on the article. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 08:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I really like your West Wikipedia idea! Even though I was born in East Wikipedia, I now am an official West Wikipedian citizen. Maybe you can make administrative division-type things (states, provinces—whatever you wanna call it). I dunno, just an idea. Regards,   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 00:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that your surname means "drunkenness" in Finnish? JIP | Talk 07:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:EarMaster logo hi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:EarMaster logo med.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward2 Jerry lavoie 03:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Email head498.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chord prog.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind response. I'd like to contribute to mostly perhaps social commentaries and average users experiences / knowledge about LED lights. (Stuff like really smart home lighting, fun and therapy lights that are hopefully interesting to most of us who read wikis. Here is my Wikihow page http://www.wikihow.com/User:Otti-N and my site blog on LED lights http://www.fun-led-light.com/led-light-blog.html that always have my updated "brain" on those subjects. So thanks again for making me feel welcome and also for the pointers especially. (Even if it was automatied and you are on Holiday irihgt now. Hope you have a good time there ... ) Cheers, Otti N 03:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!!! I, Eacz12 hereby award you a Tireless Contributor Barnstar for contributing tirelessly to the Peru, related pages and many other articles. Keep up the good work and please, don't stop contributing!!!  Armando.O  (talk

The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 17:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USERNAME has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. If nothing else, the catgory and usage is insufficient. Without a proper category, no one else can find it and use it widely. -- Best regards // FrankB 19:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me for saying so but I found it rather difficult (ergo my revert) to view your addition of that picture as sincere (particularly with the language you used in describing the individual as a "bum"). Was I mistaken in my impression of that? (→Netscott) 05:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Walter! I noticed that you've been using {{User:Walter Humala/welcome noobie}} to welcome new users. This is perfectly fine, except for the fact that it contains {{User:Walter Humala/Emperor Userboxes/Template:Adopting}}, which in turn contains "[[Category:Wikipedians seeking to adopt in Adopt-a-user|{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]". Thus, new users like Party Walrus appear to be seeking to adopt a new user, even though they did not express this desire, may be too new to adopt a user through the program, or may have in fact made no edits at all as in Party Walrus' case. If you could amend some part of this process so that welcoming users no longer makes them appear involved in WP:ADOPT (as this involvement should be initiated on their part), I would greatly appreciate it. However, I am by no means saying not to offer adoption; this is not an issue at all. Thanks for your help with this, Dar-Ape 16:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, mate! Best, Dar-Ape 17:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You really should clean up your page. I'm not trying to be an asshole about it, but it looks like a mess. Sure it may be your "unique" way of "expressing yourself", but it looks terrible to the rest of us. Please consider it. Eyeball kid 23:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Emperor (..right) Humala, here's some more stuff you might want to "clean up". Take it easy. :-) (→Netscott) 04:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, I already knew about that special page, and the only subpages I need to "clean up" are Emperor Templates, just that and I'll go to heaven. Thanks for reminding me anyway. -- Walter Humala Godsave him! ^{(wanna Talk?)} 05:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good... you should know that I've found your stuff amusing but somewhat inappropriate... if we're honest with ourselves. See you around. (→Netscott) 05:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, if you continue to canvass, you may find yourself blocked from editing. Metros232 06:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right man, I will stop. But let me tell you my reason for canvassing.

• Talk pages were I "canvassed" were from people with the same issue than me, they have too many subpages, by helping me, they would also save themselves from MFd's. Thanks Metro223(I couldn't read your policy message 'cuz I was too busy canvassing). -- Walter Humala Godsave him! ^{(wanna Talk?)} 06:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Because you chose to revert all the removals of your canvassing, I have blocked you for 6 hours. When your block expires, please do not continue canvassing. Thanks, Metros232 14:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mr. Humala. I realize you're already getting a lot of attention you may not like, but it's brought another issue to my attention. You use a template for your signature. If you read WP:SIG#Transclusion of templates, you'll see that this has been prohibited. I will freely admit that I had experience with this, and I agree with the reasoning (at the time I used a sig template, transclusion was merely "frowned upon"). Please substitute your template if you feel the need to use one, or just paste the wikicode you have into the signature box on your preferences page. Thanks! — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 06:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding pictures about yourself. Dicklyon 08:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you've made a number of edits to people's talk pages where you've over-written previous content. Please don't do this. Thanks, --Dweller 14:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why shouldn't I? Have you noticed what is really happen?--Walter Humala - King one! 14:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are overwriting the Signpost on the pages of people who have elected to receive it. Stop at once. Newyorkbrad 14:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake!, I really sorry I didn't notice that, kinda dizzy I'm now Thanks. --Walter Humala - King one! 14:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter Humala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here:*I'm too dizzy. While reverting accidental edits by me on talkpages some users removed also my comments, I just tried to re-add those (I accidentaly removed signposts on some pages were I canvassed at first **On the other hand I previously gave reasons to canvass, talk pages were i did were from users with the same issue than me on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Walter Humala, so they could help themselves by helping me. ***What's the deal with blockin me, Metro didn't like my prior edits so he gets a lil excuse to block me, I think so...--Walter Humala - King one! 14:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

06:02, 20 February 2007 You were warned not to canvas, you then did it many time more, unblock declined, this is a valid block. It is only six hours, I suggest you avoid violation of WP:CANVAS in the future. -- ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 14:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"While reverting accidental edits by me...some users removed also my comments". Uhh...no, I removed YOUR comments. I wasn't trying to remove something else and mistakenly took your comments with it. My aim was to remove your canvassing. Metros232 14:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't talking bout you, but Newyorkbrad and Dwelle's edits

Don't you get it?. the reason for canvassing. Please

C'mon I was gonna translate an article today. --Walter Humala - King one! 14:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you still can because: A. it's only 6 hours of a block and B. you can translate it on a word processor and copy and paste it to Wikipedia when you get unblocked. Metros232 14:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason for canvasing, that is against our policy. ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 14:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right if it's a 6 hour then might be fine, I have to go now. thanks! --Walter Humala - King one! 14:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I'll give you a hand. I really don't see the point of deleting all that stuff, anyway (I also don't see the point of somewone taking of the info you put on my talk page, so I put it back) Qmwnebrvtcyxuz 14:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I went to the page and gave you a hand. I did something for you, now please do something for me. They are trying not to accept my Username. Please give my a hand at WP:RFC/N. Please. No matter what they say, my name is not random letters. Qmwnebrvtcyxuz 15:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For this edit just a few hours after coming off another block, you have been reblocked for 24 hours. You've been blocked many, many times in the past for disruption. You KNOW that is inappropriate yet you did it anyway. Metros232 23:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. And thanks for blocking me anyway, this way I can spend more time on the spanish and swedish wikipedia. --Walter Humala - King one! 23:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you blocked me for editing my userpage or for adding "nazi" on a worthless comment? --Walter Humala - King one! 23:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter Humala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Some silly edit can't get me blocked

Decline reason:

Declined. Please use the time to read WP:CIVIL and WP:POINT. You are a valued contributor, but it is important to remember to be civil in edit summaries and other comments. -- BigDT 00:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, you were blocked for your Nazi edit. And based on your previous history..."some silly edit" is a pattern with you, not just something outside the norm. Metros232 23:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your avoidance of the block with 201.230.120.48 (talk · contribs), your block has been reset to another 24 hours. Metros232 18:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, please no, you're such a bad guy. I had to comment on my entry man. Don't you realize what they're just about to do??? (and I din't know editing with ip while blocked was forbidden)--Walter Humala - King one! 23:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you did NOT had to remove comments I've made! --Walter Humala - King one! 23:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask Jimbo after all this apocalipsis what he thinks 'bout you and the other bad guys.--Walter Humala - King one! 23:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, blocking me again? I have to comment before entry finishes! Arggg --Walter Humala - King one! 23:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, Mr. Humala, you're approaching the line. Please, no personal attacks. You have been blocked for a reason, and if you just accept the block and do not try to avoid it, you will be unblocked in 24 hours. Why all this raging argument? Besides, you've just edited your talk page while blocked, so you didn't have to evade with 201.230.120.48; editing your talk page is always possible. Just think, you would have been unblocked by now. — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 23:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr? haha i'm just 19. There was no attack above and I'm sure of that.

• • • • • I never tried to avoid the block , its just I didnt know that editing while blocked was forbidden.
        • I might be raging because block avoids me to comment on my deletion entry.
        • And I know I would ve been unblocked. arg!--Walter Humala - King one! 00:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walter Humala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please administrators, be so kind as to read above section and tell me what you think. Thanks

Decline reason:

You are not to avoid a block. -- Yamla 23:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

About comments on my DELETION entry:Whats all that deal with canvassed users?, being canvassed doesn't make one powerful on wikipedia, do YOU guys want to null their comments just cause they were canvassed maybe?, you fear I CAN WIN this miscellany thanks them? Come on, theyre just editors trying to help some guy in trouble. Let's nominate for deletion User:Ryulong/Penguin Cabal.

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I never would be able to keep my cool like you do. I'm glad to award you the Barnstar of Good humor.--γιατί Sign Here | ESP. 12:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would have lost my patience and probably gone bazerk had I been in the situation your in with you entire account being put up for deletion. Just hold strong and I believe that you will get to keep it. Good luck and may the force be with you.--γιατί ^{Sign Here | ESP.} 12:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at my Talkpage history when I saw that you reverted an odd person's additions to it. I just thought I'd say thanks since, after all, it's just a user page, and most vandal fighters don't do much in the way of userpage reversion, AFAIK. So, thanks! --tennisman ^{sign here!} 18:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted you to know that I oppose the proposed deletion of your user subpages (at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Walter Humala). The user who nominated them was, IMHO, being ridiculous and pedantic; you're clearly a good contributor and I see no reason for other users to interfere with your userspace. I have included a reprimand to the nominator with my Keep vote, which has been seconded by two other users. I will support you all the way on this, as I'm appalled at the way some other editors have treated you. Walton monarchist89 19:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [unassessed articles] tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 23:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add "votes" to comments that do not claim to support or oppose an action. For the record, I had already given my nomination. I reverted your changes to the MFD. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right man, thanks anyway.--Walter Humala - King one! 01:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:SIG, please do not use templates or other transcluded pages as your signature. Instead, you can customize your siggy in the 'preferences' menu. Thanks. >Radiant< 09:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not sure if it's a problem, all such redlinks to show it was your comment. If you want a bot's help, try asking at WP:BOTREQ. >Radiant< 12:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Shostakovich's Prelude XXI Bb Major (Allegro) - (Part of opus 87).ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Fair use and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mak (talk) 18:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the rule for fair use is either 10% of the work or 30 seconds, whichever is shorter. It may still be possible for the performance itself to be GFDL while the work is copyrighted, but in any case the recording must follow Fair Use rules, and may not be a Featured Sound. Mak (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then please give me some time for cutting it down to 30 seconds. Thanks. --– Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( shout! · sign? )} 23:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 22:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for rating this article. I am one of the people who worked hard in this article and just with the goal to let people know a little bit more about my wonderful Peru. It feels so good that someone recognize that job. Thanks again!!! --Evelyn Zuñiga 17:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the barnstar! It's my second one; I'll probably move it to my userpage when I get around to archiving my talkpage (which I should do soon). As for the editor review, no problem! Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 18:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you put emperor in front of the User part. Please tell me! Big Boss 0 22:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a floated DIV that covers Wikipedia's title. You should be able to check User:Walter Humala/Title for the code. Create a similar page for yourself, then include it on all your user and user talk pages. — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 06:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may be the Emperor but I am The Real People's Champion Big Boss 0 and I am interested in helping you out in any way I can. Big Boss 0 02:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I admire your creativity, but would you consider removing Image:Uncyclopedia Featured.png from your header? I find the green stamp rather annoying, and it interferes with the MediaWiki tabs. I also thought it said "Retired"; I wouldn't have figured out that it says "Featured" unless I had figured out how to click on the image and read it on its description page (it's difficult to read). Thanks for considering! — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 06:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I finally noticed your comment on my Editor Review. I have responded, if you're interested. — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 04:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Walter Humala,

I come on the unpleasant chore of asking you to remove the adopter template from your userpage. Previously I had had doubts about your appropriateness to be an adopter, but this has been confirmed after reviewing your block log, and your attempts to circumvent a block by use of Anon only accounts. Maybe after a few more months editing and more experience with working with others you will be ready to be an adopter. Cheers Lethaniol 12:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And along that same vein, can you please stop referring to yourself as emperor, especially in your welcome template? This can get really confusing for people new to Wikipedia. Metros232 13:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calling yourself Emperor makes you unique. Just like I call myself The Real People's Champion. Something about it has a certain flair that I like. It's like Hulkamania. It is a feeling that makes everyone want to rally around it. Big Boss 0 03:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See people, not many dislike that I call myself emperor. --– Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( shout! · sign? )} 16:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your imperial highness, my contribution to your page was because of the bullying you seem to have recently received from other (especially elevated) users, and because I think your page theme shows good humor, as well as imperial qualities. Still, you might try keeping your word.Purrny gotobed 13:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... and much thanks to you, too. You don't have to look very far to find self-important folk who violate the 'not a web page' thing, and yours is fun, therefore beyond just a web page! All the best.Purrny gotobed 13:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all of your help. As a tolken of my appriciation please accept this award. Big Boss 0 01:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been recognized as a Big Boss Award recipient.

Do you have confirmation of this? Chick Bowen 20:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You did a good job on creating the hardwork medal catagory. I would also like to make you an offer that you cannot refuse. Big Boss 0 13:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Currently my New World Organization Wolfpack branch is without a leader. I was wondering if you are interested. I do have some reservations before I decide to give you such a commanding position:

1). You must promise never to vandalize wikipedia.

2). All motives concerning our group shall be discussed with all available New World Organization members. I will be around so I will be there.

This is my offer. What do you say. Do you agree to be a member of the Wolfpack? Big Boss 0 01:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit on Peruvian national election, 2006 because you put the first round results at the top of the page which I think gives an inaccurate representation of the elections (kind of implying that the first round results were the one that decided the who was the President). I was thinking that maybe if we wanted a leading image for that page we could do what was done in the Chilean presidential election, 2005–2006 article and create an image made up of images of the leading candidates but my image making skills are subpar.--Jersey Devil 01:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I mean if you want the results at the top that is fine but they should be the second round results not the first round.--Jersey Devil 02:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right, done --– Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 02:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had to also revert your changes on Template:Politics of Peru. Sorry :( but they were really messing up alot of Peru pages.--Jersey Devil 04:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You use an animation in your signmature, which is very irritating. The eye is automatically drawn to anything that moves, which makes a lot of sense in the environment humans (or any other animal for that matter) evolved in. Advertisers have figured this out and use a lot of animation because it is impossible for people to ignore that. So when I'm reading any of your posts (or any other post near it) I can't concentrate on the text because my eye is constantly drawn to your signature. You use a lot of cool features on your user page, which I plan to look into, but this one is not quite that cool. Also, it's something that is not restricted to your user page, which makes quite a difference. So could you change it? DirkvdM 13:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My offer still stands. Do you wish to lead the Wolfpac? Please respond ASAP. Big Boss 0 23:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Metros232 has put the catagory that that you created for the Big Boss Award up for deletion. If you want to save it vote against the deletion. How to get to it is to click on the blue recipient tag on the award. It will take you to the page and then you can find where it is posted. Big Boss 0 02:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a hyperlink to it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_20#Category:Hardwork_Medal Big Boss 0 02:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please try combine your edits into one, rather than flooding the page history with unnecessary edits. This is especially important for templates, where every edit causes a significant load on the servers as each change is propagated to every page on which the template is used, which also delays changes that people are making to other templates from appearing. —Centrx→talk • 03:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolfpac (3).JPG

Congratulations you are now the leader of the Wolfpack branch of the New World Organization. Please respond to this for more information. Big Boss 0 01:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your first new soldier to command is User:Hunter1586. make yourself known to him. Also display the Wolfpack logo on your userpage if you like. Big Boss 0 01:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway thank you for joining the Wolfpack.

Please don't do this again. It's tantamount to violating the Wikipedia:No legal threats policy and it defeats the purpose of the SharedIPEDU and Schoolblock templates which are aimed at reassuring the innocent users who unfortunately share an IP address with immature vandals. See also Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals. Thanks. --  Netsnipe  ►  19:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right I won't repeat it, it's just I didn't care very much.... I'll revert my edits right away.--Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 20:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I know exactly what the feeling about not caring anymore feels like. It never ends... = P --  Netsnipe  ►  20:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you put the give our membership back template on your page? Could you give me the code? Big Boss 0 01:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I downloaded it under the GNU. --Pupster21 12:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put it on my page. But how do you center it. Big Boss 0 13:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Atomic Religione request to be in the Wolfpack --ÄtΘmicR€£igione^sїgñ

I would appreciate it if you would tell me everything that you know about the nWo. I'm just curious as to what this whole thing really is. -- The Hybrid 04:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well it seems quite interesting almost like a support group, encouraging good editing and wiki friendship. I like it --ÄtΘmicR€£igione^sїgñ

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I hereby award you this Barnstar of Good Humor, my emperor. You make me laugh a lot. ♣Tohru Honda13♣ 04:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are yet another user in my random-user-barnstar-giveaway-for-those-who-deserve-them. Congrats! ♣Tohru Honda13♣ 04:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For matters i dont wish to disclose, i am deciding not to join the Wolfpack. Thank you --ÄtΘmicR€£igione^sїgñ

No problem man. --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 05:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Moan*, read this link. BB0's statement should get across what I tried to convey to you in the email. -- The Hybrid 19:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That makes the point I was trying to in the email better than the email itself. Also, BB0 is fairly screwed up, as the paragraph below shows. Protection? Uniting Wikipedia against vandals? I thought that Wikipedia was already united, and that anyone that would cause anyone else to need protection would be blocked without hesitation. He has ulterior motives for creating this group, and I don't want you to get hurt by what he is doing. He is a manipulator. He doesn't care about you or anyone else. I mentored him for months, and he stabbed me in the back after getting what he wanted from me. He'll do the same to you, and I bet that he has already made the plans for when he does. Don't let him use you like he did me. -- The Hybrid 03:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen your earlier conversations about me and I am okay with it. Technically I failed in trying to bring my NWO(black and white logo) members to wikipedia. I doubt we will ever see them again. So recently I decided than I need reinforcements to protect me. In return I would agree to protect them to the best of my abilities. The Wolfpack branch which you are currently a part of will hopefully be one of the most successful wikipedia anti vandal guards! My other two members have dropped so you are all I got left. And Huntermay not be as useful as I hoped either. I need someone like you around to help me in my goal of uniting wikipedia users against vandals. The past is currently behind me. I need your help. Big Boss 0 21:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Moan*, Wikipedia is united against vandals. -- The Hybrid 03:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as being united this is a load of bull. There is no real union between users. What I am trying to do is create a small group which shares information gathered from vandal attacks and see if any of them are the same person through this information gathering. The New World Organization will be the elite vandal fighting group on wikipedia. Big Boss 0 00:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is impossible. The only true way of determining whether or not vandals are one in the same is through checkuser. We can compare articles vandalized and usernames, but if they use random usernames, and vandalize random articles, then they won't be recognized as the same person no matter how many people examine the information. If they are vandalizing the same articles than the same user will figure it out on their own. The nWo seems like a good idea on the surface, but when you begin to examine the details it would be a pointless group. Besides, with how you have tormented poor Metros no one will want to unite underneath your banner. You shot yourself in the face before you ever got started. -- The Hybrid 03:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be like a broken needle. You are missing the point. Our group is for those who have lost trust in admins. That is our purpose. There are plenty of people who hate their abuse of power and we can stop it. Big Boss 0 15:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've completely thrown apart the idea of the group you originally had. You said the group was to fight vandals. Now it's to fight admins it appears. Metros232 17:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike Metros's idea we both have lost trust in him. We will not fight but will do things our own way. At the same time sticking to wikipedia rules. Our NWO has no desire to fight anyone but vandals. That is that. Big Boss 0 02:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those who have lost trust in admins are those who don't seem to get the point that admins are just regular users with a few more buttons. Also, an anti-vandal organization cannot exist without admins. How do you plan to block them? Admins are janitors, and vandals are the dirt that they mop up. That is how it works. -- The Hybrid 03:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice little addiion to the userbox usage. Would be nice to see more editors taking a more active role. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 07:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please sign my sig book? Thanks! (not)(listening)

Thanks!

Let me define how the system works. The NWO (black and white) is for PDL members only. The Wolfpack (red and black) logo is for non PDL members like yourself. As far as recruiting new members they must agree to the terms that you agreed to. I have a lot of trust in you. Big Boss 0 02:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, yeah, but it doesn't mean that much. About the NWO itself, you said that its goal was to "share important information related to vandal attacks, threats or sth like that". well I've noticed they're already doing that on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboardand Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I really don't know what to say to you, think The Hybrid disagrees on nwo's creation, I really don't know if continuing this might be good for us. --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 05:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We actually talked and he will help us now. Big Boss 0 16:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only if I want to on what I want to, and I do oppose the creation of the NWO. -- The Hybrid 05:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Association of Member's Advocates is being threatened with deletion. Please consider visiting and adding your voice to the MFD discussion. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 17:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me about this MfD. To be honest, it's the most insane nomination for deletion I've seen yet. Sadly, the recent spate of pointless MfDs shows no signs of slacking. The AMA, which is a useful organisation and helps people (and I should know, having been a member since last year), is far more beneficial to the encyclopedia than pages like Wikipedia:Whacking with a Wet Trout, to take an example at random. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 16:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chopin on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —  $PЯINGrαgђ  21:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, I am joking only on templates, there was no joke on chopin's article. cheers --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 21:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the template affected the article. —  $PЯINGrαgђ  21:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hehe, but only for 1 minute --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 21:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walter, you mentioned some curious statements at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates. I have a few questions and you can read them in reply to your post. When you get around to it, I would appreciate further discussion. Just post your points to the bottom of the MfD if you wish. Thanks, Iamunknown 21:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly recommend withdrawing the MFD of MFD. Your nom statement reads like it's an exercise in disruption to make a point. Not funny. April Fools' Day is over. – Chacor 05:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pointing April's FOol day is over man, this is serious, I'm giving plenty of reasons for the mfd on the mfd. --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 05:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for a period of 48 hours for violating WP:POINT with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion 2.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are just punishing me for that, and I'm starting to hate you, no offense. --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 05:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are disrupting Wikipedia by making that MfD especially after it was deleted once before. This block is not punitive.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user opposes George W. Bush and supports his impeachment.

All right from this point, I wont respond anyone who supports the only one guilty of all trouble in the world. sorry --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 05:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So basically you'll still be responding to everyone ;) -- The Hybrid 05:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear this, Walter, I thought we were wikifriends. (I'm a Bush supporter.) Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 13:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Walter, I am just wondering why you call yourself an "Emperor" and have altered the header to sat "Emperor User:Walter Humala". RyGuy 13:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, nevermind. It appears that you won't respond to me per your above message. Though, not to be rude, (belive me, that's the last thing I want to be) but you shouldn't base your opinion of someone on what president they support ot oppose. RyGuy 13:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walter, if you're still around, can I invite you to join the new project at Wikipedia:Editor assistance? Your experience with the AMA would be highly beneficial to the project. I hope to see you there soon. :) Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 16:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Do you have a source stating that "Weird Al" Yankovic is a Slovenian-American or has Slovenian origins (as per the Slovenian Americans artcle)? I'm not saying that you're definitely wrong, but because his Wikipedia article specifically mentions that he is of Serbian descent, I had to remove his name for the time being. Are you perhaps confusing him with Frankie Yankovic, who was a Slovenian-American? BTW, the name Jankovic/Yankovic is far more common in Serbia than it is in Slovenia. WorldWide Update 11:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by Grafikbot 11:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Seen anything out of the ordinary lately? Anyway just here to check up on the Emperor of West Wikipedia. If it wasn't for you wikipedia would have died by now! Big Boss 0 16:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message posted on Sunday, April 8, 2007[edit]

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article [[Talk:User:Walter Humala/Freedom of Expression|Talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:User:Walter Humala/Freedom of Expression]] with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article [[Talk:User:Walter Humala/Freedom of Expression|Talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:User:Walter Humala/Freedom of Expression]] with a link to the details.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [[Talk:User:Walter Humala/Freedom of Expression/Temp]]. Leave a note at [[Talk:User:Walter Humala/Freedom of Expression]] saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Your original contributions are welcome.

--22:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Walter, I'm just giving you the standard message. I'm not sieving through your subpages, and I'm not going to even look at any more of them. I simply found this when I clicked the link at the top of this page to your vandalbox and then clicked the link at the top of that page to your freedom of expression page. --Iamunknown 22:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week Ludwig van Beethoven was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. BetacommandBot 20:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 17:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Walter Humala. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Limaflag.gif) was found at the following location: User:Walter Humala/Sandbox7. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Walter Humala, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Ultra fractal logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Walter Humala/Sandbox4. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Walter Humala, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Ultra fractal screenshot.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Walter Humala/Sandbox4. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]