User talk:Vgy7ujm

Hello, Vgy7ujm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 01:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please remember WP:NPOV, WP:NOR and WP:RS in your edits please. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Brandenburg class battleship, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Resolute 04:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand what you were trying to do, however I tagged the articles on the premise that Wikipedia is not a repository of external links. An article that is only link with no text is generally frowned upon. As you may have noticed, someone else came along and saved the articles by adding a bare level of context. Hopefully you can use the link you provided, and others, to ultimately build these articles into something as useful as some of the others on different classes of battleships. It can be a facinating topic to read about. Cheers, Resolute 23:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's no call sign pattern I've ever run into. I know the VG- at the start means Canada, but how did you choose the other five characters? --  Denelson83  04:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is an upside-down V on the keyboard. Vgy7ujm 20:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lot of links you're adding to bartleby. I use the site myself, but an external link is only appropriate if it adds something important and new. These translations are public domain and in many cases already linked from the article. Do not add bartleby.com links if they are redundant—usually the site already linked will not feature all the popup advertising, etc., of bartleby! I have reverted you at The Divine Comedy (because the Cary translation was already linked), and if you care about the encyclopedia & its policies, you will revert almost all of your other bartleby links on your own, for the same reason. Form letter follows, which is relevant, though I'm not assuming you're employed by bartleby.com to advertise for them.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Wareh 00:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Affirmative action‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

• Looking back, while your edits may not have constituted vandalism per se, please take a note of WP:NPOV when making edits. Please see my comments in Talk:Affirmative action. Thank you. DAMurphy 16:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We have an article on Thomas Woods' informative book "Meltdown". When you might otherwise just add a citation of it, I suggest that you link to this article -- Meltdown (book). Thank you. JRSpriggs (talk) 08:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neville Chamberlin flew on British Airways Lockheed 14s not the Lockheed Model 10 Electra; they superficially look the same from the rear, but the Model 14 is substantially larger. FWiW, I have removed your comment on the Lockheed Electra article for the time being; do you want to add it to the Lockheed 14 article?. Chamberlin used BA G-AFGN on his famous "Peace in our time" trip. Bzuk (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vgy7ujm, thank you for adding Constelletion here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_distributed_computing_projects&oldid=408257854 :) --Andreas -horn- Hornig (talk) 20:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted a couple of your edits in relation to a screenshot from a Beverly Hillbillies episode. The dark haired woman is Sharon Tate in a wig. She played the secretary at the bank, in several episodes, always with the dark wig. The blonde caterer was played by Kathy Kersh, and according to IMDb Kersh played a character called Marion Billington. The last section of the episode, in which the caterer appears, can be viewed here She makes her first appearance around the 1 minute 25 second mark, and the driver of the catering truck addresses her as "Miss Billington". There are several very clear closeups of the actress, and it's definitely not Sharon Tate. Interestingly, Tate and Kersh also appeared together in an episode of Man from U.N.C.L.E. (pictured here) Tate is the one behind David McCallum, Kersh is on the right. Not dissimilar in appearance. Cheers Rossrs (talk) 13:51, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Computing for Clean Water has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company with no significant coverage in secondary sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Staff ride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helmuth von Moltke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I notice from this edit that you duplicated about 22 Kb of material from the Bismarck page to the Operation Rheinübung page. I appreciate you’ve spent quite some time on this, but it seems to me to be a bad idea. I’ve opened a discussion there, and am inviting comments from the editors on the Bismarck page and from yourself. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:59, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Falkirks^Talk 23:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welch Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gravesend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Brinkley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SCTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I removed this edit from Sharyl Attkisson, as it's a clear copyright violation. The text you added appears to have been copied more or less verbatim from the cited source. Please take a look at the site policy on copyright violations; I think the content in question is clearly notable and well-sourced, but it needs to be included in a way that doesn't violate copyright. Thanks. MastCell ^Talk 18:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Petrosino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pietro Inzerillo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Snows of Kilimanjaro (short story), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flight instruments may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the vertical speed in thousands of feet per minute, usually in the range -6 to +6. The gyrocompass) can be used for navigation, but it is indeed a flight instrument as well. It is needed to control

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note you edited about Cornwall Ontario. There's many other people worth mentioning. Sean Harley, Marc Muir, Rod Rivette, Jamie Jarvo, Shane Levac just to name a few. These guys were pioneers, and still are of local music! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geezlouise123 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted your changes to these articles. For one, the lithographs are restored and are mostly (if not all) Featured Pictures, so they should be used in the articles, preferably as the lead images. Second, and more importantly, there's no indication that the photos you added are in the public domain in the United States, so we cannot use them. For that, we'd need a pre-1923 date of publication (and since they are sourced to Nottelmann's book, which was published in 2002, that's no good). And really, we also need the names of the authors and their date of death, so we can also verify they they're PD in Germany. Parsecboy (talk) 00:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Thewolfchild. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - ^theWOLFchild 18:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Beth Shalom Synagogue (Edmonton), Vgy7ujm!

Wikipedia editor Mr.Bob.298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good start, must add several citations from secondary or tertiary sources to establish notability for the subject.

To reply, leave a comment on Mr.Bob.298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Joseph Howe Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Higher education in the United States

added a link pointing to Media

Tradesman

added a link pointing to Media

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Council of Trent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fulmination. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward the Seventh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Robinson and Angus MacKay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You removed huge sections of the Education in the United States article without any prior discussion. I strongly recommend taking such initiatives to the talk page first, as editors have invested many hours in developing these pages. Clean Copy^talk 02:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vgy7ujm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at University of San Diego, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article EOn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. tagged for notability since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 16:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vgy7ujm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and added a source to back up your recent addition to July 14. Please try to find sources for additions to these pages as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vgy7ujm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent edits in the global warming article. As a FA article, we have to maintain a consistent citation style. The agreed upon style can be found Talk:Global warming/Citation standards. Could you conform your citation to this style? (adding an inline harv and adding the article in the right alphabetical place in the sources section). Thanks! Femke Nijsse (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Big Bang Theory (season 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlsbad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited June 11, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just wanted to explain I've removed a number of external links you added. I did this for the following reasons;

• The links are not accessible to a large number of Wikipedia readers outside the United States. See note 7 here.
• Wikipedia is not an internet links directory for commercial websites.

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rumble (online video management) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumble (website). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS ^💬 03:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rumble (online video management) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumble (online video management) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GSS ^💬 03:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.  Bishonen | tålk 22:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Vgy7ujm, I removed your addition at Communism because the source you used does not meet WP:RS. Thanks -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 20:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read over WP:RS; I removed another one of your additions as can be seen here [1] -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 09:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reported you to the admin "JGHowes"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JGHowes#User_%22Vgy7ujm%22_violating_copyright

for having reverted the deletion of the "Sites traffic" section at the article "Comparison of video hosting services"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_hosting_services#Site_traffic

as described here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_video_hosting_services#Deleting_%22Site_traffic%22_section_for_copyright_violation Francisco Ferioli Marco (talk) 16:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello! I just saw you added a source to renewable energy from the Manhatten Institute. Think tanks are often not really reliable sources. This one has a history of climate denial, making it definitely unreliable.^[1] Please use reliable sources in the future. Femke (talk) 07:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.[2] --Hipal (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]