User talk:TamilMirchi

Archives

1, 2

Thanks for uploading File:Sankarankovil Film Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could u pls help me in getting me articles approved Chiki170 (talk) 07:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi Chiki170, they are not part of WP:AfC, so they can't get your article approved. Just submit it for review and it will get approved. Best, --◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Chiki170 (talk) 13:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rinson Simon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rinson Simon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 03:09, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Good Luck Sakhi#Languages. SP013 (talk) 16:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - please note that it is incredibly difficult to get sources on the web for old Tamil film articles - and do think twice before you shortlist films for deletion. A film like Thoothukudi was a success in rural areas during 2006 and the songs Karuvappaiya and Kozhukattai Kozhu were chartbusters at the time across all Tamil music channels. Such a rare yet memorable success for a film with newcomers.

I see a lot of your work involves Generation Z stars such as Eruma Saani Harija, Santhosh P. Jayakumar or Abarnathi - but just please do note that there were similar phases of popularity for individuals perhaps before you started tracking films. Neutral Fan (talk) 01:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutral Fan: Sorry for the deletion. Are there no archived newspapers that have an article on the film? TamilMirchi (talk) 01:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Boy With The Topknot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Curious to know if you've ever used the "show preview" button before clicking "publishing changes"? Neutral Fan (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, in your sig the talk link goes to User talk:Tamil:Mirchi, and the colon between "Tamil" And "Mirchi" results in a red link. Might want to fix that. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 15:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mahalakshmi (Malayalam actress), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Draft:Thazh Thiravaa create an article. Thanks Eswnav (talk) 07:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TamilMirchi kindly please reply me Eswnav (talk) 07:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TamilMirchi please Eswnav (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply me please Eswnav (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already created please move this article please and expand it please it is upcoming movie please expand Eswnav (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will not create any article. Kindly do it yourself.TamilMirchi (talk) 17:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Eswnav (talk) 17:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NACTOR for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Only one role in a current film is listed. Multiple roles are required for acting notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priyanka Arul Mohan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Priyanka Arul Mohan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smruthi Venkat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smruthi Venkat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 19:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - again, there's a very strange pattern to your recent creations and deletions requests. There seems to be a different rule for the artistes you watch/ like vs other artistes. Hardly any of the sources refer to the individuals directly - all these need to be moved to draft or deleted.

• Praveen Kumar - one film
• Karthik Yogi - five non-notable acting roles
• Vignesh Shanmugam - very, very small roles. Also stop including shorts in the filmography.
• Paige Henderson - two feature films. As non-descript as it gets.

Neutral Fan (talk) 23:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - if possible, can you list the articles you want to create or put up for deletion somewhere else before you go ahead and do it. Bit embarrassing to see the number of deleted articles you've made / articles that you put for deletion turn up with better sources. Neutral Fan (talk) 18:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutral Fan: Here is a list: Veerasekaran, Vikadakavi ([1] [2]), Alti (film), 18.05.2009 . TamilMirchi (talk) 18:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about Alti (released days before the lockdown), but others should stay. Vikadakavi ([3] [4]), Veerasekaran (few Hindu articles on Amala's debut prior to release + Bwoods review), 18.05.2009 - lots of coverage online. Please just do a simple Google search. Neutral Fan (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutral Fan: Kindly expand the articles listed.TamilMirchi (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you trolling me? You have complained about the exact same behaviour (asking someone else to do work) here a few days ago. Why don't you do it - the sources are there. [5] Neutral Fan (talk) 00:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutral Fan: What do you mean? TamilMirchi (talk) 00:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You complained about Eswnav troubling you with requests. You have just done the same above. Neutral Fan (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arjun Das, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gopichand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any possibilities to have your mail id to have some professional conversation DeccanTelugu (talk) 21:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I don't add emails.TamilMirchi (talk) 23:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to connect with you then? DeccanTelugu (talk) 10:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that on articles of people related to the film industry you are including them in the "Films" discussion. Per WP:DSFILM people should not be listed on the 'Films' discussion's page, only on the "Actors and filmmakers" discussion's page. The direct quote is "Deletion discussions relating to filmmakers, directors and other non-actor film-related people should no longer be listed on this page. Please list them at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers instead." Thanks! Donaldd23 (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - please stop putting articles up for deletion without discussion! Please also understand that there are only 4-5 "reliable" sources which regularly cover Tamil film content - this makes the job of covering Tamil film biographies supremely difficult. Even several articles tat you've created suffer from the exact same issue. Pon Parthiban, Brigida, L. Raja, Lallu etc - they are fine to stay despite minimal extra coverage. Neutral Fan (talk) 01:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutral Fan: If you want me to delete the articles, you just listed I can.TamilMirchi (talk) 01:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for creating so many articles! Our coverage of the Tamil film industry just wouldn't be the same without you. Wear this one with pride. Cheers, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laxman Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Katha Nayagan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xavier Britto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xavier Britto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like the express my sincere thanks for your many recent deletion nominations. You have provided a good work in postponing the dred day when Wikipedia will have over 1 million biographies of living people. We just do not have a broad enough based support to maintain so many biographies of the living at once.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• We would have if more editors added a big watch list, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Srivin, Kailash29792, Terminator92 - just wanted to hear your thoughts on the strange creations/deletions of this individual. Although, I do appreciate cleaning up/removing unneeded articles - the repeated hypocrisy and the total lack of disregard in terms of discussing moves + reasoning is worrying. Neutral Fan (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the deletion discussion of Naina Sarwar, etc., you said that the articles I created are not notable, so that is why I am going to delete some of my articles.TamilMirchi (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the consensus agrees with TamilMirchi's deletion rationales, I see no wrong. After all, Wiki operates by consensus and not hierarchy. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Perhaps he is overdoing the AFD nominations at the moment and not giving interested parties long enough to source search, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't understand why you put Priyanka Jawalkar's article up for deletion. She's just starred in one prominent film, Taxiwaala but she has films lined up which haven't been updated on her page yet. For example, this is one and the song released just today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-fFgb7UYjI&feature=youtu.be It's produced by a big banner and has prominent names working in it.

How do you decide who's prominent or not? Imo, she's absolutely prominent. She hasn't acted in just one movie and quit the industry. She has reliable sources of references and is an active actress in the industry, even though she's quite new. I do not think this article deserves to be deleted.

One film is not enough to have an article based on the guidelines. If you can prove that she has a significant fan base, then the article can be preserved.TamilMirchi (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"If you can prove that she has a significant fan base..." How does this make sense? Tons of background actors do not have fanbases and yet their wikipedia articles still stand. She's completed one film as a lead role but has a few more coming up, all with references. She's a pretty well known name in Telugu cinema and I believe that her article should stand. I would also like to see the guidelines you are talking about. Intoxicatedmidnight (talk) 06:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uday Shankar (actor). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NACTOR for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

The filmography lists one significant role since the date of the AFD, which is not enough to establish acting notability. This draft can be resubmitted if additional roles are listed, or with an explanation in AFC comments or on this draft talk page of how the subject is notable. Do not resubmit this draft without either listing additional roles since 2019 or providing an explanation.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uday Shankar (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uday Shankar (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MDM didn’t release in theatres, they saw raw film on tv ,check Pia interview about it Mahayadav (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ramachandra Raju, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mayabazar 2016

added a link pointing to Prasanna

Mismatch (film)

added a link pointing to Tholi Prema

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Her short film data us correct and she wanted the data should be in Wikipedia. Kandesrikanth (talk) 18:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is a conflict of interest because you are connected to the subject.TamilMirchi (talk) 18:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Given such a tireless contributor you are, no further explanation is needed! --Ab207 (talk) 19:15, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Florent Pereira, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Salimfadhley (talk) 20:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:CRYSTAL, films currently in production are almost never notable, yet. It's fine to keep this as a draft, expand as more information becomes available and then submit it once there are two nationally-published reviews of the film published by a reliable source. Until then, any information can go in Mayabazar 2016.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Untitled Mayabazar 2016 remake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Untitled Mayabazar 2016 remake, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 17:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Each and every content that has been added to the Wikipedia page of GK Reddy is updated by himself and contains only authorized information about him that has all the necessary proofs. We are not informed of who you are or on what authorization you are making these changes. If a person's authenticated information on a platform like Wikipedia is subject to any changes other than the person himself or a body that has been authorized by him, it is legit. Do note this and make sure there aren't any more changes in the future. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragunath Shanmugam (talk • contribs) 09:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user is close to the subject of G. K. Reddy (producer) and has subsequently added information that is irrelevant such as "As a child and then as a teenager, he was seen as an individual who had a simple, straight forward, and challenging mindset, which earned him a compact circle of friends. Gradually, he became the best sportsman in the school with the first position in games like shotput, javelin throw, disc throw, and swimming.consecutively".TamilMirchi (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thank you for notifying me this. Please read thoroughly for the comments i give in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venpa (film). Please consider to withdraw all nominations for deletion. --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM 04:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G. K. Reddy (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. K. Reddy (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 23:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, are you going to withdraw some more or all the nomination of Malaysian Tamil-language films if I start to improve all the article now? Please give me reply, thanks. Or give comments too. I just hope that improvements can be made, but deletion couldn't. --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM) 07:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes. Kindly add reliable sources and reviews such as Malaysia Nanban, Tamil Nesan, Makkal Osai, and Malaysiakini.TamilMirchi (talk) 20:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ka Pae Ranasingam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not remove references from filmographies as ideally they should be referenced. Check out some featured articles on actors and you will see that is the case, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate-

I look forward to your response to article's FL nomination page.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣✅ 08:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have let go and will not comment on the possible outcome that the local Tamil-language articles are deleted. I will not request anything anymore. But just that I need to give you some advise, you certainly are an experienced user in editing Indian-language films from India, you have worked on your own for a long time. I know that it is your working habit and cycle, that whenever you see any article not in your mind, you will just request for deletion, and usually no other users will stand in your way, and the articles will just get deleted.

I know, somehow it became your habitual working style, you will examine the notability of a film judgmentally even as they stays on wiki for a long time. Sometimes just let it go, and don't straightly nominate for deletion. Try to understand the feelings of articles created getting deleted.

But sometimes things will not always work out this way, try to use references tag or citation tag for your own goodwill. Because in future there will be other users like me who will not back down easily if you try to mass-delete articles.

But these users will be more compulsive, and editing war will happen. You might get complaint and submitted to administrator as you always mass-nominate articles for deletion. I hope you will be more compassionate next time.

Till then, User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM) 1 October 2020 UTC

User:TamilMirchi tq so much for creating a wikipededia page for me. i dont know how else to contact you.vivek rajgopal wiki page

== Housemates == Please and And in nominations table can you change the color codes for the 2nd (#7FFFD4) and 3rd runner up (#DDA0DD) and rename runner up with 1st runner-up in Snehan column. As this needs to be same like the other bb pages. User:TamilMirchi please could you do this please don’t ignore.

User:TamilMirchi Please do it it’s needs to be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:64:3168:50F8:E720:D04E:36C3 (talk) 19:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I can not edit Wiki based on a IP's request, because the last time I did that I got into troubleTamilMirchi (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you do it don’t worry you won’t get in trouble please do it I promise please do it please User:TamilMirchi please please you won’t get in trouble. User:TamilMirchi Please trust me you won’t get in trouble — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:64:3168:7431:815E:48A5:90CC (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TamilMirchi Sorry for this it’s fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:64:3168:81C8:D3EE:A0D4:34CD (talk) 19:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help expand this? I feel the article should exist, similar to Zack Snyder's Justice League. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isha Chawla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darshan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article cites "Balabharathi 2012" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry to ask this, Can you see Draft:Rekha Krishnappa page? If you not interested sorry. Eswnav (talk) 17:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stone Bench Creations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Bench Creations (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This subject does not seem to have received any significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. This subject does not meet the requirments for WP:NBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shivani Narayanan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shivani Narayanan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 00:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...a Afd is currently running regarding the notability of List of programs broadcast by Asianet. It is my understanding that most of it is original programming. An Indian editor's opinion would be appreciated in the matter. TheRedDomitor (talk) 02:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kadhale Jeyam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:12, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch out for this editor. He is extremely disruptive, and appears biased towards Telugu cinema and against Tamil cinema. Also pinging Cyphoidbomb as a precaution. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jayashree".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 12B you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 06:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had created this article some time ago, would you like to help expand? I say this because I feel you can do it without copyvio issues. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lesa Lesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pongal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Othigai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 12B you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:12B for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 21:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeeva (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeeva (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that when you list actors/filmmakers pages for nomination you use the "film" sort category. According to WP:DSFILM you should be using the "Actors/Filmmakers" sort category. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers. I have been changing them...removing them from "film" and adding to "Actors and Filmmakers", but wanted to let you know that going forward you should use the correct sort category. Thanks! Donaldd23 (talk) 01:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi,

Should you move an article from main space to draft space and need to tag the redirect for speedy deletion, please do not blank the page. If you leave the original redirect, the admin looking at the page can see that the tagging is valid and delete the page. When the page is blank, the admin needs to go into the page history and investigate whether the tagging is appropriate. It's just easier if you leave the evidence on the page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Kindly delete Mamakiki. --TamilMirchi (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you use Twinkle, you can tag pages for AFDs, PRODs or speedy deletion. Please remember to notify the page creator of the tagging and choose an appropriate CSD deletion criteria. This is much more efficient than posting notes on to a talk page. Admins regularly check CSD categories for tagged pages and will see them, along with the reason for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi

Thank you for creating S. U. Arun Kumar.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good job

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dhruv Vikram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:36, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi,

Just a reminder that ANY TIME you nominated a page for deletion (whether speedy deletion, PROD or AfD), you MUST inform the page creator with a notice on their user talk page. If you use Twinkle, please set up your preferences so that a notification is post automatically. This might involve you checking the right (or all!) checkboxes for different categories of CSD. This isn't an option, you need to inform the editor who created the page, even if it looks like they are not active, of the fact that there is a deletion discussion of their page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai 2 Bangkok.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 18:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TamilMirchi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My block was incorrect because I was not paid in any form. My block should be reversed because I can give evidence against being paid. The topics of which I created are because those pages did not have Wikipedia pages, not a financial stake. Here is prove that I am not paid. I created an article called Mamakiki. Later I realized that there was not enough sourcing other than a review from The New Indian Express and wanted to delete the page. If I were paid to create the article, wouldn't I want to keep the article even if it is not notable. The issue with me is that I am creating more articles than other people and am addicted to Wikipedia. Here is proof that I am addicted: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive320#TamilMirchi. Proof that I am not related to user who violate terms such as ArthurCurry70: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArthurCurry70/Archive. If delete pages is an issue, then by all means, I will stop deleting pages. If mass creation of articles is an issue, then I will edit Wikipedia less in the future. --TamilMirchi (talk) 20:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For the reasons GeneralNotability mentions below. TamilMirchi, be advised that any attempt to evade your block can result in those edits being reverted and articles being deleted. It will be a complete waste of your time. See WP:REVERTBAN. Editors who lack integrity are not welcome here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have an email in OTRS from a company who asked why the articles they paid for are gone...and wouldn't you know, you created or substantially contributed to every article they listed, and the articles all relate to that company. It's also funny that you mentioned Editor 2050 here considering that nobody brought that name up...but now that you bring it up, yes, I do think you're them. I don't know why you are AfDing or G7ing the articles, and frankly I don't care. You are lying and are probably evading a block, and short of a miracle you're probably never going to get unblocked. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Out of the articles created, they are not related in any way. Who is this company? I have no connection to this company and it is a mistake. I can give a reason for why I created each article. I create articles based on reliable sources on the internet. The company won't even know my name or Wikipedia name. Paid editors edit Wikipedia based on contacting the person themselves and can write detailed articles for which lack of sources exist such as Thittivasal. My articles are not in depth because I do not consult anybody in writing the article. I am not related to Editor 2050, either. That user has created an article for a director G. Marimuthu, the article is detailed and covers the life of director. My articles such as Draft:Thirumalai (director), Draft:S. U. Arun Kumar, and Draft: Vijay Chandar mainly refer about the films themselves and not so much detail about the director's life because I have no connection or conflict of interests to any of the articles that I created. I encourage everyone to deeply investigate the company to show that they do not know me. Take the page Draft:Linga (actor) for example. I had not written much information because I could not find any. If I were paid, wouldn't I just consult the person themself and interview them and write a long article. I have deleted one-hundred articles +, more than most users. Some company investigated why their articles were deleted. I guarantee you that the company did not state directly that they were paying TamilMirchi. All they would have said is that their articles have been deleted. I am the only user who has created and deleted articles. Lallu and Soundarya Bala Nandakumar appeared on Google with a Wikipedia link. But I later deleted them, because I realized that they were not notable. Lallu had played an important film in one film (Rangoon - as shown by this ref: [6]) and Soundarya Bala Nandakumar had only played an notable role in one television series [7]. If you go to Google now and search both of these actors know, there Wikipedia links are gone because I deleted them. You are ignoring my AfDing and G7ing, but these are what extinguish me from paid users. If I realized that an article I create is not notable per Wikipedia guidelines, I delete them. If I were paid to create articles and I deleted them, wouldn't I lose my money. The deletions (I have deleted 112 articles (77 as shown here [8] + 35 here [9]). I wanted Wikipedia to have more links for Tamil actors such as Draft:Mippu, but later started deleteing/draftifying the articles because none of the sources were independent. --TamilMirchi (talk) 18:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The company won't even know my name or Wikipedia name ... I guarantee you that the company did not state directly that they were paying TamilMirchi. You're creating a complicated hypothetical scenario, but it feels like lots of distractive arm-waving. This seems pretty straight-forward to me: A company emails Wikipedia with a list of articles it says they paid for and have been deleted. An admin looks at this list, and looks at who the creator and/or chief contributors are, and your name comes up for a significant number of them. "I guarantee you that the company did not state directly that they were paying TamilMirchi." This sounds like an argument of semantics. While it might be technically true that the complaining company did not pay you directly, it is also feasible that they paid an intermediary entity/person and that person subcontracted the work. So, let's not play language games here, please. Oh, and since you keep bringing up articles that you nominated for deletion, in an editing-for-pay situation, this could be indicative of someone trying to delete an article they wrote but never got paid for. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact the company's intermediaries. The company should be inquired in detail. I want to prove that I am not related to any company. The administrator should contact the company because no money was ever given to me. Kindly contact all people of the company and check if they are connected me please. The possibility that the company is lying should also be considered. From an editor's perspective, it is easy to frame someone as a paid editor, but other possibilities should also be considered. The truth is that the company is the one lying and not me. The company may have paid other editors, but I never have received any money. I do not the company's name or details, either. People (random IP users) have requested edits on my talk page, but I have told them that I do not edit Wikipedia for other people. If you find someone that is masquerading as me, tell them to log in to my account. Nobody knows my password. Tell the intermediaries if they know the real person who edits TamilMirchi. If they say yes, ask them to log in to my account. I can guarantee that some fraudulent activities are happening and I am not part of any of it. I can guarantee that nobody from that company/intermediaries can identify the user behind TamilMirchi.

I do not know all of the exact ideas on how undeletion works. The company is probably lying that they paid for an article simply to get the article back on Wikipedia. Seems likely. If the company stated that they wanted their articles back and that their articles were created by a random free user. This is the question that I request you to answer. If the company stated that they want all of there articles back on Wikipedia, but that no money was involved, would they contact you?. If that same company did not use the word paid in their email. Would you guys take the same action? No and that is why that company stated that they were paid. They wanted their articles back it seems. This should be reported to Wikipedia Central because this is the first time, you are framing a innocent user. You guys said that a company is complaining that there articles are getting deleted. But you guys are not specifying which user deleted the article. I deleted 112 articles due to notability issues. If I am the one deleting the articles, why would I create the article. Paid users do not create and delete. Look at all of the blocked users on Wikipedia, none of them would have created and deleted their own article.

From your perspective, if I am not paid, do you guys expect me to lie that I am paid. I want to know. From your perspective, if I am not paid, what else do you expect me to say? You are saying that I lie but I am a truthful person. If someone is paid, then that user is blocked and that is fine. But if some person lies that they paid me specifically for some edits, then that person should be inquired as well. Say that I was paid, then I would say so, and the block would be removed. It would be the easy way out if it was the truth. I can not lie that I was paid because I do not know which articles that I was "paid" for. The reason why I keep on saying that I am not paid is because I am not paid. You should be framing the fraudulent company and not me. There has been a company that has lied that they have paid for these articles to be created. It is easy to frame someone on the basis of false evidence. Please enquire this company and their intermediaries. Figure out from the intermediaries who is getting paid. There has been a confusion. One person has sent an administrator an email that contains false statements. --TamilMirchi (talk) 00:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let me try to present a different angle: A company contacts Wikipedia and complains that articles it paid for were created and deleted. Let's assume that you, somehow, are unwittingly at the centre of all of the creation and deletion of these articles. You've said that this company would "won't even know my name or Wikipedia name", so then what motive would this company have to implicate you in the centre of their complaint across a variety of articles? Did they just happen to pay some scammer who lured them into paying for articles that somehow, by extreme coincidence, YOU created of your own volition and interest? And they all got deleted? That's so astoundingly far-fetched. Anyway, it's not my job to convince you of why you are guilty, since this isn't a court, and even in courts, we don't care what the accused thinks. The evidence here is sufficient to deem you unsuitable to edit at present, and since there is no compelling evidence to the otherwise, you are unwelcome to edit here. If you have an "addiction" as you've claimed, you should quickly find some professional help for that, as addictions are serious medical issues and Wikipedia is not a suitable therapeutic outlet. As previously mentioned, any effort to circumvent your block will result in the deletion and reversion of all subsequent edits per WP:REVERTBAN, and unless you provide a coherent unblock request that is consistent with Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks, you are almost certainly going to have your talk page privileges pulled. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) TamilMirchi, Why did you mention being unrelated to Editor 2050 without being prompted by anyone? Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because of this, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#TamilMirchi. --TamilMirchi (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, you mentioned Editor 2050 at 22:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC), and GeneralNotability posted at COIN at 15:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC). So that's totally inaccurate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thedu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Behind Closed Doors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @GeneralNotability: --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, I guess asking you to read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID is redundant, but it couldn't hurt. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:12, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editors should go through the AfC process. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Little Hearts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TamilMirchi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "K. G. F".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Udyama Simham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG / WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — IVORK _Talk 05:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

add it to Vijay (actor) article. Thanks 123.215.16.234 (talk) 09:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]