User talk:SteveCof00

Welcome!

Hello, SteveCof00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for United Parcel Service. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --ErgoSum88 (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on School bus manufacturers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 11:38, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SteveCofoo!

First of all, I'm really sorry if it's inappropriate to contact you like this (if this is even getting to you). I'm writing you this note because someone needs to have a look at the introduction to the Stock Transportation, Ltd. page. It's been hijacked. I've done many edits on Wikipedia, but only to fix typos and grammar. I would mess it up royally, and besides, I don't know anything about that company, school buses, etc.

Thank you, and again, I'm very sorry if personal notes like this are not acceptable on Wikipedia. I promise I won't make a habit of it.

-LLothaire LLothaire (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism fixed Fortunately, it didn't need much in the way of editing or changing, so much as rolling back the somewhat obvious vandalism. --SteveCof00 (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		In recognition of the time and effort you have put into creating and improving school bus-related articles, I present you with The Original Barnstar. –BMRR (talk) 18:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. I noticed that your marked your last few edits to school bus as "minor." If you haven't already seen it, you might wish to check out the Wikipedia guidelines on what constitutes a "minor edit". Thanks and have a great day. :-) –BMRR (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there SteveCof00, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:SteveCof00/Ward Body Works. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw you attempted to archive the talkpage of Lincoln Town Car, but it didn't go so well. I have reverted the page move and nominated Lincoln Town Car/Archive1 (which is in wp:mainspace) for speedy deletion. I have also set up automated archiving using Miszabot, which I personally prefer over move archiving. Yoenit (talk) 11:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hello, I see you have done some work on IH trucks before. I created a little article on the International Harvester A-Series, but as this is not an area of expertise for me I would welcome any assistance, references, or pointers you could give. Also, I only got up to 1962 and there is a hurricane (Irene) on its way so maybe I'll never finish. If so, I bequeath the article to you. Thanks,  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 12:05, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope that this finds you well! I noted that you reverted my edit of Blue Bird Wanderlodge, adding back Category:Recreational vehicles. At present we have various RV manufacturers listed all over the place in various RV-related articles, and there is no one place in which all of this information is conglomerated, or hence accessible. The Category:Recreational vehicle manufacturers was created for the purpose of listing manufacturers, but as is often the case through multiple different editors, we multi-categorise for various superflous reasons. Hence in trying to rationalise the information somewhere and make it useful, I created the page List of recreational vehicle manufacturers, and am trying to place the specific vehicles/manufacturers in Category:Recreational vehicle manufacturers, leaving Category:Recreational vehicles for generic/universal terms. Hope that this helps! Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your merge proposal, there is no such thing as First Student (United States), it should just be First Student (the first First Student), and the others are properly named independent parts of First Group, with First Student Canada being the dominant part of First Canada. The official divisions of First America are First Student, First Canada, First Transit, First Services and Greyhound. Each of those divisions has its own internal subsidiaries. If you wish to reorganize those article make sure they fit with the corporate plan not how you imagine the might fit together. Thank you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank you for the merger tag. I created the EL-Series page with the hope that this would someday occur (under the EL-Series page of course). Sadowski (talk) 23:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Much could be said about this car within one (appropriate) page.

Hi there, I wanted to clarify the issues on the Ford Taurus. As it says here a car over 120 cubic feet of combined passenger and cargo volume is a full size car. If you look here: http://www.vehix.com/car-reviews/1999/ford/taurus/vehicle-specifications you will realize that the sum of the cargo and passenger volume equal 116.8 cubic feet, falling into the midsize category. However, in 2000, as you can see here: http://www.vehix.com/car-reviews/2000/ford/taurus/vehicle-specifications you'll notice that the interior volume for the Taurus is 121.7, just over the requirements for being a full-size sedan. Bookster451 (talk) 19:44, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to the math, I do concur that it does fall into the Large category; I just felt it was pointless to openly disagree with what was written in the specifications (where it listed mid-size in the EPA size class). I'm going to go on a limb and figure that as a typo/oversight; the math makes a better case. --SteveCof00 (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't think you were just trying to prove a point or whatever, anyway. Bookster451 (talk) 17:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Ford F-Series page is getting attacked by 2 IP Users. The edit was originally sourced from an internet forum. I saw you have made some edits there, thus I stopped by to ask for your advice.

This new line of truck features an innovative rack & pinion (EPAS) system which is showing signs of problems with customers. This Electronic Power Assisted Steering is an advanced system which increases efficiency and driver control; however, these benefits are outweighed by the fact that this system provides a ride that "pops and clunks" over small imperfections on driving surfaces.

The page history is littered with our edit war.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of automobile model nameplates with a discontiguous timeline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Escort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ford D3 platform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sedan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rockford Public School District 205, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public schools (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve, I came across your merger proposal for the Ford Freestar and Ford Windstar but I couldn't find the discussion. Do you mind directing me to it; thanks.VX1NG (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the article --Dana60Cummins (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ford F-Series third generation may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SteveCof00,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Full-size Ford (1969-1978) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SteveCof00. You have new messages at Vanjagenije's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Steve, I've stuck my oar in at Talk:School bus. Thank you for your continued work on this article. Peter Nankai (talk) 20:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SteveCof00, I noticed that your signature doesn't include a link to your user page, user talk page or your contributions page per WP:SIGLINK. If you aren't sure how to change it I'm happy to help, or you can look at Help:How to fix your signature. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IC Bus product lineup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 07:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to School bus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{convert|80|km/h|mph|}}, any buses with standing passengers are limited to {convert|60|km/h|mph|}}.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for improving the school bus article, I'm genuinely amazed at how much you've changed it! So Well Done & thank you :) Regards, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you've made many helpful contributions, but I am not sure why you made this glaring mistake in regards to the SVT Raptor. I've noticed people tend to get mixed up with model and production/release years. Usually model years can run from January 2nd (2009) of the previous year to December 31st of the actual year (2010). The SVT Raptor was unveiled in November 2008 and went into production in mid-2009, going on sale by the fall of 2009.

Is there a reason why you put "In 2010", without further distinguishing In 2010 as In the 2010 model year instead? Actual years in real-time (January to December), are obviously not the same as model years that typically run: September (2013) to August (2014) or January (2013) to December 2014 (ex. 2014 model year).

Unlike you, those who do not know better, will mistakenly assume the Raptor was not on sale before January 1, 2010. That isn't the case, since it was in 2009 for the 2010 model year. If you meant the 6.2 litre SVT Raptor, then I see your point. Exercise caution when editing certain concrete facts, as you usually have when you've previously edited, so we avoid misleading all readers (of a high-selling vehicle).——Carmaker1 (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lincoln Aviator may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• bridged the gap between the [[Mercury Mountaineer#Third generation (2006-2010)|Mercury Mountaineer)]] and the Navigator by upgrading its interior trim and offering a voice-based navigation system.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ford Transit may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ford Transit Courier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 22:57, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ford Modular engine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• falcon-xr8-goes-public-new-falcons-now-on-the-roads</ref> || Supercharged <br> Peak output of [{{Convert|375|kW|hp|0|abbr=on}} with overboost<ref>http://www.topgear.com/au/photos/ford-xr8</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SteveCof00! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 09:46, Friday, February 6, 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GM J platform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bertone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steve,
Please see Template talk:Infobox automobile#Capacity field. Peter Horn User talk 14:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CACH, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In this revision you've added over 5K of material to Minivan. Thanks for that, but this is an article already flagged with WP:VERIFY. I don't believe any of the new material is referenced and so is WP:ORIGINAL. Any plans to add references? --Cornellier (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ought one take silence as "no"? --Cornellier (talk) 04:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crown Firecoach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devopam (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited School bus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compartmentalization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Firecoach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 02:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please check your recent edit at Buick Roadmaster: diff. It contains several phrases with junk letters, for example "performance,tGeneraloMotors limitedlthe top speed". It should be checked by someone who understands the topic. Two IPs have done some edits since yours, and they have tried to fix things but not totally, and they have introduced at least one error. For example, the first of the following should be replaced with the second:

{{convert|17|mpg us|L/100 km mpg imp|abbr=on}}

{{convert|17|mpgus|L/100km mpgimp|abbr=on}}

Johnuniq (talk) 01:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't get why you added another column to this timeline. Almost every other automobile timeline template out there has just one header column, so why does Lincoln need another? It's implied that "mid-size" and "full-size" are cars, but we can easily call them "mid-size car" and "full-size car" instead. All the CUV/SUV/pickup rows are already grouped together in the usual fashion. To me, this extra column doesn't add any value to the timeline and wastes horizontal space. --Vossanova ^o< 01:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The editing still needs some technical tweaks, perhaps, but this may need better explanation than is allowed in any edit summary. As I thought the vertical column was starting to get cluttered, I followed the layout seen in several other timeline templates (Template:Mercedes-Benz vehicles, Template:BMW cars, and Template:Ferrari modern car timeline) (in terms of coding). It mostly seems to take up horizontal space because I didn't force the width (as the template fits differently on each screen, as does the text; I didn't want to force the text into line breaks). As I said, still not technically perfect yet. --SteveCof00 (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SteveCof00. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SteveCof00. Are you able to help me find out why International trucks are known in Wikipedia as International Harvester trucks? Regards, Eddaido (talk) 10:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not easy to explain in the scope of this talk page, but a good read of both International Harvester and Navistar International should help things. Long story short, International Harvester reorganized itself in 1986 as Navistar; the latter company is the successor. The S-Series trucks were produced during this transition. --SteveCof00 (talk) 10:36, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. What I was wondering was why "Harvester" is put into the name of International Trucks in Wikipedia. I've driven about in lots of Chevrolets and Fords and Internationals but I certainly would not want to get about the place in any kind of International harvester. Do you see what I mean. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 11:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• On 25 August 2017 a mistake in the name of "International" was shown to me. Since then I have tried to correct this one mistake.

I have driven International trucks, used their state registration cards, insurance cards, read their operators manuals, and talked with others who did the same. Of course this would be OR in an article, but we are on a talk page. I can post the truth and you can call me a liar.

Anyone close to International trucks can walk right up to a ratty S truck in a parking lot and look at it. Of course you don't have to, and you can't use it in an article, but you can use it as background. If you can't/won't do that you could at least read sources objectively.

I keep providing sources for using the name "International" and nobody provides any source disputing it. Of course not. Even if someone could come up with a single source disputing it the number of supporting sources should overwhelm it anyway.

People have used their own opinions with no sources to oppose something which has been overwhelming sourced. Some have edited these articles (I have, too). I think some people are too close and can have an ingrained opinion that they can/will not look at objectively.

I believe people are standing in the way of correcting Wikipedia for their own personal reasons. People who are objective can look at and discuss evidence. And if you are only subjective should you be editing an encyclopedia?

Feel free to call me a liar who is only trying to help my ego. But when this move request fails Wikipedia will still be presenting incorrect information across the board and some people did nothing to correct it, not even consider it honestly. Sammy D III (talk) 12:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SteveCof00. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SteveCof00! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:58, Wednesday, July 18, 2018 (UTC)

One question regarding your revamp of Ford Super Duty engine: Why duplicate the valvetrain layout and compression ratio in the output table? They're the same for each engine, so in my opinion it only serves to make the table more cluttered and more difficult to read in terms of being able to see power and torque values at a glance. --Olds 403 (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(In the revision, I probably could have paid a little more attention to the title) For the most part, I wanted to shift things from output to an overview of all three engines, including output. I might have ended up with a little information overload, and I tried to revise a little of it. As the stock compression ratio is common to all three engines (according to what is included here, that is the format I have posted, rather than three separate entries. --SteveCof00 (talk) 10:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It does look clearer now. I meant why include the compression ratio there at all, but I suppose that since most engines do have differing ratios that affect output, it's helpful to confirm the information there when it's the same. --Olds 403 (talk) 13:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SteveCof00. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making certain edits in articles, in which you don't fully know the context of what you're addressing. Very clearly you entirely decided on March 18, 2018 to undo what I had typed up and edited here, instead replacing it with conjecture and contradictory text that hurts the credibility of the article. It is also interruptive, as someone who reads that gets the wrong narrative.
What you reworded poorly, conveys to me, you are not really aware of how the automotive development process works at Ford and just jumped on changing things around without being absolutely certain or getting proper assistance. Pre-development on the U152 ended with design freeze in February 1998, which is when the actual program began and ran until 2000, with engineering sign-off. So why undo the hardwork of someone else or muddle it up, if not maybe on purpose because I have addressed you before about my discontent with erroneous submissions that confuse people or make it harder for me to also edit?
It wasn't an improvement to the article, when you did not do the research yourself and verify what you changed on March 18, 2018 to be credible. Ford most cetainly did not develop the U152 from 1995 to 1998. The program began in the latter half of 1995, fully kicking off after design concluded and an internal package plan was reached, running till to the first half of 2000. I am fixing that ASAP and suggest you do thorough research for once. I would have preferred to be adding new information to Wikipedia, than constantly wasting time correcting the silly mistakes of others.--Carmaker1 (talk) 06:02, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles Ford Ranger (Americas) and Ford Ranger (T6). You have to edit the article Ford Ranger (T6) as well. See Ford Ranger (T6): Revision history (-2,962 and -3,561 bytes‎). Thanks.--Prince Ferfried (talk) 16:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve. Thanks for all your work on the History section of this article, it is a great improvement. Sorry if it seems like I'm being pedantic, but I think the 1980s and 2000s sections could use some more references for the key points. (Just thought I should explain the reason for my tagging.)
Thanks again, 1292simon (talk) 23:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ford F-Series (thirteenth generation). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop making inaccurate claims in regards to the origin of the P552 body design, in relation to a previewing 2013 concept vehicle called the Atlas. It is contradictory information, that does not belong in the article and borne of your own opinionated narrative/belief, which itself is misinformed. P552 design work was completed in 2011 at the internal stage FAA/AA1 (Final Appearance Approval), before work began on the Atlas project in 2012 and design freeze was achieved at FDJ stage. A production vehicle body designed before a show concept's subsequent fruition and showcase, cannot be based on it, by virtue of the concept of TIME. I have pointed this out before regarding the Atlas, but I only can see the aspect of incorrigibility with you accepting this. Ignoring what has been pointed out already and then do the same thing again, without making sure it's consistent with reality. You did a nice article cleanup, but you already have been told before that the 13th generation F-150 is not based on the Atlas. It's vice-versa. I am tired of addressing this. A journalist that does not work for Ford and is giving their simple opinion (as if fact), is not a credible source for Ford product development. Carmaker1 (talk) 23:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WTF??? Please let me know if I can help you rescue it. Sammy D III (talk) 01:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding a controversial move without discussion. The thread is US school buses have been hidden from search engines without discussion. The discussion is about the topic US School buses.

No new move from QuadColour. Part of the background is here if you care. Sammy D III (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting a move of International Harvester Loadstar. I am telling you because you have opposed this move in the past. No reply needed. Thank you. Sammy D III (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for going there. No reply needed. Sammy D III (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for going to International Loadstar. This person changed a lot. I see they changed something about PayStar, DuraStar and 3300 at least. I thought you might care. Thank you. Sammy D III (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to be clear that this was not a mistake or vandalism. I was told to and then complemented for it. Sammy D III (talk) 11:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok (and I welcome the change); sometimes things can get "lost in translation" in large changes to an article (I have done that myself). --SteveCof00 (talk) 07:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve, I was doing some minor edits to this article and noticed an unfinished sentence recently added by you: "Following the replacement of the Mark VI by the Mark VIII, the " I was going to finish the sentence but realized that I can't imagine what's to come next. Best,  Mr.choppers | ✎  05:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes Awkward... And I went back and I fixed it (among other things). --SteveCof00 (talk) 10:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!  Mr.choppers | ✎  12:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WayneBuslogo1980s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No longer orphaned; image was replaced in infobox by different file and now has been returned elsewhere in article space --SteveCof00 (talk) 04:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Rockford, Illinois, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Rockford, Illinois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Automotive Barnstar
		For excellent work in splitting out the second, third, and fourth generations of the Chevrolet C/K into separate articles, all of noticeably higher quality, I hereby award you the Automotive Barnstar. --Sable232 (talk) 14:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ford VN platform, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ford VN platform until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wardbuslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate you voting either for or against my proposal re the above at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles.

Thank You GTHO (talk) 02:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ford full-size timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ICBus logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 02:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AmTranbuslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 20:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2000sCarpenterbuslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wardbuslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steve - thanks for organizing the Ford Escort (North America) article. However, I noticed an alarming number of factual errors, most of them stemming from an over reliance on a single source which is not always correct (at least on earlier years). For instance, the SS was available in 1981 and did not receive the HO engine from what I can tell - see here but more importantly, Autoweek from May 1982 expressly spells out how and when the HO option was introduced (only in the automatic EXP for the first month or two, then the EXP and the new GT). Here is a Marti Report on an '81 SS; build date March 1981. You also added a non-existent 1.1 engine to my 1981 Road & Track quote - as per all of my sources, the 1.3 was planned but the 1.1 was only ever intended for Europe. In any case, it was certainly not mentioned in the R&T reference.

Also, why remove the power conversions? The article was already written using conversion templates as per project guidelines, but you removed them throughout. Thanks,  Mr.choppers | ✎  01:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ford early commercial trucks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ford commercial trucks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ford full-size timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Oldsmobile Bravada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Oldsmobile Bravada, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]