User talk:St.nerol

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:37, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sigehelmus. I noticed that you recently removed content from Spotify without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Sıgehelmus♗_(Tøk) 18:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is your user name deliberately a bit tricky to rag or am I doing something daft? I can't tell what's going on with it on my own talk page? There seem to be brackets in it, but j don't think I put them therr. Sorry, I worry this is a very stupid question. Irtapil (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, there should be no brackets. My user name is "St.nerol". Perhaps you're thinking about the square brackets in the code that makes a link: User talk: Irtapil? Anyway, don't worry about stupid questions! :) —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 09:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To ping someone, you should write {{ping|St.nerol}}. This is automatically replaced with an "@" and the username. For example, I hope this gives you a notification: @Irtapil: ... —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 09:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is true when using "source editing". When using "visual editing" it works differently and there should be a button for tagging. Trying: @Irtapil —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 09:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix your signature settings in your wikipedia preferences. In your recent posts to WP:COIN, your signature displays as (St.nerol) and none of the links (user page, talk page, contributions) work because they don't target your actual user name. Thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 15:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schazjmd: Thanks for pointing this out. It seems to me that this affected only the link to my contributions, which might be why this has been unnoticed for quite some time. It should work now. —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 15:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Frieren‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 00:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xexerss: I understand you disagree with the edits. However, the edit summaries said what was removed and why (see [1], [2]). We can discuss the content on the talk page. But can you justify this template, and explain the edit summaries you would have preferred? —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 10:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "Trimming circulation numbers", but I don't think this properly explains the reason behind the removal of the other figures, so I take the opportunity to ask here. In my opinion, I think it is useful to have a record of the figures that have been reported regularly, and I think that they could contribute to a potential section dedicated to the sales of the series, like in the Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba or Jujutsu Kaisen articles, but if you know of any guideline or consensus opposing this practice, let me know please. Xexerss (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My interpretation was just that the paragraph was probably accumulated by different authors adding the most up-to-date information at each point in time, and that the older figures were not so interesting anymore. Looking at your other examples, I was probably wrong. The other issue, about "best selling", seems more complicated. I have started a discussion at the talk page. —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 11:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from citing the IMDb: as per WP:RS/IMDB, it's not deemed reliable. Thank you. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 14:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: The webpage I cited captures statistics from IMDb. Since it was used to verify a statement about IMDb itself, I think that WP: PRIMARYCARE might apply. As you are aware, there are already two good secondary sources that establish the notability of the claim. Readers might want to verify it directly themselves. —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 23:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]