User talk:SmokerOfCinnamon

Hello, SmokerOfCinnamon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 17:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lana Lokteff, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Calton | Talk 03:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm afraid I had to delete Lana Lokteff, as a previous discussion has concluded that we should not have an article on this person. If you disagree, I suggest you contact Deletion Review. You should first consult our criteria for notability of people in order to ensure that your request explains either why the original discussion was uninformed, or why things have changed since then. Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 07:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I wanted to let you know I reverted your addition of the white supremacist category over at Margaret Sanger. This is an article that often gets targeted for various accusations of racism and eugenecist theories. If you genuinely believe this category applies (and can provide sound sources), please attempt to establish WP:CONSENSUS first at Talk:Margaret_Sanger. Cheers, Basie (talk) 23:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for late reply, but here is some proof that she is a white supremacist:

• She wanted to "exterminate the Negro population".
• She said that "colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated".
• She also referred to Orientals and Jews as "human weeds".

SmokerOfCinnamon (talk) 22:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's really important that when making statements about a person, even one no longer living, that we have really solid independent sources to back it up. For this kind of thing, I'd imagine you'd need a number of reliable references (not including sites and authors known as proponents of white nationalism/supremacy). Basie (talk) 02:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ayla Stewart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 11:46, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Isaac Baker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of Sellner being 'category:white nationalists' That should be stated and sourced in the article before such a category is added - WP:CATVER I'll leave it to you. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Margaret Sanger above: If you want to include that information in an article after you have been reverted, it is best to start a discussion on the article's talk page. Before you do on an article which is often subjected to contentious editing, it is best to go through the talk pages' history to see what has been discussed before. BTW: Sanger, for one, is often taken out of context. When discussion on the talk page, wp:cite wp:RS to support your points. See wp:BRD, help:talk pages, and wp:talk page guidelines Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Knowledge is powder (talk) 03:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi Knowledge is powder (talk) 03:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Marcus Nakao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alt-lite, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. wumbolo ^^^ 19:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SmokerOfCinnamon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M8l8th is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M8l8th until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A loose necktie (talk) 03:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holden Matthews (arsonist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holden Matthews (arsonist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 20:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Holden Matthews (arsonist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

BLP violation as he has not been tried let alone convicted

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:22, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Daniel Hertz. Since you had some involvement with the Daniel Hertz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matias Oyarzo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matias Oyarzo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 04:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odinia International is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odinia International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ffranc (talk) 07:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allison Christine Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Christine Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StAnselm (talk) 15:08, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Stephen French (troll). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31#Stephen French (troll) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. gnu57 13:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alt-right musicians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Douglass Mackey has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 21 § Douglass Mackey until a consensus is reached. wbm1058 (talk) 17:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]