User talk:Serte

Serte's Talk Page
Start a new topic Speak in Portuguese or English

Someone tagged the article as non-notable. It is obviously notable, since rink hockey is a major sport in Portugal. I've contacted the user and removed the tag. Keep your good work. By the way, visit Portal:Portugal and give your help. Include rink hockey related articles in the "to do" list, if you want. Cheers! Afonso Silva 19:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Luís. Já vi que és relativamente novo por aqui, pelo menos no que a editar diz respeito. É sempre bom ver mais portugueses por cá, já que a maioria dos artigos relativos ao nosso país estão bastante abaixo do que seria de esperar. Gostava de te convidar a visitar e se quiseres colaborar no Portugal Portal. Qualquer dúvida que tenhas estou sempre disponível para te ajudar, e se quiseres, como primeira dica, quando não souberes como fazer algo, como por exemplo uma tabela, limita-te a copiá-la de um outro artigo substituindo o conteúdo. Com o tempo vais aprendendo. Já agora fica sabendo que para além de mim podes sempre contar com o Afonso Silva, provavelmente o utilizador mais activo aqui p'rós nossos lados lusitanos, que julgo que posso dizer, estará sempre disponível para te ajudar para além de ser uma óptima pessoa, de crítica construtiva e uma excelente ajuda em colaborações a meias (isto sou eu a ver se lhe dou graxa...). Bem, acho que disse tudo. Podes sempre ver a minha página de utilizador onde encontras a maior parte das minhas contribuições (a maior parte meio obsessivo-compulsivas). Alguma coisa User talk:Joaopais. Um abraço. Joaopais 04:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, tou a ver que o João já andou a falar de mim (Eu mudei de username). Queria só dar-te os parabéns pelo bom trabalho que fizeste com as freguesias de Barcelos. Começaste logo pelo mais difícil, nunca cheguei a perceber como é que aquilo tem 89 freguesias. És de lá? Já agora aproveito para confirmar o que o João disse, qualquer coisa que precises é só dizer, e ajuda com o Portal se quiseres. Se tiveres algum projecto que queiras realizar é só pedir ajuda. Mário 22:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Obrigado. Vou tentar ir fazendo outros concelhos à medida que ganhe paciência, porque é algo um bocado repetitivo e então tantas freguesias... Como é que acabou com 89 freguesias não faço ideia :P Obrigado por tudo pela disponibilidade --Serte 22:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words. There was was one section in Portuguese I hid (inside <!-- --> tags) instead of removing it. Could you check if there was anything important? - Skysmith 13:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You left your comment in the right place. Are there any articles you had in mind for improvement? Anyone can nominate an article, just follow the instructions at the bottom of the page. Each Sunday, the article with most votes is the one selected. You can vote for as many or as few articles as you like. Oldelpaso 15:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure i agree with sunday being chosen as the day.--88.105.110.173 07:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say that the results table you replaced on the Superliga page looks perfect using every browser except Firefox. Its only on firefox that the names along the top are shown horizontally instead of Vertically. Table itself is perfect and prob looks better than the one you are using at present. Niall123 20:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just pointing out that this is what the table looks like when I'm using Internet Explorer. [1] Niall123 23:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the G14 template is only temporary as I change all the club pages. Please give me another 5 minutes. I'm changing the template to be joinable to other templates used by Serie A and the Premier League. Niall123 23:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Partly my fault. Should have done the club pages first for the extra coding. Check out the bottom of the AC Milan page to see what I'm doing. You can also use the template seperately by using the 2 tags "fb start" and "fb end" around it. Its the way all the templates for Premier League and Serie A are going. Looks better IMO. Niall123 23:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My advice is to place a hold-on tag on the article, and I will ask an administrator to take a look. ---Charles 18:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the article Responses to Michael Schumacher's retirement. This just seems like a long list of quotes, conflicting with Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I think you could edit the main article just to say "Many important people, such as ___ and ___, commmented on his retirement" without actually including all the quotes verbatim. Thanks, NawlinWiki 18:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could the quotes, which are retrivable from older versions of the Michael Schumacher article, could go to Wikiquote, which seems to be designed for this kind of thing? 4u1e

Good work on Schumacher - how do you feel about others editing it? I've got some ideas, but the easiest thing is probably to implement them. :) --4u1e 06:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a go then, although it probably won't be this evening now. I'll warn you now, some of my ideas will make it rather shorter- I'll try and do it in such a way that it is easily reversible! Cheers. --4u1e 16:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just having a go at it now. Cheers. --4u1e 07:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I'm done. Mostly editing for length, rather than neutrality - where I think you've done a very good job. I'm wondering now whether, in the context of Schumacher's overall career, the 1998 British GP is noteworthy enough to mention here? What do you think? Feel free to revert my changes by the way - happy to discuss and start again if you wish. Good work on the main article too - looking much better now. --4u1e 08:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I was working from the view that if we need to get it shorter, it usually easier to over do it and then add stuff back in - gives us a better perspective on what's important. Let's see how it does down in the article! Cheers. --4u1e 09:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please discuss the races with out retirement thing on his talk page so we ccan sort this out thanks--Lucy-marie 16:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, I didn't realise they were serving different purposes. And no, two is not too much, four is overkill though! Best regards -- Mark83 18:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Schumacher&curid=20396&diff=84209285&oldid=84208240

I think there must be a better source to cite - not that I've found one yet. The thing is, team orders weren't unequivocally banned - the rule says something like "team orders which affect the outcome of a race". -- Ian Dalziel 12:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't that reference good? It is about the fact that team orders were banned after the two incidents with the ferraris in 2002, in Austria and USA. If you read the reference well, you'll see "The rule forbidding teams from determining the finish of their drivers resulted from Ferrari instructing Barrichello to let five-time champion chumacher pass him to win the Austrian Grand Prix earlier this year, and Barrichello winning the U.S. Grand Prix when Schumacher slowed down in a bid for a dead-heat finish.". This proves what is stated in the article. I think if something has to change, is the wikipedia article to match the reference, not the opposite. Cheers--Serte 13:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ian_Dalziel"

True - the statement in Wikipedia is even more sweeping, I hadn't noticed that. -- Ian Dalziel 14:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By way of a ref for the banning, see this:[3]. Those words now seem to appear in the sporting regulations for each season, which are also publised at www.fia.com. 4u1e

Sempre às ordens. Já agora, excelente trabalho o teu! Parabéns. Joaopais 18:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are a number of issues with that template:

1. There are no obvious benefits, as the table syntax is pretty simple already.
2. The colours should be parametrised, not part of the name of each template.
3. Standardised columns prevents extra information being added to the table later, such as a 'notes' column.

Thanks, ed g2s • talk 12:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the basis of taking a short break from Schumacher, I'm taking another stab at my pet project: Brabham Racing Organisation.

I'm too close to it to see it's faults, would you mind having a look and either editing or commenting on any improvements it needs. I'm thinking of putting it up for FA shortly.

Cheers. 4u1e 13:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work, but should we not include António de Spínola and/or the National Salvation Junta before Palma Carlos? I did after all do something similar with Template:PortuguesePresidents. Biruitorul 06:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if that's what the list says, then let's stick with it. I think I may put the Junta in parentheses right before Palma Carlos, just to indicate that someone was in fact heading the Portuguese government during those three exciting weeks in spring 1974. Biruitorul 10:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks fine. Thank you. Biruitorul 11:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My French is fairly basic, but I had a go at translating the Saint Etienne section in your sandbox. Its paraphrased in places, the bit I'm most unsure of is using mixed in place of bilan mitigé. Oldelpaso 11:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I realized you have improved a contribution that 84.50.171.2 has made in regards to Michael Schumacher's perfermance in 1991 - 1993. 84.50.171.2 has also made a change to the number of GP for Michael Schumacher, and it seems like you had no trouble with it. However, according to the official formula 1 website, his GP is 250, not 249. Did you just happen to overlooked or is it really 249, in which I should not keep reverting it back to 250? --Cyktsui 00:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. I am just worried that I have reverted something that I shouldn't have reverted. You have been excellent of making the article getting into GA standard! -Cyktsui 21:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping a line to say good job on the editing for the Colorado Avalanche article. It needed a cleanup and re-working pretty badly in some areas. Good job!!! Jmlk17 00:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, seeing you are interested in football this is an invitation to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 20:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that, i know the stats were completely wrong, i had taken the template from another league an just re-entered the correct stats, i guess when u saw the incorrect table, i was still re-entering them, i'm actually finished now, i finished just about the same time u sent me that message, have a look BWINLIGA 2006-07...also i'm trying to make the top 2 division in the por. football system separate articles, one for BWINLIGA, and one for league of honour Muppeteer

Hey, thanks for the complement. But regarding the BWINLIGA article, thats all i feel like doing for today, i'll do the rest tomorrow, but if u or anyone else u know wants to finish it off be my guest. Also i had a question: do u know how to make a new template each for the BWINLIGA seasons and the Liga de Honra seasons?. ciao

WPTP has made it quite clear, that the section is to be named Honored Members (only). It's makes it clear as well, the Honored Members section is to be made up of the Hall of Famers and Retired Numbers (only). PLEASE stop going against the WikiProject's desires, I'm certain (someday) both Sakic and Forsberg will enter the HHOF & have their numbers retired, be patient. Besides Sakic & Forsberg's accomplishment are already mention at the Franchise records section and Sakic's captaincy tenure is shown at the Team Captains section. GoodDay 16:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for my attitude, forgive me for being an asshole. You're correct about my barking at you. If I'd had used my brain more, I would have notice it was an anon-user who (first) added Sakic & Forsberg. Still, that's not a good excuse for my 'hot headed' behaviour. Again, I'm sorry for offending you. PS- I'm keeping your posting (at my page) intact, as a reminder to myself to 'read the history' of a page more carefully and curb my 'passions'. GoodDay 17:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Airo, by Hbdragon88, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Airo seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Airo, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Airo itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to let you know I'm amazed at the effort you put into the list, I just don't think it's quite up to snuff, because you can't use the same style as the player list. Take a look at my sandbox page.. I started working on this well before you nominated the Colorado page (coincidentally, I'm working on a list of NJ Devils players that I'm now basing off your featured Colorado list that I had also started before your nomination). I think for draft picks, it's best to separate them by draft year, with links to each individual draft year. Also, it's key to include notes about if any picks were traded. I'm basing this somewhat off the featured lists of football first-round draft picks (here and here). If you want to change it to work with my suggestions, let me know and I'll help you out. At any rate, nice job on all the hard work you've been doing lately, and please don't take my comments as anything other than positive critiques. Anthony Hit me up... 14:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it's a good idea to get an idea of where the WikiProject wants to go with it, because whatever gets featured will set the standard for the rest of the teams (see New Jersey Devils and all the precedents it has set). We want to do this right the first time so we don't have to go back later and say "well, now we want it this way, so let's fix it". I'll post this for discussion at the project talk page & see what people have to say about it. Anthony Hit me up... 15:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know, it's just that when I first started on Wikipedia, I got into some heated arguments with people because one or both of us took critiques personally, so I'm a little gun-shy about stuff like that. I know you know I'm not ragging on you, it's just a reflexive defense thing, lol. Anthony Hit me up... 11:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• BTW, started working in my sandbox on converting the Avs draft picks over; User:FutureNJGov/sandbox/Avsdraft is where it's at. You can just copy & paste if/when you start working on it. I've got 1995 done so far; I'll do the others as I can. Anthony Hit me up... 23:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a fair use rationale for the use of Image:Platiniec.jpg in a specific section of Michel Platini, I hope you can support this solution. – Ilse@ 23:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Metclub logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hcblogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Moon2ndskin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ocbarcelos.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SoWhat book cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Julgo que querias algo como isto? Zé da Silva 22:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Serte. It seems, that obnoxious editor has returned (via his 'anon' moniker). If he continues further, my guess is he will be 'permanently banned'. PS- I commend you, on your coolness. GoodDay 23:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You have received this newsletter because you have added your name here. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter, please remove your name. From the automated Animum Delivery Bot (delivered on 19:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)). [reply]

Note: You have received this because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. --Animum Delivery Bot 02:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Getting Joe Sakic passed was a team effort. Without your help, it wouldn't have happened. Kaiser matias 04:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

Weekly Delivery

Weekly Delivery

edit  WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter Dear Serte! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been many more new things going on at WP:HOCKEY; this newsletter will be sent every two weeks/months. If you wish to not receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the newsletter mailing list. Thanks! edit  New recognized content By The Pancake of Heaven! There has been numerous new recognized content, so much that it's too time-consuming to sift through the "trophy cases" on WP:HOCKEY. Some interesting achievements: 2016 NHL Draft has been newly created and has immediately become a GA status article. The Vancouver Canucks task force has become active again, thanks to Canuckian89! J.D. Watt has been declined at WP:AFD. Drafts related to the OHL have been published! edit  Task forces By The Pancake of Heaven! We are working to create a new task force within the WikiProject to deal with topics related to the Pittsburgh Penguins. It hasn't been created yet; but it aims to expand articles based on former and current Pittsburgh Penguins players and articles. Good luck! edit  New Administrators Currently 0 promoted admins! Be the first one at WP:RFA. edit  Featured Topic Drive By Maxim The original featured topic drive, initiated by Scorpion0422, has concluded succesfully. National Hockey League awards is now a featured topic, with 24 articles in total. Of them, 20 are featured lists, one is a featured article, and the other three are trophy articles that were too short to become featured lists. Eight users signed up to help out, shown here. The next Featured Topic hasn't been decided upon, and the ideas and organization for it fell apart. If you have any ideas, don't hesitate to share them at WT:HOCKEY. edit  Notes More editors are needed to help out with the newsletter. The newsletter creator doesn't have an infinite nor perfect supply of ideas, and thus he might omit some interesting news. Portal:Ice hockey is being considered for featured status. Should Chris Pronger have been suspended for more than eight games for stomping on Ryan Kesler? Vote here! Help Patrik Stefan -- one of the greatest NHL draft busts -- become a GA status article.

Weekly Delivery

Weekly Delivery