User talk:Sdname9

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sdname9 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm sorry for not understanding English Wikipedia rules. I just think that a well-known program in Vietnam is outstanding enough to write articles on a wiki, which is similar in Vietnamese language. Please ask the administrator to unlock the account, I swear, I will not violate it anymore, I will carefully read the rules before writing. Sdname9 (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D (talk) 05:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sdname9 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understood what I was doing wrong and promised to rediscover the rules of wikipedia, I will never do it again. I will make a positive contribution to projects about Vietnam. For example, articles about universities in Vietnam, famous landmarks in Vietnam, ... @Nick-D: Sdname9 (talk) 05:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I recommend the best way back to editing for you is to take the standard offer and not edit for six months. PhilKnight (talk) 06:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Sdname9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mighty Guardian: Lost Avian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sdname9 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello admins, I have been waiting for 6 months since being banned, I have thoroughly researched all wikipedia rules, so can I please unlock my account, I will Follow and do not violate any wikipedia rules anymore. Sdname9 (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to have continued using sock puppets. The standard offer requires that you not use any sock puppets for six months. You should also list all the accounts you have ever used. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please describe what rules you have violated, what you will do differently in the future, and what productive edits you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 09:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's your relationship to Ryusoul and Lupinpat? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate and 331dot Previously I did not know that using multiple accounts could violate wikipedia regulations (I missed using the secondary account to clear the quick delete table). After doing some research I learned that I only use the secondary account for minor modifications and does not produce polemic actions. I want to contribute more about articles about movies, writing about Asian countries, ... Sdname9 (talk) 09:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]