User talk:Sciencia58

I am not German but I can speak a bit hi any way!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.2.11.216 (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sciencia58, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 08:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as anaphylaxis are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. JFW | T@lk 21:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Redrose64. An edit that you recently made to Mendelian inheritance seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:51, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redrose64 Please read the discussion page of the article first, before making false speculations. Sciencia58 (talk) 08:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ronald Grossarth-Maticek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Self-knowledge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Hans Eysenck are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. You've been told this by someone else, but I want to reinforce it. Doug Weller talk 16:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could I add that calling the work of other editors "manipulative" when the material is closely based on reliably-cited stories is a personal attack, something forbidden here on Wikipedia. Please read the policy: No Personal Attacks. I would be grateful if you would withdraw the comment and strike it out <s>like this, struck-out text</>), and not to repeat it or say anything else like it. Thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The diagram should show the source of the statement made. The name of the author of the statement should be written on it. It is not enough if this is stated in the explanation, because the images can also be used by other wikis. Sciencia58 (talk) 22:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well we could do that (belt, braces, and suspenders, we'd call that, to make quite sure the trousers don't slip), but it's way beyond policy. If it'll make you happy I'll add a mention. ... oh, I see, you mean actually in the image. Even more unusual. Again, that's way way way beyond policy requirements. I'll consider whether it can be done without making things worse - since few editors have the skills to edit diagrams, it's far less accessible to minor adjustment, and might be inappropriate. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ronald Grossarth-Maticek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that medical scholar Ronald Grossarth-Maticek directed a long-term study involving 30,000 people from 18,000 households, spanning more than 20 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ronald Grossarth-Maticek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ronald Grossarth-Maticek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sciencia58

Thank you for creating Werner W. Wittmann.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work! See notes at article talk page.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Surplus killing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have reverted your edit to Mongolian wolf for two reasons. (1) It was not a reference; the link should go under the "External links" section. (2) The pix you linked to is that of a Himalayan wolf in a zoo at Darjeeling, India, therefore I did not relocate it. If you should visit the Himalayan wolf page, you will find that the taxonomy of the Himalayan and Mongolian wolves is currently under debate. At this stage, we do not know which of these two wolves formed the holotype for C.l. chanco until the holotype (in the British Museum) is DNA analysed. That should be coming soon. Regards, William Harris (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valerius Geist, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Calamity and Anthropogenic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clitoris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The sexual activity during pregnancy article is a perfect place for your "sex positions for pregnant women" image. I think it's a good image. Thanks for creating it. Enlightenedstranger0 (talk) 06:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have edited or that may interest you, (Clitoris), has content that I have proposed to be removed and moved to another article, (Human clitoris). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 05:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sciencia58, thanks for creating this diagram and adding it to some Wikipedia articles. Unfortunately, I found two translation errors in the English text of the diagram. The phrase "lose sediments" is not correct. The correct wording should be "loose sediments". Also, I think that you have translated from the German word "Hebung" to "heaving" in English (as in the German version of this diagram, Kreislauf_der_Gesteine_1.png). This English word "heaving" is too informal for a geological diagram. In this situation, it is much better translated to "uplift" in English. Also, I recommend that you should change "Magma" to "magma", for consistency, because all the other text is lowercase. Can you make these changes in the diagram. please? (I have duplicated this message on your Wikimedia Commons talk page, because I want you to receive it as soon as possible). GeoWriter (talk) 22:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, I have uploaded a new version. You may not see the new version immediately, sometimes it helps to clear the browser cache, sometimes it takes time. The corrected version is now available. Sciencia58 (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]