User talk:Satellizer

User:Satellizer

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Satellizer.

This user is male.	This user is a participant in WikiProject Anime and manga.	This user is a participant in WikiProject Video games.
37,000+ This user has made more than 37,000 contributions to Wikipedia.	This user was ranked 1755 on the list of Wikipedians by number of edits on November 4, 2016.	This editor is a Senior Editor III and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star.

Please put comments below this section. Thanks. satellizer (talk - contributions)

Look, I'm sorry for starting an edit war with you and several of your other colleagues, but I just want to leave at things the way I edit the articles. I just want you and several people know that is not what I meant, Tsukune and Moka are not lovers in the manga neither is the anime. They are still just friends and that is how the series functions, plus it is not confirmed in the series by the original manga artist, Akihisa Ikeda. If any of you guys can contact him from Japan to my address at 3201 W 10th Ave Pl Broomfield, CO 80020, I could have a little chat with him face-to-face and we'll put aside this once and for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Duran (talk • contribs) 15:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Baby Bonnie Hood.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work creating Asuna (Sword Art Online). It looks like a potential Good Article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. :) Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 04:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I came by to say the same thing, actually, about Asuna and Kirito. Very nice. Sergecross73 msg me 15:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 09:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Hey, good work on creating articles for SAO characters. As a SAO fan myself, this is very much appreciated. -Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, could you write article on Madoka girls? Madoka, Homura, and Mami appear to have been covered by several sources (both in Japanese and in English), so the potential is there. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! I'll see what I can do for the Madoka girls, probably not immediately though as there's other SAO and IRL stuff I might have to attend to first, sorry. However you might have to ensure everything is factually accurate after I write them as I honestly know absolutely nothing about the Madoka franchise. Thanks again! Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 12:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Satellizer, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 13:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 13:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is that title really necessary? Why not something like Hestia(fictional character) or Hestia(anime)? Even Hestia(DanMachi) would be better IMO. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 04:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I've moved it to Hestia (character). "Character" seems to be used more often than "fictional character" for disambiguation. [1] [2] Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 10:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Satellizer,

I just wanted to thank you for your recent comments on that page. I found them to be very poignant, especially with regards to the mental gymnastics required to equate moving pages to deleting them. I've personally giving up trying to explain the technical differences; the "abuse mentality" crowd tends to be so terrified of any rights being abused that they don't actually consider what is going on (i.e. the page content is still there at a new title, and the new name is still linked from the old page). An odd attitude to have, on an encyclopedia where anyone can edit.

Have a good one, Ajraddatz (talk) 04:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I agree on everything you said. :) Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 08:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	How about a little bit of Equivalent Exchange, especially with your own work on those SAO character pages? I think you deserve it as well, partner. Zappa24Mati 04:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Great gif btw :) Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 08:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your Asuna and Kirito articles, they are pretty top notch! 110.20.207.12 (talk) 08:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 08:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Silver STiki Barnstar of Merit
		Congratulations, Satellizer! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 10,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Dcirovic (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 13:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've still been arguing with Czar over the notability of video game characters? You know, there's a certain character article or two I've been wanting to get to GA for some time now, but I've been afraid that he would come in and try to argue its notability. What do you think?

There's also a certain character article I've been wanting to undo a redirect of, and put in more information and sources at.

Really, this whole issue with the character articles will probably never be resolved. This whole debate his been going on for years. No one can seem to agree on where the bar should be raised. Kokoro20 (talk) 17:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What are those character articles? I might be able to see what I can do. The subjective and sometimes contradictory nature of Wikipedia policy means such issues are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon; creating the article and letting consensus decide if it does get nominated for deletion is all we can do. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 02:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been wanting to get Lili and Ling Xiaoyu from Tekken to GA. There's quite a few Tekken character articles, but none of them are at GA yet. Maybe you could end up reviewing those two?

As for the article I've been wanting to revive, I've been wanting to do the one for R. Mika from Street Fighter. I want to expand upon the sourcing that was already there before.

And yeah, I guess. Just keep your eyes peeled for any character articles or character list articles that are brought to AFD or an RFC in the future. Kokoro20 (talk) 06:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Lili or Ling have any notability problems and no-one has tried to argue otherwise except for something 4 years ago when Lili's reception section was shorter, so there shouldn't be problems there. R. Mika seems to be getting tons of coverage due to her controversial character design/actions from what I can see through a quick Google search, so a new article for her shouldn't be a problem.

About the GA reviews, I'm not sure whether I should get involved; I have no idea on how the GA process works and since you've directly approached me someone might come in and cry "conflict of interest". Notability is separate from GA (which is more about article formatting) and I've never seen articles get merged because they were brought to GA, so that shouldn't be an issue. I might be able to expand some of those articles though, if I can find the time :) I watchlist WP:DELSORT/FICT already as well as DELSORT/VG and DELSORT/ANIME already and !vote on issues I'm interested in. :) Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 06:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but even so, I wouldn't be too shocked if someone came along and still argued that those characters aren't notable enough for their own article at this point.

Yeah, R. Mika, her outfit and her butt slap censorship in Street Fighter V has received a lot of attention, so it should be easy to find more coverage for her.

Well, I do know that merges have been proposed before when articles have been nominated for GA, which was why I said that. Do you see what I mean now? But yeah, if you can't review them, then go ahead and help expand them. Kokoro20 (talk) 07:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I would just like to let you know that I've started work on the R. Mika article. I'm currently planning to get it to GA after I restore the article from a redirect. You're welcome to help out once the article is restored. Some copyedits would be nice. Kokoro20 (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now restored at R. Mika. I would like some help with this, as well as the Lili and Xiaoyu articles, if you can. Kokoro20 (talk) 23:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do some work on it this afternoon (it's currently 10 o'clock in NSW where I live). Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 00:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Now, what do you think is a fitting class for article? I still may want to be getting it to GA. Kokoro20 (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've listed the R. Mika article for a peer review now. Feel free to give any thoughts you have on it here. Kokoro20 (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hestia (Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon?). Since you had some involvement with the Hestia (Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon?) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you reverted my changes on the Grand Theft Auto page about graphics. Please know that I have spent time working with the development of creating games, and calling the visual appearance of a game "graphics" is wrong. If anything, it should be called "visual fidelity". I am simply trying to help people understand what is right and what is wrong. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tristansfn (talk • contribs) 08:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming you're talking about this edit, which you made when you weren't logged in. While perhaps the technical term is "visual fidelity" (though a Google search shows it's barely used), we use the WP:COMMONNAME on Wikipedia which is "graphics". Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 08:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see note on this DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 22:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have never made any contributions to the "Ertug" page - what was that message about???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.198.54 (talk) 23:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@213.205.198.54: Satellizer is referring to this. As you're an IP, the editor on the address can change; if you did not make the edit, it's possible that someone else, using that IP, made the edit instead. Zappa24Mati 00:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks for the response Zappa Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 00:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the article Allen Walker to see if it could become a GA. However, English is not my first language so I wondered if you could take a look. If you can't, no worries. I'll just request help from the guild. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did some minor copyediting of the page for you :) I haven't read or seen D.Gray-man though so if you want more detailed feedback or criticism you might want to start a peer review for the article. Seems to be mostly GA-ready but fleshing out explanations for the terminology (e.g. "Akuma", "Innocence", "Noah" etc) might be helpful for readers unfamiliar with the franchise. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 11:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article became a GA. Thanks for your copyedit. Do you also plan to nominate the other articles you created like Kirito or Asuna? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 01:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For character articles I do intend to take Rias Gremory or Hestia (character) to GA someday, as well as maybe Sinon (Sword Art Online) (that was mostly done by ZappaOMati though so I'll leave the decision to him). Kirito and Asuna still need references for their "Story" sections. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 02:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for reporting the sock. I was working my way around figuring out how to file a SPI case but you took care of it swiftly. Opencooper (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. FYI in future just go to WP:SPI, open the "How to open an investigation" navbox, enter the sockmaster's username and click submit. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 06:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you for adding the picture of Widowmaker to her article. For the Tracer image, would it be better to keep the current one or replace it with the type of promotional art picture you uploaded for the Widowmaker article seen here? And if we should replace it with that promo art, would it be possible for you to upload it? Thank you again :) Soulbust (talk) 04:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, replaced with the promo art as I reckon it's higher quality. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 05:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wanted to point out that your adding Acension to the Throne to the Open World category is fine, but that's because it's sourced in the developers website. GameFaqs Reviews cannot be used to source anything as they are user reviews and they are not checked by an editorial staff. This makes GameFaqs reviews unreliable, so you should refrain from using them as sources in the future.Dohvahkiin (talk) 11:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How, exactly, was my edit to Mouse vandalism? Trisha Gaurav (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You mean both of your edits where you said they were "mean-spirited animals"? How is that helpful to the reader? Not to mention that what you added was your own personal opinion which has no place in a scientific, fact-based website. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 09:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean it in the informal way people use it. You should look it up in a dictionary.--Trisha Gaurav (talk) 12:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm well aware of your dictionary definition of "mean-spirited", thanks. Still doesn't change the fact that what you added was 1) your own personal opinion and 2) completely unscientific. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 07:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to find references about specific characters? English coverage of The Idolmaster is somewhat lacking, while much I could find in Japanese is in one way or another "promotional". Given the franchise's popularity, I'm sure there's something out there, but I'm having a hard time looking for sources about characters which aren't merchandise/live show news. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 21:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo my friend, you did a pretty decent job in creating those pages. I'm currently trying to create a character page, can you give any good advises and tips?

Zero stylinx (talk) 13:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Assuming you're talking about Draft:Ultraman (character), the page is coming along nicely but you might want to trim down the WP:Inuniverse details a bit and add some critical analysis in a reception section to prove notability. Anyways, good work Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 13:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Inuniverse, I'm not an expert on that. For reception, the only source I can found isthe 2013 interview with Susumu Kurobe, Bin Furuya and Hiroko Sakurai. There's also another source I can found, the main character Ultraman has made multiple collaboration with several products (ie. Fujiya Co.'s Milky, Converse shoes) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zero stylinx (talk • contribs) 01:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hestia too!? Hahahahahahaha! I don't see that coming, but I'll say, you surprise me again. (hats off)

Zero stylinx (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I finally found out of universe information for another D.Gray-man character, Yu Kanda. If it is possible, could you copy-edit? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being late, was busy IRL but I've just  Done it. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 02:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyway, buddy. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on that. Months ago, I stumbled upon the game, and thought maybe it'd be an article I'd try to start up. I never got around to it, but saw that you have, and wow, you put together a lot more information than I thought would be available on the title. Nice work! Sergecross73 msg me 19:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 02:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Satellizer, I have recently created a User Draft on the literary character Judge Holden from Cormac MacCarthy's novel Blood Meridian since the original Wikipiedia article is underdeveloped and poorly written. I am in dire need of help expanding and rewriting the article in the userspace draft in order to expand the article to its fullest extent. If you are not able to help me, could you recomment some users that would do well with helping me expand this article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not sure if I'm the best guy for the job as I've never read the novel and don't usually edit literary characters. Try posting a request to WT:FCHAR and someone should be willing to help. Let me know if you need anything else :) Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 02:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply] The DYK project (nominate) 01:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I tried following your style of writing character articles in Allen Walker for the new peer review, Wikipedia:Peer review/Allen Walker/archive2, but the cosplay and quote in the reception section are clashing. Any idea of what could I use or do you think it's okay? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, the full date needs to be used for access-dates or else it causes an error.

• Accessdate= August 2016 - NO
• Accessdate= August 25, 2016 - YES
• Accessdate= 2016-08-25 - YES

- Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Girl Friend Beta.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my name is Anthony Duran. I just want to say that I modified the two anime articles that have to do with character profiles as well as the list of characters and if you are changing some of my editing I need you to stop because I know those characters are one of the love interests of the main male protagonists in the harem animes not just one. Besides, Tsukune and Moka are just friends nothing more, it seems like they have a thing for each other, but not 100%. I should know because I understand the personalities of fictional characters since I planned to be a cartoonist in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Duran (talk • contribs) 03:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Duran, It doesn't matter what your (or even my or Satellizer's) personal opinion is of the relationship between Tsukune and Moka. The sentence you changed was directly quoted from a review by Theron Martin. HERE where he wrote: "Central characters Tsukune is a cookie-cutter harem male lead, an unfailingly kind-hearted, indecisive wimp who primarily has a thing for Moka but still treasures the other girls as friends" So you can't write into that your own opinion. As for the main love interest, that is from observation of the anime where he and Moka are often trying to pair up with each other at the start or end of each episode. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They are still just friends, plus, when it comes to an harem anime, the main male protagonist has more than one love interest, trust me I know this better than anyone. Do me a favor and leave it at that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Duran (talk • contribs) 03:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're missing the point. You're changing the quote of what the reviewer wrote, which makes your edit incorrect. Please stop this. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Duran please don't add Satellizer's signature to your own. It makes it look like you're impersonating Satellizer. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally I'd like to say that on Wikipedia we go only by what WP:Reliable sources report, and prohibit any WP:Original research (I recommend that you read over those two policies) like what you're trying to add here.

Also, in harem anime it is perfectly normal for there to be a primary love interest (despite the existence of other love interests) whom is paired with the protagonist the most often (example being Kirito and Asuna in Sword Art Online). Rias and Moka are pretty much accepted as filling this role for their respective series. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 09:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sword Art Online page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry to bother you but I'd like your opinion on the requirements for Ada Wong to regain GA status. I have no personal investment in the article subject, just working on improving my overall VG article editing. Thanks. :') sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 01:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm just not as active nowadays due to exams so I may not always be able to respond. About the article: it really shouldn't have been delisted in the first place, especially considering that the GAR was started by a brand new user with no edits citing a bunch of frivolous concerns, after the primarily contributor to the article (User:Niemti) was just conveniently banned beforehand and thus unable to respond to said concerns. (The ban was quite unfair too I might add, but that's an unpopular opinion around here.)

Note that certain GAN reviewers often end up treating such nominations as a FACs, even when they shouldn't. I don't see anything on that article in dire need of fixing, though. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 10:57, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Earthlock Festival of Magic logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Monique Luiz at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 18:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sylvanas Windrunner character design.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback invited: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Reconciling_Legality_of_cannabis_by_country_and_Legal_and_medical_status_of_cannabis.3F

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 02:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your input at the AFD. If possible, could you drop by for a straw vote to determine if the article should be redirected (linked here)? Thanks. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 08:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Idol Death Game TV at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Schwede66 00:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Angry Birds has been nominated for merging with Template:Rovio Games. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After failing the FAC D.Gray-man, I decided to focus on a smaller project, Yu Kanda. I tried adding as much possible out of universe information as possible but still didn't get too much feedback from the peer review. If you comment on something or be bold, I would appreciate it.Tintor2 (talk) 14:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay to nominate this article for possible GA promotion? I initially did it without asking because I didn't know that I needed to contact anyone before doing the GAN. Sakuura Cartelet ^Talk 19:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Custom Coaches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ultraman character.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sakura Angels.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sakura Fantasy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Smurf Racer! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not written in English, no sources, no indicia of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw^(talk) 18:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

'''''[[User:Satellizer|<font color="#00B7EB">Satellizer el Bridget</font>]] [[User talk:Satellizer|<font color="magenta"><sup>(Talk)</sup></font>]]''''' : Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk)

to

'''[[User:Satellizer|<i style="color:#00B7EB">Satellizer el Bridget</i>]] [[User talk:Satellizer|<i style="color:magenta"><sup>(Talk)</sup></i>]]''' : Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_809GSkVnWnzBDoh&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 23:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TapTapRush.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hyperdimension Neptunia The Animation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sylvanas Windrunner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rosalina from Super Mario Galaxy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greninja. Since you had some involvement with the Greninja redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paintspot Infez (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Koopa Troopa 3D Land.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mario & Sonic at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games boxart.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it looks like the closer decided that the consensus was to merge the article. From here, how about me, you and Prototime help re-write the Amy article for a future de-merge? Kokoro20 (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[