User talk:Osh33m

Welcome!

Hello, Osh33m, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Just H 15:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swizz Beatz might be Muslim, but you have to cite that source. Plenty of other hip hop producers have used Islamic samples, including Timbaland and Madlib, and neither of them are Muslim. So please cite your trivia or else it can be deleted. Rockstar915 00:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the posting as a violation of WP:BLP - negative unsourced information. (Yes, you provided a source, but it's totally inadequate). Feel free to post again when you can meet the criteria for reliable sources. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on We All Want the Same Thing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 16:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NeoCrimsonmon.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NeoCrimsonmon.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dumb It Down (single), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 23:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the boldfaced you added to Lupe Fiasco discography. Please read Wikipedia:Record charts before adding any more boldfaced to music articles. Aspects (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Lupe Fiasco. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. please stop changing the Grammy noms to TBA, they are cited as nominations, and that's the way they must stay unless you have a reliable source referring to them as Grammy TBAs Mfield (talk) 04:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to see you are enjoying contributing to wikipedia. Don't forget to always fill in the edit summary when making changes as it helps other users to see what has happened in the article history, it also helps you avoid your work being reverted as vandalism as non use of the edit summary box is one of the key red flags to the vandal patrollers. Also don't forget to sign your comments on talk pages by typing four tildes after your post like this ~~~~, when you hit save page the Wiki software will convert the tildes into your name and the date as you see after other peoples posts. More information on that at WP:Signatures. Mfield (talk) 04:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Grand Theft Auto (series), it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. A single edit is much easier for people to review when on the lookout for vandalism than a dozen edits. It also allows the history list to be much cleaner. TreyGeek (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any particular reason why you refuse to use the preview button to make a single edit versus a dozen and why you refuse to put in edit summaries? I'm curious the reasoning. --TreyGeek (talk) 19:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You tell me why they are. Non-free images should only be used if the understanding of the topic could not be complete without them- they are a last resort. Take, for instance, File:GTAVC PC Gang Attack.jpg. Ok, so there was some controversy surrounding the perceived racism, but does it really mattered what it looked like to kill them? The issue is discussed briefly, and the appearance of the game has no real baring on the issue. J Milburn (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Niko drunk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the article with inaccurate sales certification data. This is considered vandalism. The Marshall Mathers LP was never awarded diamond status from the RIAA (see database). Thanks, Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 00:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I myself am not too concerned about the image, but you may want to bring the issue up on the Lupe Fiasco talk page to see what other editors think about it. The "Grammy winning" bit however, is definitely a unacceptable. It is POV and does not provide enough context to the reader. The lead sentence (the very first sentence) should be kept as basic as possible. That is not to say awards can't be mentioned later in the lead section. The category and nominated work should be mentioned, possibly the year depending on how the sentence is worded. - kollision (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flo rida kfest.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Flo rida kfest.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Flo rida kfest.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your contributions to Lupe Fiasco, which has fairly recently achieved WP:GA status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, any subject that you are interested in has needs. Similar articles to Lupe Fiasco would be Kanye West and Common (entertainer). They are also popular R&B musicians from Chicago. West is already a GA, so maybe you might want to help Common. Since you don't have a user page it is hard to say what you might be interested in. I see from your edit history, that you do Comics related stuff. Powers (comics) might be an interesting subject. The TV adaptation is set in Chicago. I don't know if that is the case with the comic book, but that article needs some work. If this does not answer your question, please clarify on my talk page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bane in other media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bane in other media shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ArtistScientist (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Bane in other media, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. ArtistScientist (talk) 01:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Osh33m. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Bane in other media. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easyjusteasy (talk • contribs) 00:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reinserting constested material into articles until you have achieved a consensus to do so at the article's Talk page. I see you've previously been involved in discussions relating to original research and edit-warring, so I would strongly encourage you to work towards developing a consensus rather than focusing on adding your material as soon as possible. Letting it sit while the discussion runs its course will not hurt anything. DonIago (talk) 20:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Eminem shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 05:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Stalley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 21:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What makes Christian Today a reliable source as opposed to IGN and others? And as there has been no official announcement for consoles, which you yourself have admitted to, Wikipedia does not speculate on potential console releases, regardless of whether he "wants" to continue it on PS4, there's been no announcement of consoles at this time. Until such time as an official announcement is made, it's inappropriate to list it as such. Regards, --Tærkast (Discuss) 21:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree. Tekken 7 will come to PS4, sometimes it's mundane but the Wikipedia rules on sourcing and speculation are to be followed. However, given the likelihood of it coming to PS4, I don't see a problem in it being added. No point making a big deal out of it really.--Tærkast (Discuss) 13:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the infobox, though, sources are generally discouraged in them. It's fine to leave PS4 there as long as it's sourced in the rest of the article.--Tærkast (Discuss) 13:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. As I mentioned before, please stop editing against consensus. As I mentioned, the last discussion on "Milestone Titles", seen at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_video_game_consoles_(eighth_generation)/Archive_2#What_is_a_.22milestone.22.3F - was that no one could define what one is, how they are determined, etc, so the consensus was to not included any at this point.

Just because other article's have them does not make it right. If you wish to change the consensus, then please start up a new discussion, and only make the changes if there is a consensus to do so, as described in WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NOCONSENSUS.

Continuing to edit against consensus will get you blocked, so please follow the correct avenues with this. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I was referring to Youtube being an unreliable source, I mean it in the fashion that even the uploader was not a important Youtube account. I can consider Youtube and Facebook reliable as long as it's a verified account, like Shane Dawson TV, Smosh, or Taylor Swift Vevo. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree 100%, but the video itself was from the movie, it wasn't fake footage, and I added the source where I found it. Osh33m (talk) 02:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. Didn't check my watchlist before I posted this. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 02:17, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mass Effect 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! FYI, please do not add rowspans to sortable Wikitables, as you did at Emma Watson. Please wee WP:FILMOGRAPHY for mote details. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 23:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Space Needle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Per WP:SPS, an open wiki is not a source. And pop culture mentions need some kind of reason why they matter. Why is this important to the Space Needle? What influence did it have? If it is only important to the game, then put it in the article about the game. Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tekken series logo as of 2012.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tekken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osh33m,

I was on my phone earlier and couldn't check if the link I wrote in my edit summary was correct, but I meant to link to Template: Infobox video game. For the arcade system field, it reads "The name of or names associated with the arcade game's system board hardware. In case of unique arcade hardware, omit this field and use those below." Sounds to me like Tekken 7 has a unique arcade hardware setup and it doesn't have a name. I'm not saying that that bit of information shouldn't be in the article, it's just that right now it shouldn't be used in the infobox. I'll leave it up to you do as you see fit. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 00:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tekken 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bane in other media. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. TL22 (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greatest Hits (PlayStation range), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knack. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Kazuma Kiryu in Yakuza Zero.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tekken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love child. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Katsuhiro Harada Japan Expo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Eminem in 2000.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nathan Drake Uncharted 4 render.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Batman Ps4 Bundle.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shannon Lee promoting Tekken 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shaheen, a new character in Tekken 7.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:21, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you intend to work on it further? Because at this point it's literally only plot and frankly speaking looks like a butchered version of http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Liara_T'Soni --LKAvn (talk) 08:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LKAvn whatever text is there, is what was on the List of Mass Effect characters page of Liara's description. And I made the new article because at that time it was suggested that Liara be split. But no, I don't plan to go further into it so if it'll be merged back in, go right ahead. Osh33m (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Osh33m!

I have noticed that you have worked on a lot on video game articles and would like to leave you a friendly reminder that adding citations with bare urls is not recommended, as they may lead to linkrot. The {{Template:Cite web}} is usually commonly used. You may want to have a look at it. Thank you very much for your attention. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AdrianGamer and Osh33m: I'm going to second this. Even more, don't add duplicate references to the same article. Please have some care for what you're doing, or it wastes tons of everybody's time. Please use WP:REFILL. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 07:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled.

Your account has also been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Swarm ♠ 19:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Demon's Souls logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dark Souls logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Demon's Souls logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hasn't this title been announced for XBO? I'm sure it has. — TPX 10:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that, although you probably put in a lot of work into the Harry Potter table of games in the List of Harry Potter-related topics article, I reverted it back to the list. This is because the list was incomplete, and the Harry Potter article has one that is more complete and more informative on sales. I hope you'll understand. Thank you. Osh33m (talk) 03:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, Osh33m! And thanks for your "thanks" on my latest edits. Your revert was the right decision. All the best, Hippo99 (talk) 06:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar sir! That means a lot to me. I am happy that I was able to find who made the original table and inform him (you) on the changes. Have a great day! =] Osh33m (talk) 06:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The pleasure is all mine, Sir Osh33m. Your really did earn this by your respectful ways. All the best! Hippo99 (talk) 06:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Your message on your revert was highly appreciated plus the revert was the right thing to do to avoid redundant info. Best regards, Hippo99 (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nathan Drake in Uncharted 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kazuma Kiryu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character development. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting very tired of warning you about basic policy like WP:OR and WP:V. You've been warned about it many times from many editors, and this edit seems to even indicate that you know what you do is against policy, but you do it anyways. This is not acceptable.

Final warning, or we're going to go hash this out at WP:ANI.

• You need to use sources that directly cite the information you add.
• Do not violate WP:SYNTH and WP:OR.
• Do not continue to re-add sources into articles that have an active consensus against their use (like Forbes Contributors). Actively editing against consensus after being informed of this is considered disruptive. Sergecross73 msg me 12:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed several times that when other editors explain a policy or consensus to you in edit notes during some minor edit war, you come back a short time later and make the change again anyways. Do we really have to keep doing this? Waiting a few days doesn't make it ok. If you really feel the change should have been kept then follow WP:BRD and use the talk page first. -- ferret (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is this in reference to? I don't wait a few days to try and get my way. It's a few days later because I'm busy with other things. Osh33m (talk) 15:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To say that a subject is "best" known for a particular work or role is to make a judgment about their the body of their work or their roles in total which is subjective and itself requires citation; hence it is a violation of neutral point of view. Not everyone would necessarily agree on which role is an actor's "best" role nor know them for the same roles. Unless you have a citable source that indicates a subject is only known for a single role, or for one role above all others, leave it as "x is known for y", versus "x is best known for y". The fact that another article uses "best known" is irrelevant; see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. General Ization ^Talk 03:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me ask you this then. If Norman Reedus is not best known for Daryl Dixon, then why is his role as Daryl Dixon even mentioned in the opening statement? Osh33m (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It probably shouldn't be, but I was addressing your edit, not every edit to this article. As it happens, I know Reedus best as the character Murphy MacManus in The Boondock Saints, and many will know him from that or from other roles as much or more than as Daryl Dixon. General Ization ^Talk 03:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Probably"? Which means part of you thinks it is okay? If you think that then go ahead and remove my edit, but change it to what you think is best. As it stands, if other wikipedia articles are like this and you are lecturing me about this edit, then the way I see it, it is your responsibility to go and fix all the others like that as well. Otherwise it is hypocritical. Osh33m (talk) 03:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, it is generally unproductive to tell other editors what their "responsibilities" are; their and your responsibilities are the same (and no one has a responsibility to fix every error or misstatement here). Second, please don't ask a question if you don't want to hear the answer. General Ization ^Talk 12:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm not saying I didn't want to hear your answer, I was just pointing out the irony; you said it probably shouldn't be there, implying that you didn't mean that with full confidence, and part of you thinks it being there is the right way for it to be. But fair enough about the responsibilities thing, I'll admit I said too much there. Osh33m (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dark Souls 2 character select screen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kazuma Kiryu in Yakuza Zero.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The how about, making the full image replace the one from the top? I can barely see the yakuza 0 imagen.Tintor2 (talk) 14:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick search several in Google search and found this for the reception section. Do you think it's okay to use it?Tintor2 (talk) 15:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That full body image of Kiryu was used when Yakuza 0 was the latest installment, however, since Yakuza 6 is now in development, his most recent look is what's most relevant. The older image is also relevant to give the viewer a full body shot of the character, same as Nathan Drake. As for the picture of him shaving, sure, if you want to upload it and put it in reception I say go for it. But you need to give a relevant context to it, you can't just put it in their to have another image of him. Osh33m (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Uncharted 4 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Please use Talk for discussion and work toward consensus with follow editors, before reverting. JckM235 (talk) 02:13, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Weeknd page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Weeknd. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ... richi (hello) 20:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kazuma Kiryu in Yakuza Zero.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kazuma Kiryu in Yakuza Zero.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 19:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nathan Drake in Uncharted 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Souls (series)‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- ferret (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nathan Drake in Uncharted 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's easy. Just write User:Osh33m/sandbox and you will obtain a redlink. Click on it and you will be automatically create the sandbox. By the way, I recently nominated Yu Kanda to FAC here. If you have free time, I would appreciate feedback to the review. Lastly, I don't remember removing things from Kiryu's article but him being requested so much for a Tekken game feels so much as part of reception rather than other media considering he still hasn't appeared in Tekken. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ogre (Tekken), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm glad you're willing to compromise. I might gently point out that I had already revised the article and submitted it to GAN so it's not a great moment to start adding stuff, let alone starting discussions. A little sensitivity to process and precedent would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, please include the actual source (the actual Twitter post in this case), and not just say "Sony Santa Monica". Their Twitter account did not come up in search results since the post did not include the words "cover art". I've already updated the rationale to include all pertinent information, as seen here. --JDC808 ♫ 03:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kazuma Kiryu in Yakuza 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears a user is trying to remove the nonfree image you uploaded. Be careful about the article if it gets removed again when I am not there. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, if you don't have time to write a halfway complete article, create a WP:DRAFT instead. Don't put wildly incomplete articles in the mainspace. It's not appropriate to put "articles" like this in the mainspace, leave it like that for days, and then revert others when they try to redirect it. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:13, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sergecross73: FYI this is the same method I used for the Souls (series) and Valkyria articles. I created them, and other users assisted in filling them in. Except this time, instead of people deciding to fill in the Bayonetta article (those who did have time), instead took a backwards step and reverted the article. A lot of what you guys do here on wikipedia is very backwards. Osh33m (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's a difference between what you did then and what you did with Bayonetta. Pro-tip - articles shouldn't consist entirely of 12 empty sections in its body. There's a difference between writing an article that needs to be expanded, and just plopping an empty article template in and publishing it. This is one of the main reasons drafts exist. If you've got article ideas that you're too lazy or time-constrained to write, start a draft and ask the WikiProject if anyone wants to help. Sergecross73 msg me 20:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osh33m,

Sections need sources. Saying "it's true" in an edit summary doesn't somehow make it so. It's original research, because it's not a sequel but another game with similar gameplay.. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osh33m, concerning Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup, it's on you to find a source to back up your claim, per WP:BURDEN. It's almost ten months later and you still haven't come up with a WP:SOURCE. So please stop reverting and find a source. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 00:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kazama in Tekken 7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Devil Jin in Tekken 7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ling Xiaoyu in Tekken 7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Comparison of hybrid human skulls.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justice Smith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:A comparison of an episode of South Park.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no plans to make one article for now, but I wonder if you are interested. There are already some sources that back up wp:notabiliy like his award from 0, his appearances in Kiwami 1, the poll, etc. However, that would require more sources more like critical reception which I find possible. The thing that might be more difficult is finding creation sources (although it was easy for Takayuki Yagami's sources). Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know how WP:Notability works, right? We basically have to back up the character through third party sources like video game journalist and developers' comments. If you want to avoid a stub, I would suggest working on a sandbox. I think Majima can pass notability but I haven't played all Yakuza games post 2 so I can't work on his appearances section. For third party sources. I quickly found these:

• this poll
• this award
• Glagowski, Peter (21 August 2017). "Review: Yakuza Kiwami". Destructoid. Archived from the original on August 27, 2017. Retrieved 18 December 2018.

The other fastest ways to find more reception might be through 0 and Kiwami 2 reviews too but don't be in a hurry.

Also, if you wanna respond to another user in the same page just use the ping option "@Tintor2:" Hope it helps.Tintor2 (talk) 20:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I ended up creating the Majima article but sadly I didn't find too much about his origins other than his potrayal in 0.Tintor2 (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tekken Hybrid cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]