User talk:Nathan2055

Nathan2055 is busy in real life due to ongoing consequences of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is Nathan2055's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Nathan2055}}), so that I will be notified. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, linking to your username, so that you will be notified. Please click here to leave me a new message.

I need help creating a page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurracane913 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hii, why it has been selected for speedy deletion? Ttttt321 (talk). 19:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Hi, I don't quite know what happened with your edit here, but it has sent me (and probably other people) notifications of 5 year old messages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: Oh crap, I didn't think about notifications. I had way too many archive pages and was trying to consolidate them a bit. I probably just pinged everyone I've ever interacted with. That's...really not good.

@admin: Is there any way I can undo the notifications or am I screwed? --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 06:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't worry about it for now. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure (like 99% sure) you can't undo a ping, and if you revert your edit you might ping everybody again. Just leave it as is. :-) Katie^talk 09:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just want to let you know that the Glapz LTA is probably not WP:LTA/CCCC. CheckUser never actually confirmed even a tenuous connection (such as useragents), in any case. He is probably User:Jeffman12345, another vandal that this LTA has claimed to be on multiple occasions. I just thought that you should know this. LTAs are known for impersonating each other (such as the Willy on Wheels troll house and the "Fuerdai" vandal LTAs), so don't let this impersonation end up confusing you. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LightandDark2000: Hmm, that makes things even more confusing. You might ought to chime in over on WP:AN, that discussion is probably why he's messing with my page right now. --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 02:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nathan2055: There's no need to open an RfC to ban either of them. Both CCCC and Jeffman12345/Glapz are de facto site banned, according to the sockpuppetry policy. (Jeffman12345 has actually been banned on en.wiki a while back.) Given the cross-wiki abuse, they're essentially de facto Globally Banned as well. There's no reason to open up an official RfC unless things get extremely serious (otherwise, it just draws unnecessary attention and energy). LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, agree with your merge proposal. The creator of the draft left in 2015 so I think you can go ahead with the merge if you like, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: Sounds great, I've added it to my wiki to-do list and I'll take care of it when I get some time. Thanks, Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nathan, Thank you for reviewing my efforts to draft a wiki article on Balipara Foundation. I have made the necessary changes. This foundation was the first one to recognise the efforts of Jadav Payeng in 2013, later on he was the recipient of Padam Shri in 2015, a very prestigious recognition of Government of India. This is one of the many things they do, to preserve and protect the nature and bio-diversity in North East of India. Any guidance to improve the article will be valuable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalpesh.popat (talk • contribs) 05:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The two "alternate" drafts are not independent. They are by different user accounts, but I don't think by different humans. The two are too similar to be a coincidence. I have filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Munenejohn. Thanks for noticing that the multiple spamming. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Looks like they did end up being socks, and a few other associated accounts were found at the same time. Thanks for the help! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 05:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there-

I am new to writing an article and lack many aspects of Wikipedia experience. Thank you for your attention to my draft regarding fully feathered basktes and for helping to move it forward in the process.

I now have drafts for two more articles I've written, but I do not know how to post them as drafts as I did the one on fully feathered baskets. I am no longer able to access my sandbox to play around with them as I did the basket article because it is pending approval. So the new articles are only in a Word document, but written in the special Wikipedia edit writing style.

How am to propose these new article for consideration? I look forward to hearing from you. Merry Christmas! Hu Nhu (talk) 06:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan,

I am the author of cool handshakes that you nominated for deletion. You are completely right that I am just a new editor with nothing to write about. This was an assignment for school, and the teacher gave me with no parameters and no answers to any questions, so it really just became a "get it over with assignment". Trust me I did not feel good about hitting publish and frankly, I am so glad that there are people who check the content on Wiki. I am so sorry for wasting your time. Cool handshakes were on the list of requested articles and when I read it, I also was confused about what constitutes a "cool handshake". There are literally no benchmarks, and I am so glad the semester is over. I am so sorry. Alexandrapantry (talk) 02:48, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan - thanks for reviewing my attempt at a stub. I have revisited the page and added links to a local newspaper article about the bilingual uniqueness of the school together with several video clips to the local MP making representations to Parliament and Ministers at the Department for Education to protect provision at the school of the European Baccalaureate qualification it offer following Brexit uncertainty. I hope you might revisit the page and reconsider given the uniqueness of the school. ESUK (talk) 19:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing Draft:American Ethane previously. I've added more to American Ethane and resubmitted the article for creation.216.248.99.93 (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are some notable references that are included in the References section. Are they not enough? Please clarify. Also, please clarify how this reads like an advertisement as the language appears neutral. I would love to make the changes to get this approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odemio (talk • contribs) 08:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason it is not allowing me to upload a picture, saying I don't have the rights, but the photo is not under copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrFishStix (talk • contribs) 15:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan, You asked for more sources on a page I was trying to create - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dadisetti_Ramalingeswara_Rao_(Raja) Added and sent the page for moderation request again.

This page is of a sitting MLA. His information is easily verifiable.

Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crownaditya (talk • contribs) 13:23, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Jackhuang2018 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Najing Technology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I would like to create "Najing Technology" at Wikipedia since there's nothing English information about this high-tech company (found 2009 in China). This is a Chinese company without any English information, reference and source, How could i cite the reference by English? That's WHY my introduction about Najing Tech on wikipeida is always rejected! What can i do next?

Thank you very much. Jackhuang2018 (talk) 08:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackhuang2018: Chinese sources are perfectly adequate, we do not require sources to be in English as long as they otherwise pass as reliable sources per our guidelines. The problem with your existing draft is that it does not have reliable sources: Wikipedia articles shouldn't cite other Wikipedia articles, the Bloomberg page only shows that it exists, and the company's websites are primary sources. Add some additional sources, including Chinese ones, to showcase the company's notability. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 08:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan2055. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion.  ~~Swarm~~  {talk}  19:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Nathan2055:, I pinged you, because I saw you where also previously engaged in Cardano (cryptocurrency platform) talks: contribution. Thank you for your input so far. Do you think this article is ready enough to be submitted as an article for creation? Or do you have any suggestions? If so, please post your comments or just your approval on this talk page. Thank you, --FlippyFlink (talk) 10:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan, thanks for appreciating my editing efforts on Wikipedia. I am learning everyday and it is encouraging to receive acknowledgement from you :) Here is some bubble tea as a thank you for your thanks. SeraneNorton (talk) 10:18, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I was looking for some small help. I created a new article in my user sandbox now the article stands transferred at Draft:Kithaab. The article has already received copyedit support from two Wikipedia Teahouse volunteer editors and has been recommended as complete and ready to be submitted for approval. Requesting your kind support in process of reviewing and accepting the article Draft:Kithaab. Thanks in advance and warm regards.

Bookku (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Akhilrajendra (talk · contribs)
  • User:Akhilrajendra/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Mr. Nathan,

I am new..rather first timer in order to attempt to create a page on wikipedia. Kindly assist me with the required changes, which shjall make my article eligible enough to get published here.

Best Regards

Akhil Rajendra Akhilrajendra (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanya Davis (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Davis (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan i wanted to create an Article but each time i publish the article it goes missing from the Wikipedia site, how can i create an article successfully without it being deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreaBunks (talk • contribs) 13:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Craig Steven Wright, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hal Finney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you use reFill. This is a useful tool but sometimes introduces errors, most frequently inserting the unsupported parameter "|deadurl=y" instead of "|url-status=dead", such as here. I would ask you to preview your edits and resolve any issues before submitting. Thanks. --John B123 (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St Antony's Church, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm wondering why my edit won't stay on the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.64.114.162 (talk) 07:30, 2020 July 8 (UTC)

@148.64.114.162: Hello! If you're referring to your edits to Chad Hurley, it's because you didn't cite a reliable source. All content on Wikipedia has to be verifiable to a reliable source but most especially when it's information concerning living people, which fall under an even stricter policy on citations than our other pages. So just locate a reliable source discussing the divorce and add that to the article along with your statement. Thanks! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my name's Oliver. I removed the citations that you restored because they lead to forums, which Wikipedia doesn't accept as a reliable source; I replaced them with more reliable sources (the recently-added commercial page for Super Mario Land 2: 6 Golden Coins on Behind the Voice Actors). Bladerunner09 (talk) 01:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello the page NiziU is being edited without fonts by the user, a huge query and without fonts. --Barbiiee20 (talk) 01:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Thank you for your offer of help, it came in very timely. I have never participated in edit wars before. In the last month, I ran into a previously unknown participant in the Wikipedia project, who constantly makes edits with inaccurate information in List of football stadiums in Belarus.

You can see the history of my edits in Wikipedia (Belarusian and English versions), Wikimedia Commons and Wikidate. I live in the Republic of Belarus and have been involved in football stadiums for over a year. I recently completely updated the list on the English Wikipedia: the list now includes all operating large stadiums, names have been translated from Belarusian into English, the actual capacity of sports facilities is indicated, shows the playing teams as of 2020.

A participant unknown to me found the Torpedo stadium in Minsk in the old version, which is currently in disrepair. The Football Federation of Belarus did not accept this stadium for official matches. Everyone in Minsk knows about it! Football club Torpedo Minsk ceased to exist. He cannot play in an indoor stadium, as he does not exist!

I explained all this to an unknown user in the description for my edits. However, he stubbornly continues to ignore me and introduces false information to the list of operating stadiums, thereby misleading the readers of Wikipedia. If he really cares so much about this stadium, why not edit an outdated version of the article about Torpedo Stadium? The article about a football club that no longer exists is also out of date. He does not make changes to it.

In similar lists of other countries, no one indicates the stadiums of former teams in disrepair. This is absurd! I even suggested a user unknown to me to create a separate list of inactive stadiums in Europe and add it there. All options offered by me were ignored, my edits are constantly canceled.

Therefore, I ask you to help me in this matter. Is it possible to protect the list from edits by any users for 30 days to stop the war of edits? Wikipedia readers will not suffer from this, but will only be protected from inaccurate information.

P.S. I keep the same list in the Belarusian Wikipedia, there are no edit wars there. All administrators know me, I always follow the rules of Wikipedia.

Thanks for your attention! --Football Beetle (talk) 13:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I considered that, but it's tagged for deletion as well. If that;s declined, I'll histmerge. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mariahjustice/sandbox the gift that keeps on giving. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: There's three in total: Draft:Mariah Justice, User:Mariahjustice (now deleted), and User:Mariahjustice/sandbox. Considering the user is "Mariahjustice" creating articles about "Mariah Justice", it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to see that it's an attempt at an autobiography. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Internet censorship topic is Semi-protection and I can't add information about internet shutdown in Iran, at the Shutdowns part of the topic. It's link of the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship

There are some useful things about Iran internet shutdown, you can help me to add (only two or three sentence is enough): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019–2020_Iranian_protests#Internet_shutdown

♡Thanks HappyBird6858 (talk) 13:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt know how to crete it as a personal page, thanks alot anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haronte (talk • contribs) 22:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...what was the point of this? Drmies (talk) 23:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathan2055. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Salvio 09:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to add some meaningful content in the middle of an article but I need to add a footnote. But, how do I add a footnote when the footnote numbers are already in order?Calvinopus (talk) 22:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Mark A. Cox[reply]

Nathan2055: Thanks for your messages on my talk page about the request to create an article. I wanted to reach out to you personally rather than asking a gneeral question on the AfC page because there are unique circumstances associated with my requests. I recognize that the List of general authorities of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Area (LDS Church) pages already exist. I am a longtime contributor to both since the mid-200os, not long after I started editing Wikipedia. But there is a problem with editing those articles with the information on the user subpages. As I mentioned in my request, the Church announces the changes in the spring that will go into effect on August 1 of each year.

But to update the two pages in question with information about changes that have not yet gone into effect (which was the case with both articles) would violate WP:CRYSTAL since those changes are subject to change sometimes before they actually go into effect. The recommended solution to this problem through talk page consensus is to establish subpages (which has been done through my user page for the last half-decade or so). I accordingly created subpages for this year's changes (which can be found here and here.

The problem I run into year after year is that, once changes are made to the subpage, simply copying over those changes to the main articles off of which the original subpages are based does not allow the edit history of those subpages to appear on the main article pages. In previous years, I have had another editor help me with merging those page histories, as that individual had some administrative tools he/she could use for that purpose at that time, but in the interim, that user no longer edits Wikipedia as frequently, and may no longer have those tools at his/her disposal.

If the content from the user subpages is copied and pasted into the existing articles of that title, then the issue arises of how to transfer the edit history of those copied-over subpages to the main article space. If you know of a way around those issues, then I'd appreciate hearing from you. If not, I guess I will just copy the text from the subpage to the main page and refer anyone who has questions on those changes back to the history of the subpages. Just let me know either way. In the meantime, thanks for reaching out to me about this. I appreciate hearing from you. --Jgstokes (talk) 03:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{prod blp}} tag from Todd Sievers, which you proposed for deletion, as the article now includes one or more sources. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please feel free to nominate it for deletion with a regular {{prod}} or via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan2055.

I just saw your copyright claim against an image on my Tom Nolan draft. I just wanted to clear this up and if you agree so you could possibly delete this claim? The image is directly from https://www.tnfreestyle.com/gallery.html Tom Nolan / TNFreestyles official website and he states all images are copyright free and free to use anywhere. Hopefully you agree this makes the image usable. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnfan99 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Very helpful redirecting a wiki draft page to its rightful place, thank you! Tnfan99 (talk) 20:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you create Draft:Explosive Removal and Destruction Service (EOD) (Belgium)? It doesn't appear to be from a move, so I'm struggling to understand what purpose that serves. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: It was cleanup from this move by UnitedStatesian; per Special:WhatLinksHere/Draft:Explosive Removal and Destruction Service (EOD) (Belgium) it was linked from Exsap's talk page, so I added back the redirect which had been suppressed to reduce any possible confusion for the new editor. After all, redirects are cheap. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not cleanup. There shouldn't be a redirect in draft space. How will it function? You would have to submit that redirect to AfC after the draft itself is promoted, which is silly. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with @Chris troutman:; it is clearly an error and should be deleted. Redirects are cheap does not apply in the draftspace, where novice editors can easily (and wrongly) think misformatted titles are actually correct, and then create new drafts with the same misformats: (do a quick search on how many drafts use (movie) as a disambiguator if you don't believe me). I plan to bring this one to RfD with the next batch of similar redirects, as I did at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_23#In-draftspace_redirects. Unless, that is, you want to save everyone the trouble and apply the {{db-author}} tag to it. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:16, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman and UnitedStatesian: Fair enough. I've G7d the redirect in question, and I'll look through my logs and see if there are any more like that one that should be similarly deleted. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 07:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 13:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Space DC. I do not think that Draft:Space DC fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because he copied content is largely short factual statements, which have reduced copyright protection. While they should be paraphrased, IMO they do not reach G12. Similarly, the essentially factual statements, while they do not all belong in an article, are not at the G11 level, IMO. . If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nathan2055, I saw in this edit that you used ProveIt. I have used it as well, but I am still exploring it. In that edit, did you have to manually change the Date format, or is there a way to select that in ProveIt? Does it depend on having a {{Use dmy dates}} (or similar) template or does ProveIt add that? Finally, was that edit summary auto-generated by the tool? Thanks, 2pou (talk) 22:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HI Nathan2055,

This is with reference to your comment regarding the Wiki Page for Suresh Kohli. He has not created a Biography for himself as he passed away in March 2016. This is an initiative people who have read, watched and learnt from his work. Creating a Wikipedia page is with objective of spreading the content related to the vast body of work by Suresh Kohli in Literature, Literary Film Making and Literary Documentation. Therefore we request you not to delete the content.

Awaiting your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kohlisuresh (talk • contribs) 13:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nathan2055. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Axcient, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: ineligible for speedy deletion - G11 previously declined. Thank you. Salvio 18:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvio giuliano: All right, I've opened an MfD instead: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Axcient. Thanks for letting me know. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 19:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan, Thank you for your message about moving the Draft/John D. Rees. I have made a horrible mistake. When I did move I renamed my username to John D. Rees not realizing that it would try to change my username. I thought it was replacing my username to the name of the article. Now what do I do? I think someone deleted it. I can access it through your email message but not when I log in to Wikipedia. I really don't have a conflict of interest. I'm retired and I'm not getting paid by John. He asked if I could set up a page for him. I thought I could but apparently this is viewed as a conflict. I don't work for him or the Department anymore. I retired almost 4 yeas ago. I do not plan to post any negativity or anything disrespectful. Should I have him get someone else to create his page?

I am really new to this and would like to do more.  Not sure that I can digest all the directives. Thank you in advance for your kind assistance.  

Smko47 (talk) 17:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nathen the reliable source was Instagram. The post was features Artist Paul Wall and Jdagr8 both being seen in the music video. Which was released. How ever I will provide a link to the actual song, Hopefully that will be enough along with the video. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josethewonderful (talk • contribs) 18:36, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Robin S. Brown

Thanks, MDanielsBot (talk) 04:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan, thank you for moving my file - Kentucky's First Prison. I got a message about someone going to delete it and I'm really confused as to why? Can you explain it a little easier for me to understand. I'm old and new - old as in age and new as in to all this. ha (thought you could use another smile!) I'm really enjoying creating but the snags are a bit overwhelming. Thank you for taking time to assist me. You are GREAT! I appreciate your feedback. Sharon Smko47 (talk) 21:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan, I hate to bother you again but I just got a message from a Zoozaz1 that said my Kentucky's First Prison was rejected. She doesn't understand! She thinks it should go under Kentucky State Reformatory Wikipedia page. They are two different prisons but had the same name. The first prison (the reason I called it that) was Kentucky State Reformatory until 1910 then the name changed to Kentucky State Penitentiary (another prison in another part of the state now has that title also on a Wikipedia page). We are talking about 3 different prisons in 3 different locations. It's really simple, the flood of 1937 made the "First Prison" uninhabitable and it was torn down. The First Prison (that was known by both names) was located in Frankfort, Kentucky and now no longer exists; the Kentucky State Reformatory on your Wikipedia page is located in LaGrange, Kentucky and the Kentucky State Penitentiary is located in Eddyville, Lyon county, Kentucky. I'm talking about a completely different prison and its history is important to "stand alone," and not be combined with the other two. I can't find a way to chat with Zoozaz1. Is there any way you can help me with this? Please. Thanks. Smko47 (talk) 00:17, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nathan for the quick response. Now I am smiling. Have a great evening. You deserve it! (smile) Smko47 (talk) 21:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I see my page has been deleted. Can you please tell me where I can find it so that I can try to edit it again to meet Wikipedia requirements? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerriAnneBaker (talk • contribs) 14:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk reader) @TerriAnneBaker: Hi. Unlike Twitter and Facebook, no one gets to have "a page" on Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia and our volunteer editors write the entries. You could ask at WP:REFUND to have an article un-deleted but, assuming the subject is not notable according to our standards, there would be no point in attempting to create it here. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Ahmass Fakahany. I do not think that Ahmass Fakahany fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because There are multiple claims of significance here including the CEO and COO positions. The tone is factual, and the article seems to be neutral, so this is not a G11. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead, if this was an article, or another process such as MfD or XfD as appropriate. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comment I left at User talk:UnitedStatesian#Gil Grant. I get that this was a mistake, but it's important that you check the history of articles before moving them to the draft namespace. – bradv🍁 02:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I would like to know how to improve my article,which u recently moved to draft and I unable to make it live. Article name Harsha CM Gowda. He is an kannada television actor ,works in the serial name "brahma gantu" . Also I have added reference links. --Ashish v chuncha (talk) 06:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, a very minor point; the stub cat (at the end of an article) should have two blank lines preceding it per WP:WSS#General rules. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 20:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day to you Nathan2055. I owe a great deal to you for moving AfC Kolathur(Chennai). Once again, 'Thanks'.

Helppublic (talk) 09:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Alice75232b (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tia Blassingame (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for the feedback concering my document Draft:Tia Blassingame. I received several messages about it and I am unsure of the next steps. Do I simply add my edits to the published article or wait for feedback from the Talk:Tia Blassingame page?

Navigation seems to be my biggest hurdle so far, so your feedback is appreciated!

16:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)alice75232b

Alice75232b (talk) 16:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nathan2055, with my Draft: Paracommando Qualification (Belgium Armed Forces)‎; 19:27 5 Aug 2020, are you able to delete the other duplicate copy of this draft last edited sometime prior to the 5 Aug 2020, and then I can re-summit the 19:27 5 Aug 2020 Draft

Thanks for your assistance

Exsap — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exsap (talk • contribs) 02:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Looking for advice because there seems to be a bit of systemic disconnect here. But legitimately seeking your thoughts. Even though there were warnings that new page submissions could take months, the page I created earlier this week was unceremoniously denied in less than two days. By a single individual. Who, if you look at his page, indicates interest in lots of areas, none of which are related to the subject matter of the article in question.

Wouldn't it make sense for this process to be more deliberative, involving multiple reviewers with at least a passing knowledge of the subject? I could understand not having heard of the organization about which I wrote (before you ask, I have no relationship with the organization - I became familiar with them while in an earlier career), but anyone who's involved in corporate governance, investor relations, securities law, etc holds this organization in very high esteem. I was surprised they didn't already have a page! This is also one of the reasons there aren't sources that go in depth describing them: because anybody who knows of them already knows them. There's no need to say more than their name if they're referring to their work or an event of theirs. They're that important!

I mentioned that I had done some dabbling in Wikipedia about a decade ago with a different account (I lost the password). Things have changed since then. There are tons of articles in existence with much less sourcing than I had even done. It seems like the only fault of my article was that it wasn't created back then. Have you observed the pendulum swinging toward articles needing to be fully formed before they can even be approved? Are stubs no longer allowed? Lukevdl (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk reader) @Lukevdl: I disagree with your assessment. Here's why: first, Zoozaz1 was right to decline Draft:The Society for Corporate Governance because the subject fails WP:NCORP. You seem to speak from a point of bias, where your familiarity with the organization blinds you to what our notability criteria actually require. For example, LinkedIn as a source fails WP:SPS and is therefore, not allowable. The subject's website also isn't a permitted source for notability. Second, our Articles for Creation process is volunteer-run, like everything is. While you could ask editors at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies for a review, editors in a topical WikiProject do not necessarily participate in draft reviews. Our draft reviewers often don't have expertise in the areas covered by the hundreds of drafts waiting for a review. Third, the wild west era of ten years ago has ended. We have since written an essay explaining why your argument about other articles is invalid. Whataboutism is really not the way to go and yes, you need to really develop an article to get it approved. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: Ouch! No bias here. Like I said, I was only tangentially aware of the organization. This was probably (hopefully?) cut and paste though so I won't take offense. Although we can be nostalgic, I think it's great that the Wild West Days are over - it seems there is more diligence in article approvals these days (so I won't take too much offense at accusations of "whataboutism" either since that's not what I was saying at all). This is clearly an improvement. What I'm suggesting is that a further improvement (and we all want to constantly be improving, don't we?) would be for reviewers to actually have at least some level of awareness in the subject matter they review. And further that there be more than one voice in the review process. That would be a way to cut out bias on all sides. And of course, the inevitable human error (I'm sure regular Wikipedia editors are guilty of that from time-to-time). I will endeavor to update the submission with additional sources when I have the time. Your fellow volunteer (and human being), Lukevdl (talk) 20:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lukevdl: I encourage you to improve and re-submit your draft. But when you claim "anybody who knows of them already knows them. There's no need to say more than their name if they're referring to their work or an event of theirs. They're that important" but the cited sources don't assert that, I wonder how else we would describe your belief about their notability as opposed to what WP:N says. I apologize if what I said came across as a personal attack. Our notability criteria are often very specific in what needs to be met, and you seem to claim that you know the subject is notable and surely someone in the field would ascribe to your same belief. This is the benefit of AfC reviewers that don't know the subject because they don't have the unexplained common belief without evidence. Please correct me if I'm mis-characterizing your position. Perhaps you stumbled into this discussion without appreciating the intricacies that editors like me would point out. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to Find a Duplicate for Paracommando Qualification (Belgium Armed Forces), So there is no reason for you Nathan2055 to remove my work from Wikipedia, yes I admit I initially did not cite things as per the standards required by Wikipedia, But subsequently this was completed and was Published and was on Wikipedia for 5 Weeks or so and then it was removed, Considering this was my second Draft and the most detailed and Largest to date at that time, I think you could have at least have cut me a bit of slack,

Can you please reinstate Paracommando Qualification (Belgium Armed Forces) as it gave the reader of Wikipedia references and a understanding to specialist training carried out by members of the Belgium Armed Forces that is accurate, detailed, supported by 8 references and is balanced.

Regards,

Exsap — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exsap (talk • contribs) 02:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr Nathan2055

You have put two tags on my Wikipedia pages AFC submission but it is not yet reviewed so could you kindly check? or i should create the page direct? Draft:Nick Wrenn Draft:Misbah Mumtaz

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 09:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Thanks
	Bless you for your work. Keep it up Emmalexs (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform

For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)

Thank you,

NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir. I tried hard to publish a page for more than 2 months following all rules of wikipedia. But the page did not approve. Please advice me sir. It will be my pleasure. And this work very urgent for me. Your advice will be very helpful for me. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alisumon09 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(by talk reader) @Alisumon09: Did you get paid to write User:Alisumon09/sandbox? Chris Troutman (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes brother. i get paid to write — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alisumon09 (talk • contribs) 09:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alisumon09: Then you have a conflict of interest which you are required to disclose. Further, your clients probably aren't notable and if you create a draft you need to make a clear case how they meet WP:N. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brother. When i triqqed to submit a new page it was rejected at the cause of duplication of previous rejected pages. When i go for editing to the rejected pages it was deleted. I face a big problem.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alisumon09 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then it sounds like your client has been pushing too hard for something that cannot be done. This is the problem with taking paid work. You'll have to tell your client that he's not welcome on Wikipedia. Sorry. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can i make a new fresh page at the same page title brother? Chris Troutman Alisumon09 (talk) 17:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Sometimes this happens that someone wants to advertise here, creating articles that get deleted. They hire one person after the next to keep doing the same thing and then the community disallows any more creations because it's a waste of our time. It's impossible, now, to advertise that subject which is why you need to find a different client. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brother. This is not for advertising. There are many medical process which are invented are not discussed in any wikipedia page. So i think It's not for promotion or advertisement. Brother Alisumon09 (talk) 18:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

how do I create articles on wikipedia?--Rowbro (talk) 03:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

how do I create an article on Wikipedia?--Rowbro (talk) 03:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please transfer the article to Amir Sarkhosh. Their original name is I was completing when you transferred it.--Mojtaba236 (talk) 18:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THe article was created in Feb 2006. The "sources" were created in 2012, 2013 & undated. I suspect any copying was from Wikipedia rather than to Wikipedia. In any case an article dating from 2006 is more deserving of repair than G12. Cabayi (talk) 19:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, Please let me know how to join in a Project and join in group activities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulsoman (talk • contribs) 19:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nathan2055: Hi please reply Rahul Soman^{Discussions - contribs} 22:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)`[reply]

Hello Nathan2055 - thank you for approving my Winmill and Kelly draft articles, and for your kind welcome. I really do appreciate it - have a nice day!! CourtauldGill (talk) 09:08, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, my draft is fully Authentic, the topic is a football coach of Asian Football Confederation i have given proper references also, still my draft was not verified can you plz help me in it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darzubair786 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, my draft is fully as per Wikipedia rules but still it got rejected, the topic is the football coach at Asian Football Confederation. Plz help sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darzubair786 (talk • contribs) 06:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey how to publish the article into main space not as a draft Djdjdjdj12345 (talk) 19:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hi - thanks for moving the page to draft i got hung up on that - also your note about adding (magazine) would be welcome ..can i do that? streetsound the magazine was and often is still confused with the uk record label sreetsounds

thanks Chris Torella (talk) 20:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HI Nathan - can you confirm my 2nd draft is in line for review? just want to make sure i did it right?

thanks Chris Torella (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, can you please move the draft to Article Seeram Sambasiva Rao IAS, You also reviewed it before.--Chennai Passangai (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chennai Passangai - No. First, are you Seeram Sambasiva Rao? Second, are you working for Seeram Sambasiva Rao? Third, post-nominals should not be used in article titles. Fourth, the subject does not satisfy general notability or political notability.

Note to Reviewer[edit]

It appears that you accepted a draft that didn't satisfy the MOS as to article title standards because it included unnecessary post-nominals. Although this wasn't the case here, unnecessary post-nominals or qualifiers are often a sign that the submitter is gaming the names of titles. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thomas9877 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:VVG SQUAD (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Because it needs to be moved to an article. And also it look like a good draft for it to be become an article.

Thomas9877 (talk) 22:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thomas9877 - No. User:Nathan2055 was right in saying that the draft has too little context. It also has no references. I suggest that you ask for advice at the Teahouse before resubmitting it. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An administrator told me that the draft does not demonstrate notability.Thomas9877 (talk) 00:17, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And also that because I just started on the draft Thomas9877 (talk) 00:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing all at once. I have already told an administrator that I will edit the draft once a week. I'm not doing all at once. Because sometimes I am a busy personThomas9877 (talk) 00:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nathan, thanks for going over the Jamie Morgan submission. Appeciate your expertise and input! MaskedSinger (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]