User talk:Muur

Archives

Archive 1

How do you suggest writing Agumon's article in regards to appearances? I'm confused with that template.Tintor2 (talk) 13:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, Pikachu doesn't just focus on the one belonging to Ash Ketchum and even Tai Kamiya talks about the Manga and video game versions of the human character. If this article is going to talk about "Agumon", like the Pikachu article it needs to talk about its appearances in ever piece of Digimon media from vpets, to games, to manga, to anime, to trading cards, and so forth. you know, like the fandom version does? ps the reboot version of Agumon is *not* the same character as the version in the OG anime/movies, that is just going to cause confusion. @Tintor2:Muur (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing says they are related. GiantSnowman 10:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Players cannot move from one club to another until the transfer window opens on 1 July, regardless of there being an option in his loan to make the deal permanent. GiantSnowman 11:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The transfer window opens June 9th. source Muur (talk) 14:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point - in which case update the article on 9 June, thanks. GiantSnowman 14:17, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna go back and put the Clause activation back part but leave him at West Ham till the 9th. Most transfers like you said end up waiting till July 1st since they're free agent ones but this is a special case. And if anyone is bought before july 1st after June 9 the transfer doesn't wait (e.g. Lets say man city buy a guy on June 18th for 50 million or something) Muur (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

also heres some more proof west ham bought this guy and stated he officially joins on june 9th.Muur (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:POINT with reference to your recent removal of honours. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hey, I want it to count. but [1]'s plan is to remove it from every single player that has ever been promoted in 2nd/play offs.Muur (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I'm referring you to WP:POINT, as you're removing content that you know to be notable to make a point. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean it'll save someone the effort in a few weeks when its time to go through 200 seasons and remove any and all promotions.Muur (talk) 21:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And with reference to Alex, the burgeoning consensus is to exclude runners-up *generally*, so I'm a little confused why you insist on that honour being included and the play-offs being removed. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you got a source for that? because the manual of style has cup runners up as relevant.Muur (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to the other discussion taking place at WT:FOOTY, directly above the play-off one. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

play offs is just bundled in with automatic promotion. the basis of the entire discussion was promotion in general, including play offs.Muur (talk) 21:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Using Football Manager to reference information about a BLP, seriously?! Reverted. Feel free to re-add information with a proper source. GiantSnowman 07:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are premier league teams that use football manager's database for scouting such as Everton. It is a highly trusted database.Muur (talk) 09:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also the leek town stuff I found regular sources that showed him signing for them. Muur (talk) 09:17, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can report vandalism at WP:AIV, non-vandalism editing issues at WP:ANI, and ask for page protection at WP:RFPP. GiantSnowman 20:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would suggest you take time to read up on using Template:Cite web. Including references as a link may cause WP:LINKROT and make it difficult for Wikipedia bots to archive the source if it goes offline. Just letting you know! lullabying (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I removed the High School from the infobox is because we typically do not include the High School there, it was still in the main article though. --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It'd be absolutely fine to include Rochdale U16 in the management section of the infobox if credible sources existed to show that Mr Muamba had ever held that role, but there aren't. It was well publicised that he did some coaching with Rochdale U16s in 2018, while doing his badges, as he also did at Arsenal in 2021, and at Bolton before he was taken on as a member of their academy staff, but there are no sources I can find to suggest he was Rochdale U16 manager from 2018 to 2022.

Rochdale's Academy website is here, and there are multiple archive copies of the staff page e.g. October 2018, September 2019, on which his name doesn't appear. And if that website's anything to go by, they don't seem to have age-group team managers as such at all. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medabots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andorran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muur,

Just FYI, redirects on categories are done differently than on article pages. See Category:Bury A.F.C. managers and look at the code to see how to create a category redirect. Without this code, then the categories appear on an Empty Category list to be deleted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that.Muur (talk) 08:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, I created the Toughsheet page to stop people moving it prematurely, I just didn't get round to asking for a technical assist yesterday, which I've now done at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I know what I'm doing, it's not a mess. Plus, one day early isn't going to kill anyone, even on Wiki! Stay frosty and COYWM! 15:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

that wasnt an issue in 2014 and 2018...Muur (talk) 19:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EFL Trophy.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 05:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on my article nomination.Mahmood Rasooli - Mahmood Rasooli (nomination)

I have used reliable sources in my article and reliable sources have been used in all my explanations. And someone gives unacceptable reasons and wants to delete my article.

I want you to tell me what you think about my article.

(This text was written with Google Translate.) AbolfazlEbrahimi14 (talk) 10:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Usual suspect of IP addresses are at it again. Not sure if the warning I placed will cease the editing behaviour alone. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

its such a weird thing to be obsessed over. maybe its hird himself or one of his friends? is there no way to admin block this?Muur (talk) 22:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[2] caught in the act again with a new IP. Aside from that, edit warring should also be taken into consideration. WT:Footy admin watchers are probably aware of this as well. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 09:35, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Muur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "S5876655331". The reason given for S5876655331's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Canelo225".</nowiki>

Accept reason:

Yeah. Autoblock gone. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was me that removed the headings on the stats table, no idea how it happened, suppose it must have been a misclick. Thank you for noticing and replacing them. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]