User talk:Musiconeologist

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 1 section is present.

Hi, I read your comments on the Fluctuation spectrum article. As far as I can tell, "Fluctuation spectrum" is just a less common synonym for the Fourier spectrum. Do you have any objection to my simply blanking the article and redirecting it to Fourier transform? PianoDan (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PianoDan I'm sorry I never replied to this—I'm very happy that you went ahead soon after and redirected it to Spectral density, which seems exactly right.

As I remember, I was randomly presented with the article when adding short descriptions, but it was in such a bad state that I couldn't add one without trying to make it comprehensible first. An interesting editing challenge, but maybe one it was unwise to accept . . . Musiconeologist (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Musiconeologist. You have new messages at Red Jay's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Red Jay (talk) 20:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Computer Peripherals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary redirect per WP:ONEOTHER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StreetcarEnjoyer I'm happy for it to be deleted. The only (non-)reason to keep it would be the one incoming link I was unable to edit because it was on a page containing a 17,000-line list. My main concern was that initially, entering computer peripherals in the search box went straight to the company article. Once I'd moved the article to Computer Peripherals (company), I couldn't really keep Computer Peripherals as a redirect to it, so changed that to a disambiguation page. But deletion is a better option. Musiconeologist (talk) 03:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent revert here [1]. Computer peripherals in fact redirects to Peripheral, so I'm definitely puzzled as to why you thought this hatnote to be inaccurate.

I also note your recent creation of Computer Peripherals (disambiguation). Such a dabpage is unnecessary, per WP:ONEOTHER, and I can't say I understand why you object to its deletion. 162 etc. (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The history of the disambiguation page is more complicated—it was left over from the original page move, and I changed from being a redirect to the company. Another editor later renamed it as part of the process of getting everything to land in the right place after the move was reverted. There was agreement, I think, that nothing should get redirected to the company article. My objection to the deletion at this point is that even people typing the capitalised version are more likely to want peripherals than the company page. At the time I first objected, it was still called Computer Peripherals. Without it, the only search result for computer peripherals was the company page, which made no sense.

My undo of the hatnote was a mistake, and I'll undo my undo. Apologies for that one.

As for the reverted move of the company article, I'm going to make an RM request for that if I've the energy, as I do feel it's important for the natural meaning of an article title to match the subject. If it does get changed to something less misleading, I think the disambiguation page will then be redundant, as per my struck-through text on the talk page.

I hope that clarifies things a bit. For now, everything seems to be pointing where it should. Anyway I'll undo my undo of the hatnote. Musiconeologist (talk) 22:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now done. Musiconeologist (talk) 22:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that I'll have an easier time opening the RM discussion for Computer Peripherals if the structure of the various redirects and disambiguation pages stays stable for a few days. I think they should all be discussed together. Musiconeologist (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]