User talk:Mohamedmarzz

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohamedmarzz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: blatant advertising

Theroadislong (talk) 12:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohamedmarzz, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Mohamedmarzz96 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DoubleGrazing, hope you're doing well!

Yes I created another user named "Mohamedmarzz96" as I could not resubmit the article and I thought it was alright to do so!

I can delete the other account if that's okay!

Thank you for your response and assistance! Mohamedmarzz (talk) 11:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you cannot delete the other account, as Wikipedia user accounts cannot be deleted by anyone. What you should do is add a note on the other account's user page saying you have two accounts and you're using this one instead, and then stop using the other account. What you shouldn't do is use both accounts in parallel, like you did at Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West, without a good reason and without being transparent about it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt use them in parallel. When I couldn't resubmit the article, I created another one to submit it. I wasn't trying to break the law! I just did not know it Mohamedmarzz (talk) 11:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did use them in parallel. On March 5th, Mohamedmarzz edited the draft. On the 12th, Mohamedmarzz96 did. Then on the 13th, Mohamedmarzz edited again. This means that the Mohamedmarzz96 edit is sandwiched between the Mohamedmarzz edits, meaning you were using both accounts in parallel. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the note sir! Mohamedmarzz (talk) 11:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mohamedmarzz. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mohamedmarzz. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mohamedmarzz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not directly or indirectly being compensated for my edits whatsoever! I just work there and I am not getting paid to do this article Mohamedmarzz (talk) 11:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to paid explicitly to edit Wikipedia. The fact that you work there and are writing about your employer puts you squarely within the paid-editing rules. Just make the disclosure already! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done! Mohamedmarzz (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will I not be able to publish the article? Mohamedmarzz (talk) 12:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohamedmarzz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There is no evidence of notability, and what's more, nothing indicating noteworthiness and little or nothing of obvious encyclopaedic value here; the draft merely describes the existence of a ROTM business. The sources are a mix of sponsored content / churnalism, publicity materials, and close primary sources, none of which contribute towards WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hyatt Regency Cairo West and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohamedmarzz, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Marinafraser90 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]