User talk:Maestlin

WWelcome!

Hello, Maestlin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --ragesoss 04:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your note about Discovery of precession in the Hipparchus article is very much the kind of work that needs to be done on this unwieldy page. I did something similar with Hipparchus On Sizes and Distances, but haven't gotten around to trimming the corresponding section on the Hipparchus page. I'll definitely be following what you do. Keep up the good work! --Dantheox 04:06, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad somebody got the project started. The new page on distances is great. --Maestlin 00:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Very nice job finding and pursuing what to do with this article. I see you've followed through with my suggestion to nominate it for deletion (I expect it will be deleted following the mandatory comment period). Keep up the good work! -- Rick Block (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I am an overseer of your brain. I have come to tell you that the Wikimetal Project is holding a poll on the inclusion of certain genres on the heavy metal template and footer that goes onto metal related articles. This poll has a closing date, however, and so here i am, reminding you to vote if you want to, by pumping strange chemicals through your veins. Its hard work being a brain you know!

If you would like to help in this crucial part of the project, the page is here. No, thats not it? Oh my! I posted those pictures of myself, what a devil i am. No the actuall link is here on this link.

I guess ill see you at breakfest when you finally recover from Wikipedia. Bye for now body, your Brain 07:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maestlin!

Im sorry to bother you. But since you have been involved in science history related articles, your neutral stand is urgently needed in the Jabir ibn Hayyan article, regarding his ethnicity. Nearly all reliable sources say that he was an Arab. I listed all sources here: [1].

Thank you! jidan 00:59, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they should be split if there is an exception. If we make Category:medieval astrologers a subcat of Category:medieval astronomers that would still mean only having one of them on any given article. But does it match the facts? Septentrionalis 18:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that the sixth vote came a few minutes too late, I took the liberty of nominating the article to Wikipedia:Medicine_Collaboration_of_the_Week. I believe there it will have a better treatment. --Francisco Valverde 15:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU for fixing this! Maestlin

anytime :) Grutness...wha? 01:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Medicine in Ancient Greece was selected. Hope you can help…

--Francisco Valverde 19:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Why do you consider the phrase "the actual sacrifice itself is known as a taurobolium", when the wikipedia page itself confirms that contemporary Roman bull sacrifice was indeed known as a taurobolium? I'm gonna be a devil and restore it, until i get an answer (only because i see this is an alternate account, so there is no guarantee of speed of reply). In the meanwhile, if you have an interest in this sort of thing , have you checked out Portal:Classical Civilisation? Kind Regards. Pydos 09:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no prob - Mithraism was the subject of my A-level coursework for class. civ. I see where you're coming from, possibly it should be couched as "an actual bull sacrifice would be known as a taurobolium" just to link things? I take your point about the confusion however. Have fun! Pydos 18:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you explain your concern at Talk:Neoplatonism for me? Jkelly 22:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointer on my talk page regarding Ibn al-Shatir. I accept fully what you say, Perhaps an article, or at least a new defination on the eccentricity page would help. --Richhoncho 05:30, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maestlin, I hope you are feeling better. I would like to thank you for your informative and incisive comments at Talk:The Jesus Mysteries. They are both even tempered and firm, without ever being insulting. Good work! - Ta bu shi da yu 15:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Historians of conjuring (magic) endorse White. User:Kazuba 09 Dec 2006

The inaugural March 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 03:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 06:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2007 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter has been published. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss 00:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is hot off the virtual presses. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's here at long last! The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is ready, with exciting news about Darwin Day 2009. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse --ragesoss (talk) 03:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you had at least a slight idea about what you were talking about with Philipp Melanchthon. But I suppose it is important to some people to maintain this idyllistic concept of the endeavors of people in the Medieval / Early Modern period of Europe. If "any" of it were true, quite obviously the world would not be in the place that is now nor has been... But more power to your ignorance and your perpetuation of your ignorance to others... A wonderful pursuit... Stevenmitchell (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Astronomers by era, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deities in the Elric series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deities in the Elric series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melniboné, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melniboné (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Law and Chaos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law and Chaos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]