User talk:Lokeshwaran V R

Welcome Lokeshwaran V R!

A tag has been placed on File:Tata Buses.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Vanamonde93. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hindu Mahasabha without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lokeshwaran V R, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Citizenship Amendment Act did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Kautilya3 (talk) 12:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In 2015 died former prime minister, and president of Turkey Süleyman Demirel

In 2014 died the former president of Georgia Eduard Shevardnadze.

And.

In 2017 died former prime minister of Greece Konstantinos Mitsotakis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.140.91.164 (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change names of places without consensus.Follow WP:COMMONNAME. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karnataka, you may be blocked from editing. The need to follow WP:Commonname was explained to you above, only this morning - Arjayay (talk)#

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bangalore. - Arjayay (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mr.Sarcastic. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Saurashtra people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 02:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Saurashtra people, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read WP:MOSLAYOUT for section orders Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of districts of Karnataka. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hindu Mahasabha, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lokeshwaran V R. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lokeshwaran V R. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lokeshwaran V R. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lokeshwaran V R|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, if you don't want to block again, please use proper WP:RM process to proposal a new article title for Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus and Bangalore City railway station. Matthew hk (talk) 06:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As well as Chennai Central railway station, forgot to mention. Matthew hk (talk) 07:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Peetha, Bengaluru, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Express trains in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir ,I m a boy 15 years old. I seen something wrong in the Wikipedia page ,it was showing that India has 28 States and 8 union territories according to Wikipedia ,but actually it was 28 States and 9 union territories.

I hope you can understand it. Thanks for your time.

Yours faithfully Nirnay Arwal Nirnay Arwal (talk) 09:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently Dadra and Nagar Haveli & Daman and Diu was formed by merging two previous separate union territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli whose capital was Silvassa and Daman and Diu whose capital was Daman. Now the merged UT's capital is Daman. That is the reason for the reduction in number of Union territories from 9 to 8.

Thank you Lokeshwaran V R (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Karnataka. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not use MOS:BOLDFACE and MOS:ITALICS unnecessarily. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lokeshwaran V R. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Peetha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Talk:Narendra_Modi_Stadium#Capacity_(110,000_or_132,000)_? before changing the figures again; there are two different numbers being published by a variety of sources. One of them sources the 132 figure to the Gujarat Cricket Association, but their site uses the 110 number. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2021 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 14:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In India as per Election Commission of India's rules, it is illegal to publish Exit Poll results before last day of polling ends. Exit poll results are usually released between the last day of polling and the counting day. This is done so that media houses and social media don't influence people. So please add these information after 6pm on April 6. Poll schedule for this election was issued just today. You can check it on the internet. Thank you Lokeshwaran V R (talk) 13:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at KSR Bengaluru–Nagercoil Express shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Nellai Express, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 13:53, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor recently replaced a valid archive link with a spam link to his own web site. I restored the correct archive link. Why are you putting the spam link back? MrOllie (talk) 19:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hanle (village), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you tell why you have moved so many articles, against the article titles policy? -- DaxServer (talk) 08:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Those place names were outdated. Lokeshwaran V R (talk) 11:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide proof that they are outdated, or please revert all your edits and move back the articles. -- DaxServer (talk) 13:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is related to your edits to Faizabad district against consensus [1]. Please read the policies linked in the box. — DaxServer (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Venkat TL. I noticed that you recently removed content from Puneeth Rajkumar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 08:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- I've noticed that you have recently been editing and moving a large number of articles to switch usage from "Bangalore" to "Bengaluru". The common name of that city has been established repeateddly at Talk:Bangalore, most recently in 2020, and it is not correct to go around changing existing usages of Bangalore in other articles to Bengaluru in this way, without a consensus that the common name has changed. Please stop making such changes. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 13:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Lokeshwaran V R. It looks like, despite my note earlier, and similar comments from other users that I can see on this talk page, you're still making undiscussed page moves to multiple pages relating to Bangalore and other similar topics. For example just now at List of areas in Bengaluru Cantonment. Please stop this, and use the WP:RM process to gain consensus for such moves before making them.  — Amakuru (talk) 18:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of districts of Karnataka. Please desist from changing names against WP:COMMONNAME policy — DaxServer (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Outer Ring Road, Warangal. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Dl2000 (talk) 14:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do move pages against the common name usage policy. Please use a Wikipedia:Requested moves discussions for any moves you'd like to make, since I see a lot of warnings on your talk page related to the common name usage. Thanks! — DaxServer (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to alert you of the Wikipedia:Discretionary sanctions, but I already gave you one exactly two months ago in October. Please refrain from further moves without a discussion, else I'll be requesting sanctions against you. Please be warned. Thanks! — DaxServer (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. — DaxServer (talk) 12:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Your entire history as Wikipedia has been constant disruption, including making a lot of page moves against consensus. While and indef block doesn't have to mean forever, it does mean until until you learn to communicate and cooperate. Please read WP:Communication is required. To any reviewing admin, if they are unblocked, I strongly recommend it is with the restriction that they are not allowed to move pages at all, and they must use the WP:RM process and let someone else do the moving. I would oppose unblocking without that restriction. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are happy to inform you that Wikimania 2022 local meetup has been planned at Madurai on August 14. This is a great chance to meet other wikimedian in Tamilnadu. For more details and registration check here -Neechalkaran (talk) 16:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]