User talk:Kpjas

Archive 1

Hi,

the main page of WikiProject Medicine has just been redesigned, comments are welcome! Please consider listing yourself as a participant.

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 00:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Islet cell transplantation was selected. Hope you can help…

NCurse _work 23:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time, could you please have a look at my nearly final sketch? :) NCurse _work 10:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edits, thank you very much, I'll fix references too. NCurse _work 16:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should have let me know that it must be ready one week before the original deadline (18)... :) NCurse _work 15:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now. The interwiki report writers of Simple English left the Wikipedia. Then I'm happy that I'd finished the hungarian one before starting the semester. :) NCurse _work 15:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who's doing the interwiki report this week? Sugarpine^t 14:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you need any help with interwiki reports let me know. BTW, sorry if this was wrong of me, but I've already asked around in the Japanese Wikipedia for someone to do an interwiki report there. Let me know what help you need, and btw, Treebark might be back soon. Sugarpine^t 22:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway I asked russian wiki to write a report but no answer form there... NCurse _work 09:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We need help with Dutch right now. Russian is a bit to small as it Bengali which Ragib is writing about. As for Portguese, I think I'll take care of that busniess, though I can't confirm. I haven't heard back from any news about Japanese right now so I'm still waiting. Sugarpine^t 22:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm off to the Dutch Wiki, now. Sugarpine^t 22:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, I've asked two people from Dutch, now to go the Japanese Wiki. Could you look for people to do Portugese? Sugarpine^t 22:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kpjas. I'm back from my wikibreak, it was very long. Good progress with interwiki reports. I'm ready to retake my postion. May I ask you why were doing a report on the Bengali Wikipedia? It's too small..I thought we agreed on something like 10 wikipedias. Thank you for all your help with interwiki. T®eebark t | c 00:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not feel that Russian is big enough. Sugarpine's already asked someone from the Japanese Wikipedia, but most people say no. T®eebark t | c 13:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you find someone from ja? Everyone's saying no in nl, but I'm working on that, and no one even replies in ja. The chatsboo link on the main page is where I posted. Sugarpinet/c 15:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kpjas. I would like to volunteer for the Portuguese Wikipedia report. Is there some kind of special requirement for writing the text (other than it has to be in English)? Indech 18:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Nope. Sugarpinet/c 22:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actully, we can do a russian report. I'm taking a break due to software so I won't be around for a while though I may check in to edit my watchlist every now and then. Thanks. Sugarpinet/c 14:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The User:Kpjas/Fifth anniversary page has been listed by User:Sugarpine for Speedy deletion for several days now. If you agree with this, please delete the page; otherwise, please remove the notice. Thanks! Owen× ☎ 17:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you, but i was looking for complete translation, is there anyone to helping me? Ofcourse i can translate every article regarding poland in persian wp in return --Ali 04:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ForestH2, Sugarpine, Carmelapple, Streamwater, and I believe Apple9 are all the same user, as well as some 10-15 other sockpuppets. Watch for that when users offer to help you with the report- as far as I'm concerned, the user's worn out his welcome with me. Ral315 (talk) 20:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hmmwv model.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Other language Wikipedias are not legitimate sources. You have to provide the original source of the material. -Nv8200p talk 20:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi, i posted in our village pump nl:Wikipedia:De_kroeg#Wikipedia_Signpost.

translation :

The signpost asked once again for a contribution for one of its coming issues. I said it would maybe nice to do this at the 250.000 mark, but 'celebrating 250K can be a separate article for the Signpost'. I started on nl:Gebruiker:Aleichem/Signpost. Examples are te be found here and here. When nobody cooperates i will do it all by myself, and at last i will be given the chanche to criticize everyting going on nl:wiki :-) . So please quick additions, and not so boring as in the examples above. greetings Aleichem _overleg 30 sep 2006 22:48 (CEST)

First draft : nl:Gebruiker:Aleichem/Signpost. Its not like the other ones. Do you have any problems with that? Aleichem 00:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When do you need it ? Aleichem 09:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say that this is not something the New York Times would say; and it seems a lot like WP:POV. Doesn't it? I mean saying it's a fun place to be...Don't worry though......isn't that POV? Aquafish talk 02:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People might want to check out Aquafish's talkpage before engaging with him in any way shape or form in regards to this project. --Charlesknight 22:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you can check out our progress here. I sincerely cannot tell if it can be assembled by Oct 2nd. I'll let you know tomorrow if a bit of a rush can make it happen. Regards, Indech 22:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I am writing you to say we will not be able to deliver the Portuguese Wikipedia Interwiki Report in advance (Oct 2nd). If you need anything, please let me know. Indech 01:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

That certainly sounds fine to me. Ral315 (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely be wary of publishing the Dutch report at this point; if Portuguese gets finished, we can go with that. I trust your opinion/judgment. Ral315 (talk) 06:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need to worry. The Portuguese report is ready to go as planned. Indech 22:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are the original author of the article on medical ultrasonography, I am letting you known that I posted the following message on the talk page of the article: "A very good and interesting article on medical ultrasonography. I have noted that through-transmission ultrasonography is not mentioned ( as used for example in quantitative ultrasound to assess bone density ). Should that be included in this article or should it be the subject of a separate article ?" Thanks for your time :-)Dr. Imbeau 02:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you have future interwikis done in userspace initially, so that if we postpone them, they're not in an incorrect location? Ral315 (talk) 02:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kpjas, seems that you took over the coordination of the interwiki reports. ForestH2 asked me a month ago if I could prepare a report from the german wikipedia for the 23 october edition, don't know if this is still scheduled. I could provide one for this edition but I'd also welcome a one week delay because the next days will be a bit busy for me. Please answer on my german talk page. greetings, --Elian ^Talk 02:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kpjas, I have the same question. I found that ForestH2 was blocked ;) Could you confirm me the date of the next french report. Is it the November 13th ? Pyb 20:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Often it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 22:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Veniarms.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Appletree_bloom.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 15:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Czosnek 1511.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 19:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kpjas! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  19:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiesz, nawet nie wiedzialem ze jestes adminem na en wiki. Goraco zapraszam do naszej malej 'community' na PWNB :) -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  19:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I noticed some great pics from Warsaw in your gallery. Could you upload them to commons one day? I'm particularly interested in the pics from the Warsaw Uprising Museum, as they seem to be of great use to our (I mean mine and Piotrus') latest collaboration that is revamping the article on Warsaw Uprising. I have lots of pics from that museum at hand, but 99% of them are grainy.. //Halibutt 08:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean picasa :) //Halibutt 14:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stefan Czarniecki.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 04:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I proposed Slovio for deletion.

Later i found out that you are one of the main contributors on meta:Slavopedia, so i would like to hear your opinion.

Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni 20:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wydaje sie, ze tak :) Ksiazki co prawda nie mialem (eh, ile bym dal za kopie PSB), ale chodzi mu pewnie o moje projekty - User:Piotrus/List of Poles i User:Piotrus/Wikipedia interwiki and specialized knowledge test.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  10:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was selected. Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 12:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment and the link to my post! I was just curious what their opinion was. I'd love to know more about the state of medical articles of other wikis as well. NCurse _work 18:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Estragon2_1511.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 01:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nitroglycerin_pl_s.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 01:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Amphetamine_formula_pl.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 01:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Bolonia 3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Bolonia 3.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 09:40, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kpjas I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions. Thank You, BCproject (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fanfare :) WP:PWNB is a good place to watchlist. My advice is - do whatever you feel is fun (I couldn't get all the details quickly - consider opting in for stat fun :). If you are interested in science in Poland, that needs help... on the other hand, practically every topic section imaginable is understaffed. History is in the best shapes, but is also most controversial. Avoid being dragged into controversial, stressful disputes. Feel free to drop me a note on GG.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Właśnie jak ja postanowiłem, jednak - choć zobaczymy na jak długo, powrócić na pl Wiki... W tej chwili to jest naprawdę społeczeństwo które bardzo ciężko choruje, a nic nie wskazuje na to, aby się to miało jakoś zmienić. Enjoy your stay here anyway :) Roo72 (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zobacz [1]. Wlasnie zerkam... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tak, to ipek znany nam od dawna. Niestety, trudno robic cos wiecej niz rewertowac... zmienia IPki dynamicznie. Sprzataniem po nim zajmuje sie glownie User:Space Cadet, on bedzie wiedzial wiecej. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on. I didn't know that the subject would be a problem. What do I do to change that? It's know for the domain, but it should be "Bloc" or "Bloc AS" to be 100% correct.

Hang on. I didn't know that the subject would be a problem. What do I do to change that? It's know for the domain, but it should be "Bloc" or "Bloc AS" to be 100% correct.(Uflidd (talk) 21:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Hi Kpjas

I have seen that you have been busy tidying-up the newly-created Solidarity (South African trade union) page. I have big plans for that page. I am going to make it much more complete and comprehensive. The content that is on the page now is really just there as a placeholder. Eventually, the plan is to have separate pages for each of Solidarity's affiliate projects like AfriForum and Helpende Hand as well, as well as a translation of the page on the Afrikaans Wikipedia and the Dutch one as well. Other languages would probably have to be done by other people.

I would appreciate any help you want to give with keeping the content encyclopedic and up to Wikipedia's standards. I am employed at Solidarity, so therefore anything I add could be considered as properly sourced material? The parts about the history of Solidarity can be found in the book by Wessel Visser that I added as "Further Reading".

I'd appreciate hearing any suggestions from you, as I see you are a veteran Wikipedia editor. Are you (or have you been) active with the Polish Solidarity?

Thanks for uploading Image:Solidarnosc.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I resubmitted the bit I'd added, but sourced it this time. Cheers, Kinou (talk) 08:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your words mean much to me. I am sure the committee would find your insight useful, too (they may not however know who you are - something you may want to clarify to them if you will be making a statement).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An arbcom member said they will be drafting their initial proposals last weekend - but they didn't (in my experience, arbcom is prone to delays). But it's more done than not, I think. Do note that talk pages are likely to be less analyzed than main pages (with the possible exception of main talk outside statements). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki, ale nie jestem zainteresowany. Wycofałem się z angielskiej wiki (za dużo fanatyków, za dużo obelg pod moim adresem), na polską brak mi sił (za dużo roboty, niemal każdy artykuł trzeba by zredagować lub napisać od nowa - tyle że po polsku). Ale dzięki za propozycję. //Halibutt 13:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Masur (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Could you please check on this troll with fixed IP: 24.86.116.250.

He seams to have problem with understanding basics of wikipedia, and now he is calling me a loser. --Ante Perkovic (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kryzstof, greetings to you and thank you for your invitation to feel free to ask you about any clarifications about Wikipedia. I would like to ask you how can I (or some administrator) change back the wrong presentation of the South Slavic languages and dialects division, placed in the chart, which is placed in the right side of the articles about Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Bunjevac and Serbo-Croatian language? In the chart named 'Chart of South Slavic languages and dialects' someone has changed the basically known fact that the politically created standards of the SerboCroatian language, such as Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, Bunjevac, etc., they all belong to the Central South Slavic languages, and they don't belong in the same group with Slovenian language (which is Western group of South Slavic Languages). Please if you can, help me correct back this factual state of the things in this chart, because like it is now - it gives a wrong information to the readers. It should be like it was before,-showing: Serbian, Croatian, Bunjevac, and Bosnian in the SAME group of dialects, and that group is CENTRAL South Slavic Diasystem. Thanks;

As for the one who is complaining about me above, please have in mind that he is the one who started first with the vandalism, calling me names and erasing my edits on some 'talk' pages. I know that it's not of your business, just to let you know. Best Regards, 24.86.116.250 (talk) 00:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Check this guy's contributions in:

a) all namespaces (47 edits)

b) article namespace (ZERO edits)

Last edit in article namespace from this IP was 18:11, 13 September 2007, so it propably wasn't this guy. Please note that wikipedia is not a Discussion forum. This guy must be very lonely and is seeking attention. I believe this is not place for helping people who are bored. Could you please block this guy or at least tell me where I can file a complaint? --Ante Perkovic (talk) 20:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You once asked me that. Check Wikipedia:WikiProject Topic outline/Drafts/Topic outline of Poland for some ideas.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for help improving the dermatology content on wikipedia. Would you be willing to help, or do you have any friends interested in derm that would be interested in helping? Kilbad (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A week block for this? Isn't that a tad extreme? I've seen established users, even admins, get more vocal when things get heated. The user seems to be more of a career newbie than a vandal. Given his history, I would naturally support a brief warning-shot-style block, but a week? What also concerns me is that your lengthy block may affect consensus on the pages he is debating on, if his voice is not represented. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 05:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I still would have given some indication that things are heading towards a block were the user to continue in his behaviour, but I see where you are coming from. +Hexagon1 ^(t) 08:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually 24.* has been systematically trolling talk pages (0 mainspace edits) for a year or so. What is really pathetic is utilizing the "fighting nationalist" rhetoric in advance to whitewash himself of possible accusations of him being the real POV partisan, with no real arguments and esp. no desire for any constructive discussion. Of the topic he "discusses" (West South Slavic languages), he apparently has no competence, misquoting the "authoritative" sources, spreading lies and ad hominems against anyone who dares to question or let alone invalidate his perception of the "truth". --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 23:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you're saying Ivan - is EXACTLY what you're doing on these pages, if you have problems blaming others for what you're doing, than that's your seerious problem, and you'd better start seeking some help:)). Bye.24.82.216.163 (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting from the talkpage: those who I was dealing with these days -they are all most likely supporters of one destructive and defeated force, supporting the ones who glorify their fascisoid NDH and fascism and who salute 'heil Hitler' at the soccer stadiums. Calling people fascists and supporters of Hitler would certainly merit a nice block, wouldn't it? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Infectious mononucleosis was selected. Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 09:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your edits to infectious mononucleosis. I noticed you moved all the differential diagnosis stuff into a new section and unfortunately I've had to undo that. WP:MEDMOS/Diseases states that differentials should be included within the diagnosis section of the article. You may wish to read through MEDMOS further to understand further how medical sectioning (in an article sense, not a psychiatric sectioning sense!) works here. Thanks again for your edits, I look forward to working with you more in future. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 13:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the edits you performed on the antibiotics page. That article is NOT intended to be pure technical formal definition of which antibiotics exactly directly react with alcohol. This is for general reader, and for average person it's important to know that alcohol is dangerous with any antibiotics and very dangerous with some of them. It's a common opinion in the medical community, i posted the references, which you removed. Besides it's based on a simple facts and logic about liver enzymes. The reference you posted cannot be easily accessed of verified by an average person. It's a 6yo book, and I'm sure it just checks the "direct" reactions of the antibiotics, and does not look at indirect effects. Who do you think reads this page? Who will get hurt if we give a warning there? Better, if we just say what most of the doctors in the world will tell you? What you say there now is the bold (incorrect) statement that alcohol is not dangerous with antibiotics ("contrary to popular belief"?) Who you wrote that statement for, chronic alchoholics looking for a reason to drink? I personally had severe liver problems, when i drank alcohol with one of (supposed to be safe) antibiotics. I want to warn other ppl, so they are at least aware of potential complications, and not just send them straight to the cemetery. That article is the place to warn.Andru nl (talk) 14:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JFW | T@lk 00:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ostronog.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was misled. You have done no wrong and I beg forgiveness.--Adam in MO Talk 17:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Czosnek2 1511.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Blood-brain barrier was selected. Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 15:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Systemic lupus erythematosus was selected. Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 11:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be so kind to look here and add some data ? 76.16.182.29 (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Huntington's disease was selected. Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 16:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We are now dividing our members into active, semi-active (have not edited a Poland-related article in more then three months) and inactive (have not edited at all for three months or more). You are mostly inactive on Wikipedia; we are moving you to semi-active members category. Please consider participating in our project activities again in the future, we would love to work more closely with you again! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Partition_Poland_1772.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Partition_Poland_1793.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Henryk Sienkiewicz0512.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Medicine Collaboration of the Week. This week Abdominal aortic aneurysm was selected. Hope you can help…

JFW | T@lk 14:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found your old user page while checking out some old edits. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 17:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kpjas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Eva Herzigová - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Dziobak001xx.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kpjas, I found your user page from the list of Wikimedians by number of edits. It seems that your very first edit was not in May 2001, but rather on 24 April 2001. Graham87 11:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Czy mógłbyś zerknąć na historię edycji w Equatorial Guinea – od dłuższego czasu "walczę" z wpisami IP podającymi, że jednym z języków urzędowych jest portugalski, co jest sprzeczne z oficjalnymi źródłami (szczegółowy opis w Equatorial Guinea#Official languages). Nie znam dokładnie zasad panujących na enWiki, jednak na plWiki klasyfikowałoby się to do częściowego zablokowania artykułu, tak aby takie edycje, de facto już wandalizmy, nie mogły być dokonywane przez IP. Aotearoa (talk) 08:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Dear Kpjas,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 03:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Przestań cofać edycje, Michał jest palantem i skurwielem. Jeśli chcesz mu pomóc to zapytaj się dlaczego skurwysyn pierdolony blokuje konta, pozdrawiam Sobołek Michałkowski (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In case you're not watching meta: m:Talk:Wikimedia Medicine#Conference call. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 00:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Get free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Research Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

• Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
• Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
• If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how to pull page numbers out of that. By the way we have a bunch of articles fully translated into Polish here [2]. Wondering if you would be interested in helping add / integrate them there. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 09:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out this very short form to receive your free access to Cochrane Collaboration's library of medical reviews: Link to form.

If you have any questions, just ask me. Cheers, Ocaasi 13:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is a brief note to let you know about an update to the Main FAQ (the addition of a large table of Components of the discussion system), and also to specifically request your feedback on two items: our sandbox release plan, and a draft of the new contributors survey. We look forward to reading your input on these or other topics - Flow can only get better with your ideas! –Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 19:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have a bunch more articles ready for integration in Polish as seen here[3]. Instructions on how to add them are here[4]. Wondering if you could help? Let me know if there are difficulties. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Krzysiu proszę abyś się nie wpierdalał w nie swoje sprawy Eugeniusz Sobkowski (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sign up for monthly delivery

Feature – Ebola articles[edit]

During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages Rubric has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

Just some of our over 60 translations:

• Xhosa
• Northern Sotho
• Zulu
• Tsonga
• Venda
• Hausa
• Igbo
• Yoruba
• Kinyarwanda
• Swahili
• Tigrinya

New roles and guides!

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!

New sign up page!

We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!

Style guides for translations

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.

Some more stats

• In July, 18 full article translations went live (WP:RTT), and an additional 6 simplified versions went live (WP:RTTS)!
• We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! (Find them here old sign up page)
• We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap
• New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!

Further reading

• Translators Without Borders
• Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

-- CFCF 🍌 (email) 13:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
  • Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 14:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

Hello, Kpjas. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 da