User talk:Kompik

Hello Kompik, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started!

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Template messages
• Sandbox

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

FireFox  ^{T C E} 17:35, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kompik. Thank you for your fixes to math articles. You are welcome to join the math club, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics (see its talk page, and the link to participants subarticle).

Hi Kompik. Thank you for copying things from PlanetMath. One remark. When you mark an article as copied, removed the word "guess" from "WP guess" but do keep the word "WP". Also, put in the status. If you copied an article the status should be "C", if our existing article is adequate, it should be "A". See the table at the top of each page in the project for the other meanings. I fixed your entries at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/PlanetMath Exchange/11-XX Number theory. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov 15:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain your edit to limit (mathematics) continuous function where you say that "It's interesting that the proof of the equivalence of Cauchy's and Heine's definition of the continuity needs some form of the axiom of choice"? In fact, I can't see the difference between Cauchy's and Heine's definition. By the way, we usually write in a formal style, and thus we don't use contractions like "it's" but write them in full as "it is"; I changed this in the limit (mathematics) continuous function article. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 21:44, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If Kompik is thinking about the same thing as me, then it goes as follows. Assume that a function f is sequentially continuous at a point x. Need to prove that if B_n is an ever-shrinking sequence of open balls at x, then the values of the function f on the ball B_n all approach the value f(x_0). Assume the opposite. Then, you are forced to pick an element x_n from each ball B_n, such that f(x_n) does not go to f(x). This choice of x_n from each ball is the axiom of choice applied to the sequence of sets B_n. It is a weak form of the axiom of choice, because the axiom of choice works for an arbitrary family of sets, not necessarily a countable one. Oleg Alexandrov 00:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about messing up the articles in my original question: I should have refered to continuous function instead of limit (mathematics). I understand what Oleg is saying, and I thought that Kompik was talking about something like that (but I couldn't remember the details). However, continuous function decribes Heine's definition of continuity as "The limit of f(x) as x approaches c must exist and be equal to f(c)." It's not clear what definition of limit is being refered to; in fact, the article limit (mathematics) does not seem to have the sequential definition, which goes something like: the limit of f(x) as x approaches c is L if, for every sequence x_n with limit c, the sequence f(x_n) has limit L (where the limit of sequences is as defined in Limit (mathematics)#Limit of a sequence). If I now understand it correctly, it seems some clarification is in order. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. It was my fault - I placed the noted that "this definition is Heine's" into continuous function. I had to read the entry more thoroughly - but at least that definition is similar to the sequential continuity - which I had in mind and which Oleg explained above. (See e.g. [1] for what I call Heine and Cauchy definition of continuity - but I think it's clear enoguh by now.) The solution is either to remove both references to Heine or to add Heine's definition somewhere. I'm rather busy these days. If some of you guys has time to do the corrections, please do it. Otherwise, I'll try to update the page later - I'm travelling abroad this weekend and I have some stuff to do before. Thanks a lot for pointing out the mistake. --Kompik 17:07, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to fix it. Check the article, if you want. Probably you'll have some corrections. --Kompik 07:09, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No need for corrections, but I did rewrite it slightly. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:43, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Finaly, I've corrected it to the following (it should be correct now) --Kompik 09:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cauchy's and Heine's definition of continuity are equivalent. The usual (easier) proof makes use of axiom of choice, but in the case of real functions it was proved by Wacław Sierpiński that axiom of choice is not actually needed.

One more note: The Sierpiński's result speaks only about global continuity. Maybe this is not important enough to mention it in the expository article, but I mentioned it -- to avoid confusion. --Kompik 14:30, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of lists of mathematical topics. Michael Hardy 20:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment. John Reid 16:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have recently created a template which can be used on their user pages by those, who contribute to the Slovak Wikipedia as well. If you do and if you are interested, you can have a look at Template:User wikisk. Jan.Kamenicek 22:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Czech Republic, a project dedicated to building and maintaining a large and neutral database of Czech Republic-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name here.

--Darwinek 16:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your invitation, but I'm not sure I would be right person for this project. My interests lie closer to mathematics than geography and biographical articles - although I do minor edits occasionaly in articles of this type. And, more important, I have not enough time these days. But I surely will follow the progress of this Wikiproject and if I see I have something to add, I'll try to contribute. --Kompik 16:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kompik, I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week(soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks--Cronholm144 22:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you didn't specify a valid email address, or you might have chosen not to receive emails, so i put message here. I am not good at math. Just for your reference.

i thought Borel sets are countably generated. if "countably generated" has several meanings, we should put them in the article. Anyway, we need some examples for "countably generated" stuff. Please put some. Jackzhp 00:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found you via category:User sk, and need a quick check. I added Slovak words to Boroughs and localities of Bratislava, but I'm not sure whether "Mestské časti" is a singular or a plural. Could you check and add the other? Thanks. Circeus 16:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Mestské časti" is plural. I'll have a look at the changes in the article. --Kompik 20:15, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singular is "Mestská časť". --Kompik 21:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Slovakia, an attempt to build and maintain a large and neutral database of Slovakia-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the members section of WikiProject Slovakia.

≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 08:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your inivitation. However, as you may have notices, my editorial activity is very low last months, I am rather busy right now. When I return to editing wiki on more regular basis, I will consider joing this wikiproject. --Kompik (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a pity, there are doubts there will be enough editors for the project to survive, I believe they will be. Maybe a symbolic support in form of your formal join would be more then enough. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 12:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kompik! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. František Laurinec - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Vladimír Vůjtek (ice hockey b. 1947). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Information: on the discussion page of European Union exist voting: Talk:European_Union#Definition_of_the_European_Union. Subtropical-man (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Karolína Schmiedlová, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I appreciate your recent revision to the article Tibor_Šalát. Thank you for the correction of some of the journals' titles. 7cc.19edv (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kompik, I'm contacting you because we need some Slovakian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sk.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Slovakian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So far I've tried to translate one paragraph in VisualEditor/FAQ [2], just to see how this things work. The most problematic for me were Wikipedia-related technical terms. If there are some other people helping with translation to Slovak language, be it translation stuff about VisualEditor or other things, where is a good place to discuss translations with them? I cannot promise devoting too much time to this, but I might try to help. You mentioned a personal message which, if I understand correctly, needs translation to Slovak. Could you direct me to this message and tell me, where can I make my attempt to translate it? --Kompik (talk) 07:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kompik, good point on collaboration space. You are free to use TranslationCentral's talkpage for questions. However, right now there is only one other Slovakian translator working, Teslaton, it might be most efficient if you both talk directly to each other. Teslaton has made a post to sk.wiki for me, so I don't need the personal message at present. You could translate a short followup for me: "Thanks Teslaton. Sk.wiki editors, please feel free to contact me about any issues with the VisualEditor". I appreciate you helping out even in a small capacity (or large, whatever you have time for!) PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the info. I'll contact Teslaton. I think it would be ok if you posted that in English on sk. wiki, but anyway, translation would be: "Ďakujem Teslaton. Redaktori Sk.wiki, neváhajte ma kontaktovať v prípade akýchkoľvek problémov s VisualEditorom". --Kompik (talk) 07:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Kompik. PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kompik, an update - we'd like to deploy the VisualEditor on the Slovakian wikipedia on September 24th. Would you be able to translate a short update for me to inform the users there about the date? PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I certainly could translate some short message, if needed. --Kompik (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great Kompik! It's in your mailbox. Thanks so much for your help, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ďakujem mnohokrát, Kompik. Posted here: [3] PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julia Görges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Li Na (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Sagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michał Kwiatkowski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Geneva Open Challenger – Singles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Wang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Knoxville Challenger – Doubles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ruben Gonzales and Kevin King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 Internazionali di Tennis Castel del Monte – Doubles

added a link pointing to Frank Moser

2014 JSM Challenger of Champaign–Urbana – Singles

added a link pointing to James McGee

2014 Trofeo Città di Brescia – Doubles

added a link pointing to Frank Moser

2014 Uruguay Open – Doubles

added a link pointing to Facundo Argüello

2014 Uruguay Open – Singles

added a link pointing to Facundo Argüello

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's great you are doing articles with challenger tour draws, but could you please, remember of adding: | team-width=175 in section Finals, so it will looks like that:

{{4TeamBracket-Tennis3-v2 | RD1=Semifinals | RD2=Final

| team-width=175

Thank you in advance.TheLightBlue (talk) 10:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will do! --Kompik (talk) 11:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2015 Aspria Tennis Cup – Singles. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2015 Aspria Tennis Cup – Trofeo CDI. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2015 Aspria Tennis Cup – Trofeo CDI – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2015 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Challenger Pulcra Lachiter Biella – Singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kompik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kompik. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please add at least one ref to 2015 Morocco Tennis Tour – Casablanca? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 05:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kompik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Expositiones Mathematicae, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 15:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Július Šupler, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Július Šupler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silvia Šuvadová has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be a notable actress

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]