User talk:Jayanthkumar123

Hello, thank you for editing Brahmanandam page. But before undoing the changes about birth place, please do some research and honour the facts told by actor about his birth village.

Hai I think you created Ardhashathabdham movie Wikipedia from where you took data I don’t know but you have to know some information that there are two producer’s for that film you only mentioned one if you can get information you can take from the news papers press release and also I will provide some information other Producer: Radhakrishna.Telu Banner : 24 Frames Celluloid Hope you will update with proper information n knowledge Thankq

Hi Jayanthkumar123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jayanthkumar123! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Rickyurs (talk) 12:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koo App, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vijayawada, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not remove longstanding sourced content without discussion in the article talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Music of Tollywood, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Re this edit, please note that filmography is not meant for talk shows and game shows. Actors do not get credit for promoting their films in these shows. Although they may be listed in the article of respective shows. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 14:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hlo bro create wiki pages on Calling Sahasra and Galodu movies AbcdSab.telfc (talk) 13:20, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Re this edit, critical acclaim means that the film received widespread appreciation while it may not necessarily be the case. Calling it critical reception would do or it may be omitted altogether when there is no other sub-heading like box office. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I suggest you do not use Pinkvilla as a source for box office or any movie related as it is considered unreliable. SP013 (talk) 15:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tamil Nadu Talkies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film production company. Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 00:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Telangana into List of capitals of Andhra Pradesh. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Vakeel Saab, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SP013 (talk) 15:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, History of Telugu cinema, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SIIMA Award for Best Debut Director (Telugu), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 17:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Anjaneya Jewellery, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 20:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Surekha Vani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Been deleted 2 weeks before for the same reasons, only supporting roles, fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surekha Vani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surekha Vani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Telugu film actors, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 07:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jayanthkumar123. Thank you for your contributions. Re this edit, however, please note that "received positive reviews from critics" should directly be supported by the source; using individual reviews to indicate as such is not allowed per WP:SYNTH. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rajahmundry, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Twitter is a self published source and citing it for "Cultural Capital of AP" doesn't hold. Anyone can tweet themselves as such. Also, please do not remove the Original research notice without explanation. -- DaxServer (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. Re this edit, I don't why this is particularly relevant. Also if we are mentioning it for Atharva, there's no reason why dubbing artists of Pooja Hegde and Mirnalini Ravi should be excluded, and basically for every other actress and villain in Telugu films. Therefore, I think we are better off omitting it entirely in the cast. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Vijayawada Airport. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. There are no scheduled international flights out of anywhere in India, so kindly stop adding DXB to the list. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 13:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samajavaragamana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Lists of Indian actors. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Clearfrienda was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not notable enough, there have not been any improvements since last submission.

Clearfrienda ^💬 12:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sarvottama Granthalayam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MasterChef India (Telugu TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Behind the Scenes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Shanmukha Priya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DJRSD (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalyaan Dhev, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalyaan Dhev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maha Samudram have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. BOVINEBOY2008 12:34, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yuvarathnaa. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fremith Let's talk do it! 04:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at RRR (soundtrack), you may be blocked from editing. Please do not move the page without starting a discussion on the talk page and getting editors to agree on the move. Along with that please check previous talk page discussions about the title of the film. We follow the same template for soundtracks across films on Wikipedia so try to keep it the same. In addition, I have seen that you do not reply to your talk page and you keep doing disruptive edits. Please refrain from doing so. SP013 (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jupitus Smart. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of longest films in India appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 07:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Education in Vijayawada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please create the release dates of telugu movies in Wikipedia recently movies August and September movies release date create Ahtdjdyehdbsuebd (talk) 05:54, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! When you add tags to pages like the {{No plot}} tag as you did here, you only need to add the month and year in the date parameter. The sorting mechanisms only use the month and adding the date will put it in the wrong category. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 10:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you use different sources other than Republic World? There is a consensus that it is not very reliable. — DaxServer (talk to me) 13:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The South Indian Cinema Barnstar
		For expanding content related to Telugu cinema and television. Ab207 (talk) 14:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir i have done the article of actress payal radhakrishna [[1]] Can u please help the article to improve I saw Tharagathi Gadhi Daati Page and approaching you 70mmreels (talk) 18:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of Telugu cinema, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of Telugu cinema".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gopi Sundar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asianet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Music of Tollywood, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding excessive citations artificially inflating the importance of the content. I've observed a lot, quite regularly, from your contributions, that this is rather "normal" in your edits. Please read about Wikipedia:Citation overkill. — DaxServer (talk) 09:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jayanthkumar123. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jayanthkumar123. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jayanthkumar123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. If you are being paid to edit Wikipedia, you will need to disclose it. If not, please ignore. — DaxServer (talk) 09:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Daxserver, I don't know what made you to do so, but let me clear one thing - I am not paid. Also, I don't have much knowledge about the policies and regualtions of Wikipedia. But I have never done anything against the organization. I understand that I have added excess citations. Since my first day of joining wikipedia, I have always worked to improve the articles that are related to the Indian states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, and Yanam. After going through the article Spamdexing, I got to know about how people spam the things. I wish you understand my intention your comment. — Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 10:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. Happy editing..! — DaxServer (talk) 11:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Telugu film actors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Anubhavinchu Raja, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:56, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarvottama Granthalayam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Intiki Deepam Illalu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noobie anonymous (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Education in Vijayawada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 3 Roses (web series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Telugu Cinema into Cinema of India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. This is your second warning for this - please provide attribution if you do this in the future, or you may be blocked without further warning. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 12:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! hemantha (brief) 10:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Rowdy Boys, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 11:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Over the past few months, I've noticed your edits and the citations that you add do not verify. I've been making corrections here and there, but no more. An example: Edit on Bangarraju - Special:Diff/1066046571#Future. The two sources that you've added does say Nagarjuna confirmed the sequel, rather a possibility of it. I'm thankful for your valuable contributions to Wikipedia. But one more edit like this and I will report for sanctions on you. — DaxServer (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I witnessed u did editing on this page, and ur interested in it. I want to discuss & suggest a edit with u abt that page. In the media portrait section some 1 wrongly written that , Don (1978-2012) series. But the truth is 1st Don (1978) was a standalone film. Later Don film was a reboot it not made by original makers, so how can it be a series. I want u to write Don (1978) seperate & other seperate.Success think (talk) 09:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Success, I agree that the original Hindi film Don (1978) was later made as Don (2006). Also another Hindi film Don 2 was made as a sequel to the 2006 film. The article it is not just about the film series in Hindi, but also regarding various visual media productions in other languages too. And in the article Organised crime in India, the same is written. If you have any issues regarding that the article Don (franchise), you can state in it's talk page.Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Education in Vijayawada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Jayanthkumar123! Looks like we unknowing created different pages about the same film—Bhamakalapam (film) (by you at 7:30) and Bhama Kalapam (2022 film) (by me at 7:34). So we need to merge one into the other. Since you created the page first, its logical to merge mine into yours. However, given that I'm autopatrolled, the page created by me is already live and need not be reviewed. Therefore, we can reverse merge if you don't mind. However, I have no issues if you want to retain your page nonetheless. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ab207, let's merge Bhama Kalapam (2022 film) into Bhamakalapam (film). The name of the film is Bhamakalapam, and accordingly there is an article already created by me. Also, you have used infobox for televsion instead of the film. --- Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Its a direct-to-video film, so television infobox may be used. Bhamakalapam (film) is ambiguous because it can also refer to Bhama Kalapam (1988 film). So the title should be Bhamakalapam (2022 film) in that case. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SP013. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Telugu films of 2022, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from using Pinkvilla as a source SP013 (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please add kgf 2 for the box office collection list 223.224.28.13 (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found a source saying Beast collected ₹240 crore worldwide.^[1] But when I add it in List of highest-grossing Tamil films, List of highest-grossing South Indian films, you removed my edits. I think Zee Hindustan is reliable. Ranjith207 (talk) 6:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Ranjith, I found that your edits are unconstructive. Before adding the data of the film in other artciles, please go through the respective article's data. Here in the case of Beast (2022 Indian film), the box office data is disputed and also the box office figures are not added in the film's infobox. Similarly you have made changes List of highest-grossing Tamil films and List of highest-grossing South Indian films regarding Valimai and other films. If you wish to add box office figures of any film, then add the data that was already in the respective film's article. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 7:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. Ranjith207 (talk) 7:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

I think the source is reliable. If you think so please add it in the film's article. Ranjith207 (talk) 7:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to List of Tamil films of 2022, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.Adakiko, what I did are purely based on the sources. In the case of Valimai, the box office collections are ranged between ₹155.45–234 crore. While few editors are continously chaning its figures as only ₹234 crore which is incorrect. The figures should not vary between List of Tamil films of 2022 and the Valimai articles. Also, its a gentle remainder to u to use the figures that are sourced and are used in the film's main article. Do not make unconsturctive edits. Now in the case of Beast (2022 Indian film), there are no proper box office figures in it's main article. First, let the box office dispute regarding the film, come to an end. Until and unless there are proper figures in the film's article, do not make changes in the articles. ..... Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 5:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your [[2]] on Acharya (2022 film) about the film incurring a loss of र90 crore is supported by Koimoi and Bollywood Life which are unreliable sources. See WP:ICTFSOURCES and the discussions on those unreliable sources. Thank you. We are the Great (talk) 21:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Tamil Films 2022 "Valimai without citing a (PINKVALLA) reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I've opened a Talk entry on the Article Talk page and pinged you over here. Thanks 106.198.111.17 (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oo Antava Oo Oo Antava, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oo Antava Oo Oo Antava until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Am observing that your editing is biased and selective, what made you to change Kgf2 collection to change, and what made u to change rrr collection from ₹1150-1200 cr with unauthenticated source. Am waiting for ur reply. Tigerikkada (talk) 14:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tiger, the changes/edits that are done by me are purely reliable. For example, take the case of K.G.F: Chapter 2, I added the lowest range of the collections too. Wikipedia is not for unconstructive edits. I have made edit based on the data provided in the News 18 article, which is regarded as reliable. For your better understanding please go through the article. The collections that are reported by News 18 had a complete breakdown with repective to both area-wise and language wise, thus making the collections more valid. If you are facing any problem while reading the article (as it is in Telugu language), I can help you out. The another edit you talked about is regarding the RRR collections. For your information, I have not made any changes regarding the collections. Please go through article's talk page and history to know more about the changes. I don't know what made you to allegedly make such a brainless statement against me. Hope you get what I mean...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Sakshi is reliable source? U r keep removing authenticated source and citing unreliable sources. Tigerikkada (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously!!!!! I don't even understand how to reply to this brainless statement. First of all, I have not done changes regarding the collections of Beast in the recent times. Yes I do agree that I have made edit on the article, but that was long ago. Secondly, where did you find this Sakshi reference in the article. As far as I know there is no refernce from Sakshi regarding the collections.....Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your biased ending may lead to block your id at anytime, you cited closing collection of Kgf2 with the help of garbage article "news18". But you forgot to cite same article with closing collection of rrr film ₹1150 crore^[2]. Stop your selection editing of wikipedia. Go with authenticated source instead of unreliable. Tigerikkada (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tigerikkada please learn to speak properly with other editors. As as I said earlier I have nothing to do with RRR edits. I have not made any edits regarding the article. But the edits on KGF chapter 2 are purely reliable. If you wish to speak more on this, then you can participate in the ongoing discussion on the article's talk page.Calling a reliable source as a "garbage" shows your awareness about the Wikipedia's policy. I agree that the other refernces on the article are also reliable, but have basic idea about why I have made changes. Finally, I suggest you have some basic idea of what's going on the article. I advice you to change your nature of speaking.......Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) Tigerikkada (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) Tigerikkada (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 9 Hours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravi Varma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of highest-grossing Tamil films, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 04:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of highest-grossing Tamil films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop vandalizing pages with your multiple IPs and your account. Panda619 (talk) 14:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Panda619 please refrain from making unconstructive edits. The box office collections of Valimai are ₹155.45–234 crore in it's main article. Please seek consensus at the article's talk page. On every edit I made, I clearly mentioned the reason. Other users including Ab207 also clearly mentioned the reason before making the edits. See here--- [[3]]......Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kinnerasani (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Modern Love Mumbai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Carney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i did not remove any sourced content that was added previously. Why did you remove all the sourced content added by me ? No perception was changed. You are free to add anything, but you are not free to delete other editors contibutions. Change only which sourced content you haad difference with, you are not entitled for blanket reverts of other editor's contribution. This article is not about dubbed films, and baahubali it is about pan indian films from other regions. The dubbed films information which you added is repetitive, and unstructured with lot of cohesion, grammar issues. I will retain your points in a seperate section of dubbed films within this article. Fostera12 (talk) 13:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have created new section, for your contributions. And lead section i have covered the points that you have already covered. You can feel free to add your contributions, pls dont succumb to blanket reverts of other editors contributions. If you disagree on a certain point change only that aspect in the article. Dont just revert. If i missed out any references, you add those specific links. Fostera12 (talk) 13:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fostera, although the media consider a film to be pan-indian, everything cannot be added here in the list. Please refer to the talk page for the criteria. Mani Ratnam, Ram Gopal Varma, Jeethu Joseph and Kamal Haasan cannot be considered as major figures, because they are really not part of original pan-india made films. I am repeating again that the media may publish saying 'x' is pan-indian figure, but there is certain criteria for this. On the top of the article you have removed "term related to Indian cinema that started off with the Telugu cinema.[1] The term gained popularity since 2015, post the success of Baahubali: The Beginning (2015)." which is very crucial. According to the sources you have added, My Dear Kuttichathan was released only in Tamil and Hindi along with Malayalam. See, the point is the source no where mentioned it as a pan-indian success although it might be successful in Malayalam. Donot add box office puffery here. Mughal-e-Azam and Sholay might be successful but how are they releated to this article. Content related to Drushyam can added but must be relatble to the article, but you have added it's success rather adding its notability. Roja and others might also be successful, but the sources must be related the article. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 13:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I am here again reminding you that a pan-indian film must be released in atleast four or more (mostly five) languages [Telugu, Tamil, Kannada, Hindi and Malayalam]. Pan-indian success is different from pan-indian film. The films that are in the list are made to be pan-indian right from their production stage or released THEATRICALLY in the above mentioned languages.

If you disagree with box office u remove only that line. I have added them in background information. Not udner notable films since 2015. Looks like you are immature in wikipedia. Why are you involved in disruptive editing, when im clealry saying to change only points you disagree. I did not add any puffery.

I have not at all said about the box-office performances of the films after 2015. I have clearly said about the films mentioned in the background section..Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

pushpak is a pan indian kannada film, you can add that information in background section Fostera12 (talk) 13:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly update without deleting the information added by me Fostera12 (talk) 13:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the dubbed films information in seperate section. Update in that section Fostera12 (talk) 14:01, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

using capital letters in edit summaries is shouting on other editor, and disrespecting fellow editor which is against wikipedia policy. Fostera12 (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that is clearly not my intention, you are the one who have added irrelevant information on the article. Such as adding yet to be released films on the list, non-major figures, etc. If you wish add something that is in large size, then use the article's talk page, which would be easier. Th bulk content you added cause disruption....

Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that I stand by you in your opinion on pan-Indian films as shown here (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pan-Indian film). DareshMohan (talk) 21:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Pan-Indian film shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Tamil films of 2018, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove or add or change sourced content, to how you think it should be. You have also blanked the content from the section Awards without providing any explanation which as a result all of your edits in the page have been reverted. Please use the edit summary if you want to add or change content. Theoder2055 (talk) 07:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theoder2055, the point is I have corrected the figures of 2.0, added Sarkar with reliable sources, etc..I haven't made any disruptive edits. Adding awards section is fine, but adding the award categories is not intended in this case. Also, the film is not about the dubbed films, in that case there will be many films....In the mean I will clean up every film article where dubbed film section is added. It is not really needed to be added.it's not just for the mentioned page. You might also be clearly aware of this. Even in the recent pages, we didn't add dubbed films section in any article. You can remove that section in the various articles and clean it up. I am getting this straight again, you can add awards/events but not the categories.. if you wish then you can open a discussion on that so that we can get insights from the other users too....Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Jayanthkumar123 at least thanks for the response. Also I suggest that to always use the edit summary so that you can explain your changes. Happy editing! Theoder2055 (talk) 06:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Talk:RRR (film)

 – Moved content dispute to article talk page.Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I standby what you said on RRR title. Thank you for editing in good faith. DareshMohan (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your inputs...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 4:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep Doing for Tamil Cinema Monhiroe (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you said is "if the ratings are from 1 to 4 out of 5 stars then we must mention the overall reviews as mixed". But in the case of brahmastra the positive reviews over dominate the negative reviews so overall critic summary can be considered as positive. Khiladi King (talk) 16:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is why I haven't removed the "positive" credit. Please understand my comment, even if the positive reviews dominate, there are two extremes in this case i.e., 1 and 4. We can go with only positive if there isn't such a low extreme. There isn't just one review giving a one-star rating. Otherwise, let's wait and watch for other upcoming reviews and let the current edit remain. Thank you...Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brahmāstra: Part One – Shiva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

request you please Stop promoting Telugu cinema as largest film industry wherever you find space. This has been a major issue with your edits. Lifting of some crazy reference out of context and citing it, the article is about cinema of india not cinema of hyderabad. There is no such thing as largest film industry of India. Please keep your edits within context.Fostera12 (talk) 11:38, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.). Fostera12 (talk) 11:55, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.) Fostera12 (talk) 12:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.) Fostera12 (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fostera12 (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am lost at your edit [4] on my talk page removing my configuration for archiving, DS aware templates. Could you explain yourself? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:22, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I might did it by mistake, I am actually unaware of that Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 12:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, no worries ;) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DareshMohan has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Just wanted to say thank you for voicing your honest opinions. Really means a lot.†

DareshMohan (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you are doing well. Thanks for all your messages. Stay strong! DareshMohan (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

) Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naidu is not his birth name, it is added as caste prejudice in some communities. But I am not going to change it. Thanks Fostera12 (talk) 13:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do aware of these caste related-things. But his complete given name is Raghupathi Venkaiah Naidu. Even the article is named after this (including Naidu). That is why I said not to remove the entire name. If the article or his complete name doesn't include "Naidu" then I would not said that. Here it is the matter of name, no matter how is it. In the personal life sections, it is acceptable to remove caste, as it is subjective. But, that case is different from here. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 04:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jayanthkumar123,

Thank you for creating Induvadana.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! I've tagged notability, refs 4 and 5 are probably reliable, independent, and constitutes of significant coverage, which means that the article IMO is borderline notable. However, is 123 Telugu reliable? Unfortunately, I couldn't find any editorial policies. Many thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 06:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it a reliable source. We use it for many Telugu/Tollywood film articles. It is primarily used only for reviews and not much for other film-related content. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dude why you changed ponniyin selvan box office to 450..?? it is almost close to 500 but why bringing down..??

in your article from firstpost it says

While Ponniyin Selvan grossed over Rs 450 crore at the global box office, it says grossed over that means not excactly 450 you idiot... நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 23:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Before making comments mind your words and decency. I know that "grossed over 450 crore" means not exactly 450. But, at that point of time, there is no other source which mentions exact figure. Making personal attacks by using words such as "idiot" is not acceptable. Know how to behave with other users. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/variety/ponniyin-selvan-i-set-to-cross-500-crore-in-box-office-collection/article66053470.ece

so you guys dont trust hindu news too....go take a look at the latest..and please change..don't try to put false data and people gonna think it did not do in box office..the info i sent is the latest october 25th now its nove 2 it should have crossed 500 crore long time ago brother.sorry for using bad words but please change. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/ponniyin-selvan-box-office-collection-historical-epic-collects-rs-464-09-crore-worldwide/articleshow/95013766.cms

october 21st it got 464..based on economic times so now it is november 2n it should hbe highesr than 450 crore that you try to put in this list..pls change pls change நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Ponniyin Selvan 1' box office collection: The epic historical film hits Rs.500 crores

By -

ETimes.in

Created: Nov 2, 2022, 11:50 IST

november 2 timesofindia article says ponniyin selvan reached 500 crore pls check them and that is reliable source and change it to 500 crore please..

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/box-office/ponniyin-selvan-1-box-office-collection-the-epic-historical-film-hits-rs-500-crores/articleshow/95247398.cms நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

times of india news article is reliable so pls change it to 500 crore as it was published nov 2nd which is today.. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it says in that article The epic historical film hits Rs.500 crores hits 500 crore so that means it reached 500 crores. you definitely have to change it now..so please change don't hang around in that 450 - 480 false long time data. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 18:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is not need to rush for box office collections. If the source are reliable then the figures can be changed. Don't bring TOI source here (at least for this case). In the 2st November article it mentioned 500 crore (as you said). But in the article [https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/enthiran-jeans-ps-1-aishwarya-rai-bachchans-tamil-blockbusters-that-shattered-bo-records/articleshow/95202901.cms] published just a day before (1st November), it mentioned 400 crore gross. So how can this both articles reliable. Yes, TOI is reliable, but there are many cases where it did in a such way. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

mr jayanthkumar in the economictimes article that you are referring it says [ went on to gross over Rs 400 crore at the box office] it says gross over but the november 2nd says clearly it reached 500 we can trust the word reached but not the previous [over 400] over means not 400..so pls add the source that is from november 2nd it is 100 percent trustworthy. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 12:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 8th Sakshi Excellence Awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]