User talk:Jayanthkumar123

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Assuming that Rajasekhar Aningi and TSR Srinivasan (likely) are not credited due to lack of dialogues? Should I remove at least the second name? Also can I mention Yashika Aannand in a guest appearance. The role itself sounds minor.

You can check if I am imagining. In Game Changer upon first watch I thought there was a sequence with Hema as a villager but I couldn't find it in the second rewatch but I saw Gangavva. I realize that she was banned from acting [1]. DareshMohan (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hema's scenes are not in the film, whereas all others have appeared in the film. Considering, this except Hema all others deserve credit. I would suggest to let the Yashika Aannand credit be as it is, because many other actors also appear in minor roles. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

మంచివాడు vs మంచోడు. Does Ee Abbai Chala Manchodu mean good or nice [2]? DareshMohan (talk) 16:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Good" is the appropriate meaning, but can vary according to the situation. "మంచివాడు" (manchivaadu) is the standard / formal form, whereas "మంచోడు" (manchodu) is the informal / shortcut form, so both have the same meaning Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! — Benison (Beni · talk) 07:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I'd suggest you to fill the edit summary box of each edit, especially the major ones where you are adding hundreds and thousands of bytes of data, with proper rationale explaining your edits. Unexplained edits are bordering into disruptive editing. Thanks again and happy editing. — Benison (Beni · talk) 08:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at L2: Empuraan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please start a discussion in talk page since you've been reverting the second/third grossing films for 2 days now without any rationale or edit summary. — Benison (Beni · talk) 16:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before randomly warning me here. Get to know the context of why edit is correct. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:44, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will again do the same edit, because the same rule has been for so long. Just because some experienced users do edits, that doesn't make anything right. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at L2: Empuraan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Charliehdb (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, making the rights edits is vandalizing. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before replying to some random IPs in the talk pages, please get to know the contest. Sankranthiki Vasthunam is the "second" and L2: Empuraan is the "third" highest grossing Indian films. 300 crore has the highest value than the 266.12 crore, simple..! Even though SV has range, it's highest value (300) is bigger than 266.12. This is followed on every Indian grossing film articles. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 05:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of the 'contest' and when you see that your edit is not staying up, as an experienced editor, you MUST start a talk page discussion. You shouldn't engage in an edit war on a protected page (or any other page for that matter). You have already crossed 3RR threshold and next edit, you are getting reported for edit warring. Thanks. — Benison (Beni · talk) 05:58, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jayanthkumar123 reported by User:Benison (Result: ). Thank you. — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft is so short, can you expand it? She acted in 23 TV serials but only God/@Srivin: knows which ones. DareshMohan (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At what time does Shankar and Ganesh Acharya come in "Raa Macha Raa" song? @Srivin: DareshMohan (talk) 17:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nilavilakku and Aruval in Telugu is called? DareshMohan (talk) 20:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What newspaper is this from? @Kailash29792: [3] [4]. DareshMohan (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why ask me, a non-Telugu speaker? This is better asked to Ab207 or any Telugu speaker. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:52, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@L5boat: DareshMohan (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It might be from Andhra Jyothi or Sakshi Sunday magazine. L5boat (talk) 08:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nilavilakku is Kundulu (plural) and Aruval is Kodavali Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 13:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Good Bad Ugly WW Collection is been misreported in the movie page by a user multiple times even after multiple corrections. Possible to check ? As per my source the movie WW gross was around 242Cr. Thanks. Shan28kk (talk) 08:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to let you know that I am merging Dear Krishna (2025) to Krishnam (2018). Reason: the makers didn't reshoot most of the film and except for 2 actors, everything else is dubbed. I will try to include the Telugu poster in the Malayalam article at the bottom. Since the Malayalam version did not receive any reviews, merging will prove useful to escape deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 02:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]