User talk:Islam90

Hello, Islam90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Salafist Call, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ben Ben (talk) 01:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Salafist Call requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ben Ben (talk) 01:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Muhammad Ismail al-Muqaddam has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ben Ben (talk) 01:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Ismail al-Muqaddam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Anarchistdy (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Khaled Aggag, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://freemusiceg.com/en/node/77.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ruwaida El Mahrouki has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jac16888 ^Talk 20:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Salma Ghazali has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jac16888 ^Talk 20:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Islam90,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Soma (Singer), may be copied from http://flachdcd.com/category/soma-%d8%b3%d9%88%d9%85%d8%a7/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 14:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Islam90, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Soma (Singer) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 14:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 22:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there are a number of rules in the English Wikipedia which you may not be aware of. One is that instead of edit-warring you should bring up disagreements on the talk page of the article first. Associated with this is that you cannot revert an article more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, which you did on Baha'i calendar. Please check the logs. The other Wikipedia policy that I should let you know about is the assume good faith policy. Just because I may disagree with you that doesn't make me "religious intolerance". Making such a statement makes it seem like you have already made up your mind about me, which is against the Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia is based on verifiability based on reliable sources. What you may think is important, if it is not distinguished in reliable sources in the same extent may not make it notable in the context that you are pushing. Hopefully you will read the English Wikipedia policies and become a useful editor here. Warm regards, -- 01:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Multiple times you have reverted changes that are under discussion in the talk page. As I noted above the method of editing is Wikipedia is to talk about changes on the talk page, and you have failed to do so. There are problems with the way that you are presenting things that don't match with the way they are in reliable sources. Please bring up your concerns on the talk page before reverting any further. Warm regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be able to contribute on the English Wikipedia you need to be able to communicate. You are again not assuming good faith with your "religious intolerance" statements. Your edits don't abide by the some policies such as [[WP:NOTABILITY|notability].. You will need to bring up your changes on the talk page, rather than reverting. Please translate the above if you don't understand. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 23:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also remember that you already have three reversions in a 24-hour period, and if you revert another time you can be blocked by passing the 3rr rule. Warm regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 23:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just an another aspect - Islam90 - do you see the comments in edits? See [1] But you should more importantly think about what you are doing. --Smkolins (talk) 00:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 02:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Template:Babism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bbb23 (talk) 04:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you may not know, it is against Wikipedia policy to remove the AFD notice from the page. Actually it states that quite directly on the template stating "Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed.". Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 14:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you don't know what Wikipedia's policies are again, but I'll point you some policies you should read. Not everything that exists in the world can/should have a Wikipedia article. Only things that are notable, by Wikipedia policy and definition, are allowed to have Wikipedia pages about them. What does notability mean; it generally means that the subject of the page has "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". This means that there must be secondary sources that talk about the subject, and not just in passing. For the two pages that you created, no-one is saying that the books don't exist, but they are both non-notable. That the primary source of the article exists, and there may be a number of self-published blogs about the books on the internet doesn't come out to be "significant coverage in reliable sources". Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read what I wrote about, and the Wikipedia policies. It has nothing to do with if it's a real book or not; it has to do with notability. And notability is defined by "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". If I write a book, can I have a Wikipedia article about my book? The answer is no, and that's because it's not notable. It's the same thing about these books. Because it has not received "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" it is not notable. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my page in Arabic is a swear word and is considered a "personal attack". Wikipedia does not look to kindly to personal attacks and there is a policy on no personal attacks. If you continue with such personal attacks you can be blocked. -- Jeff3000 (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected your newly created page Tahirih Poets to Tahirih's page. I still don't think you understand the English Wikipedia's policies. You may understand the Arabic Wikipedia policies, but each Wikipedia has it's own policies. For one, you should read WP:content forking and summary style. I think the intention of your article was something like "The poetry of Tahirih", and your English was very bad. Regardless, the way you add content first in such a manner is to add the content to the appropriate page, rather than just create new pages. In this case, the most germane place is in the Tahirih article, and only once the content becomes too large, then you create a summary style sub-article. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 03:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tamer Ashor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pop and Rotana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Reedman72. Islam90, thanks for creating El Dealer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It is written in slightly improper english

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Reedman72 (talk) 00:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will help you with them. I am not sure what you mean on part of the El dealer article. Reedman72 (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Yes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reedman72 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a corresponding article on arabic wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reedman72 (talk • contribs) 05:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

where it says at the end an killing one of them, which one dies? Reedman72 (talk) 05:38, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Dealer movie.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding every single nation that emerged from the Soviet Union in the portal box at the end of the article.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have created both Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Islam in China work group and Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam in China which contain identical content. Please decide if you and any other participants want this collaboration to be a working group of WikiProject Islam or an independent WikiProject and delete the page that you will no longer be using. It is redundant to have both pages and, as the creator, you can request a speedy deletion and bypass AfD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't responded, Islam90, but it looks like you are favoring Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam in China over Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam/Islam in China work group. If this is so, please add a WP:CSD tag so that this page can be deleted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this has been taken care of. Thank you! Good luck with Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam in China. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ihsan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Iman

Iman (concept) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Iman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited `Abdu'l-Bahá, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, we are having a debate with regards to whether the Ahmadiyya are a Muslim sect or whether they are a seperate religion in their own right Template talk:Islam feel free to contribute your viewpoints (Wiki id2(talk) 15:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

I guess you still are not reading the English Wikipedia policies, even though I've noted them to you a number of times on the talk page, but I'll do it here again:

1. No original research. You cannot have something in Wikipedia that isn't cited in a reliable source. And that includes a synthesis of other facts, like what you are trying to do. From the policy page: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources."
2. Undue Weight. Small minority views don't get to be in any Wikipedia article. From the policy page: "If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Wikipedia regardless of whether it is true or not and regardless of whether you can prove it or not"
3. Verifiability. Other Wikipedia articles, such as the Book or Template that you are referencing are not acceptable as sources. From the policy page: "Do not use articles from Wikipedia as sources. Also, do not use websites that mirror Wikipedia content or publications that rely on material from Wikipedia as sources."

You insertion of the Babism in that article breaks all three of thove above policies. Regards, -- 11:40, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Another Wikipedia policy that you should know about is assume good faith. That policy says to talk about user actions, not reasons. Statments such as "treats others by religious intolerance", breaks that policy. Please edit courteously. I've only commented about your actions that break Wikipedia policy, and not talking about you yourself. You need to do the same. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 12:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Yunshui ^雲_水 12:14, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:ElMAniaclub Logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ElMAniaclub Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alassiouty Sport may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You deserve this barnstar for all of your efforts you paid on Portal: Mohamed (PBUH)... Wish you continue your work on it :) Kamal Osama Elgazzar (talk) 20:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Islam in Russia work group articles by quality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 17:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Jeppiz (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Portal:Islam/Related portals, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Peaceworld 19:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		this Award goes to , brother MD. Islam90
		for contributions about " ISLAM " in many wikipedia project . Like May Allah fill your life with endless happy moments, countless wonderful surprises, and infinite success! -- - 🙋 Muḥammad ☠✉Chat💬✍Contribs© 11:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Ismail al-Muqaddam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 213.205.194.111 (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Islam90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Salma Ghazali has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Melcous (talk) 06:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm an administrator on Wikipedia. I've deleted the article for the time being but it can most certainly be re-created if you can first draft a more complete version with some supporting references. Use your sandbox to do this and if you're not sure how, then please come to my talk page or that of the editor who posted above and we can advise you. Best wishes, Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 16:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Islam90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Islam in Russia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Islam in Russia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Islam in Russia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Störm (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Muhammad, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Muhammad and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Muhammad during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 22:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of ZamalekSC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Islam90. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Bábism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bábism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Bábism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal:Islam in Russia. Since you had some involvement with the Portal:Islam in Russia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Islam in Russia portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Islam in China, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Islam in China and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Islam in China during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ToThAc (talk) 23:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Muhammad, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Muhammad and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Muhammad during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guilherme Burn (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Muhammad portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of International Islamic Fiqh Academy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of International Islamic Fiqh Academy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ElMAniaclub Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]