User talk:Hajak2

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

March 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm The Herald. An edit that you recently made to Ludhiana seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As mentioned in the infobox, kindly discuss in talk page for consensus before adding images to the infobox. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gurdwara Bibi Veero moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Gurdwara Bibi Veero. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Hajak2. Thank you for your work on Jagjit Singh Dallewal. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!, Thank you

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Jagdeep singh bittu per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jagdeep singh bittu. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
DatGuyTalkContribs 18:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]