Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to War in Afghanistan (2001–2014)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suran, Hama Governorate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Occupation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
| ||The Original Barnstar |
|thank you for making a page on the Afghan base attack Jacktime34 (talk) 18:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC) |
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
--NeilN talk to me 20:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Just want to create a template for an offensive on the eastern Hama. As if reading my mind what I wanted to start following. :) As far as Daraa offensive (June 2017), it is worth it because of the article 2 June there water terrible city struggles with fierce aerial bombardment and artillery shelling 24 hours a day. Help me to start creating articles and get into the editing more experienced members. :) --Baba Mica (talk) 17:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Baba Mica Sure, I'll help as much as I can. GroundlessAir (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
They haven't written an article yet. EkoGraf (talk) 04:04, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Made a compromise edit. EkoGraf (talk) 04:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you. GroundlessAir (talk) 08:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply, was busy. Create the article here Raqqa offensive (June 2017). Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 07:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hey Groundless, what do you think, should we maybe change the title of the article from offensive to campaign? Seems to me the operation is basically made up of several offensive on multiple axes. It would also be in line with the title of the previous rebel campaign. EkoGraf (talk) 07:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- @EkoGraf Great idea, yeah I think campaign is more appropriate naming, thanks for creating Raqqa offensive too. GroundlessAir (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Most of our individual city/town articles have infoboxes, so the infobox should remain. As for the flag, Idlib is part of the country of Syria (as it says in the infobox) and the official flag of Syria is the two-star flag. EkoGraf (talk) 15:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
@EkoGraf Scroll down the article, there is another infobox. GroundlessAir (talk) 15:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, didn't see that one lol. Hmmmm. Well its a box for the series on the Syrian opposition and its right next to the section on the war so.... Not sure, I'm fine ether way (remove or not). EkoGraf (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, sorry, mistyped that word. :P EkoGraf (talk) 15:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- @EkoGraf Heh, fascinating how one letter can be so meaningful entirely changing the meaning of entire article. Anyway, keep up the great work in the future, you're the best! GroundlessAir (talk) 15:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) EkoGraf (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello, GroundlessAir. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)