User talk:Eiland

Back in 2006 you've [1] added a line to the Wikipedia:POV check page, referring to the Category:Articles which may be biased. However, this page doesnt work or exist (anymore). Can you fix it or remove it? -- Eiland 10:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is Wikipedia, where anyone can edit. If it needs to be fixed, you can always fix it yourself. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 18:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been fixed, and so now isgoing to the next stage: Speedy deletion.Harrypotter 23:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Robin Wood (environmental organisation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 17:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have mangled the List of civilian nuclear accidents article and perpetrated a edit war over the contents.

This was noticed on the administrators' incidents noticeboard.

Please stop editing the article for the time being (talk page is ok and strongly encouraged to work out the dispute peacefully). I and others are going to have to clean it up. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leonid Savin[edit]

I am somewhat puzzled as to why you think Mr Savin is not notable. The fact that some people involved in friends of the earth maybe embarrassed by the way he infiltrated them, just as he also infiltrated Peoples Global Action is not sufficient reason. Clearly he is notable as regards the Hoverla action, and that should be plain to anyone, even if they do not see his previous manouvres of no significance. I am also puzzled why you consider straight talking about the New Right malevolent?Harrypotter (talk) 00:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid Savin (2nd nomination) thread. -- Eiland (talk) 12:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Core damage frequency. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dusti^SPEAK!! 23:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your fellow editors have invited you to join in a mediation discussion about this article. Please come join us at the table linked through the template at the top of the article's talk page. HatlessAtless (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Foratom, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/European_Atomic_Forum. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It falls under the GNU_Free_Documentation_License --Eiland (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Conventions says: Avoid the unicode characters ² and ³. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia_talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Superscripts, where I added Note that in the Wiki markup hints at the bottom of each edit page theres javascript to achieve m² and m³. -- Eiland (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Eiland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 13:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eiland. Could you kindly contact me at you best convenience, concerning the changes you made recently to the GreenFacts page. Indeed, some of them are incorrect, but as the former General Manager and still Vice-president of the organization, I would not like to revert them to avoid any potential conflict of interest. My contact detail are in my user page. Thanks, --Jacques de Selliers (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the "Criticism" talk section in the GreenFacts article concerning your modifications. Could you kindly reply? Thanks, --Jacques de Selliers (talk) 11:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very disappointed at the cherry-picking of the countries you listed as sources of uranium in Energy security [2], leaving out the largest producers (Canada and Australia). The actual list after all is in the short second paragraph of the Intro of Uranium mining (which you made a wikilink to [3]), virtually impossible to miss. Simesa (talk) 23:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I wasnt the one who said it were "stable" countries. I didnt read the entire mining article, just linked it. My action seems to have gotten it fixed :) -- Special:Contributions/Eiland (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chernobyl day.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eiland. You have new messages at Beagel's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the KNWU.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 EU Uranium sources.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:2007 EU Uranium sources.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:2007 EU Uranium sources.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious, why do you think Circa doesn't match the definition of a contemporary circus? I've never seen one of their shows, but from the descriptions of their shows in reviews and on their website ("...reimagining circus as a contemporary artform...") ("Circa’s signature style – combining poetic physical beauty, extraordinary circus skills and an immersive use of sound, light and projection – is a thoroughly new kind of circus..."), it sounds like the quintessential nouveau cirque. It's character/relationship-based, it mixes traditional circus skills with modern dance and multimedia, the troupe performs in theaters, etc. etc. How would you categorize their shows? AtticusX (talk) 18:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait, I see what's going on. There are two companies called Circa: the Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army, and the Brisbane-based Circa. The former is what you were saying was not a contemporary circus company... Yeah. AtticusX (talk) 18:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I refer to this edit that you made. I have removed it since it is contentious and I have not been able to find any reliable sources to support it. If you can point to a reliable source please advise and it can go back. Bridgeplayer (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FoE Portrait color transparant 175.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Banquine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NAD

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shashwat986 (talk) 12:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Nuclear sector, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.nuclearbanks.org/#/nuclear companies/ and subpages, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Nuclear sector and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Nuclear sector, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Nuclear sector with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Nuclear sector. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Nuclear sector saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — CactusWriter ^(talk) 23:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eiland. Regarding your question here, no, my recreation of the Robin Wood article was entirely original using the sources I found. I did notice the redlinked title on your talkpage and, after googling it, felt it certainly qualified as a notable subject and deserved at the very least a stub. I have restored your 2 edits from three years ago to the history of the article. Please feel free to work on expanding the article. Cheers. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would depend upon what sort of database and what info you wanted it to include. Its possible to do data dumps from Wikipedia. - X201 (talk) 11:23, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nukem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article with marginal notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 17:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nuclear sector, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 07:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage is a redirect to the article Island, which I did not think was permissible and I've placed a deletion tag on it accordingly. My apologies, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• An admin has declined my deletion, but blanked your redirect as an inappropriate use of one's userpage. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion about usage of nuclear power v nuclear energy. As an experienced editor in this field you are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hmmmm ... I really thought this was a newbie article until I checked through your contributions and discovered you'd been here since 2007!

It would be very nice if you could see your way clear to referencing your articles! Check out this page for some tips on how to go about this! :D Pesky (talk …stalk!) 16:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear; yes, now I can see why no source was stated for this. It was https://www.grexcmo.com/Documents/Domain_protocol_for_disclosure_Sweden_a.pdf Pesky (talk …stalk!) 16:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Pesky (talk …stalk!) 16:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)--> See below[reply] 

A tag has been placed on Elcert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 16:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last October you added content to the Waugh article relating to his perceived antisemitism. I have moved this from the "Second World War" section to the "Character and opinions" section, which sems more appropriate. I have also modified the wording; to say "This is later understood as deriving from..." etc implies a general consensus, when you are stating the opinions of a particular observer. My main concern, however, is that the sourcing is incomplete. In what publication did Jonathan David Bittner's article appear? Who published it, and what is the date of publication? The link you have provided is not informative. Brianboulton (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your conscientious editing. In fact, I derived the information in first instance from the second quote, but as that is an old source and in print only, another editor complained, I believe even deleted it, so I reverted it and googled another reference, which is the one you are asking about, and I cant help you any further with that. For further question I'll have to point you to the second reference, which is only in print.If you really want to know more, maybe ask the author, Ton Heuvelemans, I think he's at http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/ton-heuvelmans/10/b7/3b5. Regards. -- eiland (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wild Horse (mining company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Totally unsourced article. No indication of meeting WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]