User talk:Dyfsunctional

I see you made an svg of the image request image. Looks great - thanks! --Anthony5429 06:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. (I seem to be doing a lot of SVG replacements lately--it's one of the least inflammatory things you can do!) The hard part is going to be replacing all the .png versions. Even after doing all the templates, there seem to be a bazillion of 'em left. I'm sure there's an automated method that I'm not aware of. Dyfsunctional 19:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised some questions about your image Image:Xyz boxer.jpg at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#November 16. Please provide any information you can there. Thanks. Chick Bowen 03:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've left some info at that page and on the image's description page regarding the source of the background image, Image:Right-left01.png, which is purported to be "free use." Dyfsunctional 19:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. We'll keep working on it. Chick Bowen 20:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found the original here--clearly not free. Would you be willing to create a replacement? Perhaps with one of the images here? If not, it's not a problem--I'm sure the article can be illustrated with something else. Thanks again. Chick Bowen 20:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice detective work. It's a pity; I liked that image (and it was no easy task cloning all the wrinkles in the trunks as I recall!). I'm going to try and whip something up along the same lines. Thanks. Dyfsunctional 21:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've created and uploaded a new, PD image. Dyfsunctional 21:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not on your watchlist, thought you might like to see my resp to your good comment on Talk:Footprints_(poem). "alyosha" (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know enough about fonts to argue on that basis. However, current image searches are yielding some controversial evidence that lends credence to your objections. http://artamerica.com/gd/promen-1.shtml shows another artist as the author of the image I am using. Furthermore, http://www.bigbus.vispa.com/portfolio/work/popart/three.html seems to suggest another set of paintings may lay claim to the title I am using on the fair use images. I may have to remove that image out of concern for proper citation. TonyTheTiger 21:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some searching and found that the artist is indeed Steve Kaufman, who describes himself on his web site as "Andy Warhol's former protege." Coincidentally, I found this image on Kaufman's site: [1]. So yes, the image has to be removed from the soup can article at least. Dyfsunctional 16:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dyfsunctional. Excellent work on the flags!I am trying to make this flag into a graphic that captures a bit of the rough/looseness to it. Do you use Illustrator? Thanks. JimCApitol3 22:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have used Illustrator; I prefer to use Corel Draw. If you're trying to capture the spirit of the historic flag, I suppose you could monkey with those stars a bit--rotate them, randomize the angles and the sizes, etc. There's obviously no really good image of the modern version on WP. You may also want to adjust the colors to look more "flaggy" and less "screeny." I would suggest something like RGB 19,116,180 for the blue and 10,117,47 for the green. Dyfsunctional 18:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen your creation of DPP's flag. Would you please create the flag of New Party (Republic of China), and other parties? It'll look like this.--Jerry 21:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to. Is it just the yellow field with the blue characters? Dyfsunctional 03:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've done it. The new image is here. I've also gone ahead and re-done the logo image, which is now an SVG here. Dyfsunctional 22:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!--Jerry 22:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again, but can you re-do this image and make it an SVG?--Jerry 22:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also upload this image for me? Because I don't know how to properly upload it w/o running into the copyright/non-free/fair-use issue.--Jerry 23:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-done the TSU logo here. While I was at it, I did the final one, that of People First Party here. As far as the TSU flag goes, I don't know how to do the transfer from the Chinese WP other than saving the image and re-uploading it. Of course, the best thing to do would be to do the flag as a new SVG and make it public domain. I would do this if I could get a clearer shot of the calligraphy a the bottom of the flag. Dyfsunctional 17:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		I, Jerry, hereby award you The Graphic Designer's Barnstar for your great flag artwork.--Jerry 17:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I don't know what's wrong with this flag, but I think it needs to be re-done, can you help? Thanks.--Jerry 15:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did the flag as an SVG, found here. It's the closest I could come to the orginal jpeg, which unfortunately is not a great source to begin with, especially since I don't read or write Chinese! If you had a bigger, clearer image I could do more with that. Dyfsunctional 16:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's good enough, thanks!--Jerry 20:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dyfsunctional, can you help uploading this logo onto the English Wikipedia? I don't know if it needs to be re-done or not. It is the logo of the Non-Partisan Solidarity Union in Taiwan. Thanks!--Jerry 20:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean you want me to re-draw it? I'd be glad to if I knew what the characters were supposed to look like. I don't have Chinese character support on the computer I'll be using for the next few days, but next week I'll be on a different computer from which I can get the characters from the NPSU article here. I'll get to it when I can. Dyfsunctional (talk) 18:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I did what I could and placed it here. The font for the Chinese writing is all wrong because it's based on vanilla Arial Unicode MS, and I wasn't sure whether to do the swirly things as gradients or some kind of feathers. It's really as good as it's going to get until we find a better source image. I'd be happy to "accurize" the logo when we have something larger and clearer to base it on. Dyfsunctional (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much.--Jerry 01:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		I, CA387, hereby award Dyfsunctional the Graphic Designer's Barnstar for his work on Template:Peacock.

After seeing how well you did the Wehrmacht commander-in-chief flag, I would like to ask you if you can make an svg image of this

File:Standarte Adolf Hitler.jpg

. I've made a number of svg flags and roundels but this one looks difficult, but seeing the other work you've done, I bet you could do it better than I could. User:R-41

I'd be glad to do it; I just don't know if I'll have the time anytime soon. I will get to it when I can.

On another note, I've noticed the "color correction" you've done on the 30's Wehrmacht flag and many of the other Nazi-era flags here. I think most of the WP flag purists would disagree with what you've done. Real flags are made with pigments and dyes applied to cloth, not with photons on a computer monitor. RGB red is a very unrealistic (and irreproducable) color unless it's a picture of a traffic signal. Take a look at any modern national flag here that uses red as a main color and you'll see that every one of them has some kind of toned-down version of RGB red, usually less saturated and with the tiniest touch of brown. In most of my flag artwork I've tried to emulate that. I would beg that you reconsider, but stop short of reverting without hearing your side of it. Dyfsunctional 15:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that was one question I was thinking myself, sorry about the colour change. Its just that I can't find any information anywhere about the colour shade of red used on Third Reich flags. Thanks for the advice. I assume the red would be the same as the red used on both the Imperial and Weimar German flags. Personally, I found the colour shade you used to not have enough red in it. I have tried to change the Third Reich flags in the past to having a darker, more realistic hue, but I don't know it there was any official hue for them. However when I have attempted to due so, sometimes one display box shows the darker red and another one shows the brighter red, I've tried restarting the computer to see if it needed a refresh, but it stayed the same. I'll try again. Personally I think the shade of red used on the Imperial and Weimar flags was probably used on the Nazi flag (as the Imperial flag flew beside it). However many pictures have shown a brighter red (I'll admit not as bright as what I've changed them to, but still bright). User:R-41

Third Reich flags are closely aligned with the Imperial flags as those are what Hitler claimed got the colours from, so I'd sum up by saying that the hue should probably the hue of the Imperial flags, or a bright but not too bright red. Again sorry about the colour change, I've just been trying to make the Third Reich flags synonomous with each other in shade, but thanks for telling me about the difference in RGB colours and cloth colours. I will change the colour immediately to the shade of red used on the Imperial German flag. Please keep in touch, you are a good SVG artist and wikipedia sure needs you to replace the antiquated pngs and jpg files.User:R-41

Here's a more concrete example of what I'm talking about. I've taken the reds from various national flags on Wikipedia (I deliberatedly avoided Canada, since that's one you've worked on before) and made a little table for comparison:

RGB red
France	Germany	Iraq	Italy	Japan	Mexico	Morocco	Portugal	Spain	UK	US
My preferred red

Other than France, most of the flags have that dull, brownish red I was talking about. Most countries have codes explicitly describing the colors using Pantone matching, etc., and the serious flag buffs at Wikipedia have heeded this. Nazi Germany existed long before digital monitors (and maybe before Pantone matching, I don't know), so without having an actual flag to look at in person, we're kind of left on our own. For the sake of consistentcy, I've tried to keep my basic colors in line with what other people here are using. Hope this helps. Dyfsunctional 19:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I followed your advice for the shade of red, but I accidently thought the bright red for the French flag looked RGB, oops, well anyway I reverted the edit. I've changed other flags to having a standard red which I thought was acceptable. Most of the Nazi propaganda, armbands and stuff in Nazi Germany showed a bright red, but this may have been for simplicity. Flags that are flown usually need a deeper red, I believe, to avoid fading. For now, I would assume that the flag would follow the shade of the Weimar and Imperial flags before it, since they probably used the same companies to produce the official flags of Germany. Still, for the current German flag there is no sure answer by wikipedia to what the shade of red is, the one that is posted now, I don't think follows official standards but the red looks right to me (one reported official red looked too dull and almost greyish). User:R-41

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		For your great work in creating free-use city flags, particularly Montgomery, Alabama --Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 21:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I've uploaded a few of them to Wikimedia Commons.

Thanks! For some reason I always get confused about how and why to use the Commons thing, so I generally just upload them here and wait for someone like you to pick up on it. BTW, if you're from Montgomery, can you tell me how many stars ought to be on that thing? Dyfsunctional (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the late reply. I'm actually far (far) away from Montgomery right now, so I'll have to get back to you about the flag. As for commons, it's so that anything that's 'free use' (public domain, CC, or GNU) can be used across all projects, instead of each language having to upload it. Cheers. --Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 08:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for drawing Image:Flag of Cincinnati, Ohio.svg. One minor detail: the city's seal includes "1788", the year the city was settled. Did the sources you consulted include the year? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 00:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's easy enough to fix. However, images of the flag seem to have a simplified version of the seal without the date; check it out here [2] and here [3]. (The previous Wikipedia image was taken from that second link.) If you can show me a better image I'd be glad to make the change. (I'd also like to get a better look at those buckeye leaves at the top.) Dyfsunctional (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there.. it seems u have added some flags related to the ROC; including local flags, city seals and political parties flags, however u havent provided a fair use rationale for most of those, and it seem, some of those uploaded materials have been erased...

I have beena dding some fair use rationale, so ur works wont be deleted, however, Id like to tel u that u DO add thos FUR ASAP... If u want, u can tell me how and where did u obtain the images, Ill upload em and add the neede FUR.. Cheers...

U can also re upload the works (images), send me a message, so i add the FUR... Cya!!Gumuhua (talk) 12:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, could you convert the flags below to SVG? Thanks in advance. Connormah (talk) 02:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• 

[Images deleted from the gallery above: Flag of Jacksonville, Florida.png; Trentoncityflag.jpeg; Us-ak-an.jpg]

I haven't had the time to do this kind of thing much lately, but I'd be happy to attempt these when I can (and when I can find some more detailed source material). Dyfsunctional (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Jacksonville one was done by someone else two days after you posted this, by the way. I had already done a very detailed 300-vertex drawing of the statue before I found out. I may still upload it, just because mine's that much cooler (jk).Dyfsunctional (talk) 16:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've updated Jacksonville to make it look more like the description and photo found at the city web site.Dyfsunctional (talk) 18:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Thank you so much. The Charleston one can be scratched off as well, I have already sone one. Can I request a timeline on this, possibly? Thank you so much for your help. Connormah (talk) 00:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added Anchorage to the list above. Connormah (talk) 00:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the problem is that there's precious little useable source material. Most of these flags don't exist on the web any bigger than 300 pixels wide or so. If I had some higher-resolution stuff, I could probably knock these out at the rate of at least two or three a week. Without better source material, we're better off just using the raster images for now. I'll keep poking around for better images. Dyfsunctional (talk) 18:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trenton, New Jersey's done. I'm going to remove images from the gallery above as I do these, just to keep the unused ones orphaned so they can be easily deleted when the time comes. Dyfsunctional (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is the seal of Anchorage (in the middle of the flag) on brandsoftheworld, but the paths are unfortunately merged. I have added a couple more, please noe that you can take all the time you want. Great job on the Trenton one, though. Connormah (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anchorage is done. Dyfsunctional (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a vector version of part of the Newark flag on the SVG seal on it's page. The Milwaukee flag has been updated, too. Connormah (talk) 19:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the off-chance that you might respond, could you let me know the source you used for the coloring when you created File:Flag of Albany, New York.svg? Please repsond on my talk page when you get a chance. Thanks! upstateNYer 00:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, we fixed it. There were a few colors that were wrong. Using an early 20th century book, along with a pamphlet on the Albany Common Council, we were able to fix the color scheme. upstateNYer 01:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tegrin1964.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your work in making high-quality SVG flag images. I was wondering if you could slightly modify two of the designs you've made (Flag of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.svg and Ensign of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.svg). According to the municipal code standards for its design, the first one, the civic flag, should be in a 6:10 (width:length) proportion, and the civic ensign, in a 4.5:6 proportion. — AlekJDS ^talk 16:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you haven't made any contributions in a while. I will learn how to fix the problem myself. Thanks anyway! — AlekJDS ^talk 17:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soviet leaders timeline.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Helvetica.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Akkrum flag.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Ameland flag.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:48, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Ameland seal.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Anjum flag.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Appelscha flag.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Asiatic Barred Zone.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:20, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Augustinusga flag.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bakkeveen flag.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Boelenslaan flag.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Boornsterhem flag.svg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:00, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Rochester, New York.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Rochester, New York.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New Party (Taiwan) logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Gaasterlân-Sleat seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Gaasterland-Sloten wapen.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Football-3D.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File not being used in any constructive way. File would have no obvious value being hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:34, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Microgramma1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File not being used in any constructive way. File would have no obvious value being hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:35, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Church in Wales Celtic Cross.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File not being used in any constructive way. File would have no obvious value being hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:37, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Drachten flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Drachten vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:41, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dokkum flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Dokkum.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bakkeveen flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Bakkeveen vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Schiermonnikoog flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Schiermonnikoog.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Terschelling flag2.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Terschelling.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Vlieland flag2.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Vlieland.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Leeuwarderadeel flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Leeuwarderadeel.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Leeuwarden flag2.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Leeuwarden.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Het Bildt flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Het Bildt.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ferwerderadiel flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Ferwerderadiel.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dongeradeel flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Dongeradeel.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 09:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Munnekezijl flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Munnikenzijl vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Morra flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Moarre vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 09:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Kimswerd flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Kimswert vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Jirnsum flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Jirnsum vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 09:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ijlst flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:IJlst vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Grouw flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Grou vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 05:27, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Goutum flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Goutum.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Gorredijk flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Gorredijk vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Kollumerland flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Burum vlag.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Franeker flag.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of Franeker.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bolsward seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Bolsward wapen.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Het Bildt seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned and inaccurate representation of the seal of Het Bildt. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Symbols_of_het_Bildt

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 00:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dongeradeel seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Coat of arms of Dongeradeel.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dantumadeel seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Coat of arms of Dantumadeel.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Franekeradeel seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Franekeradeel wapen 1816.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ferwerderadiel seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Coat of arms of Ferwerderadeel.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ameland seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to [[:]] which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Littlerockseal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Coat of Arms of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned. Obseleted by c:File:Pittsburgh city coat of arms.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:07, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Thomas Moran (author), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:People First Party flag.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ooststellingwerf seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Coat of arms of Ooststellingwerf.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Menaldumadeel seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Coat of arms of Menaldumadeel.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Littenseradiel seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Coat of arms of Littenseradiel.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Lemsterland seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Lemsterland wapen.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Kollumerland c.a. seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Kollumerland wapen.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Leeuwarderadeel seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Coat of arms of Leeuwarderdeel.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Leeuwarden seal.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Coat of arms of Leeuwarden.svg & c:File:Leeuwarden wapen 2014.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asiatic Barred Zone.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Apocheir (talk) 20:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]