User talk:Dq209

From Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Hello Dq209! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

An extended welcome[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Netflix[edit]

Please read WP:OFFICIALNAME.

Plus the change cannot be easily reverted without administrator intervention. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

...which I am, so I did. Dq209, see WP:RM for the proper process if you wish to pursue this. I echo ViperSnake151 that all editors should be conservative rather than bold in page-moves due to their potential for disruption and the effort it takes to undo them. DMacks (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with above. Please review Wikipedia policies thoroughly before attempting to move any more pages. --Coolcaesar (talk) 13:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question[edit]

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"W i k i p e d i a" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect W i k i p e d i a. Since you had some involvement with the W i k i p e d i a redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article renaming[edit]

Hi, I'd like to repeat the advice given to you above that "all editors should be conservative rather than bold in page-moves due to their potential for disruption". I called for your recent title change to Homosexual behaviour in animals to be reverted, which it was. If you want to make such a move please just open a discussion on the Talk page and see if there are other opinions. Which there probably will be in most cases. After all, there's a reason why the title is the way it is (someone wanted to call it that). Not to say there shouldn't be moves, of course there should be sometimes. But it ought to be tested through discussion. Thanks FrankP (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khalsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mustard brands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amora.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Štrigova massacre (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 17:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dq209! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Snowycats (talk) 17:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Anti-electric vehicle tactics in the US and Canada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trump administration farmer bailouts has been accepted[edit]

Trump administration farmer bailouts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lyft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trans people.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ñ[edit]

Information icon Hello, Dq209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ñ, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ñ[edit]

Hello, Dq209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ñ".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]