User talk:CycloneYoris

Please click here to add a new message!

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Sorry for draftifying, that was dumb of me. Qcne (talk) 08:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne: Don't worry about it. We all make mistakes. :) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CycloneYoris. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh: Well that was quite a surprise. Thank you so much! :) CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
just so you know, that user can technically remove that PROD, but not a BLPPROD, as it is unreferenced (external links don't count), so maybe add one of those? (on Dean Scott Vazquez)  Thanks, Geardona (talk to me?) 23:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geardona: Yeah, I know. But they've also been adding unsourced content and that's why I've reverted their edits. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just suggesting a BLP PROD as well, just so you don't get any flack about it (also thanks for all of the PC reviewing, I always see you around there helping).  Thanks Geardona (talk to me?) 23:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geardona: Looks like the page was already deleted lol. Thank you for the kind words btw. I've also seen you there helping and also appreciate your work! :) CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprised, kind of a meh article anyways. Thank you as well! Geardona (talk to me?) 23:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris: Hi, sorry to bother you again, but I see you are working on reviewing this article, just so you know it is entirely copied from a PD source. I am going to let you deal with it. [1]  Thanks Geardona (talk to me?) 23:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geardona: Hi. I just tagged it for more sources, since I noticed that there weren't any. I'll leave it for someone else to review it thoroughly. Should be tagged under G12 in my opinion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure you know my comment here was not directed toward you. You were also cleaning up the vandalism (thank you). Star Mississippi 00:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: No worries, and thank you for moving the page to its correct title. I should've noticed that the title of the draft was incorrect before moving it (self trout). CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

but only because you requested it :D We've all been there in trying to clean up messes. Star Mississippi 00:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: Thanks, definitely deserved it lol! :D CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Congratulations for being one of the top three most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days! Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm translating the page from Spanish and trying to improve it! Luiz265 (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dune: Part Two on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CycloneYoris. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2024 Iditarod, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: @CycloneYoris:There is no question that the Iditarod is a notable event. I agree that 2024 en.wp article needs tidying up, but unless you can show otherwise, this is not a WP:G7 candidate . Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC). Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shirt58. No worries, and thank you for notifying me. The page looks much better now that you've added a source, and I guess I added the CSD tag too quickly without acknowledging the importance of the event. Thanks again. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries CY. Pretty much the only reason I've heard of this particular dog-sled race is because I heard Dr Norman Swan discuss it on an ABC Radio National podcast back in 2018 or so.--Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shirt58 Yeah, I've personally never heard of it before. But I guess we learn something new every day. :D CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I convince you to withdraw your recent AIV report for the time being? (I saw it because you'd beaten me to it when I went there to report.) I don't know how open this editor is to guidance, but they do seem to be engaging now instead of carrying on. I've already mentioned to them that they can either read up on how it works, or they can have a demonstration. It can always go back if they just don't get it. _signed, Willondon (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Willondon:  Done. I've now withdrawn my report. I do agree that it would be pointless to block them now, since they seem to be open to dialogue and to fix this situation. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thanks. I got an edit conflict when I was going to add "just consider", since the editor's latest comment didn't seem very promising. Oh, well. It's up to them now. Cheers. _signed, Willondon (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. The report was already stale anyway, and we can always file a new one if necessary. Cheers. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The mobile game Candy Crush Saga came from the browser game Candy Crush Saga. The browser game Candy Crush Saga came from another browser game Candy Crush. Both Candy Crush (original) and Candy Crush Saga started as browser games. 96.43.184.27 (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the CSD tag. Actually, when I tagged it, the draft link was blue. Maybe it needed to be purged. – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: You're welcome! Yeah, when I noticed the link it was already red, but I guess R2 would still apply as well. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just a good faith heads up; this was not a speedy keep candidate (see WP:CSK for criteria) since the article has not remained in main space, the closure should indicate draftify. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 07:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Goldsztajn: Thanks! I wasn't aware that a page needed to remain in mainspace for an AfD to be closed as "speedy keep", nor is this mentioned at WP:CSK. But thank you for the heads up. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CycloneYoris, sorry I forgot to attribute myself on this article, as it was essentially a mini-split, so blanked it for less than a minute and re-added with attribution? Hope that's fine, you were quick with the tag! Thanks DankJae 23:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DankJae: No worries. I noticed you restored the content and was about to revert myself anyway. Cheers. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on being among the top three most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 06:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting dizzy. Wheeeeeeee! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Me too! They made a huge mess! :/ CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this is not football related. GiantSnowman 12:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gabin in The Little Rebels (1955) Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is: Jean Gabin Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Abdalá Bucaram • Natural resource Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Markos Botsaris on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CycloneYoris,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CycloneYoris,

I noticed to moved the article The Crimean slave trade‎ to Draft:The Crimean slave trade‎. I wonder if you would consider reconsidering? You may not be aware of this, but the user who created this article, has been engaging in an edit war in the section of the Black Sea slave trade that concerns the topic of the Crimean slave trade: [2].

They have used two accounts: User:AzaqQara and User:Someone Qırımlı, as well 2-3 IP-adresses, to delete referenced information about the Crimean slave trade and replace it with poorly sourced information which depicts this particular slave trade and slavery in a benevolent light, by referring to any information about the slave trade that does not depict it in a benevolent light as "Russian propaganda".

Their various accounts and IP-adresses have been warned for dispruptive editing, violation of neutrality and are under investigation for sock puppetry: [3]

It appears they created their own article to forward a bias agenda when their revisions of the topic on Black Sea slave trade was reverted. As one may imagine, this user can not be expected to be be able to improve the article in a Draft to creat a neutral article, if they have no intention of respecting the rules of neutrality in the first place, but rather have a bias agenda.

Under these circumstances, would you consider reverting your draft and simply delete the article?

My best greetings,

Aciram (talk) 22:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aciram. I was not aware that the user was edit warring, many thanks for notifying me! I already deleted the article from mainspace, but I will gladly tag the draft for deletion (instead of moving it back to mainspace) and an admin will surely delete it there. I was also about to open a sockpuppet investigation, but I've noticed that someone already opened one. Thanks again for your message and for letting me know of this situation. Cheers. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I am glad to have been of help (I figured you may have been unaware). Yes, please tag it for deletion! It would be for the best I think. Cheers.--Aciram (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CycloneYoris, I've added back the IP's edit with the genres and have linked it up to each genre the source, can you give it a quick look over to see if it's alright please? Many thanks Kepin' it FUNKY (talk) 09:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Kepin' it FUNKY. No problem. The sources you added seem fine, and I've now accepted your changes. Cheers. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, can you add the note to stop people from adding Beyoncé to the genre list, a singer can't be defined as a genre and it looks silly doesn't it? Kepin' it FUNKY (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kepin' it FUNKY:  Done. Yeah, I agree that it does look silly. I've now added the hidden note. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you're a star and amazing too. Kepin' it FUNKY (talk) 09:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you completely deleted my edit for Jack in the Box sponsorships with the Diamondbacks. I live in phoenix. I know for sure that there is this deal. Can I ask why you deleted it, and if it must be deleted then why. Just deleting it makes no sense. Jhardaway1115 (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jhardaway1115: I already explained why in my edit summary. Your addition of content is unsourced and it needs proper sources for it to stay in the article. See WP:SOURCING. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then why didnt you take out the sponsorships with the dodgers and the niners, bc they dont have sources either. I will find a source for the dbacks special but be a little more judicious in what you delete please. Jhardaway1115 (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also i havent figured out how to cite a source in Wikipedia yet so i will find a link but could you put the source in for me Jhardaway1115 (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.mlb.com/dbacks/fans/in-game-promotions Jhardaway1115 (talk) 04:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-best-reads/2017/08/14/arizona-diamondbacks-plating-runs-feeding-fans-free-food-deals/557841001/ Jhardaway1115 (talk) 04:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also, please forgive me if I sounded terse in my comments. it was a long day and i was a bit frustrated. i guess i felt a little targeted because the others didnt have sources yet they stayed.

i have not yet figured out how to put sources into wikipedia. would you mind inserting those sources i sent into the article along with my text? or do you need different sources? Jhardaway1115 (talk) 07:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jhardaway1115: No worries, and sorry for the late reply, I honestly thought I had already responded. Just wanted to let you know that I restored the content with one of the sources you provided. Please see WP:Citing sources to learn how to add sources, and you can refer to the WP:Teahouse if you have any questions. Apologies again for the late response. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! all good. thanks again Jhardaway1115 (talk) 15:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please Anonymousoofy (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anonymousoofy: Why would I? The content you're adding is unsourced, and you need to provide a valid reference if you want to add it again. See WP:Citing sources and WP:Verifiability for further information. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for your feedback! I am newish to wikipedia and appreciate any help at getting better at this. I am having a bit of trouble with the reference formatting. Would you be able to recommend some sources? Sometimes I find the documentation here a bit vague. Thanks so much! -Rodolfo Rodolfomartinez1978 (talk) 01:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodolfomartinez1978: Hello. You're very welcome, and sorry for not replying sooner. I recommend reading WP:Citing sources, Help:Referencing for beginners, and WP:Verifiability if you want to learn how to add sources. You can also ask questions at the WP:Teahouse where experienced editors offer advice and are quick to help anyone out. Thank you for your message, and happy editing! CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Djong (ship) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment-- Merzostin (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I believe that you made a mistake in requesting the deletion the Blue Imperial rabbit page. It was deleted for the reason that I made up the Blue Imperial. I did not make up the Blue Imperial. It was a breed that existed for several decades in the late 19th and early 20th century. It was created by a Miss Mabel Illingworth, who was one of the only, as well as the fist, women to create a rabbit breed. The seed for the Blue Imperial was a single Sooty Fawn English Lop. The genetics of the breed contributed to the American rabbit among others. References to the Blue Imperial may be found here ^[1] which describes the entire Blue Imperial history, here ^[2] on a page describing the American rabbit and here ^[3] which describes the history of the Lilac breed, including the line: "Miss Mabel Illingworth also crossed her newly developed breed, the Blue Imperial, with the Havana to produce a Lilac in 1913. She called her new creation Essex Lavenders." The Blue Imperial was an extremely important breed and is referenced on other Wikipedia pages. Thank you. The Blue Imperial is also described in the 1920 Standard of Perfection for the National Breeders and Fanciers Association of America (which became the American Rabbit Breeders Association). It may be seen here ^[4] on page 32. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TanRabbitry (talk • contribs) 16:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TanRabbitry: Your article was apparently moved to draftspace, where you can find it here: Draft:Blue Imperial rabbit. Please ensure that you add proper sources to this draft or else the reviewer might not accept it. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I believe it is now published. Thank you. If anything is wrong with it, please let me know, User: TanRabbitry. TanRabbitry (talk) 20:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information on signing "posts," TanRabbitry (talk) 08:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TanRabbitry: You're very welcome! Glad I could help out. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you could mark this page as needing improvement and more citations? I don't know how to do that. The article uses a single source and is quite limited for such a wide-spread subject. Thank you,

TanRabbitry (talk) 23:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TanRabbitry:  Done. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full rack of fifteen balls, ready for the break shot Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is: Pool (cue sports) Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Antarctic • Fire safety Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Normal procedure is to issue warning no. 1 as the first warning, not warning no. 2. Regards Denisarona (talk) 09:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Denisarona: Not when vandalism is obvious. General note is normally skipped in those instances. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(not CycloneYoris, I just saw this after posting a message below & decided to reply) My understanding is that the warnings are on a sort of AGF-scale; where e.g. {{uw-vandal1}} is fully assuming good faith, {{uw-vandal2}} is more neutral, and {{uw-vandal3}} & 4 are where it's clear that the edits aren't being made in good faith. Given that this IP's first edit was adding and his stupidity to what a person is known for, I think starting with a level-2 warning was appropriate in this situation. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 09:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CycloneYoris, I'm just wondering why you suppressed the redirect for pagemoves such as this, this, this & this? To me, they seem like they'd be relatively harmless redirects from unnecessary/incorrect disambiguations. As far as I can see, there's no criterion in the WP:PMRC that would apply to these; though please let me know if I'm missing anything. All the best :) ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 09:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi A smart kitten. I guess I felt that leaving a redirect is unnecessary when the disambiguator is technically the same, but I do agree that it would've been harmless to leave them as redirects; and I've ceased suppressing them lately for the same reason. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I'm very new to Wikipedia and was just wondering that when I edited the Dead by Daylight article I had cited a forum post created by a game developer which you deemed unreliable. I'm just wondering if forums posted by the official accounts of games are still considered unreliable on Wikipedia. Thanks! TreEven (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TreEven: Forums and blogs can be edited by anyone, and that is why they aren't adequate to be used as reliable sources per WP:BLOG. Some social media posts can be used, however, as proper sources, and this is further explained at WP:SOCIALMEDIA. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kemunkhimhun and CycloneYoris: Hey CY. This article would appear to be AI generated - the "conclusion" section there would appear to be "tell" here. The article may be good content I guess, but not in its current form. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shirt58! I knew there was something fishy with that article, but I couldn't put my finger on what was wrong with it. The only thing I noticed was that it was lacking sources, and that's why I decided to tag it. Thank you for telling me. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on ranking among the top three most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Excellent work!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 18:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: What a lovely goat! Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I’ve come here on your talk page because the caseoh article has a deletion proposal to it. I think it should stay up because it provides information about Caseohs career, including an extra info box on the side that wasn’t there in any of the other drafts. The pages information is a repost due to the limited reliable information of Caseoh. It also has a streamer awards section; once again a section not added in the original. I did work on this article for a little bit, and I would respect if this article would stay up. Caseoh is also getting extremely popular, and most of the times popular streamers or YouTubers get Wikipedia pages, so, caseoh would subsequently have to get his own with a bunch of information about his personal and professional info. Bennett1203 (talk) 21:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bennett1203: The article was tagged under WP:G4 because it was deleted at this lengthy AfD just a few weeks ago, and is therefore likely to be deleted again. I suggest creating the article via the WP:AfC process in order to overturn the consensus reached at AfD. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But how? Like I said there’s little reliable information on Caseoh. There’s nothing to do about it until the future. Also, there is a nominations and infobox (like I said earlier), which is all new information. Let’s keep it up for now, and you can or cannot remove the deletion proposal, and let’s see what happens. The page could be edited to be reliable and not go against any rules of Wikipedia. Although for now, you have the decision to remove or not remove the deletion proposal and not see what happens to the article. It’s like red pill or blue pill. Lastly, it would be weird for a twitch streamer who’s almost about to appear on the list of most-followed Twitch channels to not have a Wikipedia article associated with him. Bennett1203 (talk) 22:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]