User talk:Chantern15

Welcome Chantern15!

Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 122.179.221.229 (talk) 03:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)chantern15122.179.221.229 (talk) 03:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 122.179.221.229 (talk) 03:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)chantern15122.179.221.229 (talk) 03:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ghost rockets

added links pointing to British, Scandinavian and American

List of mass hysteria cases

added links pointing to British and German

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- LuckyLouie (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's have some fun.Chantern15 (talk) 02:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

I see someone created an account in my name on Hindi Wikipedia yesterday. [1],[2]. Is this what you meant by "fun"? - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:14, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why're you looking at me? I'm not an imposter, bro or sis. :)223.236.202.200 (talk) 16:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

I’m going to assume the Hindi thing was some kind of cross-wiki notification glitch and nothing to do with you. And I remain puzzled by your “let’s have some fun” non sequitur above. Note that the DS notice was only to make you aware that the topic area you’re working in has certain restrictions. I had resisted sending you a DS notice before this, because it appeared you were a new user having a hard time understanding how Wikipedia editorial policies worked. But even after you had relevant policies explained to you by several editors, you continued to SOAPBOX and complain about bureaucracies, too many rules, not being able to make the changes you want to make [3] etc., and suggesting that editors must be biased against certain subjects [4]. If that kind of behavior escalates to WP:DISRUPTION, you could be vulnerable to DS sanctions. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be bold without being sanctioned.Chantern15 (talk) 00:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

It's not a glitch mate, when you enter another language Wikipedia from the one you were on previously, Wikipedia auto creates an account on that one, if you were signed in. It's like a welcoming. The kind which I got when I joined EnWiki. I had the same thing happen to me when I went to the Hindi Wikipedia.Chantern15 (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

Hello, just an important note about NPOV (since the above called to "reflect all views to be NPOV"): on Wikipedia "neutral point of view" has a specific definition and as part of the WP:NPOV policy is WP:GEVAL (avoiding a false balance between all views). Then part of WP:FRINGE are WP:FRIND and WP:PARITY: in journalism, one could use the primary source for a claim and echo it, on Wikipedia we expect independent reliable sources to put such claims in context, so that it's possible for articles to reflect that analysis instead of indiscriminately promoting one's claims, or resulting in false balance by presenting pro/con views as equal opinions (extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, of course). —PaleoNeonate – 03:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well I see that it was also explained here. —PaleoNeonate – 03:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PaleoNeonate I would appreciate that your post could be written as a separate topic, as I don't know about which particular event you are talking about (but if it isn't, it's okay). But I have read the policies which you have mentioned here and WP:FAILN.Chantern15 (talk) 04:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

It was about this edit (so the same topic LuckyLouie was talking about), sorry if it was unclear and for my delayed response (sometimes it takes a while for me to catch up with article/talk history). —PaleoNeonate – 12:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, I see now, and thank you for your inputs, I will keep them in mind.Chantern15 (talk) 17:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

For further context in this conversation with LuckyLouie, please see^[1] and: ^[2].Chantern15 (talk) 01:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Identity politics, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a mistake, and I explained my reasons why, the definition of Identity Politics was not sourced from an academic journal, but articles on socialist websites and the website of Berkeley University. Furthermore, the tone of the article was as if Wikipedia itself was stating these to be true, and not from a neutral tone, describing the sources and their viewpoint. Chantern15 (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

^[1]

Sometimes secondary academic sources like university material is better than primary journal sources. Berkeley University can hardly be called a "socialist website".. —PaleoNeonate – 03:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PaleoNeonate I wasn't talking about Berkeley when I said "Socialist", I was talking about "LibSyn" and the "MonthlyReview" (citations 3 and 4), which clearly state that they are "socialist" and a very particular kind of socialism. Hence my doubts about about whether they would be reliable in stating in the first voice about identity politics.Chantern15 (talk) 04:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

Ok, I think you did the right thing to go at RSN for LibSyn. —PaleoNeonate – 12:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Chantern15 (talk) 17:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Katzmayr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Richard Katzmayr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chantern15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In response to AndyTheGrump you wrote if you read the content of that dispute (that is, this) you will find that it has merit [...] I have only written a wall of text where it was required AndyTheGrump had clearly read and understood the dispute, so suggesting they hadn't is assuming bad faith on their part. Regarding the merit of that dispute, I believe it likely that most editors would come to a conclusion opposite yours. Additionally, walls-of-text of the type you added to both the disputed article and the dispute discussion are never "required," and they are pretty much never welcome (see WP:WALLS). You might not recognize it, but a great deal of good faith is being extended to you in that dispute discussion. I extend more of that good faith here by suggesting that you begin editing in such a way that your desired content additions do not ignite disputes that involve (on your part) a weak understanding of, or respect for, WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE, WP:GEVAL, WP:NOT, WP:RS, WP:FRINGE, and WP:SYNTH. I fear you are trending in that direction, and if it continues the outcome is unlikely to be a good one. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to say that I appreciate your concerns, but I believe that preserving and expanding Wikipedia is a good goal, and if you read the sources that I have provided with respect to the Malmstrom Incident and the Ellsworth Incident, and how I have covered it, they cover the topics and in good detail if not significant. And I hope to find more sources to back them up, which requires time.Chantern15 (talk) 01:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

Hello, Chantern15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Katzmayr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chantern15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Katzmayr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]