User talk:Banjaloupe

I'm probably not the best person to ask, because I'm not the hugest editor. I just see stuff that could use improvement and I'm bold and I edit it. You could look at a few of my previous edits...... I fix typos, remove stupid stuff, revert vandalism, add small pieces of info, and very occasionally write an article. Find whatever suits you best and go with it. On Wikipedia, I spend most of my time on the "front end," i.e. the actual articles. There's also a whole system of catacombs such as policies and project pages that's known as the "back end." So if you wanted to focus on psychology articles, for instance, you could join the Psychology WikiProject. – MaskedSHEIK ^{(talk)(contrib)} 04:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:March of the zapotec holland ep.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article details every single feature and goes into just way too much intricate detail. It reads more like the program's manual, and that's the main problem I have with it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Etienne d'aout from the discography list because it's not an album. It's a single. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.166.135.10 (talk) 04:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bryan Lee O'Malley by Bryan Lee O'Malley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Banjaloupe. The copyright holder should send an email to the OTRS team giving permission for the license to be displayed here and specifying the license. There's detailed instructions at commons:OTRS. -- Dianna (talk) 14:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Bryan Lee O'Malley by Bryan Lee O'Malley.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 06:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:March of the zapotec holland ep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]