User talk:Astudent

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Thank you, maveric149. -Astudent

Not a problem. :-) --mav

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Hi, Astudent, my name is waldir and i have made been making some research on the field of utopian thougts. I read the wikipedia article on Utopia, and there was something that called my attention, on the economic utopias section. The description i found there for UTOPIAN SOCIALISM is very close to my own ideals and i was trying to find authors who had described such utopias (i believe thomas more's utopia is one of them, but i'm note sure) So, if you could help me in any way i'd be grateful. By the way, here's my mail: waldir@email.com

Hi. I don't think I contributed much to the Utopia article. If I remember correctly, I wrote a short section in the Star Trek article about a utopia caused by lack of scarcity due to scientific/technological advances. Astudent 08:18, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)

Well, infact it was quite hard to find out who wrote that little sentence, "...an egalitarian distribution of goods, frequently with the total abolition of money, and citizens only doing work which they enjoy and which is for the common good, leaving them with ample time for the cultivation of the arts and sciences." I had to search the history very deeply, but if i am not wrong you are mentioned as the authhor of it. am I wrong?

Sorry, but that sentence doesn't sound like my style of writing. Perhaps you could post a message on the Utopia article's discussion/talk page and someone may be able to help you. (My apologies for the delay in replying: I don't write in Wikipedia as much as I used to.) Astudent 03:49, 2005 August 8 (UTC)

It's ok, i only came here to look for your reply a few times meanwhile. I have posted a message on the Utopia's discussion page but i have no answer so far. thanx for the feedback anyway.

remove tag if you disagree!-Rich Peterson130.86.14.90 (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

did you create this article as a hoax or are you interested in it's development?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Space_and_survival&diff=prev&oldid=5177758
A merger has been proposed that as an editor of this article you may be interested in.
GabrielVelasquez (talk) 03:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Disaster recovery (business). Since you had some involvement with the Disaster recovery (business) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. , see article talk page. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eradication of suffering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gene editing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]